What is Emergence, After All?

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2507.04951
• Title: What is Emergence, After All?
• Author: Abbas K. Rizi (DTU Compute, Technical University of Denmark; University of Copenhagen; Aalto University)
• Classification: physics.soc-ph, cond-mat.stat-mech, physics.hist-ph
• Publication Date: Compiled October 14, 2025
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.04951

Abstract

The term "emergence" is increasingly used across scientific disciplines to describe phenomena arising from the interactions of system components that cannot be easily inferred by examining these components in isolation. While frequently employed to explain higher-level behaviors such as collective motion, synchronization, or collective intelligence, the term is often used imprecisely, sometimes generating ambiguity and even mystique. In this perspective paper, the author clarifies the scientific meaning of emergence as a measurable and physically grounded phenomenon. Through concrete examples such as temperature, magnetism, and herd immunity in social networks, the paper reviews how collective behavior emerges from local interactions constrained by global boundary conditions. By refining the concept of emergence, we gain a clearer and more well-founded understanding of complex systems.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Identification

The core problem this research addresses is the ambiguity and mystification of the concept of "emergence" in scientific usage. The author identifies:

1. Conceptual Misuse: The term emergence is widely used across disciplines but lacks precise definition, often being imbued with mystical qualities
2. Theoretical Gap: Absence of a unified framework for understanding and quantifying emergent phenomena
3. Scientific Rigor: Need to transition emergence from philosophical speculation to measurable physical phenomena

Importance Analysis

The significance of this problem is evident in:

1. Interdisciplinary Relevance: Emergent phenomena span from physics to biology and social sciences
2. Theoretical Foundation: Providing a solid theoretical basis for complex systems science
3. Practical Value: Correct understanding of emergence aids in predicting and controlling complex system behavior

Limitations of Existing Approaches

• Early British emergentists proposed a hierarchical view of nature, which declined with the rise of reductionism
• Modern complex systems theory, while reviving the concept of emergence, still lacks a unified quantitative framework
• Many studies treat emergence as a mysterious phenomenon lacking physical grounding

Core Contributions

1. Established an Operational Definition of Emergence: Defined emergence as a many-to-one coarse-graining mapping process that retains predictive power while discarding microscopic details
2. Provided Methods for Quantifying Emergence: Quantified emergence through physical concepts including effective theories, critical phenomena, and symmetry breaking
3. Clarified the Distinction Between Weak and Strong Emergence: Distinguished scientific emergence (weak emergence) from philosophical emergence (strong emergence)
4. Constructed a Unified Interdisciplinary Framework: Unified understanding spanning from physics to social sciences
5. Provided Concrete Measurement Indicators: Including order parameters, response functions, and scaling behaviors as observable quantities

Methodology Details

Task Definition

The core task of this paper is to provide a scientific, operational definition and measurement method for emergent phenomena. Specifically:

• Input: Microscopic state description of complex systems
• Output: Effective theory at macroscopic level and predictable collective behavior
• Constraints: Maintain physical consistency while avoiding introduction of supernatural causes

Theoretical Framework

1. Many-to-One Mapping and Coarse-Graining

Emergence is realized through the following mapping process:

$F : (x_1(t_i), \ldots, x_N(t_k)) \mapsto (X_1(t'_j), \ldots, X_{N'}(t'_\ell))$

where $N' < N$, representing a lossy data compression process that retains only information necessary for prediction.

2. Effective Theory

Taking temperature as an example, its effective theory is expressed as:

$T = \frac{1}{3m}\langle v^2 \rangle \left(1 \pm \frac{1}{\sqrt{N}}\right)$

As $N \to \infty$, the fluctuation term vanishes and temperature becomes a well-defined coarse-grained variable.

3. Critical Phenomena and Symmetry Breaking

At the critical point $T = T_c$, the system exhibits:

• Continuous phase transitions of order parameters
• Divergence of correlation length and relaxation time
• Universal class behavior

Technical Innovations

1. Information-Theoretic Perspective: Viewing emergence as a compression process that preserves predictive information
2. Renormalization Group Methods: Understanding scaling invariance and universality through RG flow
3. Duality Analysis: Revealing how different microscopic descriptions can produce identical macroscopic physics
4. Network Theory Application: Extending physical concepts to social systems

Experimental Setup

Case Studies

1. Physical Systems

• Temperature: As a coarse-grained description of kinetic energy
• Magnetization: Collective phenomenon of spin alignment in ferromagnets
• Phase Transitions: Liquid-gas transitions and universality classes of the Ising model

2. Social Systems

• Network Percolation: Emergence of giant connected components in random graphs
• Herd Immunity: Collective protection in vaccination networks

Evaluation Metrics

1. Physical Indicators:
   • Order parameter $m(T)$
   • Magnetic susceptibility $\chi$
   • Correlation length $\xi$
   • Critical exponents
2. Information-Theoretic Indicators:
   • Mutual information
   • Transfer entropy
   • Effective information
3. Network Indicators:
   • Giant component size $\sigma$
   • Percolation threshold $p_c$
   • Interface link density $\rho_{SR}$

Experimental Results

Main Findings

1. Universality of Critical Phenomena

Different microscopic systems (such as liquid-gas transitions and ferromagnetic transitions) exhibit identical critical behavior, belonging to the same universality class, demonstrating the fundamental nature of emergent phenomena.

