A Generalized Nonlinear Extension of Quantum Mechanics

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2509.04320
• Title: A Generalized Nonlinear Extension of Quantum Mechanics
• Authors: Alan Chodos (University of Texas at Arlington), Fred Cooper (Santa Fe Institute & Los Alamos National Laboratory)
• Categories: quant-ph (Quantum Physics), hep-ph (High Energy Physics - Phenomenology), hep-th (High Energy Physics - Theory)
• Publication Date: November 5, 2025 (arXiv v2)
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.04320

Abstract

This paper constructs the most general form of a nonlinear extension of quantum mechanics previously proposed by the authors, which possesses three fundamental properties. Unlike simpler models, the new version is not completely integrable but possesses an underlying Hamiltonian structure. The authors analyze a specific solution in detail and use a natural extension of the Born rule to calculate particle trajectories, discovering the possible existence of closed particle orbits.

Research Background and Motivation

Core Problems

1. Exploration of Nonlinear Extensions of Quantum Mechanics: The authors investigate specific nonlinear extension forms of quantum mechanics and their consequences, representing a fundamental extension of the standard quantum mechanical framework.
2. Unification of Gravity and Quantum Mechanics: The authors address a profound question—whether the combination of gravity and quantum mechanics is best achieved through fully quantized general relativity (such as string theory or loop quantum gravity), or through alternative approaches such as coupling quantum mechanics with classical gravity, or modifying quantum mechanics itself.

Research Significance

• Fundamental Physics Problem: The quantum gravity problem is one of the most important unsolved problems in modern physics
• Possibility of Nonlinear Quantum Mechanics: Exploring nonlinear extensions of quantum mechanics may reveal new properties of nature
• Universal Characteristics: The nonlinear corrections proposed by the authors are universal, independent of the underlying system's Hamiltonian, which may be related to the universality of gravity

Limitations of Existing Approaches

1. Restrictions of the Original Model: Although the initial model proposed in reference 1 is completely integrable, the possibilities for dynamical evolution are overly constrained
2. Decay of Nonlinear Effects: In the original model, nonlinear effects vanish in the far future and distant past (γ → 0), limiting its physical applications
3. Limitations of the Born Rule: The density matrix defined in the original model cannot reflect nonlinear effects

Core Contributions

1. Construction of the Most General Nonlinear Extension: Proposes the most general nonlinear quantum mechanical extension satisfying three fundamental properties, containing 8 real parameters (compared to 2 in the original model)
2. Identification of Hamiltonian Structure: Demonstrates that the τ-δ system can be formulated within a Hamiltonian framework, mapping the problem to the motion of a one-dimensional classical particle in an exponential potential
3. Construction of Exact Solutions:
   • Provides exact solutions expressed in terms of Jacobi elliptic functions for the special case (p = -1)
   • Discovers "simple solutions" (static solutions with τ = 0) that are valid for all parameter choices
4. Discovery of Closed Orbits: By calculating particle trajectories using the extended Born rule, proves the existence of elliptical closed orbits within specific parameter ranges
5. Analysis of Time-Reversal Symmetry: Investigates the time-reversal properties of the model, finding that the parameter λ breaks the time-reversal symmetry of the original model

Detailed Methodology

Problem Definition

The authors study a quantum system described by two state vectors |ψ⟩ and |ϕ⟩, whose evolution equations are:

$i\frac{\partial|\Psi\rangle}{\partial t} = H|\Psi\rangle + M|\Psi\rangle$

where $|\Psi\rangle = \begin{pmatrix} |\psi\rangle \\ |\phi\rangle \end{pmatrix}$, H is the Hamiltonian of the underlying system, and M is a matrix containing nonlinear terms.

