Symmetric entanglers for non-invertible SPT phases

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2509.04581
• Title: Symmetric entanglers for non-invertible SPT phases
• Author: Minyoung You (Yukawa Institute for Theoretical Physics, Kyoto University)
• Classification: cond-mat.str-el hep-th quant-ph
• Publication Date: January 14, 2025 (arXiv v2)
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.04581

Abstract

This paper challenges the previous view that non-invertible symmetry-protected topological (SPT) phases lack symmetric entanglers due to the absence of stacking structures. Using topological holography theory, the author argues that symmetric entanglers should actually exist in 1+1 dimensional systems when non-invertible symmetries are connected through fixed-charge duality (FCD). Furthermore, the author constructs explicit examples of symmetric entanglers connecting two Rep(A₄) symmetric SPT phases, presented in the form of matrix product unitary (MPU) operators.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Background

1. Symmetric entangler theory for SPT phases: In conventionally group-symmetric protected SPT phases, symmetric entanglers are global symmetry finite-depth quantum circuits connecting different SPT states. They form group structures and are closely related to the stacking operations of SPT phases.
2. Challenges of non-invertible symmetry: For non-invertible symmetries, traditional stacking operations no longer apply because the fusion algebra lacks diagonal subalgebras. This raises an important question: do symmetric entanglers exist between non-invertible SPT phases?
3. Limitations of existing views: Previous research (e.g., Ref.7) based on the absence of stacking structures argued that non-invertible SPT phases lack symmetric entanglers, and verified this with examples in Rep(D₈).

Research Motivation

Through the new perspective of topological holography theory, the author discovers that fixed-charge duality (FCD) may provide symmetric entanglers connecting non-invertible SPT phases, challenging the existing theoretical framework.

Core Contributions

1. Theoretical breakthrough: Proves that symmetric entanglers indeed exist in non-invertible symmetric systems when fixed-charge duality connects two SPT phases
2. Mathematical proof: Rigorously proves the theorem that FCD preserves symmetry using topological holography theory
3. Explicit construction: First construction of explicit symmetric entanglers between two SPT phases under Rep(A₄) symmetry
4. Conceptual clarification: Reveals that the existence of symmetric entanglers is decoupled from stacking structures in the non-invertible case

Detailed Methodology

Theoretical Framework: Topological Holography Theory

The author employs the symTFT (symmetry topological field theory) framework, where:

• The bulk 2+1 dimensional TQFT is given by the Drinfeld center Z(C) of the fusion category symmetry C
• The forgetful functor F: Z(C) → C maps bulk line operators to boundary symmetric operators
• Charges are defined as anyons μ condensed on a reference boundary, satisfying ⟨μ,1⟩ ≥ 1

Core Theorem

Theorem: Let D be a symmetry of the bulk TQFT Z(C), and F: Z(C) → C be the forgetful functor. If D is a fixed-charge duality (FCD), then for any bulk anyon μ of Z(C), we have F(D(μ)) = F(μ).

Proof Strategy:

1. Utilize modular transformation relations of torus partition functions Z¹ₐ and Zₐ¹
2. Prove invariance of S·Zₐ¹ under FCD
3. Derive the condition ⟨D(μ),a⟩ = ⟨μ,a⟩
4. Conclude F(D(μ)) = F(μ)

Technical Innovations

1. Holographic perspective: First systematic application of topological holography theory to symmetric entanglers in non-invertible SPT phases
2. FCD analysis: In-depth analysis of the crucial role of fixed-charge duality in preserving symmetry
3. Explicit construction: Development of MPU construction methods based on projective representations

Case Study: Rep(A₄) SPT Phases

Symmetry Setup

• Group A₄: Alternating group with 12 elements, generators x³ = a² = e, (xa)³ = e
• Representations: Four irreducible representations 1, ω, ω², π (where π is 3-dimensional)
• Physical Hilbert space: CA₄ on each lattice site

Construction of Two SPT Phases

SPT Phase 1 (Product state):

|Ψ₁⟩ = |e,e,e,···⟩

Corresponds to modular category Rep(1), with bond space dimension 1.

