2025-11-22T19:31:16.567579

Every conformal net has an associated unitary VOA

Henriques, Tener
Unitary vertex operator algebras (VOAs) and conformal nets are the two most prominent mathematical axiomatizations of two-dimensional unitary chiral conformal field theories. They are conjectured to be equivalent, but a rigorous comparison has proven challenging. We resolve one direction of the conjecture by showing that every conformal net has an associated unitary VOA. We also show that every representation of a conformal net in which the generator of rotation acts with discrete spectrum and finite-dimensional eigenspaces yields a unitary module of the corresponding VOA. A talk describing our results is available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f_LhNSeiiaE .
academic

Every conformal net has an associated unitary VOA

Basic Information

  • Paper ID: 2507.20735
  • Title: Every conformal net has an associated unitary VOA
  • Authors: André G. Henriques, James E. Tener
  • Classification: math.OA (Operator Algebras), math-ph (Mathematical Physics), math.MP (Mathematical Physics), math.QA (Quantum Algebra)
  • Publication Date: October 10, 2025 (arXiv v3)
  • Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.20735

Abstract

Unitary vertex operator algebras (VOAs) and conformal nets are the two most important mathematical axiomatizations of two-dimensional unitary chiral conformal field theory. They are conjectured to be equivalent, but rigorous comparison has been extremely challenging. This paper resolves one direction of the conjecture by proving that every conformal net has an associated unitary VOA. The authors further prove that every representation of a conformal net (where the rotation generator has discrete spectrum and finite-dimensional eigenspaces) yields a unitary module of the corresponding VOA.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Background

  1. Coexistence of Two Axiomatization Methods: Two-dimensional chiral conformal field theory has two main mathematical formulations:
    • Unitary Vertex Operator Algebras (VOAs) - emphasizing vector spaces of boundary local operators and their operator product expansions
    • Conformal Nets - based on the Haag-Kastler framework, emphasizing Hilbert spaces associated with Cauchy slices
  2. Equivalence Conjecture: The physics perspective suggests these two approaches should describe the same mathematical objects, but rigorous mathematical proof has been lacking
  3. Existing Progress: CKLW (2018) proved the construction from strongly local unitary VOAs to conformal nets, but the reverse direction remained an open problem

Research Significance

  • Theoretical Unification: Bridging two important mathematical frameworks
  • Foundations of Conformal Field Theory: Providing firmer mathematical foundations for two-dimensional CFT
  • Connection Between Operator Algebras and Quantum Algebras: Linking research across different mathematical branches

Limitations of Existing Methods

  • CKLW's strong locality condition is overly restrictive, requiring polynomial energy bounds
  • Lack of systematic methods for constructing VOAs from conformal nets
  • Unclear correspondence in representation theory

Core Contributions

  1. Main Theorem A: Proves that every conformal net A has a natural unitary VOA structure VA, and A = AVA
  2. Main Theorem B: Proves that for AQFT-local unitary VOAs V, VAV ≅ V
  3. Main Theorem C: Establishes correspondence between conformal net representations and VOA modules
  4. Technical Innovation: Introduces geometric constructions of "worm-shaped insertions" and "point insertions"
  5. Conceptual Simplification: Proposes AQFT-locality concept, avoiding technical requirements of polynomial energy bounds

Detailed Methods

Task Definition

Given a conformal net A (satisfying standard axioms), construct a unitary VOA V such that:

  • The underlying vector space of V consists of finite-energy vectors in the vacuum sector H₀ of A
  • The vertex operators of V correspond to local fields of A
  • The construction is functorial, establishing a bijective correspondence A ↦ VA

Core Construction Methods

1. Torus Semigroup and Its Representations

  • Torus Semigroup Ann: Composed of tori with parameterized boundaries, forming a semigroup through conformal welding operations
  • Central Extension: Constructing Ãnnc → Ann, determined by Virasoro cocycles
  • Representation Theory: Each positive-energy unitary Virasoro representation integrates to a holomorphic representation of Ãnnc

2. Worm-shaped Insertions

For disjoint intervals I₁,...,Iₙ in disk D and elements xⱼ ∈ A(Iⱼ), construct vectors:

|x₁...xₙ⟩D ∈ H₀(D)

Key properties:

  • If all intervals are on the boundary: |x₁...xₙ⟩D = x₁···xₙΩD
  • For annulus A = Dout \ D̊in: |x₁...xₙ⟩Dout = YA|x₁...xₙ⟩Din

3. Point Insertions

For finite-energy vectors v ∈ V and point z ∈ D̊, constructed through the following decomposition:

Lemma 6.1: Every v ∈ H₀ can be written as v = x₁Ω + x₂Ω, where xᵢ ∈ A(Iᵢ)

Point insertions are defined as linear combinations of worm-shaped insertions:

|v₁(z₁)...vₙ(zₙ)⟩D = ∑ |x_{ε₁,1}...x_{εₙ,n}⟩D

where the sum ranges over all ε ∈ {1,2}ⁿ

4. Vertex Algebra Structure

Verification of V's vertex algebra structure through geometric vertex algebra axioms:

  • State-Field Correspondence: Y(v,z)u := |v(z)u(0)⟩
  • Translation Operator: Tv := d/dz|v(z)⟩|_ = L₋₁v
  • Conformal Vector: ν = L₋₂Ω

Technical Innovations

  1. Geometric Methods: Using geometric decomposition of tori avoids algebraic complexity
  2. Holomorphicity: Holomorphicity of point insertions with respect to insertion points (Lemma 6.13)
  3. Unitarity Structure: Establishing PCT involution Θ through Bisognano-Wichmann theorem
  4. Module Correspondence: Establishing precise correspondence between conformal net representations and VOA modules (Theorem 9.5)

Experimental Setup

This is pure mathematical theoretical research with no numerical experiments. Verification is completed through rigorous mathematical proofs.

Main Theoretical Results

Theorem A (Conformal Net → VOA)

Statement: For each conformal net A, there exists a natural unitary VOA structure VA, and A = AVA

Proof Outline:

  1. Construct geometric vertex algebra structure (Theorem 7.3)
  2. Verify conformal symmetry (Theorem 7.11)
  3. Establish unitarity (Theorem 7.13)
  4. Prove AQFT-locality (Proposition 8.8)

Theorem B (Equivalence)

Statement: For AQFT-local unitary VOAs V, VAV ≅ V

Proof Strategy: Establishing identity of local algebras through affinity of smeared fields

Theorem C (Representation Correspondence)

Statement: Functor correspondence exists between conformal net representations and VOA modules

Key Formula:

πI(Y(v,f)) = Y^M(v,f)

where the left side is the action of smeared fields in the representation, and the right side is the VOA module action

Historical Development

  1. Haag-Kastler Framework (1964): Algebraic approach to quantum field theory
  2. Vertex Operator Algebras (1980s): Development by Borcherds and others
  3. CKLW Work (2018): Construction from VOA to conformal nets
  4. This Paper's Contribution: Completing the reverse direction construction
  • Technical Improvements: Avoiding polynomial energy bound conditions from CKLW
  • Conceptual Innovation: Introducing AQFT-locality concept
  • Methodological Innovation: Using geometric methods rather than purely algebraic approaches

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

  1. Equivalence Established: Under AQFT-locality conditions, unitary VOAs and conformal nets are equivalent
  2. Naturality of Construction: Providing natural functors in both directions
  3. Representation Theory: Establishing complete representation correspondence

Limitations

  1. Technical Conditions: Still requiring discrete spectrum of L₀ and finite-dimensional eigenspaces
  2. AQFT-Locality: Conjectured that all unitary VOAs satisfy this, but not fully proven
  3. Computational Complexity: Concrete constructions may be technically complex in applications

Future Directions

  1. Complete Equivalence: Proving all unitary VOAs are AQFT-local
  2. Integrability Conditions: Developing equivalent integrability characterizations
  3. Higher-Dimensional Generalization: Extending to higher-dimensional conformal field theory
  4. Classification Problems: Utilizing equivalence for classification studies

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

  1. Theoretical Importance: Resolves a long-standing important problem in the field
  2. Methodological Innovation: Highly creative use of geometric methods
  3. Technical Depth: Involving operator algebras, differential geometry, and representation theory
  4. Completeness of Results: Not only establishing correspondence but also handling representation theory

Technical Highlights

  1. Torus Semigroup Method: Clever algebraization of geometric objects
  2. Holomorphicity Proof: Rigorous establishment of point insertion holomorphicity
  3. Unitarity Verification: Establishing PCT structure through modular theory

Shortcomings

  1. Technical Threshold: Requiring deep background in operator algebras and geometry
  2. Condition Restrictions: L₀ spectrum conditions may be overly restrictive
  3. Construction Complexity: High technical complexity in practical calculations

Impact

  1. Theoretical Unification: Providing unified mathematical framework for conformal field theory
  2. Methodological Contribution: Application of geometric methods in algebraic structures
  3. Subsequent Research: Providing new tools and perspectives for related research

Applicable Scenarios

  • Mathematical research in two-dimensional conformal field theory
  • Representation theory of vertex operator algebras
  • Applications of operator algebras in physics
  • Quantum groups and infinite-dimensional Lie algebra theory

References

This paper cites 75 important references, primarily including:

  • CKLW18: Original work on VOA to conformal nets
  • HT24, HT25: Authors' prior work on torus semigroups
  • FBZ04: Classical textbook on vertex algebras
  • GF93: Important literature on conformal net theory

Summary: This is a mathematically significant paper that resolves a core problem in conformal field theory through innovative geometric methods, establishing profound connections between two important mathematical frameworks. While technically demanding, its theoretical contributions and methodological innovations have far-reaching implications for related fields.