The gravitational Compton amplitude from flat and curved spacetimes at second post-Minkowskian order

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2506.19705
• Title: The gravitational Compton amplitude from flat and curved spacetimes at second post-Minkowskian order
• Authors: N. Emil J. Bjerrum-Bohr, Gang Chen, Carl Jordan Eriksen, Nabha Shah
• Categories: hep-th (High Energy Physics - Theory), gr-qc (General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology)
• Publication Date: October 14, 2025 (arXiv v2)
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.19705

Abstract

This paper calculates the classical gravitational Compton amplitude at second post-Minkowskian order using various computational techniques in both flat and curved spacetime backgrounds. The results support the use of worldline effective field theory in non-trivial background spacetimes to obtain new theoretical insights, which both enhance computational efficiency and provide useful cross-validation of results, particularly in the context of classical binary black hole mergers.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Context

Since the LIGO-Virgo collaboration's first confirmation of gravitational wave detection, significant progress has been made in studying the dynamics of gravitational binary systems. In this context, the Compton amplitude—describing the scattering of gravitons with massive compact objects—has become a key element, playing important roles in:

1. Theoretical computational requirements: Deriving observables from loop integrals constrained by unitarity
2. Classical dynamics: Determining the classical dynamics of gravitational perturbations around stable curved backgrounds (such as Schwarzschild or Kerr black hole spacetimes)
3. Computational efficiency: Opening new avenues for insight by transitioning from flat spacetime to curved spacetime S-matrix methods

Research Motivation

In the existing literature, this specific object has only been completely treated at first post-Minkowskian order, with systematic studies at second order remaining incomplete. The main motivations for this paper are:

1. Method verification: Verifying consistency between curved spacetime Feynman rules and traditional flat spacetime methods
2. Computational optimization: Exploring whether curved backgrounds can provide computational advantages through resummation
3. Theoretical refinement: Systematically extending the post-Minkowskian expansion to second order

Core Contributions

1. First systematic calculation: Completion of systematic calculation of the gravitational Compton amplitude at second post-Minkowskian order
2. Method comparison verification: Demonstration that curved spacetime and flat spacetime Feynman rules yield completely consistent results
3. Technical framework establishment: Establishment of curved spacetime Feynman rules in Schwarzschild-Tangherlini backgrounds
4. Theoretical insights: Demonstration of how curved spacetime methods achieve resummation of infinite series graviton diagrams
5. Cross-validation: Independent result verification using heavy mass effective field theory

Methodology Details

Task Definition

Calculation of gravitational interactions of a single massive object, described by the Einstein-Hilbert action and minimally coupled massive worldline action:

$S[g, x] = S_{EH}[g] + S_{gf}[h] + S_{wl}[g, x]$

which includes the Einstein-Hilbert action, gauge-fixing terms, and worldline action.

Model Architecture

1. Weak-field Expansion Method

In flat spacetime, the metric is expanded as: $g_{\mu\nu} = \eta_{\mu\nu} + \kappa h_{\mu\nu}$

Employing flat harmonic gauge yields the standard de Donder graviton propagator: $\frac{iP_{\mu\nu \rho\sigma}}{k^2 + i0}$

2. Curved Spacetime Expansion Method

In curved backgrounds, the metric is expanded as: $g_{\mu\nu} = \bar{g}_{\mu\nu} + \kappa h_{\mu\nu}$

where $\bar{g}_{\mu\nu}$ is chosen as the Schwarzschild-Tangherlini metric: $\bar{g}_{\mu\nu}(x) = \left(1 + \frac{\Lambda_d}{4|x_\perp|^{d-3}}\right)^{\frac{4}{d-3}} \eta_{\perp\mu\nu} + \left(\frac{1-\frac{\Lambda_d}{4|x_\perp|^{d-3}}}{1+\frac{\Lambda_d}{4|x_\perp|^{d-3}}}\right)^2 \eta_{\parallel\mu\nu}$

3. Worldline Quantum Field Theory

The worldline coordinate is expanded as: $x^\rho(\tau) = v^\rho\tau + z^\rho(\tau)$

where $v^\rho$ is the constant velocity and $z^\rho(\tau)$ is the deflection. This leads to an infinite tower of interaction vertices containing arbitrary numbers of deflection legs.

Technical Innovations

1. Diagram Resummation: The curved spacetime method achieves resummation of infinite series diagrams from flat spacetime: $\text{Curved spacetime n-point vertex} = \sum_{k=0}^{\infty} \frac{1}{k!} \times \text{Flat spacetime k-loop diagram}$
2. Dimensional Regularization Advantages: In dimensional regularization, diagrams involving self-energy automatically vanish
3. Gauge Invariance: Gauge invariance is ensured through highly non-trivial cancellations between diagrams

Experimental Setup

Computational Framework

• Dimension: $d = 4 - 2\epsilon$ dimensional spacetime
• Regularization: Dimensional regularization scheme
• Integral Reduction: Integration-by-parts identities handled using LiteRed
• Master Integrals: Three master integrals $K_1, K_2, K_3$ form the basis of the integral family

