2025-11-18T18:58:13.588589

Deep Learning-based mmWave MIMO Channel Estimation using sub-6 GHz Channel Information: CNN and UNet Approaches

Pasic, Eller, Schwarz et al.
Future wireless multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) systems will integrate both sub-6 GHz and millimeter wave (mmWave) frequency bands to meet the growing demands for high data rates. MIMO link establishment typically requires accurate channel estimation, which is particularly challenging at mmWave frequencies due to the low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). In this paper, we propose two novel deep learning-based methods for estimating mmWave MIMO channels by leveraging out-of-band information from the sub-6 GHz band. The first method employs a convolutional neural network (CNN), while the second method utilizes a UNet architecture. We compare these proposed methods against deep-learning methods that rely solely on in-band information and with other state-of-the-art out-of-band aided methods. Simulation results show that our proposed out-of-band aided deep-learning methods outperform existing alternatives in terms of achievable spectral efficiency.
academic

Deep Learning-based mmWave MIMO Channel Estimation using sub-6 GHz Channel Information: CNN and UNet Approaches

Basic Information

  • Paper ID: 2506.11714
  • Title: Deep Learning-based mmWave MIMO Channel Estimation using sub-6 GHz Channel Information: CNN and UNet Approaches
  • Authors: Faruk Pasic, Lukas Eller, Stefan Schwarz, Markus Rupp, Christoph F. Mecklenbräuker
  • Institution: Institute of Telecommunications, TU Wien, Vienna, Austria
  • Classification: eess.SP cs.IT math.IT
  • Publication Date: October 15, 2025 (arXiv v2)
  • Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.11714

Abstract

Future wireless multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) systems will integrate sub-6 GHz and millimeter-wave (mmWave) frequency bands to meet growing high data rate demands. MIMO link establishment typically requires accurate channel estimation, which is particularly challenging at mmWave frequencies due to low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). This paper proposes two novel deep learning-based approaches for estimating mmWave MIMO channels by leveraging out-of-band information from the sub-6 GHz band. The first approach employs a convolutional neural network (CNN), while the second utilizes a UNet architecture. Simulation results demonstrate that the proposed out-of-band assisted deep learning methods outperform existing alternatives in terms of achievable spectral efficiency.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Definition

  1. Core Challenge: Channel estimation problem in mmWave MIMO systems, particularly the estimation difficulties caused by low pre-beamforming SNR
  2. Technical Requirements: Future 5G/6G systems need to simultaneously utilize sub-6 GHz and mmWave bands to achieve high data rate transmission
  3. Existing Limitations: Traditional methods rely solely on in-band mmWave information, constrained by low SNR, resulting in limited performance

Research Significance

  • mmWave communication offers tremendous bandwidth potential but suffers from high propagation loss, requiring large antenna arrays and MIMO techniques
  • Accurate channel estimation is critical for link establishment in mmWave MIMO systems
  • Multi-band measurements indicate that sub-6 GHz and mmWave bands exhibit similar multipath characteristics, but sub-6 GHz provides higher pre-beamforming SNR

Limitations of Existing Methods

  1. Pure In-Band Methods: Use only mmWave channel information, constrained by low SNR
  2. Traditional Out-of-Band Methods: Such as pilot-assisted approaches in references [12]13, which do not fully exploit machine learning to discover inherent relationships between in-band and out-of-band channel estimation
  3. Deep Learning Methods: Existing CNN, FFDNet, ResNet-UNet and other methods rely solely on in-band information

Core Contributions

  1. Proposes Two Novel Deep Learning Methods: CNN and UNet-based mmWave MIMO channel estimation methods that effectively utilize sub-6 GHz out-of-band information
  2. Improves Existing Out-of-Band Assisted Methods: Incorporates machine learning into the MRC method from reference 13, better exploiting the relationship between in-band and out-of-band channel estimation
  3. Comprehensive Performance Evaluation: Compares with pure in-band methods and existing out-of-band methods using normalized channel MSE and spectral efficiency metrics
  4. Significant Performance Improvement: Achieves 3.35% and 4.03% median spectral efficiency improvements over the MRC method for CNN and UNet, respectively

Methodology Details

Task Definition

  • Input: In-band mmWave channel estimate H̃^(m)n, out-of-band auxiliary channel estimate Ĥ^(m)n, estimated sub-6 GHz K-factor K̃^(s), noise variance Γ^(m)
  • Output: Improved mmWave channel estimate H̄^(m)n
  • Objective: Minimize normalized channel estimation MSE, maximize achievable spectral efficiency

System Model

Channel Model

Employs a frequency-selective Rician fading channel model:

H^(b)[n] = √(η^(b)) * [√(K^(b)/(1+K^(b))) * H_fs^(b) + √(1/(1+K^(b))) * H_rp^(b)[n]]

which includes deterministic line-of-sight (LOS) components and Rayleigh scattering components.