Model Architecture

1. Three Fundamental Constraints

The model must satisfy:

(I) Linear Dependence: Each element of M should depend linearly on the inner products ⟨ψ|ψ⟩, ⟨ϕ|ψ⟩, ⟨ψ|ϕ⟩, ⟨ϕ|ϕ⟩, and depend on time only through them

(II) Norm Conservation: The equations of motion should ensure that ⟨ψ|ψ⟩ + ⟨ϕ|ϕ⟩ = N = const.

(III) Phase Invariance: The equations of motion are invariant under independent constant phase transformations |ψ⟩ → e^(iθ₁)|ψ⟩ and |ϕ⟩ → e^(iθ₂)|ϕ⟩

2. Most General M Matrix

The most general form satisfying the above conditions is:

$M = M_0 + M' = \begin{pmatrix} \alpha_1\langle\psi|\psi\rangle + \alpha_2\langle\phi|\phi\rangle + i\mu\langle\phi|\phi\rangle & g\langle\phi|\psi\rangle + \lambda\langle\phi|\psi\rangle \\ g^*\langle\psi|\phi\rangle - \lambda\langle\psi|\phi\rangle & \beta_1\langle\psi|\psi\rangle + \beta_2\langle\phi|\phi\rangle - i\mu\langle\psi|\psi\rangle \end{pmatrix}$

where:

• αᵢ, βᵢ, λ, μ are real constants
• g = a + ib is a complex coupling constant
• Total of 8 real parameters

3. Reduction to the τ-δ System

Define key variables:

• γ = ⟨ϕ|ψ⟩ (inner product of state vectors)
• δ = |γ|²
• τ = ⟨ψ|ψ⟩ - ⟨ϕ|ϕ⟩
• κ = ln δ

These variables satisfy evolution equations independent of the underlying Hamiltonian H:

$\frac{d\tau}{dt} = \mu(N^2 - \tau^2) + 4b\delta$

$\frac{d\delta}{dt} = -2(b + \mu)\tau\delta$

Technical Innovations

1. Discovery of Hamiltonian Structure

Through variable substitution s = -(b+μ)t and p = μ/(b+μ), the system can be formulated in Hamiltonian form:

$\frac{d\kappa}{ds} = \frac{\partial h}{\partial \tau} = 2\tau$

$\frac{d\tau}{ds} = -\frac{\partial h}{\partial \kappa} = -4e^\kappa - pce^{p\kappa}$

The Hamiltonian is: $h = \tau^2 + 4e^\kappa + ce^{p\kappa} = N^2$

This maps the problem to a one-dimensional particle moving in a potential V(κ) = 4e^κ + ce^(pκ).

2. Parameter Space Analysis

• p > 0: The potential approaches a constant as κ → -∞ and infinity as κ → +∞, with δ → 0 (similar to the original model)
• p < 0 (i.e., -b < μ < 0): The potential approaches infinity in both directions, with δ remaining bounded and away from zero or infinity—this is the parameter range emphasized by the authors

3. Evolution of Schwarz Parameter

Define S = ⟨ψ|ψ⟩⟨ϕ|ϕ⟩ - ⟨ψ|ϕ⟩⟨ϕ|ψ⟩, and find:

$4S = c\delta^{\mu/(b+\mu)}$

While S is constant in the original model, it is no longer conserved in the generalized model.

Experimental Setup

Construction of Exact Solutions

Case 1: The p = -1 Scenario

When choosing μ = -b/2, we have p = -1, and the potential becomes symmetric:

$V(\eta) = 4\sqrt{c}\cosh\eta$

(through translation κ = η + η₀, where η₀ = ½ln(c/4))

The solution is given by Jacobi elliptic functions:

$\eta = -2i\,\text{am}\left(i\sqrt{N^2-4\sqrt{c}}\,s\Big|\frac{8\sqrt{c}}{4\sqrt{c}-N^2}\right)$

$\tau(s) = \sqrt{N^2-4\sqrt{c}}\,\text{dn}\left(i\sqrt{N^2-4\sqrt{c}}\,s\Big|\frac{8\sqrt{c}}{4\sqrt{c}-N^2}\right)$

