Streamlined WZ Method Proofs of Van Hamme Supercongruences

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2508.00343
• Title: Streamlined WZ method proofs of Van Hamme supercongruences
• Author: Andrés Valloud
• Classification: math.NT (Number Theory)
• Publication Date: October 10, 2025
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.00343

Abstract

This paper addresses the critical challenge of selecting WZ pairs cleverly when proving supercongruences using the WZ method. The paper presents a systematic procedure for finding candidate WZ pairs to prove given supercongruences. When suitable WZ pairs are obtained, combining them with Long and Ramakrishna's $p$-adic approximation of $\Gamma_p$ yields unified proofs for Van Hamme supercongruences (B.2), (C.2), (D.2), (E.2), (F.2), (G.2), and (H.2). This approach also produces the known extension of (G.2) modulo $p^4$, as well as an extension of (H.2) modulo $p^3$ when $p \equiv 3 \pmod{4}$. Finally, Van Hamme supercongruence (I.2) is shown to be a special case of the WZ method where the Gosper algorithm itself succeeds directly.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Background

In 1997, Van Hamme proposed $p$-adic analogues of 13 Ramanujan hypergeometric series formulas for $1/\pi$. These analogues assert that certain truncated hypergeometric series satisfy congruences modulo unexpectedly large prime powers—a phenomenon termed supercongruences.

Core Problem

The primary obstacle in using the WZ method to prove supercongruences has been that finding the necessary factors has consistently relied on ad hoc methods, lacking a systematic procedure for selecting appropriate WZ pairs. This limitation has restricted the broad application of the WZ method.

Research Motivation

• Van Hamme's original supercongruence proofs employ diverse methods, lacking unified methodology
• Sun's 99-page paper contains 100 supercongruence conjectures, along with various conjectures proposed by other scholars, necessitating more general proof methods
• The WZ method possesses algorithmic advantages but requires addressing the systematic issue of factor selection

Core Contributions

1. Proposed a systematic procedure for finding candidate WZ pairs: Theorem 1.1 establishes a method for constructing standard WZ pairs from generalized WZ pairs
2. Provided unified proofs for seven Van Hamme supercongruences: (B.2)-(H.2) can all be handled using the same proof structure
3. Extended known results: Proved extensions of (G.2) modulo $p^4$ and (H.2) modulo $p^3$ (when $p \equiv 3 \pmod{4}$)
4. Introduced the WZ apparatus concept: Systematized the mechanical recovery of suitable WZ pairs from WZ algorithm output
5. Demonstrated the special nature of (I.2): Showed that (I.2) is a special case where the Gosper algorithm succeeds directly

Detailed Methodology

Task Definition

Given Van Hamme supercongruences of the form: $\sum_{n=0}^{d} u(n)c^n \cdot \frac{(1/a)_n^m}{(1)_n^m} \equiv f(p) \pmod{p^r}$

The objective is to find suitable WZ pairs to prove these supercongruences.

Core Theoretical Framework

Theorem 1.1 (Key Theorem)

For a field $F$ of characteristic zero, let $F(n,k), G(n,k): \mathbb{Z}^2 \to F$ be hypergeometric in both $n$ and $k$. If there exist polynomials $p_0, p_1 \in F[k]$ such that: $p_1(k)F(n,k+1) + p_0(k)F(n,k) = G(n+1,k) - G(n,k)$

and $p_0, p_1$ factor into linear factors over $F$, then there exist functions $\tilde{F}(n,k), \tilde{G}(n,k)$ forming a standard WZ pair: $\tilde{F}(n,k+1) - \tilde{F}(n,k) = \tilde{G}(n+1,k) - \tilde{G}(n,k)$

Construction Method

By defining: $q(k) = (-1)^k \cdot \frac{\phi_{p_1}(k)}{\phi_{p_0}(k)}$

where $\phi_r(k)$ is determined by the linear factor decomposition of polynomial $r(k)$.

Technical Innovations

1. Degree Collapse

When the WZ algorithm returns a difference operator of degree greater than 1, by modifying $F(n,k)$: $\tilde{F}(n,k) = \frac{F(n,k)}{(1/a)_k^{m-1}}$ the new difference operator becomes linear.

