Topology and Algebra of Bonded Knots and Braids

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2507.15086
• Title: Topology and Algebra of Bonded Knots and Braids
• Authors: Ioannis Diamantis, Louis H. Kauffman, Sofia Lambropoulou
• Classification: math.GT (Geometric Topology)
• Publication Date: October 12, 2025 (arXiv version 3)
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.15086v3

Abstract

This paper presents a detailed study of bonded knots and their related structures, integrating recent developments into a unified framework. Bonded knots are classical knots equipped with embedded bonding arcs used to model physical or chemical bonds. The paper classifies bonded knots into three categories based on bond type (long bonds, standard bonds, and tight bonds) and two categories based on allowed homotopy moves (topological vertices and rigid vertices), defining invariants for each class. Subsequently, bonded braid theory is developed as the algebraic counterpart of bonded knots, with bonded braid monoids defined along with their generators and relations. Alexander and Markov theorem analogues for bonded braids are established, including L-equivalence of bonded braids. Enhanced bonded knots and braids are then introduced, incorporating two bond types (attractive and repulsive) corresponding to different interactions. Finally, bonded knotoids and bonded braidoids are studied, modeling open chain topologies with inter- and intra-chain bonds, providing new invariants for biomacromolecule classification.

Research Background and Motivation

1. Problem to be Addressed

This research aims to establish a unified mathematical framework for describing and analyzing knot and link structures with internal connections (bonds), which are ubiquitous in biological molecules such as proteins.

2. Problem Significance

• Biological Significance: Biological molecules like proteins frequently form internal connections such as disulfide bonds, hydrogen bonds, and salt bridges, which significantly affect the molecular topology and function
• Mathematical Significance: Classical knot theory cannot adequately describe open chain structures with internal connections, necessitating new mathematical tools
• Physical Significance: In quantum field theory, interaction lines in Feynman diagrams exhibit similar structural forms to bonds

3. Limitations of Existing Methods

• Classical knot theory requires closed loops, necessitating artificial closure for open-chain proteins
• Existing knotoid theory, while addressing open endpoints, cannot capture the presence of internal bonds
• Lack of a unified algebraic framework for handling different types of bonded structures

4. Research Motivation

Building upon recent developments in protein folding, molecular biology, and topology, this work establishes a comprehensive mathematical theory capable of simultaneously handling open chain structures and internal bonds, providing new tools for biomolecule structure classification.

Core Contributions

1. Established a complete classification system for bonded links: Defined three bond types (long, standard, tight) and two homotopy types (topological and rigid vertices)
2. Constructed the bonded braid monoid BBₙ: Provided complete generators and relations, proving its isomorphism with the singular braid monoid
3. Proved Alexander theorem analogues for bonded links: Demonstrated that every oriented topological standard bonded link can be represented as the closure of a bonded braid
4. Established L-equivalence theory for bonded braids: Provided necessary and sufficient conditions for determining topological equivalence of bonded braid closures
5. Introduced enhanced bonded theory: Extended the bonded braid monoid to the enhanced bonded braid group through attractive and repulsive bonds
6. Developed bonded knotoid and bonded braidoid theory: Provided complete algebraic descriptions for open chain structures
7. Constructed new topological invariants: Including unplugging techniques, tangle insertion methods, and bonded bracket polynomials

Methodology Details

Task Definition

Study the topological properties of knots, links, and open chain structures with internal bond connections, establishing corresponding algebraic theories and invariants.

Input: Knot/link/knotoid diagrams with bonds Output: Topological invariants, algebraic representations, equivalence class determination Constraints: Bonds are embedded arcs with endpoints on the link, satisfying specific homotopy move rules

Model Architecture

1. Hierarchical Structure of Bonded Links

Bonded Links
├── Long Bonded Links
│   └── Bonds can be knotted and linked
├── Standard Bonded Links
│   └── Bonds are unknotted, forming H-shaped neighborhoods
└── Tight Bonded Links
    └── Bonds do not cross the link arcs

2. Homotopy Equivalence Types

• Topological Vertex Homotopy: Vertices can move freely
• Rigid Vertex Homotopy: Vertices move within rigid 3-balls

