Well-posedness for a fourth-order nonisothermal tumor growth model of Caginalp type

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2508.07979
• Title: Well-posedness for a fourth-order nonisothermal tumor growth model of Caginalp type
• Authors: Giulia Cavalleri, Pierluigi Colli, Elisabetta Rocca (University of Pavia & IMATI-C.N.R.)
• Classification: math.AP (Analysis of PDEs)
• Publication Date: October 10, 2025 (arXiv v2)
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.07979

Abstract

This paper introduces a Caginalp-type nonisothermal phase-field system describing tumor growth under hyperthermia. The model couples a possibly viscous Cahn-Hilliard equation (governing the evolution of healthy and tumor cell phases), a heat balance equation, and a reaction-diffusion equation for nutrient concentration. The resulting nonlinear system incorporates chemotaxis and active transport effects, equipped with no-flux boundary conditions. The analysis proceeds through a two-step approximation procedure involving regularization of the potential function and a Faedo-Galerkin discretization scheme. Under stronger regularity assumptions, the existence of strong solutions is further established, and their uniqueness is demonstrated through continuous dependence results.

Research Background and Motivation

1. Problem Significance

Cancer remains one of the leading causes of death globally, and with population growth and aging, the number of new cases annually is expected to continue increasing. Hyperthermia as a therapeutic approach has been explored for decades, functioning by raising local, regional, or systemic temperature above 39°C and maintaining it for 30-60 minutes.

2. Different Effects of Hyperthermia

• Moderate hyperthermia (<42°C): Increases tumor perfusion, primarily due to heat-induced vasodilation, improving drug delivery for chemotherapy or immunotherapy
• High hyperthermia (42-50°C): Produces direct cytotoxic effects and induces vascular damage, impairing DNA repair mechanisms
• Thermal ablation (>50°C): Causes irreparable cellular damage and apoptotic necrosis of tumor tissue

3. Limitations of Existing Research

Although the literature on tumor growth models based on the Cahn-Hilliard equation is extensive, to the authors' knowledge, only recent contributions Ipo22 incorporate temperature effects. This paper proposes a different system and employs a different analytical strategy, proving not only the existence of weak solutions but also establishing higher regularity and continuous dependence on data.

Core Contributions

1. Establishment of a new nonisothermal tumor growth model: Proposes a Caginalp-type phase-field system coupling temperature, phase-field variables, and nutrient concentration
2. Rigorous mathematical analysis: Proves the existence of weak solutions (Theorem 3.5)
3. Regularity results: Establishes the existence of strong solutions under stronger assumptions (Theorem 3.6)
4. Uniqueness proof: Demonstrates uniqueness of strong solutions through continuous dependence results (Theorem 3.8)
5. Innovative analytical techniques: Employs a two-step approximation procedure (potential function regularization and Faedo-Galerkin discretization)

Detailed Methodology

Problem Formulation

The study investigates the well-posedness of the following PDE system on a smooth domain Ω ⊆ ℝᵈ (d=2,3):

∂t(θ + ℓφ) - Δθ = u                                    (1.1a)
∂tφ - Δμ = (λPσ - λA - λEθ)h(φ)                        (1.1b)  
μ = τ∂tφ - Δφ + β(φ) + π(φ) - χσ - Λθ                 (1.1c)
∂tσ - Δ(σ - χφ) = -λCσh(φ) + λB(σB - σ) - λDσk(θ)    (1.1d)

equipped with no-flux boundary conditions and initial conditions.

Model Architecture

1. Physical Interpretation

• θ: Relative temperature with respect to a critical value
• φ: Difference in volume fraction between tumor and healthy cells
• σ: Nutrient concentration
• μ: Chemical potential

2. System Components

• (1.1a): Heat balance equation, where u is a given heat source and ℓ is a constant related to tissue latent heat
• (1.1b)-(1.1c): (Possibly viscous) Cahn-Hilliard equation governing the evolution of phase-field variable φ
• (1.1d): Parabolic equation for nutrient concentration

3. Key Features

• Chemotaxis: The Cahn-Hilliard equation includes the term div(χ∇σ), describing tumor cell migration toward high nutrient concentration regions
• Active transport: The nutrient equation includes the term -div(-χ∇φ), modeling preferential nutrient flow toward tumor cells
• Temperature effects: Modeled through the term -λEθ representing the cytotoxic effects of temperature

Technical Innovations

1. Free Energy Functional

The system is based on the total free energy functional:

F(θ,φ,σ) = ∫Ω [½|∇φ|² + β̂(φ) + π̂(φ) + ½|σ|² + χσ(1-φ) - Λθφ] dx

2. Variational Derivative Method

The chemical potential and fluxes are defined through variational derivatives of the free energy, ensuring thermodynamic consistency.