2. WZ Apparatus Concept

Define a WZ apparatus $w(n,k)$ satisfying:

• Hypergeometric in both $n$ and $k$
• $w(n,0) = 1$
• Such that the WZ algorithm applied to $F(n)w(n,k)$ returns a linear difference operator

3. Unified Proof Structure

All proofs follow the same pattern:

1. Construct appropriate $F(n,k)$
2. Apply the WZ algorithm to obtain a difference operator
3. Use Theorem 1.1 to construct a standard WZ pair
4. Simplify via telescoping summation
5. Analyze the remainder using Long-Ramakrishna's $\Gamma_p$ approximation

Experimental Setup

Verification Methods

The paper validates the method's effectiveness through:

1. Symbolic Computation: Using Maple for WZ algorithm, Gosper algorithm, polynomial factorization, and other calculations
2. Concrete Proofs: Providing complete proofs for each Van Hamme supercongruence
3. Boundary Case Verification: Checking small prime cases (e.g., $p=3$)

Comparative Methods

Comparison with existing proof methods:

• Van Hamme's original proofs
• Various approaches by Swisher, Long, Mortenson, and other scholars
• WZ method proofs by Zudilin and Osburn

Experimental Results

Main Results

Theorem 1.2 (Principal Theorem)

Van Hamme supercongruences (B.2)-(H.2) can all be proved using the streamlined WZ method by combining Theorem 1.1 with Long-Ramakrishna's Theorem 2.1. Specifically:

• (G.2) holds modulo $p^4$
• (H.2) can be extended to modulo $p^3$ when $p \equiv 3 \pmod{4}$

Proposition 1.3

Van Hamme supercongruence (I.2) follows directly from applying the Gosper algorithm.

Concrete Proof Example

Proof Structure for (H.2)

1. Construct WZ apparatus: $w(n,k) = \frac{(-1)^k(3/4)_k}{(1/4)_k(1/2)_k^2}$
2. Apply telescoping summation: $\sum_{n=0}^{\lambda_2} \tilde{F}(n,k+1) - \sum_{n=0}^{\lambda_2} \tilde{F}(n,k) = \tilde{G}(\lambda_2+1,k)$
3. $\Gamma_p$ Analysis: Use Long-Ramakrishna approximation to analyze the $p$-adic valuation of $\tilde{G}(\lambda_2+1,k)$

WZ Apparatus Table

The paper provides a complete list of WZ apparatuses (Table 2), demonstrating the specific apparatus corresponding to each supercongruence.

Related Work

History of Supercongruence Research

• Van Hamme (1997): Proposed 13 supercongruence conjectures
• Multiple Scholars' Contributions: McCarthy-Osburn, Mortenson, Zudilin, Long, Swisher, and others separately proved different supercongruences
• Recent Developments: Latest WZ method applications by Guo-Wang, Jana-Karmakar, and others

Development of the WZ Method

• Wilf-Zeilberger Algorithm: Provides an algorithmic proof framework
• Zudilin, Osburn-Zudilin: First applied the WZ method to supercongruences
• This Paper's Contribution: Systematized the selection process for WZ pairs

$p$-adic Analysis Tools

• Morita $p$-adic Gamma Function: Definition and properties of $\Gamma_p$
• Long-Ramakrishna Approximation: Provides high-precision $p$-adic approximation of $\Gamma_p$

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Method Universality: At least 9 (out of 13) Van Hamme supercongruences can be proved using the WZ method
2. Degree of Systematization: Provides a mechanized procedure for finding WZ pairs
3. Extension Capability: The method naturally produces known extensions modulo higher prime powers

Limitations

1. Scope of Applicability: The method primarily applies to Van Hamme-type supercongruences
2. Computational Complexity: Still requires support from symbolic computation systems
3. Creativity Requirements: Although the process is systematized, some insight is still needed in selecting initial forms

Future Directions

1. Higher Moduli: Investigate higher modulus extensions of (C.2) and (D.2)
2. Other Supercongruence Families: Extend the method to Sun's 100 conjectures
3. $q$-Analogues: Incorporate $q$-microscoping techniques

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Theoretical Contribution: Theorem 1.1 provides a systematic method for handling nonlinear difference operators
2. Unification: Provides proofs with identical structure for seven different supercongruences
3. Algorithmization: Partially algorithmizes the creative aspect of WZ pair selection
4. Completeness: Each proof is complete and self-contained
5. Extensibility: Naturally produces known results modulo higher prime powers

Weaknesses

1. Limited Generality: The method primarily targets specific types of supercongruences
2. Computational Dependence: Heavily relies on symbolic computation systems
3. Theoretical Depth: While systematizing the process, it lacks deep theoretical explanation for why these specific forms are effective

Impact

1. Methodological Contribution: Provides new systematized tools for supercongruence proofs
2. Practical Value: Applicable to proving other supercongruence conjectures
3. Theoretical Significance: Connects the WZ method with $p$-adic analysis

Applicable Scenarios

• Research on $p$-adic congruences of hypergeometric series
• Combinatorial problems requiring systematized proof methods
• Interdisciplinary research between $p$-adic analysis and algorithmic mathematics

References

The paper cites 26 relevant references, covering important works in multiple fields including supercongruence theory, the WZ method, and $p$-adic analysis, providing a solid theoretical foundation for the research.

Summary: This is a paper of significant importance in number theory. By systematizing the application of the WZ method in proving supercongruences, it provides powerful tools for this active research area. Both the theoretical contributions and practical value of the paper are outstanding, representing important progress in supercongruence research.