Rotating Proto-Neutron Stars Admixed with Mirror Dark Matter: A two fluid approach

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2507.20823
• Title: Rotating Proto-Neutron Stars Admixed with Mirror Dark Matter: A two fluid approach
• Authors: Adamu Issifu, Andreas Konstantinou, Prashant Thakur, Tobias Frederico
• Classification: astro-ph.HE nucl-th
• Publication Date: October 24, 2024 (arXiv v2)
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.20823

Abstract

This study investigates the effects of mirror dark matter (DM) on the global properties of rotating neutron stars, spanning evolutionary stages from hot, lepton-rich proto-neutron stars (PNSs) to cold catalyzed neutron stars on the Kelvin-Helmholtz timescale. Baryonic matter (BM) is modeled using relativistic mean-field (RMF) theory with density-dependent couplings, while the dark matter sector mirrors analogous thermodynamic conditions of the visible sector. Using a two-fluid formalism with purely gravitational DM-BM interactions, the study finds that rotation expands the star, while DM admixture increases compactness and enhances gravitational stability. However, the increased compactness induced by DM lowers the threshold for rotational instability, making DM-admixed stars more susceptible. Rotation reduces the central temperature by redistributing thermal energy over a larger volume and lowering the central density, while DM increases temperature by deepening the gravitational potential and increasing thermal energy.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Background

1. Dark Matter Detection Challenges: Despite strong cosmological observational support for dark matter's existence (comprising ~94% of the universe's total mass-energy), direct laboratory detection remains difficult, primarily due to limited understanding of its fundamental properties, interaction channels, mass, charge, and coupling with baryonic matter.
2. Neutron Stars as Dark Matter Probes: Neutron stars provide observational advantages over terrestrial experiments. The presence of dark matter is expected to affect multiple observable neutron star properties, including mass, radius, and tidal deformability, as well as internal dynamical properties such as rotational behavior, angular momentum loss, and gravitational wave emission.
3. Research Gap in Proto-Neutron Star Evolution: Existing research primarily focuses on cold, mature neutron stars, while systematic studies of dark matter effects on proto-neutron stars during their evolution from birth to maturity remain relatively lacking.

Research Motivation

• Filling Theoretical Gaps: First application of the two-fluid method to study dark matter effects on proto-neutron star structural evolution
• Multi-Stage Evolutionary Analysis: Systematic investigation of the complete evolutionary process from the neutrino-capture phase to the neutrino-transparent phase
• Rotational Effects: Exploration of how rotational frequency affects key global properties of dark matter-admixed stars
• Indirect Detection Possibilities: Providing theoretical foundations for indirect dark matter detection through astrophysical observations

Core Contributions

1. Pioneering Research: First application of the two-fluid formalism to study mirror dark matter effects on rotating proto-neutron star structural evolution
2. Complete Evolutionary Coverage: Systematic analysis spanning from the neutrino-capture phase to the cold catalyzed phase
3. Competing Effects Revealed: Discovery that rotation and dark matter produce opposite effects on neutron star properties: rotation expands the star while dark matter increases compactness
4. Universal Relations Verification: Demonstration that hot, lepton-rich matter still satisfies universal relations derived primarily for cold stars, with deviations ≤5%
5. Observable Feature Predictions: Provision of specific observables that can constrain dark matter properties through multi-messenger observations

Methodology Details

Task Definition

Investigation of how mirror dark matter affects global properties of rotating proto-neutron stars at different evolutionary stages, including key parameters such as mass, radius, moment of inertia, temperature distribution, and gravitational redshift.

