Imprints of screened dark energy on nonlocal quantum correlations

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2508.18448
• Title: Imprints of screened dark energy on nonlocal quantum correlations
• Authors: Fabiano Feleppa, Gaetano Lambiase, Sunny Vagnozzi
• Classification: gr-qc astro-ph.CO hep-ph quant-ph
• Publication Date: October 14, 2025 (arXiv preprint)
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.18448

Abstract

This paper investigates how screening mechanisms can be probed through their effects on nonlocal quantum correlations between entangled spin pairs. These screening mechanisms reconcile the contradiction between light scalar fields driving cosmic acceleration and local fifth-force constraints. The authors consider a thought experiment involving a pair of massive spin-1/2 particles orbiting Earth, assessing their nonlocal correlations through spin observables related to the Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt (CHSH) inequality. The study finds that screening effects suppress the degree of CHSH inequality violation relative to flat spacetime.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Definition

1. Dark Energy Origin Problem: Observations of late-time cosmic acceleration require a dark energy mechanism to explain, but the simple cosmological constant Λ faces severe fine-tuning problems and inconsistencies with observations.
2. Fifth-Force Constraints: Light scalar fields as dark energy candidates would produce unobserved long-range fifth forces, conflicting with local gravitational tests.
3. Testing Screening Mechanisms: New methods are needed to test screening mechanisms that dynamically suppress fifth forces in high-density environments while allowing deviations from general relativity at cosmological scales.

Research Motivation

• Existing screening mechanism tests rely primarily on cosmological observations, astrophysical observations, and laboratory experiments
• The intersection of quantum information and gravity offers new possibilities for testing modified gravity theories
• The influence of spacetime curvature on quantum entanglement evolution provides a new avenue for probing screening effects

Core Contributions

1. First proposal of a method to test screened dark energy through quantum nonlocality, establishing a new bridge between gravity and quantum information
2. Development of a universal formalism applying spin evolution theory in curved spacetime to screened modified gravity theories
3. Systematic calculation of the effects of three major screening mechanisms (chameleon, symmetron, dilaton) on the CHSH inequality
4. Identification of parameter space regions currently unconstrained where screening contributions can be comparable to general relativity effects
5. Proof of principle demonstrating the feasibility of testing screening mechanisms through quantum nonlocality

Methodology Details

Theoretical Framework

Scalar-Tensor Theory

The authors work in the Jordan frame, where matter is minimally coupled to the Jordan frame metric $\tilde{g}_{\mu\nu}$. Under 1PN approximation, the metric around a point mass can be written as:

$d\tilde{s}^2 = -\left(1 + 2\Phi\right)dt^2 + \left(1 - 2\Psi\right)\left(dr^2 + r^2d\Omega^2\right)$

where the gravitational potentials are: $\Phi = -\frac{G(\epsilon)M}{r} + \beta(\epsilon)\frac{G^2(\epsilon)M^2}{r^2}$$\Psi = -\gamma(\epsilon)\frac{G(\epsilon)M}{r}$

The parameters $G(\epsilon)$, $\gamma(\epsilon)$, $\beta(\epsilon)$ depend on the scalar charge parameter $\epsilon$.

Spin Evolution Formalism

In curved spacetime, spin state evolution is described by Wigner rotation. For spin-1/2 particles, the D-matrix is:

$D^{(1/2)}_{\sigma'\sigma}[W(x)] = \exp\left(-\frac{i}{2}\theta_{31}\sigma_y\Delta\tau\right)$

The key parameter is: $\theta_{31} = \cosh(\zeta)\sinh(\zeta)\left[\partial_r\Phi - \frac{1 + \Psi(r) - r\partial_r\Psi(r)}{r}\right]$

CHSH Inequality

The initial EPR singlet state $|\chi\rangle$ evolves after Wigner rotation to $|\chi'\rangle$, with the CHSH parameter becoming: $S'[|\chi'\rangle] = 2\sqrt{2}\cos^2\Delta$

where the critical angle is: $\Delta = \bar{\phi}\{\cosh(\zeta)[1 - r\partial_r(\Phi + \Psi)] - 1\}$

Application of Screening Mechanisms

Chameleon Mechanism

• Potential: $V(\phi) = \Lambda^{4+n}/\phi^n$
• Coupling function: $F(\phi) = \exp(\beta_m\phi/M_{Pl})$
• PPN parameters: $G_{cham} \simeq G\left(1 + \frac{\beta_m\phi_\infty}{M_{Pl}\Phi_N}\right)$$\gamma_{cham} \simeq 1 - \frac{2\beta_m\phi_\infty}{M_{Pl}\Phi_N}$

Symmetron Mechanism

• Potential: $V(\phi) = -\frac{1}{2}\mu^2\phi^2 + \frac{\lambda}{4}\phi^4$
• Coupling function: $F(\phi) = 1 + \phi^2/M_{sym}^2$
• Z2 Symmetry Breaking: Occurs in low-density regions $\rho < M_{sym}^2\mu^2$

