We theoretically investigate the magnetic-multipole orders in two-dimensional (2D) altermagnets, focusing on two representative models: a generic minimal three-site model, and a four-site model representative of monolayer FeSe. We construct low-energy effective Hamiltonians for both systems and calculate their respective multipole indicators to characterize the underlying magnetic order. Our analysis reveals an intriguing contrast between the two systems. We find that the generic minimal model exhibits the expected non-zero magnetic-octupole order. In the monolayer-FeSe model, however, the magnetic-octupole order vanishes globally, and a magnetic-hexadecapole order is present instead. The emergence of altermagnetic splitting in the band structure then arises via the interplay with a sublattice-isospin degree of freedom. Our work demonstrates how the classification and comprehensive understanding of 2D altermagnetic materials transcends bulk descriptions.
- Paper ID: 2507.18020
- Title: Multipole order in two-dimensional altermagnets
- Authors: Tenta Tani (Osaka University), Ulrich Zülicke (Victoria University of Wellington)
- Classification: cond-mat.mes-hall (Condensed Matter Physics - Mesoscopic Physics)
- Publication Date: October 16, 2025
- Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.18020
This paper theoretically investigates magnetic multipole order in two-dimensional altermagnetic materials, focusing on two representative models: a generic minimal three-site model and a four-site model representing monolayer FeSe. By constructing low-energy effective Hamiltonians and calculating corresponding multipole indices, the authors characterize potential magnetic orders. The study reveals an interesting contrast between the two systems: the generic minimal model exhibits the expected nonzero magnetic octupole order, while in the monolayer FeSe model, magnetic octupole order globally vanishes and is replaced by magnetic hexadecapole order. The appearance of antiferromagnetic splitting in the band structure is realized through interaction with sublattice isospin degrees of freedom.
Altromagnetism represents an emerging magnetic phase with unique properties: zero net magnetization yet spin splitting in the electronic band structure. This material differs from ferromagnets (spontaneous magnetization and uniform exchange spin splitting) and conventional antiferromagnets (zero net magnetization with preserved spin degeneracy).
- Altermagnetic materials hold significant potential for spintronics applications, including spin-charge conversion, thermal transport, and magnons
- Two-dimensional altermagnetic materials attract increasing attention due to their advantages in device applications
- Understanding the connection between altromagnetism and hidden multipole order provides guidance for material design
Although previous studies have proposed minimal models for two-dimensional altermagnets and DFT studies of monolayer FeSe, these works have not deeply explored the nature of magnetic multipole order intrinsically related to the altermagnetic phase.
To fill this gap by constructing effective low-energy Hamiltonians and calculating multipole indices, revealing the essential role of multipole physics in two-dimensional altermagnetic materials.
- Theoretical Framework Establishment: Derivation of effective low-energy Hamiltonians for the two-dimensional altermagnetic minimal model and identification of characteristic magnetic octupole order
- Novel Mechanism Discovery: Discovery that magnetic octupole order globally vanishes in the monolayer FeSe model, with magnetic hexadecapole order becoming the hidden order parameter
- Multipole Index Methodology: Extension of band structure multipole index construction methods to incorporate real-space quantities (such as sublattice pseudospin) in two-dimensional systems
- New Altermagnetic Pathway: Identification of a novel mechanism for realizing altromagnetism through even-order magnetic multipole order
Through tight-binding models and effective field theory methods, investigate the multipole order characteristics of two-dimensional altermagnetic materials and establish quantitative relationships between band structure and magnetic multipole density.
- Lattice Structure: Square lattice containing non-magnetic site A and two magnetic sites B↑, B↓
- Hamiltonian:
H=∑σ=±(t∑⟨i,j⟩ci,σ†cj,σ+t2∑⟨⟨i,j⟩⟩ci,σ†cj,σ−Jsdσ∑iSici,σ†ci,σ)
where t is the nearest-neighbor hopping parameter, t2 is the next-nearest-neighbor hopping parameter, and Jsd is the exchange coupling strength.
- Lattice Structure: Additional non-magnetic site A' added to the minimal model
- External Field Effect: Perpendicular electric field introduced through site potential ±Δ
- 4×4 Bloch Hamiltonian:
-\Delta & 0 & 2\cos k_x & 2\cos k_y \\
0 & \Delta & 2\cos k_y & 2\cos k_x \\
2\cos k_x & 2\cos k_y & -J\sigma & 4t_2\cos k_x\cos k_y \\
2\cos k_y & 2\cos k_x & 4t_2\cos k_x\cos k_y & J\sigma
\end{pmatrix}$$
### Technical Innovations
#### 1. Effective Low-Energy Theory Construction
Standard subband k·p theory is employed, adapting the envelope function method originally developed for semiconductor heterostructures to two-dimensional magnetic systems.
#### 2. Multipole Index Extension
- **Magnetic Octupole Index**: $I^{(m,3)}(k,\sigma) = \sigma(k_x^2 - k_y^2)$
- **Magnetic Hexadecapole Index**: $I^{(m,4)}(k,\tau,\sigma) = \tau\sigma(k_x^2 - k_y^2)$
where $\tau$ represents sublattice pseudospin. This formulation represents the first realization of band index construction for even-order magnetic multipoles in two-dimensional systems.