Model Architecture

1. Baryonic Matter Equation of State

Employing relativistic mean-field (RMF) theory with Lagrangian density:

L_H = Σ_{N=p,n} ψ̄_N [iγ^μ∂_μ - γ^0(g_{ωN}ω_0 + g_{ρN}I_3ρ_{03}) - (m_N - g_{σN}σ_0)]ψ_N

Using DDME2 parameterization with density-dependent coupling constants:

g_{iN}(n_B) = g_{iN}(n_0)a_i [1 + b_i(η + d_i)^2]/[1 + c_i(η + d_i)^2]

2. Mirror Dark Matter Sector

Employing the mirror dark matter model with Lagrangian density:

L_DM = ψ_D[(iγ^μ∂^μ - γ^0g_vV_0) - (m_D - g_σ̃σ̃_0)]ψ_D - (1/2)m^2_σ̃σ̃^2_0 + (1/2)m^2_vV^2_0

3. Two-Fluid Rotating Formalism

• Metric: Employing stationary, axially symmetric spacetime metric
• Energy-Momentum Tensor: T^{μν}_ = T^{μν}_D + T^{μν}_B
• Simplifying Assumptions: Dark matter fluid remains static and non-rotating, while baryonic matter rotates with uniform angular velocity

Technical Innovations

1. Two-Fluid Method Extension: Modification of the original RNS code for single-fluid systems to handle dark matter-baryonic matter two-fluid systems
2. Evolutionary Stage Modeling:
   • Neutrino-capture phase: Y_l = 0.4, s_B = 1
   • Deleptonization phase: Y_l = 0.2, s_B = 2
   • Neutrino-transparent phase: Y_{νe} = 0, s_B = 2
   • Cold catalyzed phase: T = 0
3. Static Dark Matter Core Assumption: Based on physical considerations that dark matter capture timescales (10^6-10^9 years) far exceed proto-neutron star evolution timescales (tens of seconds)

Experimental Setup

Model Parameters

• Baryonic Matter: DDME2 parameterization, nuclear saturation density n_0 = 0.152 fm^{-3}
• Dark Matter Mass Fraction: f_χ = 5%
• Rotation Parameters: Polar-to-equatorial radius ratio r_p/r_e ∈ {1.0, 0.9, 0.8, 0.7, 0.6, 0.5}

Evaluation Metrics

1. Structural Parameters: Maximum gravitational mass M_, corresponding radius R_, radius at 1.4M_⊙ (R_{1.4})
2. Dynamical Parameters: Moment of inertia I_, maximum rotation frequency ν_
3. Thermodynamic Parameters: Central temperature T_c, entropy density
4. Observable Quantities: Polar gravitational redshift Z_p, mass-radius relation

Comparison Methods

• Pure baryonic matter stars without dark matter (baseline model)
• Comparisons across different evolutionary stages
• Comparison with observational data: NICER-observed pulsars, gravitational wave event GW170817 constraints

Experimental Results

Main Results

1. Mass-Radius Relation (Figure 1)

• Rotation Effect: As r_p/r_e decreases (faster rotation), both mass and radius increase
• Dark Matter Effect: 5% dark matter makes the star more compact, with both mass and radius decreasing
• Evolutionary Trend: Maximum mass increases significantly from hot proto-neutron stars to cold mature stars

2. Temperature Distribution (Figure 2)

• Rotation Cooling: Rotation reduces central temperature by redistributing thermal energy and lowering central density
• Dark Matter Heating: Dark matter increases temperature by enhancing compactness and deepening the gravitational potential
• Evolution Pattern: Temperature peaks after neutrino escape, then begins cooling

3. Rotation Frequency-Mass Relation (Figure 3)

• Mass Enhancement: Rapid rotation can support larger masses, with effects most pronounced near the Keplerian limit
• Stability: Dark matter-admixed stars become more unstable when approaching the mass-shedding limit

4. Moment of Inertia (Figure 5)

• Rotation Effect: I_ increases with rotation
• Dark Matter Effect: Dark matter reduces I_, reflecting mass concentration toward the center
• Evolution Dependence: I_ in hot phases exceeds that in cold phases

Universal Relations Verification (Figure 4)

Verification of universal relations for equatorial radius, polar-to-equatorial ratio, and total mass shows:

• |Dev(R_e)| ≤ 1.94%
• |Dev(M_)| ≤ 4.69%
• |Dev(R_)| ≤ 8.37%

Most data deviations are ≤2%, confirming that universal relations remain valid for hot, lepton-rich matter.

