A Lecture Note on Covering Theory in Representation Theory of Algebras

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2508.01563
• Title: A lecture note on covering theory in representation theory of algebras
• Authors: Yuming Liu, Nengqun Li, Bohan Xing, Pengyun Chen
• Classification: math.RT (Representation Theory)
• Publication Date: October 14, 2025 version
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.01563

Abstract

Covering theory is an important tool in the representation theory of algebras; however, related results and proofs are scattered throughout the literature. This paper presents covering theory at an elementary level and systematically organizes the core concepts, main theorems, and applications of this field.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Background

Covering theory plays a crucial role in the representation theory of algebras, particularly in the study of algebras of finite representation type. This theory was introduced and developed by scholars such as Bongartz-Gabriel, Gabriel, Green, and Riedtmann, and is primarily used for:

1. Study of algebras of finite representation type: Through Galois covering theory, representation problems of complex algebras can be reduced to more tractable cases
2. Classification of module categories: Covering theory provides powerful tools for understanding relationships between indecomposable modules
3. Applications of Auslander-Reiten theory: Covering functors preserve the properties of AR-sequences

Research Motivation

Although covering theory holds an important position in representation theory, related results and proofs are scattered throughout the literature, lacking a systematic introductory treatment. This paper aims to:

1. Provide a systematic introduction to covering theory
2. Integrate important results dispersed across various sources
3. Present the core content of the theory at an elementary level
4. Provide researchers with easily comprehensible reference materials

Core Contributions

1. Systematic organization: Results on covering theory scattered in the literature have been systematically organized and uniformly presented
2. Elementary exposition: The core concepts and main theorems of covering theory are presented at an elementary level
3. Complete theoretical framework: A comprehensive theoretical framework from basic definitions to advanced applications has been constructed
4. Rich examples: Numerous concrete examples are provided to aid understanding of abstract concepts
5. Application demonstration: The important applications of covering theory in determining the representation type of algebras are showcased

Detailed Methodology

Theoretical Framework Structure

The paper constructs a four-level theoretical framework:

1. Covering Theory of Quivers with Relations (Chapter 1)

Definition 1.1 (Covering map): Let Q and Q' be quivers, and let f : Q → Q' be a quiver morphism. If for each x ∈ Q₀, f induces a bijection between the set of arrows emanating from (or arriving at) x and the set of arrows emanating from (or arriving at) f(x), then f is called a covering.

Key properties:

• Covering maps possess the unique path lifting property
• Covering maps induce covering functors between path categories

Definition 1.4 (Covering of quivers with relations): Let (Q,I) and (Q',I') be quivers with relations, and let f : (Q,I) → (Q',I') be a morphism of quivers with relations. f is a covering if:

1. f is a covering of quivers
2. For any minimal or zero relation ρ' in I', there exists a unique lift

2. Galois Covering Theory

Definition 1.10 (Galois covering): A morphism f : (Q,I) → (Q',I') is called a Galois covering if there exists a (Q,I)-automorphism group G acting on Q such that G acts freely on Q, and there exists an isomorphism ν : (Q/G, Ī) → (Q',I') such that the corresponding diagram commutes.

Universal Covering Theorem (Proposition 1.18): For any quiver with relations (Q,I), there exists a universal covering π : (Q̃, Ĩ) → (Q,I), which is a Galois covering with Π(Q,I) as its group.

3. Push-down and Pull-up Functors (Chapter 2)

For a covering π : (R,L) → (Q,I), define:

Push-down functor: Fλ : MOD(R,L) → MOD(Q,I)

• For a module M, define (FλM)ₐ := ⊕_{πx=a} Mₓ
• Preserves exactness and forms an adjoint pair with the pull-up functor F•

Pull-up functor: F• : MOD(Q,I) → MOD(R,L)

• For a module V, define (F•V)ₓ := V_{πx}
• Provides the reverse module construction

Technical Innovations

1. Unified definitional framework: Definitions from different sources are unified under a consistent framework
2. Constructive proof methods: The existence of universal coverings is demonstrated through explicit construction
3. Functor methods: Systematic use of functor language to handle covering theory
4. Classification theory: Algebras are classified by representation type through covering theory

Main Theorems and Results

Core Theorems

Theorem 2.11 (Gabriel-Martínez-Villa-de la Peña): Let Λ be a locally bounded k-category over an algebraically closed field k, and let G act freely on Λ. Then Λ is locally representation-finite if and only if Λ/G is locally representation-finite. In this case, the push-down functor establishes a bijection between G-orbits and isomorphism classes of indecomposable modules.