Case 2: Simple Solutions (τ = 0)

The particle rests at the potential minimum, with conditions:

$\delta = \left(-\frac{\mu}{4b}\right)N^2$

$\langle\psi|\psi\rangle = \langle\phi|\phi\rangle = \frac{N}{2}$

The evolution of inner product γ is: $\gamma = \gamma_0 e^{-i\theta t}$

where θ = (N/2)2λ + α - β

Complete Solution of State Vectors

For simple solutions, the state vectors can be expressed as:

$|\psi\rangle = e^{-i\frac{N}{2}(\alpha+\lambda)t}\left\{e^{i\sigma t}|A\rangle + e^{-i\sigma t}|B\rangle\right\}$

$|\phi\rangle = \frac{i}{(g+\lambda)\gamma_0}e^{-i\frac{N}{2}(\beta-\lambda)t}\left\{\nu_+e^{i\sigma t}|A\rangle + \nu_-e^{-i\sigma t}|B\rangle\right\}$

where:

• |A⟩, |B⟩ are state vectors evolving under the underlying Hamiltonian H
• σ is a frequency determined by system parameters
• ν± = -μN/2 + iχ± are eigenvalues

Experimental Results

Main Findings

1. Behavior of Numerical Solutions (N² = 25, c = 4)

The paper presents three key figures showing the system's dynamical behavior:

• Figure 1: κ(s) shows periodic oscillations, varying between -2 and +2
• Figure 2: τ(s) exhibits periodic behavior with amplitude approximately ±4
• Figure 3: δ(s) = e^κ shows periodic variation, oscillating between 1 and 6

These results indicate that, unlike the original model where δ → 0, nonlinear effects can persist continuously in the generalized model.

2. Elliptical Orbits of Trajectory Functions

For simple solutions, the expected position of the particle is:

$\langle\vec{X}'(t)\rangle = \vec{V}\cos(2\sigma t) + \vec{W}\sin(2\sigma t)$

This describes an elliptical orbit:

$\frac{X_1'^2}{R_1^2} + \frac{X_2'^2}{R_2^2} = 1$

Key Features:

• The particle undergoes simple harmonic motion at frequency 2σ
• This is not a Keplerian ellipse (does not satisfy the equal area law)
• The existence of closed orbits is unattainable in the original model

Nonlinear Effects in the Density Matrix

Define the extended density matrix: $\rho = \frac{1}{N}[|\psi\rangle\langle\psi| + |\phi\rangle\langle\phi|]$

Its evolution equation is: $i\dot{\rho} = [H,\rho] + 2i\mu[|\psi\rangle\langle\phi|\phi\rangle\langle\psi| - |\phi\rangle\langle\psi|\psi\rangle\langle\phi|] + 2\lambda[\gamma|\phi\rangle\langle\psi| - \gamma^*|\psi\rangle\langle\phi|]$

Purity deviation: $\text{Tr}\,\rho^2 = 1 - \frac{2S}{N^2} = 1 - \frac{c}{2N^2}\delta^{\mu/(b+\mu)}$

This shows that nonlinear effects now manifest in the density matrix, contrasting with the original model.

Experimental Discoveries

1. Criticality of Parameter Range: The range -b < μ < 0 is necessary to ensure δ remains bounded
2. Constraints from Energy Conservation: $N^2 = \tau^2 + 4e^\kappa + ce^{p\kappa}$
   provides an integral constant for system evolution
3. Wronskian Relations: For two solutions F₁ and F₂ of the state vectors: $W(F_1,F_2) = \dot{F}_1F_2 - F_1\dot{F}_2 = c_0e^f$
4. Consistency Conditions: Requiring both S₊ and S₋ to be positive yields the constraint: $-\frac{\mu}{b}\left(1+\frac{\mu}{b}\right)(a+\lambda)^2 - \mu(\mu+b) > 0$
   which is automatically satisfied within the parameter range -b < μ < 0