2. Network Effects of Herd Immunity

In social networks, the protective effect of vaccination exhibits nonlinear growth:

• Local "firewall" effects overlap to form collective barriers
• Protection effect exceeds vaccination coverage ratio
• Network structure significantly influences herd immunity threshold

3. Verification of Scaling Behavior

Through data collapse and finite-size scaling analysis, power-law behavior and universality near critical points were verified.

Case Analysis

Magnetization Phenomenon

In ferromagnets, when temperature drops below critical temperature $T_c \approx 450°C$:

• Microscopic: Collective alignment of $10^{23}$ electron spins
• Macroscopic: Emergence of net magnetization $m > 0$
• Mechanism: Spontaneous symmetry breaking producing order parameter

Network Percolation

In Erdős-Rényi random graphs:

• Control parameter: Connection probability $p$
• Order parameter: Giant component fraction $\sigma$
• Phase transition: Global connectivity emerges when $p > p_c$

Related Work

Historical Development

1. Classical Foundations: Aristotelian holistic philosophy
2. Early Development: Mill's distinction between mechanical and chemical effects
3. British Emergentism: Hierarchical view of nature by Alexander, Morgan, Broad, and others
4. Modern Revival: Anderson's "More is Different," multiple realizability theory

Contemporary Research

1. Complex Systems Theory: Santa Fe Institute's complex adaptive systems
2. Network Science: Small-world networks, scale-free networks, and emergent properties
3. Critical Phenomena: Self-organized criticality, phase transition theory
4. Information-Theoretic Approaches: Information bottleneck, causal emergence theory

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Scientific Definition of Emergence: Emergence is a measurable physical phenomenon realized through many-to-one mapping from microscopic to macroscopic effective description
2. Quantification Methods: Emergence can be quantitatively described through order parameters, critical exponents, and information-theoretic indicators
3. Universality Principle: Different microscopic systems can exhibit identical macroscopic behavior, embodying fundamental characteristics of emergence
4. Interdisciplinary Applicability: The concept of emergence has broad applicability from physics to social systems

Limitations

1. Computational Challenges in Complex Systems: For biological, cognitive, or social dynamical systems, effective theories may contain memory and non-locality, making microscopic derivation computationally infeasible
2. Difficulty in Verifying Criticality: In biological systems, evidence for precise self-tuned criticality is limited, with more support for near-critical behavior
3. Boundaries of Strong Emergence: Emergent mechanisms of phenomena such as consciousness and creativity remain unclear
4. Challenges in Empirical Verification: Certain emergent phenomena are difficult to verify through controlled experiments

Future Directions

1. Non-Equilibrium Universality Classes: Develop systematic frameworks for non-equilibrium phase transition theory
2. Emergence in Biological Systems: Establish quantitative emergence theories for life and consciousness phenomena
3. Computational Emergence: Study emergent phenomena in artificial intelligence systems
4. Social Dynamics: Develop predictive models for emergence in social systems

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Theoretical Rigor: Provides strict mathematical definition and physical foundation for the concept of emergence
2. Interdisciplinary Integration: Successfully extends physical concepts to social sciences
3. Practical Value: Provides operational measurement methods and predictive tools
4. Conceptual Clarification: Effectively distinguishes scientific from philosophical emergence
5. Rich Case Studies: Demonstrates theory applicability through concrete examples

Weaknesses

1. Complexity Limitations: Limited applicability of theoretical framework to highly complex biological and social systems
2. Computational Challenges: Computational complexity may be high in practical applications
3. Experimental Verification: Certain theoretical predictions are difficult to verify directly through experiments
4. Philosophical Controversy: Discussion of strong emergence may remain contentious

Impact

1. Academic Contribution: Provides important theoretical foundation for complex systems science
2. Practical Value: Direct applications in network science, epidemiology, and social dynamics
3. Educational Significance: Clarifies misconceptions about emergence in scientific education
4. Interdisciplinary Bridge: Promotes communication between physics and other disciplines

Applicable Scenarios

1. Physical Systems: Phase transitions, critical behavior, collective excitations
2. Biological Systems: Collective behavior, ecological dynamics, neural networks
3. Social Systems: Epidemic propagation, social networks, collective behavior
4. Technological Systems: Artificial intelligence, complex networks, multi-agent systems

References

The paper contains 163 references spanning from Aristotelian classical philosophy to modern complex systems theory, including major works such as:

• Anderson, P.W. (1972). More is different. Science.
• Sethna, J.P. (2021). Statistical mechanics: entropy, order parameters, and complexity.
• Newman, M. (2018). Networks.
• Wilson, K.G. & Kogut, J. (1974). The renormalization group and the ε expansion.
• Hoel, E.P. (2017). When the map is better than the territory. Entropy.

This paper provides a rigorous scientific foundation for the concept of emergence and represents an important contribution to complex systems theory, offering significant guidance for understanding collective phenomena ranging from physics to society.