Certifying non-classicality and non-Gaussianity through optical parametric amplification

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2507.18296
• Title: Certifying non-classicality and non-Gaussianity through optical parametric amplification
• Authors: Mahmoud Kalash, M.H.M. Passos, Éva Rácz, László Ruppert, Radim Filip, Maria V. Chekhova
• Classification: quant-ph (Quantum Physics)
• Publication Date: Compiled October 13, 2025
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.18296

Abstract

Non-Gaussian optical states are essential for numerous quantum information protocols, making the certification of non-Gaussianity a critical problem. While conventional full quantum state tomography is commonly employed for this purpose, the process is complex and yields uncertain results for highly mixed states. Certifying non-Gaussianity through directly measurable parameters offers a simpler alternative, typically achieved by measuring photon number probabilities—either directly using photon-number-resolving detectors or through Hanbury Brown-Twiss type measurements with single-photon detectors. This paper demonstrates theoretically and experimentally that optical parametric amplification combined with conventional intensity detectors can effectively replace this approach without requiring photon-number resolution. The method successfully certifies the non-Gaussianity of heralded quasi-single-photon states by measuring the mean photon number and second-order correlation function of the amplified state. Since optical parametric amplification is a broadband multimode process, this method provides a foundation for developing high-dimensional quantum technologies utilizing broadband multimode non-Gaussian states.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Definition

Three hierarchical levels of quantum state classification exist in quantum optics:

1. Classical states: Optical states representable as mixtures of coherent states
2. Non-classical states: States not representable as mixtures of coherent states but potentially Gaussian
3. Non-Gaussian states: States not representable as mixtures of Gaussian Wigner functions

Significance

Non-Gaussian optical states are indispensable in quantum information protocols, particularly for:

• Entanglement distillation
• Quantum error correction
• High-dimensional quantum technologies

Limitations of Existing Methods

1. Full quantum state tomography: Complex process with uncertain results for highly mixed states
2. Wigner function negativity detection: For mixed non-Gaussian states, the Wigner function may remain positive
3. Photon number probability measurement: Requires photon-number-resolving detectors or multiple single-photon detectors
4. Hanbury Brown-Twiss measurement: Applicable only to dark states with mean photon numbers far below 1

Research Motivation

Development of a novel method capable of:

• Avoiding complex photon-number-resolving detection
• Applicability to brighter quantum states
• Utilizing conventional intensity detectors
• Supporting broadband multimode detection

Core Contributions

1. Proposed a novel certification method based on optical parametric amplification: Certifies non-Gaussianity and non-classicality by measuring the mean photon number μ and second-order correlation function g^(2) of the amplified state
2. Established new witness functions: Constructed boundary conditions for non-Gaussianity and non-classicality in the (μ_rel, g^(2)) parameter space
3. Experimentally validated the method: Successfully certified the non-Gaussianity of heralded quasi-single-photon states and tracked the transition from non-Gaussian to non-classical to classical regimes
4. Provided theoretical framework: Established exact relationships between pre- and post-amplification statistics for phase-invariant states
5. Demonstrated broadband multimode potential: Laid foundation for high-dimensional quantum technology applications

Methodology Details

Task Definition

Input: Unknown quantum optical state Output: Certification result (non-Gaussian/non-classical/classical or inconclusive) Constraint: Applicable to phase-invariant states (Wigner function depends only on x² + p²)

Core Principles

Optical Parametric Amplification Transformation

The parametric amplification process is described using the Bogoliubov transformation:

â = â₀ cosh G + â₀† sinh G

where G is the parametric gain and â₀ is the input operator.

Key Parameters

1. Relative mean photon number: μ_rel ≡ μ/μ_vac, where μ_vac = sinh² G is the mean photon number of the amplified vacuum
2. Second-order correlation function: g^(2) = ⟨a†a†aa⟩/⟨a†a⟩²

Pre- and Post-Amplification Relations

For large gain (G > 3), exact relationships are established:

μ_rel = 2m + 1
σ²_rel = 2(1 + m + m² + 3s²)

where m and s² are the mean photon number and variance before amplification, respectively.

Witness Function Construction

Non-Gaussianity Witness

Boundary curves are defined through parametric equations:

μ̃_rel(r) = e^r cosh 2r
g̃^(2)(r) = 3 - 3·sinh² r·(sinh 2r + 1)/cosh² 2r

Non-Gaussianity is certified when measurements satisfy g^(2) < g̃^(2)(μ̃_rel^(-1)(μ_rel)).

