Rephasing Invariant Formulae for CP Phases in General Parameterizations of Flavor Mixing Matrix and Exact Sum Rules with Unitarity Triangles

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2508.17866
• Title: Rephasing invariant formulae for CP phases in general parameterizations of flavor mixing matrix and exact sum rules with unitarity triangles
• Authors: Masaki J. S. Yang (Department of Physics, Saitama University; Faculty of Engineering, Yokohama National University)
• Classification: hep-ph (High Energy Physics - Phenomenology)
• Submission Date: August 2025 (v2: October 15, 2025)
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.17866

Abstract

This paper proposes rephasing invariant formulae for CP phases associated with nine Euler-angle-type parameterizations of the flavor mixing matrix: $\delta^{(\alpha i)} = \arg[V_{\alpha1}V_{\alpha2}V_{\alpha3}V_{1i}V_{2i}V_{3i}/V_{\alpha i}^3 \det V]$, where $\alpha$ and $i$ denote the row and column carrying trivial phases in a given parameterization. Furthermore, the authors demonstrate that the phases $\delta^{(\alpha i)}$ and the nine angles $\Phi_{\alpha i}$ of unitarity triangles satisfy compact sum rules: $\delta^{(\alpha,i+2)} - \delta^{(\alpha,i+1)} = \Phi_{\alpha+1,i} - \Phi_{\alpha+2,i}$ and $\delta^{(\alpha+1,i)} - \delta^{(\alpha+2,i)} = \Phi_{\alpha,i+2} - \Phi_{\alpha,i+1}$, where all indices are taken cyclically modulo 3. These relations represent a natural generalization of the previous result $\delta_{\mathrm{PDG}}+\delta_{\mathrm{KM}}=\pi-\alpha+\gamma$.

Research Background and Motivation

1. Core Problem: Quark and lepton flavor mixing constitute an important component of particle physics development and also represent an intrinsic mathematical research interest. Among various representations of the mixing matrix, Euler-angle-type parameterizations based on three rotation matrices and one unique CP phase allow nine possible forms. However, the nine phases initially appear to exhibit chaotic values without obvious patterns.
2. Significance: CP violation is an essential component of the Standard Model of particle physics. Understanding the relationships between CP phases in different parameterizations is crucial for both experimental verification and theoretical development. The six unitarity triangles generated by unitarity conditions and their angles appear to possess independent values; discovering the intrinsic connections between them is an important theoretical physics problem.
3. Existing Limitations: While previous research has discovered rephasing-invariant CP phase formulae and produced simple sum rules $\delta_{PDG} + \delta_{KM} = \pi - \alpha + \gamma$, there lacks a systematic relationship connecting the nine CP phases and the nine angles of unitarity triangles.
4. Research Motivation: The authors aim to organize relationships connecting the nine CP phases and nine unitarity triangle angles by first deriving rephasing-invariant formulae for each CP phase in terms of mixing matrix elements and determinants, then proposing exact sum rules between phases and angles.

Core Contributions

1. Derived rephasing-invariant formulae for nine parameterizations: Provided unified expressions for each CP phase $\delta^{(\alpha i)}$ in the nine Euler-angle-type parameterizations of the flavor mixing matrix.
2. Established exact sum rules between CP phases and unitarity triangle angles: Discovered two sets of transfer relations that systematically connect the nine CP phases with nine unitarity triangle angles.
3. Proved completeness of irreducible fifth-order invariants: The proposed nine formulae constitute a necessary and sufficient set of irreducible fifth-order invariants constructed using determinants.
4. Generalized known results: Reproduced the previous special relation $\delta_{PDG} + \delta_{KM} = \pi - \alpha + \gamma$ as a special case of the general sum rules.

Detailed Methodology

Task Definition

This paper investigates the unified description of CP phases in the flavor mixing matrix V under nine different Euler-angle-type parameterizations $V^{(\alpha i)}$, where each parameterization is defined by specifying that the α-th row and i-th column carry trivial phases.