  1. Training Phase:
    • Step 1: Transmit non-precoded pilot symbols on both frequency bands
    • Step 2: Utilize sub-6 GHz channel estimates for angle estimation, transmit precoded pilots on mmWave band
  2. Data Transmission Phase: Use improved channel estimates for SVD precoding and combining

Model Architecture

1. MRC Baseline Method

Maximum ratio combining method:

H̄^(m)[n] = ŵ * Ĥ^(m)[n] + (1-ŵ) * H̃^(m)[n]

where ŵ is an adaptive combining factor determined by K-factor and noise variance.

2. CNN Architecture

  • Input: 6 real-valued matrices (real and imaginary parts of H̃^(m) and Ĥ^(m), K̃^(s), Γ^(m))
  • Structure: 9 convolutional layers, each with 64 3×3 filters, ReLU activation, batch normalization, zero padding
  • Output Layer: 2 channels (real and imaginary parts), Tanh activation function
  • Mapping Relationship: H̄^(m)n = f_ΦC(H̃^(m)n, Ĥ^(m)n, K̃^(s), Γ^(m); ΦC)

3. UNet Architecture

  • Encoder-Decoder Structure: Two encoders (contracting path) and two decoders (expanding path)
  • Distinctive Design: Skip connections directly link encoder and decoder layers, transmitting feature information
  • Advantages: Capable of capturing global information and fine-grained details, more robust to noise
  • Layer Configuration: Convolutional layers with 64→128→256 channels, coupled with max pooling and upsampling

Technical Innovations

  1. Multi-Modal Information Fusion: First combines sub-6 GHz out-of-band information with deep learning for mmWave channel estimation
  2. Adaptive Architecture Design: Network adapts to different K-factor and SNR conditions
  3. Skip Connection Mechanism: UNet's skip connection design better preserves spatial localization information
  4. End-to-End Optimization: Directly optimizes channel estimation quality related to spectral efficiency

Experimental Setup

Dataset

  • Training Samples: 500,000 channel realizations
  • Test Samples: 500,000 channel realizations
  • Parameter Distribution:
    • SNR γ^(m): Uniformly distributed -20, 10 dB
    • K-factor K^(m): Uniformly distributed -20, 30 dB
    • AoD ϑ, AoA φ: Uniformly distributed -90, 90 degrees

Simulation Parameters

Parametersub-6 GHzmmWave
Carrier Frequency2.55 GHz25.5 GHz
MIMO Configuration8×88×8
Bandwidth20.16 MHz403.2 MHz
Subcarrier Spacing60 kHz120 kHz

Evaluation Metrics

  1. Normalized Channel MSE:
    NMSE = (1/L_r N^(m)) * Σ ||H_l^(m)[n] - H̄_l^(m)[n]||_F^2 / ||H_l^(m)[n]||_F^2
    
  2. Achievable Spectral Efficiency:
    SE = (1/N^(m)) * Σ Σ log2(1 + SINR_μ[n])
    

Comparison Methods

  • Pure In-Band Methods: Traditional estimation, in-band CNN, in-band UNet
  • Out-of-Band Assisted Methods: MRC, proposed CNN, proposed UNet
  • Ideal Upper Bound: Perfect channel state information (CSI)

Implementation Details

  • Loss Function: Normalized channel estimation MSE
  • Optimizer: Adam optimizer
  • Batch Size: 64
  • Training Epochs: 200
  • Single Subcarrier Training: Training uses only the center subcarrier, deployed across all subcarriers

Experimental Results

Main Results

Performance Comparison Under Different K-Factors

  1. K = -20 dB: In-band and out-of-band assisted ML methods perform comparably, both superior to MRC
  2. K = 10 dB: MRC outperforms in-band CNN/UNet, but out-of-band assisted CNN/UNet exceed MRC at all SNR levels
  3. K = 20 dB: Out-of-band assisted ML methods significantly outperform MRC and in-band methods