Key Numerical Results (Table II)

For the sB=1, Yl=0.4 phase as an example:

• Without dark matter: M_ = 2.44M_⊙ (static) → 2.85M_⊙ (r_p/r_e = 0.6)
• With 5% dark matter: M_ = 2.25M_⊙ (static) → 2.58M_⊙ (r_p/r_e = 0.6)

Related Work

Dark Matter-Neutron Star Research Directions

1. Two-Fluid Methods: Dark matter interacts with baryonic matter only through gravity 10-17
2. Single-Fluid Methods: Dark matter interacts with baryonic matter through Standard Model particles or other mediators 18-21

Advantages of This Work

• First systematic study of dark matter effects in rotating proto-neutron stars
• Coverage of complete evolutionary stages, not limited to cold stars
• Comprehensive analysis combining rotational and thermodynamic effects
• Provision of specific predictions for observable quantities

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Competing Mechanisms: Rotation and dark matter produce opposite effects on neutron stars
   • Rotation: Expands the star, reduces central temperature and density
   • Dark Matter: Increases compactness, raises temperature, enhances gravitational binding
2. Stability Implications:
   • Dark matter enhances gravitational stability but lowers rotational instability threshold
   • Hot phases are more susceptible to rotational instability than cold phases
3. Observable Features:
   • Dark matter-admixed stars display higher surface gravitational redshift
   • Moment of inertia is highly sensitive to rotation and dark matter content
   • Universal relations remain effective in hot matter

Limitations

1. Simplifying Assumptions: Assumption that dark matter remains static and non-rotating; frame-dragging effects may exist in reality
2. Model Dependence: Results depend on specific mirror dark matter models and RMF parameterization
3. Fixed Mass Fraction: Only 5% dark matter mass fraction considered
4. Simplified Interactions: Only purely gravitational interactions considered

Future Directions

1. Dynamic Coupling: Consideration of dynamic coupling effects between dark matter and baryonic matter
2. Parameter Space Extension: Exploration of different dark matter mass fractions and model parameters
3. Observational Constraints: Parameter constraints using additional observational data
4. Gravitational Wave Features: Investigation of dark matter effects on gravitational wave signals

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. High Innovation: First application of two-fluid methods to rotating proto-neutron star dark matter research
2. Good Systematicity: Coverage of complete evolutionary stages, providing comprehensive physical picture
3. Rigorous Methodology: Based on mature RMF theory and numerical relativity methods
4. Reliable Results: Good agreement with universal relations enhances result credibility
5. Physical Insights: Revelation of competing mechanisms between rotation and dark matter

Weaknesses

1. Assumption Limitations: Static dark matter assumption may be oversimplified
2. Parameter Dependence: Result dependence on specific model parameters requires further verification
3. Observational Verification: Lack of comparison with direct observational data on proto-neutron stars
4. Theory Extension: Other types of dark matter models not considered

Impact

1. Theoretical Contribution: Provides new theoretical framework for dark matter astrophysics
2. Observational Guidance: Offers theoretical predictions for future multi-messenger astrophysical observations
3. Method Value: Two-fluid rotating code applicable to other related research
4. Interdisciplinary Significance: Connects nuclear physics, dark matter physics, and astrophysics

Applicable Scenarios

1. Theoretical Modeling: Astrophysical modeling of dark matter-baryonic matter interactions
2. Observational Interpretation: Explanation of anomalous phenomena in neutron star observations
3. Parameter Constraints: Constraining dark matter properties through astrophysical observations
4. Future Detection: Providing theoretical support for next-generation gravitational wave detectors and X-ray observatories

References

The paper cites 92 relevant references covering multiple fields including dark matter theory, neutron star physics, numerical relativity, and observational astrophysics, providing a solid theoretical foundation for the research.