SPT Phase 2: Constructed from non-trivial projective representations of Z₂×Z₂:

|Ψ₂⟩ = Σ_{gᵢ∈H} Tr[Q(g₁)Q(g₂)···]|g₁,g₂,···⟩

where Q(g) are projective representation matrices of Z₂×Z₂, with bond space dimension 2.

Explicit Construction of Symmetric Entangler

MPU Tensor:

T^{g,h} = (1/2)(sₑ)_{g,h}Q(gh)
T^{xg,xh} = (1/2)(sₓ)_{g,h}Q(x)Q(gh)  
T^{x²g,x²h} = (1/2)(sₓ²)_{g,h}Q(x)²Q(gh)

where the sign factors sₑ, sₓ, sₓ² ensure unitarity of the MPU.

Key Properties:

1. Connectivity: E|Ψ₁⟩ = |Ψ₂⟩
2. Unitarity: Satisfies MPU unitarity conditions
3. Symmetry: Commutes with all Rep(A₄) symmetric operators
4. Order-2: E² = 1, forming a Z₂ group structure

Experimental Verification

L-symbol Calculation

The author calculates L-symbols of the two SPT states, verifying they belong to different phases:

Torus partition function of SPT Phase 1:

(Z_{ππ,π})_{μν} = (-3  0)
                   ( 0  3)

Torus partition function of SPT Phase 2:

(Z_{ππ,π})_{μν} = ( 3  0)
                   ( 0 -3)

The sign difference proves the inequivalence of the two phases.

Symmetry Verification

By analyzing the action of MPU on general ground states, the author proves:

1. Conjugacy classes x and x² are preserved
2. Charges are preserved when total group elements are in H
3. MPU commutes with all Rep(A₄) symmetric operators

Comparison with Related Work

Rep(D₈) Case

• Three SPT phases are not connected by any FCD
• Indeed lack symmetric entanglers, consistent with theoretical predictions

G×Rep(G) Cluster State

• Product state phase and cluster state phase have Lagrangian algebras with different multiplicity structures
• No FSD connecting them exists, hence no FCD
• Consistent with "no symmetric entanglers" prediction

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Theoretical breakthrough: Proves that non-invertible SPT phases can possess symmetric entanglers when connected by FCD
2. Conceptual clarification: The existence of symmetric entanglers is decoupled from stacking structures in the non-invertible case
3. Explicit realization: First construction of explicit symmetric entanglers for non-invertible SPT phases

Limitations

1. Conditional constraints: Only applies to SPT phases connected by FCD
2. Construction method: Explicit MPU construction is provisional, not directly derived from bulk FCD
3. Dimensional restriction: Currently only considers 1+1 dimensional systems

Future Directions

1. Generalization: Explore whether generalized stacking concepts applicable to non-invertible symmetries can be defined
2. Bulk-boundary correspondence: Establish direct derivation methods from bulk FCD to boundary symmetric entanglers
3. Higher-dimensional extension: Study symmetric entanglers for higher-dimensional non-invertible SPT phases

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Conceptual innovation: Challenges existing theoretical frameworks and provides new theoretical perspectives
2. Rigorous proof: Provides rigorous mathematical proofs using topological holography theory
3. Explicit construction: Provides the first concrete example of symmetric entanglers for non-invertible SPT phases
4. Technical depth: Combines multiple sophisticated mathematical physics concepts (fusion categories, topological quantum field theory, matrix product operators, etc.)

Weaknesses

1. Limited applicability: Theory only applies under specific conditions (existence of FCD), with limited universality
2. Construction gap: Lack of direct connection between explicit MPU construction and theoretical predictions
3. Experimental verification: Lacks physical implementation or numerical verification

Impact

1. Theoretical significance: Redefines understanding of SPT phase classification under non-invertible symmetries
2. Technical advancement: Provides new tools for research on non-invertible symmetric systems
3. Application prospects: May influence research in quantum computing and topological quantum matter

Applicable Scenarios

1. Theoretical physics research: Classification studies of topological phase transitions and quantum phases
2. Quantum information: Quantum error correction codes and topological quantum computation
3. Condensed matter theory: Strongly correlated electron systems and quantum spin systems

References

This paper cites 35 important references covering multiple fields including fusion category theory, SPT phase classification, topological holography theory, and matrix product states, providing a solid theoretical foundation for the research.