Master Integral Definitions

The integral family is defined as: $K_{\nu_1,\nu_2,\nu_3,\lambda_1,\lambda_2} = \tilde{\mu}^{2\epsilon} \int_\ell \frac{\hat{\delta}(\ell \cdot v)(\varepsilon_1 \cdot \ell)^{\lambda_1}(\varepsilon_2 \cdot \ell)^{\lambda_2}}{[\ell^2]^{\nu_1}[(p_1 + \ell)^2]^{\nu_2}[(q - \ell)^2]^{\nu_3}}$

The three master integrals are:

• $K_1 = K_{0,1,0,0,0}$ (cut bubble)
• $K_2 = K_{1,0,1,0,0}$ (cut triangle)
• $K_3 = K_{1,1,1,0,0}$ (cut box)

Experimental Results

Master Integral Results

Expansion near $d = 4 - 2\epsilon$:

$K_1 = -\frac{i\omega}{4\pi}\left[1 + \epsilon\left(i\pi + 2 - \log\frac{4\omega^2}{\mu^2}\right)\right] + O(\epsilon^2)$

$K_2 = \frac{1}{8|q|} + O(\epsilon)$

$K_3 = -\frac{i}{8\pi q^2\omega}\left[\frac{1}{\epsilon} - \log\frac{-q^2}{\mu^2}\right] + O(\epsilon)$

Second Post-Minkowskian Amplitude

The complete second-order amplitude has the following structure: $i\hat{\delta}(q \cdot v)\mathcal{M}_{2PM}(p_1, p_2) = \frac{d_{IR}}{\epsilon} + d_1 \log\frac{4\omega^2}{\mu^2} + d_2 \log\frac{-q^2}{\mu^2} + d_{Im}i + \frac{d_q}{|q|} + d_R$

Infrared Behavior Verification

The amplitude exhibits the expected infrared divergence behavior, consistent with Weinberg's soft graviton theorem: $d_{IR} = -\frac{i\kappa^2M\omega}{16\pi}\mathcal{M}_{1PM}(p_1, p_2)$

This provides an important consistency check.

Deflection Angle Recovery

In the geometric optics limit, the exact universal deflection angle expression is recovered from the amplitude, consistent with results for massless scalar or photon scattering.

Related Work

Post-Minkowskian Expansion Research

Major research in this field includes:

1. Effective field theory approaches: Work by Goldberger-Rothstein, Kälin-Porto, and others
2. Scattering amplitude methods: Contributions by Bern et al., Cheung-Rothstein-Solon
3. Worldline quantum field theory: Framework by Mogull-Plefka-Steinhoff

Curved Spacetime Methods

Recent developments include:

1. Self-force calculations: Kosmopoulos-Solon's scattering amplitudes in curved spacetime
2. Extreme mass ratio: Effective field theory by Cheung et al.
3. Resummation techniques: Work by Damgaard-Lee, Mougiakakos-Vanhove

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Method consistency: Curved spacetime and flat spacetime Feynman rules yield identical results
2. Computational advantages: Curved spacetime methods provide certain simplifications through resummation
3. Theoretical verification: Results satisfy all expected theoretical constraints (gauge invariance, infrared behavior, etc.)

Limitations

1. Point particle approximation: Current methods are limited to point-like sources, not accounting for finite-size effects
2. Second-order limitation: While the framework is established, calculations extend only to second order
3. Coordinate dependence: Results may depend on specific coordinate gauge choices

Future Directions

1. Higher-order calculations: Extension to third and higher post-Minkowskian corrections
2. Spin effects: Inclusion of Compton amplitudes for rotating black holes
3. Kerr-Schild gauge: Exploration of simplifications in Kerr-Schild coordinates
4. Quasinormal modes: Connection with black hole perturbation theory

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Technical rigor: Detailed calculations with multiple verifications
2. Methodological innovation: First systematic establishment of curved spacetime Compton amplitude framework at second order
3. Theoretical completeness: All necessary consistency checks are satisfied
4. Practical value: Provides new tools for high-precision calculations in gravitational wave physics

Weaknesses

1. Computational complexity: Despite claims of simplification, curved spacetime methods remain quite complex at current order
2. Resummation benefits: At second order, the advantages of resummation are not apparent
3. Physical intuition: Some technical details may lack clear physical interpretation

Impact

1. Theoretical contribution: Provides new computational paradigm for post-Minkowskian gravity
2. Practical value: Potential value for theoretical predictions in LIGO/Virgo gravitational wave detectors
3. Methodological significance: Demonstrates application of curved spacetime quantum field theory to classical gravity

Applicable Scenarios

1. Binary black hole mergers: Applicable to high-precision orbital calculations in the pre-merger phase
2. Gravitational wave templates: Provides analytical benchmarks for numerical relativity
3. Theoretical verification: Serves as cross-check tool for other methods

References

The paper includes 153 references, covering major works in post-Minkowskian gravity, scattering amplitudes, effective field theory, and gravitational wave physics, reflecting the comprehensive and active nature of this field.

Overall Assessment: This is a technically sophisticated theoretical physics paper that makes important contributions to the post-Minkowskian gravity field. While current computational advantages are limited, the established framework provides a foundation for future higher-order calculations and methodological improvements.