Spectral Efficiency Improvements

  • In-Band CNN vs Traditional Method: 86% median spectral efficiency improvement
  • In-Band UNet vs Traditional Method: 88% median spectral efficiency improvement
  • MRC vs Traditional Method: 151% median spectral efficiency improvement
  • Out-of-Band CNN vs MRC: 3.35% median spectral efficiency improvement (159% total)
  • Out-of-Band UNet vs MRC: 4.03% median spectral efficiency improvement (161% total)

Key Findings

  1. Importance of Out-of-Band Information: Out-of-band information significantly improves performance in high K-factor scenarios
  2. Advantages of Deep Learning: ML methods better exploit complex relationships between in-band and out-of-band channel estimates
  3. Marginal UNet Advantage: Although computationally more complex, UNet slightly outperforms CNN on large-scale data
  4. Robustness: Proposed methods demonstrate stable performance across different channel conditions

mmWave Channel Estimation

  • Traditional ML Methods: Multi-layer perceptron, CNN, FFDNet, ResNet-UNet, etc., but using only in-band information
  • Out-of-Band Assisted Methods: References [12]13 propose pilot-assisted methods utilizing sub-6 GHz LOS components

Multi-Band Communication

  • Measurement Validation: Multiple measurement campaigns confirm similar multipath characteristics between sub-6 GHz and mmWave bands
  • System Integration: Trend toward joint deployment of mmWave systems with sub-6 GHz systems

Deep Learning Applications in Channel Estimation

  • CNN Applications: Exploit antenna spatial arrangement characteristics
  • UNet Advantages: Encoder-decoder structure and skip connections provide noise robustness

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

  1. The proposed out-of-band assisted deep learning method significantly outperforms existing solutions
  2. UNet architecture slightly outperforms CNN in capturing fine-grained details
  3. Deep learning effectively exploits inherent relationships between multi-band channel information
  4. The method demonstrates good adaptability and robustness across different channel conditions

Limitations

  1. MIMO Configuration Constraints: Networks require retraining for different antenna configurations
  2. Computational Complexity: UNet's complex design increases computational overhead
  3. Single Subcarrier Training: While scalable to all subcarriers, potential frequency correlation loss may occur
  4. Simulation Environment: Results based on 3GPP channel models; real environments may differ

Future Directions

  1. Multi-Configuration Adaptation: Develop universal network architectures adaptable to different MIMO configurations
  2. Real-World Validation: Verify method effectiveness in actual environments
  3. Computational Optimization: Reduce network complexity and improve real-time deployment feasibility
  4. Multi-Band Extension: Extend to joint channel estimation across more frequency bands

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

  1. Strong Innovation: First to combine deep learning with multi-band channel estimation, novel approach
  2. Complete Methodology: Forms a complete technical chain from system modeling to network design to performance evaluation
  3. Comprehensive Experiments: Thorough comparisons across multiple K-factors and SNR conditions, credible results
  4. Engineering Value: Significant performance improvements make the method practically applicable

Weaknesses

  1. Insufficient Theoretical Analysis: Lacks theoretical explanation for why deep learning effectively fuses multi-band information
  2. Computational Complexity Analysis: Missing detailed computational complexity comparison and real-time performance analysis
  3. Generalization Capability: Validation limited to specific channel models; generalization to other environments unknown
  4. Practical Deployment Considerations: Lacks discussion of synchronization, calibration, and other practical system deployment issues

Impact

  1. Academic Contribution: Provides new research direction for channel estimation in multi-band MIMO systems
  2. Industrial Value: Important reference for multi-band deployment in 5G/6G systems
  3. Technology Promotion: Method extensible to other multi-band communication scenarios
  4. Reproducibility: Detailed implementation parameters facilitate reproduction and improvement

Applicable Scenarios

  1. 5G/6G Base Stations: Base station systems supporting dual sub-6 GHz and mmWave bands
  2. High-Speed Mobile Communication: High-speed scenarios like vehicular networks requiring reliable channel estimation
  3. Dense Deployment Environments: Complex propagation environments such as urban macrocells
  4. Large-Scale MIMO Systems: Large antenna array systems requiring precise channel information

References

The paper cites 18 relevant references, primarily including:

  • Fundamental mmWave communication literature 1-3
  • Deep learning channel estimation methods 4-6
  • Multi-band measurements and modeling 8-11
  • Out-of-band assisted channel estimation 12-13
  • 3GPP standards and channel models 15

Overall Assessment: This is a high-quality paper with strong technical innovation and well-designed experiments, providing an effective deep learning solution for channel estimation in multi-band MIMO systems with significant academic value and engineering application prospects.