Theoretical Framework

1. Parameterization Definition

The authors employ nine parameterizations proposed by Fritzsch and Xing:

$P_k: V^{(\alpha i)} = R_1(\theta_1) R_2(\sigma, \delta^{(\alpha i)}) R_3(\theta_2)$

where rotation matrices are defined as:

• $R_{12}(\theta) = \begin{pmatrix} c_\theta & s_\theta & 0 \\ -s_\theta & c_\theta & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 1 \end{pmatrix}$
• $R_{23}(\sigma) = \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & c_\sigma & s_\sigma \\ 0 & -s_\sigma & c_\sigma \end{pmatrix}$
• $R_{31}(\tau) = \begin{pmatrix} c_\tau & 0 & s_\tau \\ 0 & 1 & 0 \\ -s_\tau & 0 & c_\tau \end{pmatrix}$

2. Derivation of Rephasing-Invariant Formulae

By considering the transformation from the mixing matrix V in an arbitrary basis to a specific parameterization $V^{(\alpha i)}$:

$V^{(\alpha i)} = \Psi_L^\dagger V \Psi_R$

where $\Psi_L$ and $\Psi_R$ are diagonal phase matrices, the inverse transformation is:

$V = \Psi_L V^{(\alpha i)} \Psi_R^\dagger$

Through the argument relationship of determinants, the general expression for the CP phase is obtained:

$\delta^{(\alpha i)} = \arg\left[\frac{V_{\alpha1}V_{\alpha2}V_{\alpha3}V_{1i}V_{2i}V_{3i}}{V_{\alpha i}^3 \det V}\right]$

3. Simplified Form

Since $V_{\alpha i}$ appears twice in the numerator, it can be cancelled to yield:

$\delta^{(\alpha i)} = \arg\left[\frac{(\prod_{j \neq i} V_{\alpha j})(\prod_{\beta \neq \alpha} V_{\beta i})}{V_{\alpha i} \det V}\right]$

Technical Innovations

1. Unified Formula: First provided unified rephasing-invariant expressions for nine different parameterizations, which are irreducible fifth-order invariants.
2. Transfer Matrix Method: Introduced the transfer matrix $T = \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 0 & 1 \\ 1 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 & 0 \end{pmatrix}$ to systematically describe relationships between phase differences and angle differences.
3. Cyclic Symmetry: Utilized cyclic symmetry of indices (modulo 3) to establish compact sum rules.

Experimental Setup

Numerical Verification Data

The authors employed the latest CKM matrix parameters provided by the UTfit collaboration:

• $\sin\theta_{12} = 0.22519 \pm 0.00083$
• $\sin\theta_{23} = 0.04200 \pm 0.00047$
• $\sin\theta_{13} = 0.003714 \pm 0.000092$
• $\delta = 1.137 \pm 0.022 = 65.15° \pm 1.3°$

Verification Methods

1. Direct Calculation: Computed numerical values of nine CP phases using rephasing-invariant formulae.
2. Cosine Verification: Cross-verified through independent calculation of $\cos\delta^{(\alpha i)}$ using matrix element magnitudes.
3. Sum Rule Verification: Numerically verified the proposed transfer relations.

Experimental Results

Main Results

1. Numerical Values of Nine CP Phases

$\begin{pmatrix} \delta^{(11)} & \delta^{(12)} & \delta^{(13)} \\ \delta^{(21)} & \delta^{(22)} & \delta^{(23)} \\ \delta^{(31)} & \delta^{(32)} & \delta^{(33)} \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix} 92.44° & 115.91° & 65.15° \\ 157.51° & 1.089° & 114.89° \\ 23.54° & 156.49° & 93.45° \end{pmatrix}$

where:

• $\delta_{PDG} = \delta^{(13)} = 65.15°$
• $\delta_{KM} = \pi - \delta^{(11)} = 87.56°$

2. Invariance of Row and Column Summations

All row and column summations of phases yield the same ninth-order invariant value: $\sum_i \delta^{(ij)} = \sum_j \delta^{(ij)} = 273.49°$

3. Cosine Value Verification

Cosine values obtained through independent calculation of matrix element magnitudes are in complete agreement with direct calculations, validating the correctness of the formulae.