3. Bonded Braid Monoid BBₙ

Generators:

• Classical braid generators: σ₁, σ₂, ..., σₙ₋₁
• Bond generators: bᵢ,ⱼ (connecting the i-th and j-th strands)

Relations:

• Classical braid relations
• Bond-bond commutation relations
• Bond-crossing interaction relations

4. Enhanced Bonded Braid Group EBₙ

Building on BBₙ with additions:

• Attractive bonds: bᵢ
• Repulsive bonds: bᵢ⁻¹
• Inverse relations: bᵢbᵢ⁻¹ = 1

Technical Innovations

1. Bond Classification System

Innovatively classifies bonds into three levels by topological complexity: long bonds → standard bonds → tight bonds, where each level can be simplified to the next through homotopy moves.

2. Dual Homotopy Theory

Distinguishes between topological and rigid vertex homotopy, providing mathematical descriptions for different physical assumptions:

• Topological vertices: flexible bond connections
• Rigid vertices: rigid bond connections

3. L-Move Equivalence

Extends the L-move concept from classical braid theory to bonded braids, including:

• Classical L-moves
• Bonded L-moves
• Bond exchange moves

4. Algebraic Embedding Theorem

Proves BBₙ ≅ SBₙ (singular braid monoid), establishing connections with known algebraic structures.

Experimental Setup

Theoretical Verification Methods

This paper primarily conducts theoretical construction with verification methods including:

1. Isomorphism Proofs: Explicit construction proving the isomorphism between BBₙ and SBₙ
2. Invariant Computation: Computing bonded bracket polynomials for specific examples
3. Algorithm Validity: Converting bonded links to bonded braids through braiding algorithms

Specific Example Analysis

The paper provides multiple computational instances:

• Bracket polynomials of unknots with n bonds
• Bonded bracket calculations for two-component unlinks
• Invariant comparisons for bonded trefoil knots

Comparison Benchmarks

• Classical knot theory
• Singular braid theory
• Knotoid theory

Experimental Results

Main Theoretical Results

1. Structure Theorems

• Theorem 2.2: Any bonded link diagram can be homotopically transformed to standard form
• Theorem 5.7: BBₙ ≅ SBₙ (isomorphic to the singular braid monoid)
• Theorem 6.1: Every oriented topological standard bonded link can be represented as the closure of a bonded braid

2. Equivalence Theorems

• Theorem 7.7: Two bonded braid closures are topologically equivalent if and only if they are related by bonded braid homotopy, L-moves, bonded L-moves, and bond exchange relations

3. Invariant Results

• Proposition 4.10: The bonded bracket polynomial is invariant under regular homotopy of tight rigid bonded links
• Examples 4.11-4.13: Specific computations of bracket polynomials for multiple bonded knots, demonstrating the discriminating power of invariants

Computational Examples

Unknot with n Bonds

⟨Uₙ⟩ = (a - A³ - A⁻³)ⁿ

Two-Component Unlink with n Bonds

⟨Kₙ⟩ = (a + A + A⁻¹)ⁿ⁻¹(ad - A³ - A⁻³) + (A + A⁻¹)∑ᵢ₌₁ⁿ⁻¹(a + A + A⁻¹)ⁿ⁻ⁱ⁻¹(a - A³ - A⁻³)ⁱ

where d = -A² - A⁻²

Discriminating Power Verification

By computing bracket polynomials for two bonded trefoils T₁ and T₂:

• ⟨T₁⟩ = 1 + 1/A⁸ + a/A⁷ + 1/A⁶ - 1/A⁴ - a/A³ - A⁴ - aA⁵ + A⁸
• ⟨T₂⟩ = -1/A¹⁰ + a/A⁷ - 2/A⁴ - 1/A² + a/A + aA - A⁴ - aA⁵ + A⁸

This demonstrates that these two bonded knots are inequivalent under rigid vertex homotopy.