Non-classicality Witness

g^(2) < 3/2 + 3/μ_rel - 3/(2μ²_rel)

Experimental Scheme

State Preparation

• Dual-photon generation using type-II spontaneous parametric down-conversion (SPDC)
• Heralding of signal photons by detecting idler photons
• Pump power control to adjust source brightness

Parametric Amplification

• Type-I collinear degenerate phase-matched BiBO crystal
• Parametric gain G = 6.5 ± 0.5
• Phase-sensitive amplification configuration

Detection System

• Intensity detection using sCMOS camera
• Single-mode fiber ensuring single-mode detection
• 0.5 nm bandpass filter ensuring spectral purity

Experimental Setup

Experimental Apparatus

• Light source: 400 nm, 1 ps pulses, 5 kHz repetition rate
• SPDC crystal: 3 mm thick BBO crystal, type-II non-collinear degenerate phase-matching
• OPA crystal: 3 mm thick BiBO crystal, type-I collinear degenerate phase-matching
• Detectors: Superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors (quantum efficiency ~80%), sCMOS camera (quantum efficiency ~50%)

Key Parameters

• Heralding efficiency: ηH = 51 ± 2%
• Amplification efficiency: ηOPA = 51%
• Total transmission: η = 26%
• Parametric gain: G = 6.5 ± 0.5

Evaluation Methods

1. Standard coincidence measurement: Using HBT apparatus to measure p₀, p₁, p₂₊
2. Post-amplification measurement: Measuring μ_rel and g^(2)
3. Comparative verification: Converting results from both methods to (m, s²) space for comparison

Experimental Results

Main Results

Non-Gaussianity Certification

• Successfully certified non-Gaussianity of heralded states with brightness 0.1 ppp
• Measured μ_rel = 1.66 ± 0.02, g^(2) = 2.58 ± 0.03
• Results located within non-Gaussian region (green region)

Transition Process Tracking

As source brightness increased from 0.1 to 0.94 ppp:

• 0.1-0.15 ppp: Non-Gaussianity certified
• 0.39-0.62 ppp: Only non-classicality certified
• 0.77-0.94 ppp: Entered inconclusive region

Theoretical Agreement

Experimental data showed excellent agreement with theoretical predictions (26% effective transmission), validating the method's accuracy.

Photon Number Distribution Analysis

• Amplified vacuum: Complete agreement with theoretically predicted gamma distribution
• Amplified heralded state: Intermediate between vacuum and single-photon distributions
• Different mixed states exhibit similar distributions but different non-Gaussian properties

Comparative Verification

Converting both coincidence measurement and amplification measurement results to (m, s²) space, the two sets of data points showed excellent overlap, demonstrating method equivalence.

Related Work

Traditional Methods

1. Wigner function negativity: Direct but inapplicable to mixed states
2. Photon parity detection: Requires specialized detectors
3. Photon number probability methods: Filip-Mišta witness functions requiring photon-number resolution

Recent Advances

1. Bright state witnesses: Witness functions based on mean values and variances
2. Correlation function methods: Independent work also utilizing correlation functions but still requiring single-photon detectors

Advantages of This Work

• No photon-number-resolving detectors required
• Applicable to brighter states
• Naturally supports multimode detection
• Uses conventional intensity detectors

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Method validity: Optical parametric amplification combined with conventional detectors effectively certifies non-Gaussianity
2. Technical advantages: Eliminates complex photon-number-resolving detection requirements
3. Broad applicability: Handles various states from dark to bright
4. Multimode potential: Provides foundation for high-dimensional quantum technologies

Limitations

1. Phase-dependent states: Current method applicable only to phase-invariant states
2. Mode matching: Requires good spatial and spectral mode matching
3. Gain requirements: Requires sufficiently large parametric gain (G > 3)
4. Loss sensitivity: While correctable, still affects state purity

Future Directions

1. Extension to phase-dependent states: Requires more complex experimental apparatus
2. Mode matching optimization: Improving amplification efficiency
3. Simultaneous multimode detection: Achieving true high-dimensional quantum technologies
4. Practical applications: Specific applications in quantum information processing

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Strong technical innovation: First application of OPA to non-Gaussianity certification, avoiding photon-number-resolving technical challenges
2. Solid theoretical foundation: Complete theoretical framework with rigorous mathematical derivations
3. Comprehensive experimental validation: Not only validates method effectiveness but also demonstrates state transition processes
4. High practical value: Uses conventional detectors, lowering technical barriers
5. Multimode potential: Opens new pathways for high-dimensional quantum technologies

Weaknesses

1. Limited applicability: Restricted to phase-invariant states
2. Mode matching challenges: OPA efficiency only 51% in experiments, affecting performance
3. Gain dependence: Requires high-gain amplifiers, increasing system complexity
4. Limited comparative experiments: Primarily compared with traditional HBT methods, lacking comparison with other novel approaches

Impact

1. Academic contribution: Provides new perspectives for quantum state certification, potentially inspiring related research
2. Technical value: Lowers technical barriers for non-Gaussianity certification, facilitating practical applications
3. Application prospects: Provides foundational tools for high-dimensional quantum information processing
4. Reproducibility: Clear experimental scheme with detailed parameters facilitates reproduction

Applicable Scenarios

1. Quantum optics laboratories: As a routine quantum state characterization tool
2. Quantum information processing: In protocols requiring non-Gaussian resource certification
3. High-dimensional quantum technologies: Parallel detection of multimode non-Gaussian states
4. Industrial applications: Cost-effective quantum state quality control

References

The paper cites 32 important references covering core works in non-Gaussian state theory, witness functions, optical parametric amplification, quantum state tomography, and related fields, providing solid theoretical foundation for the research.

Overall Assessment: This is a high-quality quantum optics paper proposing an innovative method for non-Gaussianity certification with close integration of theory and experiment, possessing significant academic value and practical significance. This work not only addresses technical limitations of existing methods but also provides new tools and perspectives for future high-dimensional quantum technology development.