Related Work

History of Nonlinear Quantum Mechanics

1. Bialynicki-Birula & Mycielski (1976): Early exploration of nonlinear quantum mechanics
2. Weinberg (1989): Proposed nonlinear quantum mechanical extensions, but found to allow superluminal communication
3. Kaplan & Rajendran (2022): Recent research on nonlinear quantum mechanics

Quantum Gravity Approaches

1. Penrose (2014): Proposed that gravity may lead to modifications of quantum mechanics
2. Carlip (2008): Discussion of coupling classical gravity with quantum mechanics
3. Oppenheim (2023): Post-quantum theory of quantum mechanics and classical gravity

Two-State Vector Formalism

1. Aharonov, Bergmann & Lebowitz (1964): Early work on time-symmetric quantum mechanics
2. Aharonov & Vaidman (2008): Systematic exposition of two-state vector formalism

The authors' model bears similarities to the ABL two-state formalism but differs in physical interpretation—ABL is a reformulation of standard quantum mechanics, while this work represents a genuine nonlinear extension.

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Successful Construction of the Most General Model: Within the constraints of three fundamental principles, constructs the most general nonlinear extension containing 8 parameters
2. Identification of Hamiltonian Structure: The τ-δ system possesses an elegant Hamiltonian structure, mappable to a classical mechanics problem
3. Rich Dynamics: Compared to the original model, the new model exhibits richer time-dependent behavior, including:
   • Persistent nonlinear effects (not decaying to zero)
   • Possibility of closed particle orbits
   • Nonlinear behavior manifested in the density matrix
4. Existence of Exact Solutions: For special parameter choices (p = -1) and special initial conditions (τ = 0), exact solutions are obtained

Limitations

1. Non-Complete Integrability: Unlike the original model, the generalized model is not completely integrable, and closed-form solutions cannot be obtained in general cases
2. Unclear Physical Meaning of the Second State Vector: The physical interpretation of |ϕ⟩ remains unclear, with the authors adopting a "calculate first, understand later" strategy
3. Speculative Connection to Gravity: The connection between nonlinear effects and gravity is currently conjectural, lacking direct evidence
4. Unresolved Superluminal Communication Problem: The authors acknowledge uncertainty about whether the model allows superluminal communication, but remain open to the possibility
5. Difficulty in Experimental Verification: Nonlinear effects are predicted to be extremely weak and difficult to observe

Future Directions

The authors propose two approximation methods:

1. Small Oscillation Approximation: Expansion around the potential minimum $\kappa = \kappa_0 + \delta\kappa$
   where $e^{\kappa_0} = (-\mu/4b)N^2$, studying the effects of small perturbations δκ
2. Piecewise Exponential Approximation: Replacing the true potential V(κ) with $\tilde{V}(\kappa) = 4e^\kappa\theta(\kappa-\kappa_1) + ce^{p\kappa}\theta(\kappa_1-\kappa)$
   where κ₁ is defined by 4e^(κ₁) = ce^(pκ₁). The problem becomes solvable in each region.

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Rigor of Theoretical Framework
   • Systematically constructs theory from explicit principles
   • Mathematical derivations are rigorous; the identification of Hamiltonian structure is elegant
   • Ensures theoretical self-consistency through constraints such as energy conservation
2. Innovation in Methodology
   • Mapping nonlinear quantum problems to classical mechanics problems is a clever insight
   • Construction of solutions using Jacobi elliptic functions demonstrates deep mathematical proficiency
   • Discovery of simple solutions provides a benchmark for understanding complex systems
3. Depth of Physical Insights
   • Classification of parameter space (sign of p) reveals qualitatively different behaviors
   • Discovery of closed orbits hints at possible gravitational connections
   • Analysis of time-reversal symmetry reveals the special role of the λ parameter
4. Clarity of Presentation
   • Logical structure is clear, progressing systematically from motivation to methods to results
   • Mathematical derivations are detailed and reproducible
   • Figures intuitively display key results

