Conformal bootstrap: from Polyakov to our times

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2509.02779
• Title: Conformal bootstrap: from Polyakov to our times
• Author: Slava Rychkov (Institut des Hautes Études Scientifiques)
• Classification: hep-th, cond-mat.stat-mech, physics.hist-ph
• Publication Date: October 16, 2025 (arXiv v2)
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.02779

Abstract

This paper traces the historical development of conformal bootstrap from its early origins to modern times, exemplifying the unity of physics. The article begins with the origins of conformal field theory in the 1960s-1970s in the study of strong interactions and critical phenomena, describing the similarities and differences in approaches and results from major research groups in Moscow, Rome, and Sofia. Subsequently, it introduces breakthroughs in the 1980s-1990s, particularly in two-dimensional CFT and holographic theory. Finally, it describes the origins of numerical conformal bootstrap, from conformal technicolor bounds in the 2000s to the determination of three-dimensional Ising critical exponents in the 2010s. The paper emphasizes that conformal invariance is a symmetry of nature.

Research Background and Motivation

Historical Context

1. Manifestation of Physics Unity: The development of conformal bootstrap demonstrates deep connections between different branches of theoretical physics, from particle physics to statistical physics, from critical phenomena to string theory.
2. Importance of Conformal Field Theory: Conformal invariance, as a spacetime symmetry, plays a central role in describing critical phenomena, quantum field theory, and string theory.
3. Necessity of Historical Documentation: As an important participant in the field, the author seeks to record many lesser-known historical details, particularly important events and figures in the early development stages.

Research Motivation

1. Educational Value: Providing young researchers with a complete picture of the field's development, demonstrating mutual promotion between different physics branches.
2. Academic Heritage: Preserving important historical information, including the origins and development trajectories of key ideas.
3. Future Guidance: Through historical review, providing insights for future research directions.

Core Contributions

1. Systematic Historical Review: First comprehensive documentation of the complete development of conformal bootstrap from the 1970s to the 2020s.
2. Valuable Historical Details: Providing many previously lesser-known historical facts, such as important exchanges at the 1970 Kiev Conference.
3. Technical Development Trajectory: Detailed description of technical evolution from "old bootstrap" to modern numerical conformal bootstrap.
4. Future Research Directions: Summarizing major current challenges and possible breakthrough directions.
5. Importance of Experimental Verification: Emphasizing experimental evidence for conformal invariance as a symmetry of nature.

Methodology Details

Historical Periodization and Key Milestones

Phase One: Origins (1970-1974)

1970 Kiev Conference:

• Meeting between Migdal and Polyakov with West German physicist Kastrup
• Discussion of asymptotic scale invariance in hadronic interactions
• Yang and Wu's questioning of scale invariance reflected contemporary controversy

Polyakov's Foundational Work (1970):

⟨O₁(x₁)O₂(x₂)O₃(x₃)⟩ = C₁₂₃ / (x₁₂^(Δ₁+Δ₂-Δ₃) x₂₃^(Δ₂+Δ₃-Δ₁) x₁₃^(Δ₁+Δ₃-Δ₂))

The conformal invariant form of three-point functions established the foundation of modern CFT.

Phase Two: Early Development (1971-1983)

"Old Bootstrap" Method:

• Self-consistency conditions based on skeleton expansion
• Computational schemes by Migdal and Parisi-Peliti
• Competition and eventual triumph of Wilson renormalization group

Contributions from Various Research Groups:

1. Rome Group (Gatto, Ferrara, Grillo, Parisi):
   • Explicitly conformal covariant OPE
   • Shadow formalism
   • First discussion of modern conformal blocks
2. Sofia Group (Todorov, Dobrev, Petkova):
   • Harmonic analysis methods
   • Euclidean inversion formula

Phase Three: Two-Dimensional Breakthrough (1984)

BPZ Revolution:

• Infinite-dimensional symmetry of Virasoro algebra
• Degenerate fields and differential equations
• Exact solution of minimal models

Phase Four: Numerical Bootstrap Renaissance (2006-2014)

Technical Breakthroughs:

1. Linear Programming Method: Converting crossing symmetry into optimization problems
2. Taylor Expansion Technique: Expansion around z=z̄=1/2
3. Semidefinite Programming: Handling mixed correlation functions

Core Technical Methods

Conformal Bootstrap Equations

Crossing symmetry of four-point functions:

⟨O(x₁)O(x₂)O(x₃)O(x₄)⟩ = ⟨O(x₁)O(x₃)O(x₂)O(x₄)⟩

Conformal Block Expansion

g(u,v) = 1 + Σ_{Δ,ℓ} λ²_{Δ,ℓ} g_{Δ,ℓ}(u,v)

Numerical Implementation

1. Functional Form: Finding non-negative linear functionals
2. Derivative Constraints: ∂ⁿₓ∂ᵐₓ̄|_{x=x̄=0}, n+m ≤ Λ
3. Optimization Problem: Maximizing/minimizing operator dimensions