Related Work

Classical Knot Theory Foundations

• Alexander Theorem (1923): Establishes correspondence between knots and braids
• Markov Theorem: Provides necessary and sufficient conditions for braid equivalence
• Jones polynomial and Kauffman bracket polynomial

Extended Theories

• Singular Braid Theory (Baez, Birman, et al.): Braid theory handling singular crossings
• Knotoid Theory (Turaev, 2012): Studies knot diagrams with open endpoints
• Tied Links Theory (Aicardi, Juyumaya): Links with ties

Biological Applications

• Protein Knot Research: KnotProt database by Sulkowska et al.
• RNA Structure Analysis: Kauffman-Magarshak polynomial invariants
• Molecular Topology: Circuit topology research by Mashaghi et al.

Innovation of This Work

This paper establishes for the first time a complete mathematical theory of bonded structures, unifying topological, algebraic, and geometric approaches, providing new tools for biomolecule structure analysis.

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Theoretical Completeness: Establishes a complete theoretical system from basic definitions to advanced invariants
2. Algebraic Structure: Reveals deep connections between bonded braids and singular braids
3. Computational Feasibility: Provides effective algorithms and invariant computation methods
4. Application Potential: Offers new mathematical tools for protein structure analysis and molecular design

Limitations

1. Computational Complexity: Invariant computation becomes complex as the number of bonds increases
2. Physical Verification: The correspondence between theoretical models and actual biomolecule structures requires further verification
3. Application Scope: Primarily applicable to molecular systems with well-defined bond structures

Future Directions

1. Computational Tool Development: Develop efficient algorithms and software for invariant computation
2. Biological Database Applications: Apply theory to protein database analysis
3. Physical Model Extension: Consider more complex molecular interactions
4. Feynman Diagram Applications: Explore potential applications in quantum field theory

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Theoretical Innovation

• Original Concepts: The classification system for bonded bonds and dual homotopy theory are entirely new mathematical concepts
• Structural Completeness: Forms a complete closed loop from basic definitions to advanced applications
• Methodological Unity: Organically combines topological, algebraic, and geometric methods

2. Mathematical Rigor

• Complete Proofs: All major theorems have rigorous mathematical proofs
• Clear Logic: Theory construction is well-organized with clear logical relationships
• Standard Notation: Mathematical notation is used consistently with precise definitions

3. Application Prospects

• Biological Relevance: Directly corresponds to structural features of biological molecules like proteins
• Computational Feasibility: Provides concrete algorithms and computational methods
• Strong Extensibility: Theoretical framework can be extended to other fields

Weaknesses

1. Practical Application Verification

• Lacks comparative verification with real protein structure data
• Biological significance of invariants requires further clarification
• Computational complexity may limit large-scale applications

2. Theoretical Depth

• Some proofs could be more concise
• Relationships with other topological invariants need further investigation
• Physical interpretation of enhanced bonds could be more profound

3. Presentation Issues

• The paper is lengthy; some sections could be more concise
• Figures could be clearer
• Some technical details could be moved to appendices

Impact

1. Academic Contribution

• Opens a new field in bonded knot theory
• Provides new research directions for topology and algebraic topology
• Establishes new bridges between mathematics and biology

2. Practical Value

• Provides new tools for protein structure analysis
• Applicable to molecular design and drug development
• Potential applications in materials science

3. Reproducibility

• Clear theoretical construction, easy to understand and extend
• Concrete computational methods, convenient to implement
• High open-source potential, beneficial for community development

Applicable Scenarios

1. Protein Structure Analysis: Analyzing topological structures of proteins with disulfide bonds
2. RNA Folding Research: Studying RNA tertiary structures and base pairing
3. Molecular Design: Designing molecules with specific topological properties
4. Materials Science: Studying polymer and supramolecular structures
5. Theoretical Physics: Topological analysis of Feynman diagrams

References

This paper cites 48 important references spanning classical and cutting-edge work in knot theory, braid theory, topology, and biological applications, providing a solid foundation for theoretical construction. Key references include:

• Alexander (1923): Classical Alexander theorem
• Markov (1935): Markov theorem
• Turaev (2012): Knotoid theory
• Kauffman series: Topological invariants of graphs
• Biological application literature: Protein knots and RNA structure research

This paper makes pioneering contributions to bonded knot theory, establishing a complete mathematical framework and opening new directions for topology and biomolecule structure research. While practical application verification requires strengthening, its theoretical value and application potential are both highly significant.