Weaknesses

1. Absence of Physical Interpretation
   • Physical meaning of the second state vector |ϕ⟩ remains unelucidated
   • Physical origins and constraints of the 8 parameters are unclear
   • Connection to gravity is primarily speculative, lacking concrete mechanisms
2. Weak Experimental Testability
   • No concrete experimental schemes are proposed
   • Effects are predicted to be extremely weak, making practical observation difficult
   • Lacks quantitative predictions for observable quantities
3. Cavalier Treatment of Superluminal Communication Problem
   • The attitude toward the superluminal communication problem raised by Weinberg and others is overly dismissive
   • The claim of "non-fatality" lacks sufficient justification
   • May violate fundamental principles of relativity
4. Absence of General Solutions
   • Only special cases are solved (p=-1 and τ=0)
   • Systematic study of behavior for general parameters is lacking
   • Validity of the two proposed approximation schemes remains unverified
5. Unexplored Relationships with Existing Theories
   • Relationship to quantum field theory is not discussed
   • How to generalize to multi-particle systems is unclear
   • Compatibility with the Standard Model is not considered

Impact Assessment

Theoretical Contribution:

• Provides a new mathematical framework for nonlinear quantum mechanics
• Discovery of Hamiltonian structure may inspire research on other nonlinear systems
• Two-state vector formalism may have independent mathematical value

Practical Value:

• Limited practical value in the short term (effects too weak)
• May provide new perspectives for quantum gravity in the long term
• Potential applications in precision measurement fields

Reproducibility:

• Mathematical derivations are detailed and results are reproducible
• Numerical computation parameters are explicit
• Experimental verification is virtually impossible

Applicable Scenarios

1. Theoretical Physics Research
   • Exploration of quantum mechanics foundations
   • Mathematical study of nonlinear dynamical systems
   • Phenomenological models for quantum gravity
2. Possible Application Directions
   • Minute nonlinear effects in precision measurements
   • Non-standard evolution in quantum information
   • Early universe dynamics in cosmology
3. Educational Value
   • Demonstrates how to construct theory from principles
   • Illustrates connections between quantum and classical mechanics
   • Shows the role of symmetry in theory construction

Critical Reflection

1. Fundamental Question: Why are two state vectors necessary? Standard single-state-vector quantum mechanics has proven highly successful; the necessity for introducing a second state vector is insufficiently justified.
2. Occam's Razor Principle: Is an 8-parameter theory overly complex? Is there a more elegant way to achieve the same effects?
3. Experimental Guidance: The ultimate test of theoretical physics is experiment. If effects cannot be observed, what is the value of the theory?
4. Tension with Quantum Field Theory: Quantum field theory is the most successful physical theory to date. How does this model reconcile with it?

Key References

1 A. Chodos and F. Cooper, Physica Scripta 98, 045227 (2023) - Authors' original model

3 S. Weinberg, Annals Phys. 194, 336 (1989) - Classical work on nonlinear quantum mechanics

8 J. Oppenheim, Phys. Rev. X 13, 041040 (2023) - Post-quantum gravity theory

10 Y. Aharonov and L. Vaidman, Time in quantum mechanics (2008) - Two-state vector formalism

12 N. Gisin, Phys. Lett. A 143, 1 (1990) - Superluminal communication in nonlinear quantum mechanics

Overall Assessment: This is a mathematically rigorous and conceptually bold theoretical work. The authors successfully construct a self-consistent nonlinear quantum mechanical framework and demonstrate its rich mathematical structure. However, physical motivation and experimental testability are evident weaknesses. This work is better viewed as a mathematical generalization of quantum mechanics rather than a candidate for realistic physical theory. Its value lies more in inspiration and methodology than in direct physical application. For theoretical physicists, this is an interesting thought experiment; for experimental physicists, no viable verification pathway is currently apparent.