Experimental Setup

Historical Research Methodology

1. Literature Review: Systematic examination of relevant papers and conference records
2. Personal Recollection: First-hand materials from the author as a participant
3. Peer Interviews: Communication with other important participants
4. Archival Materials: Conference records, emails, and other primary materials

Technical Verification

1. Theoretical Consistency: Comparison of results from different methods
2. Experimental Comparison: Comparison between CFT predictions and experimental measurements
3. Numerical Accuracy: Comparison of Monte Carlo, renormalization group, and CFT results

Experimental Results

Historical Discoveries

Key Temporal Milestones

• 1970: Polyakov establishes conformal three-point function form
• 1974: Polyakov proposes modern conformal bootstrap philosophy
• 1984: BPZ opens exact solution of two-dimensional CFT
• 2008: Numerical conformal bootstrap method established
• 2012-2014: Exact solution of three-dimensional Ising model

Technical Achievements

1. Precision Enhancement:
   • Experiment: η = 0.04(1), ν = 0.63(1)
   • Renormalization Group: η = 0.0362(6), ν = 0.6292(5)
   • Monte Carlo: η = 0.03627(10), ν = 0.63002(10)
   • CFT: η = 0.036297612(48), ν = 0.62997097(12)
2. Universality Verification: Critical exponents of multiple universality classes determined precisely

Modern Application Achievements

1. Three-Dimensional Ising Model: Achieving 10⁻⁷-10⁻⁸ precision
2. Other Universality Classes: O(N) model, XY model, Heisenberg model
3. Theoretical Development: AdS/CFT correspondence, supersymmetric CFT, etc.

Related Work

Early Theoretical Foundations

1. Wilson Operator Product Expansion (1969): Important tool for CFT
2. Renormalization Group Theory (1971): Wilson's breakthrough work
3. ε Expansion (Wilson-Fisher, 1972): Perturbative calculation method

Modern Developments

1. AdS/CFT Correspondence (Maldacena, 1997): Holographic duality theory
2. Supersymmetric CFT: N=4 Yang-Mills theory, etc.
3. Numerical Methods: SDPB solver and other tools

Experimental Physics Connections

1. Critical Phenomena Experiments: Liquid-gas phase transitions, magnetic materials, etc.
2. Condensed Matter Physics: Quantum phase transitions, topological states, etc.
3. High Energy Physics: Conformal window, technicolor, etc.

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Unity: Conformal bootstrap demonstrates deep unity among different branches of theoretical physics
2. Validity: Conformal invariance is indeed a fundamental symmetry of nature
3. Precision: Modern methods achieve unprecedented computational accuracy
4. Universality: Methods apply to a wide range of physical systems

Current Challenges

1. Uniqueness Problem: Proving uniqueness of specific CFTs
2. Non-existence Problem: Proving non-existence of certain CFTs
3. Gauge Theories: Bootstrap of gauge CFTs such as QED₃
4. Large Δ Problem: Convergence of high-dimension operators

Future Directions

1. Analytic Functionals: Improving convergence of numerical methods
2. New Symmetries: Supersymmetry, higher spin, etc.
3. Experimental Verification: More direct tests of conformal invariance
4. Application Extension: New fields such as condensed matter and cosmology

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Historical Completeness: Provides the most comprehensive historical review of the field
2. Technical Depth: Detailed description of key technical developments
3. First-Hand Materials: Author's direct participation provides valuable historical details
4. Future Guidance: Provides clear directions for subsequent research

Academic Value

1. Educational Significance: Provides learners with complete knowledge framework
2. Historical Contribution: Fills important gaps in theoretical physics history
3. Methodological Insights: Demonstrates importance of interdisciplinary collaboration
4. Empirical Support: Emphasizes necessity of combining theory and experiment

Impact

1. Field Development: Will promote further development of conformal bootstrap
2. Interdisciplinary Communication: Promotes collaboration between different physics branches
3. Talent Cultivation: Provides guidance for new generation of researchers
4. Practical Applications: Application prospects in condensed matter physics and other fields

Limitations

1. Subjectivity: Recollections as a participant may contain subjective elements
2. Completeness: Some technical details may require further supplementation
3. Balance: Evaluation of different contributors' contributions may contain bias

References

Historical Literature

• A.M. Polyakov, "Conformal symmetry of critical fluctuations" (1970)
• A.M. Polyakov, "Non-hamiltonian approach to conformal quantum field theory" (1974)
• A.A. Belavin, A.M. Polyakov, A.B. Zamolodchikov, "Infinite conformal symmetry..." (1984)

Modern Developments

• R. Rattazzi et al., "Bounding scalar operator dimensions in 4D CFT" (2008)
• S. El-Showk et al., "Solving the 3D Ising Model with the Conformal Bootstrap" (2012)
• F. Kos et al., "Bootstrapping Mixed Correlators in the 3D Ising Model" (2014)

Summary: This paper is not only an authoritative record of the development history of conformal bootstrap, but also a vivid manifestation of the unity among theoretical physics disciplines. It demonstrates deep connections from fundamental theory to numerical computation, from particle physics to condensed matter physics, providing valuable historical experience and technical guidance for future research.