Dilaton Mechanism

• Potential: $V(\phi) = V_0\exp(-\phi/M_{Pl})$
• Coupling function: $F(\phi) = 1 + (\phi-\phi_*)^2/(2M_{dil}^2)$
• Environment Dependence: Decoupling achieved as $\phi \to \phi_*$

Experimental Setup

Thought Experiment Design

• Orbital altitude: 500 km above Earth (similar to satellite entanglement experiments)
• Background density: $\rho_\infty \sim 10^{-6}$ eV$^4$
• Particle velocity: Rapidity $\zeta \sim 5 \times 10^{-5}$ (corresponding to velocity $v \sim 15$ km/s)
• Orbital geometry: Circular orbit in the equatorial plane

Detector Configuration

• EPR source located at $\phi = 0$
• Two detectors positioned at $\phi = \pm\bar{\phi}$
• Measurement of four spin component directions to calculate CHSH parameter

Experimental Results

Chameleon Mechanism

In parameter space $(n, \beta_m)$:

• When $n \lesssim 0.25$, chameleon contribution can be comparable to GR effects
• Cassini constraints exclude most regions with $\Delta_{cham}/\Delta_{GR} > 1$
• Unconstrained windows exist at $0.1 \lesssim n \lesssim 0.25$ with small $\beta_m$ values

Symmetron Mechanism

For different scalar mass values $\mu$:

• $\mu = 1$ meV: Windows exist where $\Delta_{sym}/\Delta_{GR} \sim O(1)$
• As $\mu$ increases, Mercury perihelion constraints become more stringent
• Constraint condition: $\log_{10}\beta_{sym} \gtrsim -9$, where $\beta_{sym} = \lambda(M_{sym}/\text{GeV})^2$

Dilaton Mechanism

• For $V_0 = 1$ MeV$^4$: Parameter regions exist where dilaton effects are significant
• As $V_0$ increases, screening effects weaken and Mercury constraints become stricter
• Viable regions identified in $(\lambda_{dil}, A_2)$ parameter space

Detection Feasibility Analysis

Current technological limitations:

• Best CHSH measurement precision: $\delta S/S \sim 10^{-3}$ Ref. 355
• Minimum resolvable angle: $\Delta_{min} \sim 10^{-2}$
• Required precision: $\Delta \sim 10^{-9}$ requires $\delta S/S \sim 10^{-18}$

Conclusion: Direct detection with current technology is extremely difficult, but provides targets for future technological development.

Related Work

Quantum-Gravity Intersection Research

• Pioneering work by Terashima and Ueda 80: First study of spacetime curvature effects on Bell inequalities
• Recent developments: Broad interest in using quantum correlations to test fundamental physics 86-160
• This paper is the first application of this method to screened dark energy

Screening Mechanism Tests

• Traditional methods: Cosmological observations, astrophysical tests, laboratory experiments 66
• This paper provides a novel quantum information approach
• Comparison with existing constraints (Cassini, Mercury perihelion, etc.)

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Proof of Principle: Successfully demonstrates the feasibility of testing screened dark energy through quantum nonlocality
2. Parameter Constraints: Identifies regions in currently unconstrained parameter space where screening effects are observable
3. Technical Challenges: Current detection precision falls far short of required levels

Limitations

1. Detection Challenges: Required CHSH measurement precision far exceeds current technological capabilities
2. Theoretical Approximations: Employs 1PN approximation and point mass approximation
3. Massive Particle Limitation: Analysis restricted to massive particles, does not consider photon case

Future Directions

1. Extension to Massless Particles: Photon screening effects may be stronger and more aligned with practical Bell tests
2. Parameter Optimization: Search for experimental parameter "sweet spots" that maximize screening effects
3. Framework Discrimination: Distinguish between Einstein and Jordan frames through quantum correlations
4. Technological Development: Detection precision expected to improve with advances in quantum technology

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. High Innovation: First to establish connection between screened dark energy and quantum nonlocality, opening new research directions
2. Theoretical Rigor: Based on mature curved spacetime spin evolution theory with detailed mathematical derivations
3. Systematic Approach: Covers three major screening mechanisms, providing comprehensive theoretical framework
4. Practical Value: Provides theoretical guidance for future experimental design

Weaknesses

1. Low Experimental Feasibility: Current technological conditions make achieving required precision nearly impossible
2. Approximation Limitations: Multiple approximations (1PN, point mass, etc.) may affect result accuracy
3. Strong Parameter Dependence: Results highly dependent on specific experimental parameter choices

Impact

1. Interdisciplinary Value: Promotes fusion of gravitational physics and quantum information
2. Theoretical Contribution: Provides new theoretical tools for screening mechanism research
3. Long-term Significance: May become important dark energy detection method as technology advances

Applicable Scenarios

• Concept verification in theoretical physics research
• Design reference for future high-precision quantum experiments
• Constraint studies on dark energy and modified gravity theories
• Quantum gravity phenomenology research

References

This paper cites 185 references covering important works in dark energy, screening mechanisms, quantum entanglement, Bell inequalities, and other fields, reflecting the interdisciplinary nature of the research and solid theoretical foundation.