Sum Rule Verification

Numerically verified two sets of transfer relations:

1. Column Transfer: $\delta^{(\alpha,i+2)} - \delta^{(\alpha,i+1)} = \Phi_{\alpha+1,i} - \Phi_{\alpha+2,i}$
2. Row Transfer: $\delta^{(\alpha+1,i)} - \delta^{(\alpha+2,i)} = \Phi_{\alpha,i+2} - \Phi_{\alpha,i+1}$

Reproduction of Known Results

Successfully reproduced the previous result: $\delta_{PDG} + \delta_{KM} = \pi - \alpha + \gamma$

as a special case of the first sum rule for $\alpha = 1, i = 2$.

Related Work

Historical Development

1. Mixing Matrix Parameterizations: Evolution from the original Kobayashi-Maskawa work through various parameterization schemes by Chau-Keung, Hall-Rasin, and others.
2. Unitarity Triangle Research: Systematic studies of unitarity triangles and their angles by Wu-Xing, Xing, Harrison, and others.
3. CP Phase Relations: Recent work by Yang et al. on rephasing-invariant formulae, discovering simple sum rules between CP phases and triangle angles.

Unique Contributions of This Work

Compared to existing work, this paper provides for the first time:

• Complete unified treatment of nine parameterizations
• Systematic framework of sum rules
• Complete set of irreducible fifth-order invariants

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Unified Formulae: Established unified rephasing-invariant expressions for CP phases in nine Euler-angle-type parameterizations.
2. Systematic Relationships: Discovered a complete system of sum rules between CP phases and unitarity triangle angles.
3. Theoretical Completeness: Proved that the proposed nine formulae constitute a necessary and sufficient set of irreducible fifth-order invariants.
4. Experimental Guidance: Provided a valuable theoretical framework for future experimental tests of CP violation.

Limitations

1. Scope of Application: The formulae are specifically designed for 3×3 unitary matrices; generalization to higher dimensions requires further research.
2. Majorana Phases: While mentioned to remain valid for lepton Majorana phases, specific applications in this case are not discussed in detail.
3. Experimental Precision: Numerical verification is based on current experimental precision; future more accurate measurements may reveal additional subtle structures.

Future Directions

1. Higher-Order Invariants: Study relationships between higher-order invariants and these fifth-order invariants.
2. Phenomenological Applications: Apply these relations to specific CP violation phenomenology studies.
3. Symmetry Exploration: Explore deeper symmetry principles that may underlie the sum rules.

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Mathematical Rigor: The derivation process is logically clear, mathematical expressions are accurate, and a complete chain of proofs is provided.
2. Unification: For the first time, provided a unified theoretical framework for nine seemingly unrelated parameterizations, revealing hidden mathematical structures.
3. Practical Value: The formulae have clear physical meaning and can be directly applied to experimental data analysis and theoretical calculations.
4. Sufficient Verification: Theoretical predictions are verified through multiple independent methods, enhancing credibility of results.

Shortcomings

1. Physical Interpretation: While mathematical relationships are clear, discussion of the physical reasons behind these relationships is relatively limited.
2. Generalizability: Primarily focuses on the 3×3 case; discussion of more general cases is insufficient.
3. Application Examples: Lacks detailed examples of applying these formulae to specific physical problems.

Impact

1. Theoretical Contribution: Provides new mathematical tools and insights for CP violation theory, potentially inspiring subsequent theoretical developments.
2. Experimental Guidance: Provides a systematic theoretical framework for experimental measurement of CP phases, facilitating experimental design and data analysis.
3. Educational Value: Unified formulae help students and researchers understand relationships between different parameterizations.

Applicable Scenarios

1. Theoretical Calculations: In theoretical research requiring calculation of CP phases under different parameterizations.
2. Experimental Analysis: In analyzing experimental data, particularly in cases involving CP violation measurements.
3. Phenomenological Studies: As an important theoretical tool when studying phenomenological models of CP violation.
4. Educational Research: As teaching material for understanding flavor mixing and CP violation.

References

The paper cites 36 relevant references, covering the complete development from the pioneering work of Kobayashi-Maskawa to the latest UTfit experimental results, providing sufficient theoretical foundation and experimental support for the research.

Overall Assessment: This is a high-quality paper with significant contributions to the field of CP violation theory. Through rigorous mathematical derivation, it reveals deep connections between seemingly complex CP phases, providing valuable tools and insights for both theoretical development and experimental research in this field.