Proposition 2.14: Let π : (R,L) → (Q,I) be a Galois covering by a group G. If kQ/I is a locally representation-finite category, then kR/L is also a locally representation-finite category.

Theorem 3.9 (Second type module theorem): Under appropriate conditions, there exists a categorical equivalence: $E : \coprod_{L \in S_0} (\text{mod}L/G_L)/(\text{mod}^1L/G_L) \to (\text{mod}\Lambda/G)/(\text{mod}^1\Lambda/G)$

Application Results

Proposition 2.16: If the quiver Q of an algebra Λ satisfies the condition that each vertex has at least two incoming and two outgoing arrows, then Λ is not of finite type.

Proposition 2.18: Algebras containing specific subquivers are of wild type, which can be determined through the tree structure in the universal covering.

Concrete Application Examples

Example 1.22 (Riedtmann example)

Consider the quiver Q: 1 ⟷^{α,β} 2 ⟷^γ, with ideal I₁ = ⟨α² - γβ, βγ - βαγ, α⁴⟩

• The universal covering of (Q,I₁) is itself, since Π(Q,I₁) = {1}
• For I₂ = ⟨α² - γβ, βγ⟩, the universal covering has an infinite periodic structure

Example 3.15 (Special biserial algebras)

Complex special biserial algebras are analyzed through covering theory, proving their tame property and determining the structure of all indecomposable modules.

Theoretical Significance and Application Value

Determination of Representation Type

Covering theory provides effective tools for determining the representation type of algebras:

1. Finite type: Determined through the structure of universal coverings
2. Tame type: Analyzed through second type modules
3. Wild type: Determined through the existence of specific substructures in coverings

Module Category Structure

Covering theory reveals the deep structure of module categories:

1. Relationships of AR-quivers: Galois coverings preserve AR-sequences
2. Classification of indecomposable modules: Classification is established through orbit correspondence
3. Properties of derived categories: Covering functors induce relationships between derived categories

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Strong systematicity: Forms a complete system from basic definitions to advanced applications
2. Rich examples: Numerous concrete examples aid understanding of abstract concepts
3. Theoretical completeness: Covers the main aspects of covering theory
4. Application-oriented: Demonstrates the practical value of the theory in real problems
5. Clear exposition: Complex theory is presented at an elementary level

Academic Value

1. Pedagogical value: Provides excellent introductory material for learning covering theory
2. Reference value: Integrates scattered literature results for easy consultation
3. Research value: Provides a solid foundation for further research
4. Application value: Demonstrates practical applications of the theory in algebraic classification

Limitations

1. Depth constraints: As an introductory lecture note, some advanced results are not elaborated in detail
2. Simplified proofs: Some complex proofs are simplified or omitted
3. Limited scope of applications: Primarily focuses on classical cases with limited coverage of recent developments

Impact Assessment

This lecture note is expected to have a positive impact on the algebraic representation theory community:

1. Educational impact: Provides important reference material for teaching in this field
2. Research advancement: Lowers the barrier to entry, encouraging more researchers to enter the field
3. Theoretical integration: Unifies scattered results and promotes theoretical development
4. Application extension: The demonstrated methods can be generalized to other related problems

Conclusion

This paper successfully presents the core content of covering theory in a systematic and elementary manner, providing valuable learning and reference resources for the algebraic representation theory community. By integrating important results scattered throughout the literature, it constructs a complete theoretical framework from basic concepts to advanced applications, and demonstrates the practical application value of the theory through rich examples. This work will contribute to the advancement of teaching and research in covering theory.