3. Source Term Modeling

• Mass source: Uφ(θ,φ,σ) := (λPσ - λA - λEθ)h(φ)
• Nutrient source: Uσ(θ,φ,σ) := -λCσh(φ) + λB(σB - σ) - λDσk(θ)

Experimental Setup

Mathematical Assumptions

(H1) ℓ, Λ, χ are positive constants; τ and other λ parameters are non-negative constants (H2) u ∈ L∞(Q) is bounded, σB ∈ L²(Q) (H3) h, k ∈ C⁰'¹(ℝ) and bounded (H4) Potential function β̂ is convex and non-negative, π̂ has restricted growth

Solution Definition

Weak solution is defined as a quadruple (θ,φ,μ,σ) satisfying:

• θ ∈ H¹(0,T;V*) ∩ C⁰(0,T;H) ∩ L²(0,T;V)
• φ ∈ H¹(0,T;V*) ∩ C⁰w(0,T;V) ∩ L²(0,T;W)
• μ ∈ L²(0,T;V)
• σ ∈ H¹(0,T;H) ∩ C⁰(0,T;V) ∩ L²(0,T;W)

Experimental Results

Main Results

Theorem 3.5 (Existence of Weak Solutions)

Under assumptions (H1)-(H4) and initial data conditions, the PDE system (1.1)-(1.3) admits at least one weak solution satisfying the estimate:

‖θ‖H¹(V*)∩L∞(H)∩L²(V) + ‖φ‖H¹(V*)∩L∞(V)∩L²(W) + ‖τ^(1/2)φ‖H¹(H) 
+ ‖β(φ)‖L²(H) + ‖μ‖L²(V) + ‖σ‖H¹(H)∩L∞(V)∩L²(W) ≤ C₁

Theorem 3.6 (Regularity)

Under stronger initial data assumptions, there exists a strong solution satisfying:

• θ ∈ H¹(0,T;H) ∩ L∞(0,T;V) ∩ L²(0,T;W) ∩ L∞(Q)
• φ ∈ W^(1,∞)(0,T;V*) ∩ H¹(0,T;V) ∩ L∞(0,T;W)
• μ ∈ L∞(0,T;V) ∩ L²(0,T;W)

Theorem 3.8 (Continuous Dependence and Uniqueness)

Strong solutions satisfy a continuous dependence inequality, thereby guaranteeing uniqueness.

Proof Techniques

1. Two-Step Approximation

• First step: Moreau-Yosida approximation βε replacing β
• Second step: Faedo-Galerkin discretization scheme

2. A Priori Estimates

Boundedness of solutions is established through four levels of a priori estimates:

• First estimate: Basic energy estimate
• Second estimate: L¹ boundedness of β̂ε(φⁿ)
• Third estimate: Higher regularity
• Fourth estimate: Control of time derivatives

3. Limiting Process

First take n→∞ (Galerkin), then ε→0 (regularization), utilizing compactness and monotonicity theory.

Related Work

Cahn-Hilliard Equation Theory

Classical Cahn-Hilliard equations typically assume constant temperature, but from a modeling perspective this is not always reasonable. Consequently, numerous nonisothermal phase transition models have been proposed.

Tumor Growth Models

The literature on tumor growth models based on the Cahn-Hilliard equation is extensive, typically considering nutrient dynamics, but few works incorporate temperature effects.

Distinction from Ipo22

Although both address the coupling of phase-field dynamics with thermal effects, this paper treats a different system and employs different analytical strategies, establishing stronger regularity and continuous dependence results.

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Establishes a complete mathematical model describing tumor growth under hyperthermia
2. Rigorously proves the existence of weak and strong solutions
3. Demonstrates uniqueness of strong solutions through continuous dependence results
4. Provides a foundation for analyzing related optimal control problems

Limitations

1. Potential function restrictions: Cannot handle logarithmic or double-obstacle potentials
2. Physical constraints: Cannot guarantee φ remains in the physically relevant interval -1,1
3. Dimensional restriction: Analysis limited to d=2,3
4. Boundary conditions: Only considers no-flux boundary conditions

Future Directions

1. Extension to more general classes of potential functions
2. Consideration of other types of boundary conditions
3. Investigation of related optimal control problems (addressed in subsequent work CCR)
4. Development and implementation of numerical methods

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Mathematical rigor: Solid proof techniques using standard tools from modern PDE theory
2. Physical relevance: Model effectively combines biological and physical principles
3. Completeness: Complete theoretical framework from weak solutions to strong solutions to uniqueness
4. Novelty: First systematic analysis of this class of nonisothermal tumor growth models

Weaknesses

1. Technical limitations: Certain technical assumptions (such as growth conditions on potential functions) restrict the scope of application
2. Absence of numerical verification: Pure theoretical analysis lacking numerical experiments
3. Lack of biological validation: No comparison with actual tumor growth data
4. Parameter sensitivity: Does not discuss biological significance and sensitivity of model parameters

Impact

1. Theoretical contribution: Makes important contributions to the theory of nonisothermal phase-field models
2. Application prospects: Provides mathematical foundation for optimizing hyperthermia treatment
3. Methodological value: Analytical techniques applicable to other similar problems
4. Reproducibility: Theoretical results are fully reproducible, laying foundation for subsequent research

Applicable Scenarios

1. Tumor treatment modeling: Particularly suitable for mathematical modeling of hyperthermia effects
2. Phase-field theory: Applicable to other nonisothermal phase transition problems
3. Biomathematics: Provides analytical framework for other biomedical problems
4. Optimal control: Provides theoretical basis for optimization of treatment strategies

References

The paper cites 35 relevant references, covering important works in phase-field theory, tumor growth modeling, nonisothermal system analysis, and other related fields, particularly the pioneering work of Caginalp and recent developments.

Overall Assessment: This is a high-quality mathematical analysis paper making important theoretical contributions to the field of nonisothermal tumor growth modeling. Although lacking numerical verification and practical applications, it establishes a solid mathematical foundation for further development in this field.