#### 3. Perturbation Theory Application
For the FeSe model, second-order perturbation theory is applied near the M point, yielding the effective Hamiltonian:
$$H_{eff}(k) = \tau_z[\Delta - (4/J)\sigma_z(\cos^2 k_x - \cos^2 k_y)]$$
## Experimental Setup
### Theoretical Calculation Parameters
- **Minimal Model**: $J/t = 0.2$, $t_2/t = 0.01$
- **FeSe Model**: $J/t = 1$, $t_2/t = 0$, $\Delta/t = 0.1$
### Computational Methods
1. **Band Structure Calculation**: Direct diagonalization of Bloch Hamiltonian
2. **Multipole Density**: Calculation of multipole index expectation values through Fermi surface integration
3. **Numerical Verification**: Comparison of analytical results with numerical integration
## Experimental Results
### Main Results
#### 1. Magnetic Octupole Order in the Minimal Model
- Magnetic octupole index expectation value: $\langle I^{(m,3)}\rangle \neq 0$
- In the small $J$ limit: $\langle I^{(m,3)}\rangle \propto J/(4t_2)$
- Fermi surface shape: Elliptical with semi-major axis $k_{F>} = [2/(1+J/4t_2)]^{1/2}$ and semi-minor axis $k_{F<} = [2/(1-J/4t_2)]^{1/2}$
#### 2. Magnetic Hexadecapole Order in the FeSe Model
- Global vanishing of magnetic octupole order: $\langle I^{(m,3)}\rangle = 0$
- Finite magnetic hexadecapole order: $\langle I^{(m,4)}\rangle \neq 0$
- Fermi surface shape: Hyperbolic with $k_x^2/k_{F0}^2 - k_y^2/k_{F0}^2 = \pm 1$, where $k_{F0} = \sqrt{J\Delta/2}$
### Analytical Expressions
For magnetic hexadecapole density:
$$\langle I^{(m,4)}\rangle = \frac{k_{F0}^4}{2\pi^2}\left[\frac{\pi}{6k_{F0}a}\sqrt{\frac{\pi^2}{4k_{F0}^2a^2}-1}\left(\frac{\pi^2}{k_{F0}^2a^2}+2\right) - 2\ln\left(\frac{\pi}{2k_{F0}a}+\sqrt{\frac{\pi^2}{4k_{F0}^2a^2}-1}\right)\right]$$
### Key Findings
1. **Phase Classification**: According to Fermi surface shape, the minimal model corresponds to the weak altermagnetic phase, while the FeSe model corresponds to the strong altermagnetic phase
2. **Mechanism Differences**: The two models realize altromagnetism through completely different microscopic mechanisms
3. **Dimensional Effects**: Sublattice degrees of freedom in two-dimensional systems enable even-order magnetic multipoles to produce spin splitting
## Related Work
### Major Research Directions
1. **Bulk Altermagnetic Materials**: Experimental and theoretical studies of RuO₂, MnTe, CrSb and other materials
2. **Two-Dimensional Altermagnets**: Monolayer materials such as MnPSe₃, Cr₂SO, V₂SeTeO
3. **Multipole Order Theory**: Theoretical connections between hidden multipole order and altromagnetism
### Advantages of This Work
- First systematic study of multipole order in two-dimensional altermagnets
- Discovery of novel altermagnetic realization mechanisms
- Provision of quantitative multipole density calculation methods
## Conclusions and Discussion
### Main Conclusions
1. **Model Dependence**: Different two-dimensional altermagnetic models exhibit distinct multipole order characteristics
2. **Novel Mechanism Identification**: Magnetic hexadecapole order realizes altermagnetic spin splitting through sublattice coupling
3. **Theoretical Extension**: Multipole index construction in two-dimensional systems requires consideration of real-space pseudospin degrees of freedom
### Limitations
1. **Model Simplification**: The tight-binding models employed may neglect some important physical effects
2. **Parameter Dependence**: Results are relatively sensitive to model parameter choices
3. **Experimental Verification**: Theoretical predictions require further experimental validation
### Future Directions
1. **Systematic Classification**: Establishment of a more complete classification scheme for two-dimensional altermagnetic materials
2. **Experimental Detection**: Development of experimental detection methods for magnetic hexadecapole order (e.g., magnetopiezoelectric effect)
3. **Device Applications**: Exploration of spintronics device design based on different multipole orders
## In-Depth Evaluation
### Strengths
1. **Theoretical Innovation**: First systematic application of multipole order theory to two-dimensional altermagnets, discovering novel physical mechanisms
2. **Rigorous Methodology**: Employs mature effective field theory and perturbation theory methods with detailed and reliable mathematical derivations
3. **Novel Results**: The discovery of magnetic hexadecapole order driving altromagnetism possesses significant theoretical value
4. **Thorough Analysis**: Provides analytical expressions and numerical verification, making results convincing
### Weaknesses
1. **Model Limitations**: Only two specific models considered; universality requires further verification
2. **Experimental Absence**: Pure theoretical work lacking experimental validation
3. **Application Prospects**: Insufficient discussion of the potential of the discovered mechanisms in practical applications
### Impact
1. **Academic Contribution**: Provides new theoretical framework for understanding two-dimensional altermagnets
2. **Practical Value**: Offers theoretical guidance for designing novel altermagnetic materials
3. **Reproducibility**: Detailed theoretical derivations and clear computational methods facilitate reproduction and extension
### Applicable Scenarios
1. **Material Design**: Guides theoretical design of two-dimensional altermagnetic materials
2. **Device Development**: Provides theoretical foundation for altermagnetic-based spintronics devices
3. **Fundamental Research**: Advances theoretical understanding of multipole order in low-dimensional magnetic systems
## References
The paper cites important literature in the altromagnetism field, including pioneering work by Šmejkal et al., experimental studies of various altermagnetic materials, and developments in multipole order theory, providing a solid theoretical foundation for the research.