2025-11-19T18:16:14.210450

Continuous-Time Quantum State Transfer with a Generalized Laplacian

Shi
Quantum walks generated by the adjacency matrix or the Laplacian are known to exhibit low transfer fidelity on general graphs. In this paper, we study continuous-time quantum walks governed by the generalized Laplacian operator L_k = A+kD, where A is the adjacency matrix, D is the degree matrix, and k is a real-valued parameter. Recent work of Duda, McLaughlin, and Wong showed that in the single-excitation Heisenberg (XYZ) spin model, one can realize walks generated by this family of operators on signed weighted graphs. Motivated by earlier studies on vertex-weighted graphs, we demonstrate that for certain graphs, tuning the parameter k can significantly enhance the fidelity of state transfer between endpoints.
academic

Continuous-Time Quantum State Transfer with a Generalized Laplacian

Basic Information

  • Paper ID: 2509.05454
  • Title: Continuous-Time Quantum State Transfer with a Generalized Laplacian
  • Author: Yujia Shi (Department of Physics, Creighton University)
  • Classification: quant-ph math.CO
  • Publication Date: October 13, 2025 (arXiv preprint)
  • Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.05454

Abstract

Traditional quantum walks based on adjacency matrices or Laplacian matrices exhibit low transmission fidelity on general graphs. This paper investigates continuous-time quantum walks governed by the generalized Laplacian operator Lk=A+kDL_k = A + kD, where AA is the adjacency matrix, DD is the degree matrix, and kk is a real-valued parameter. Building on the work of Duda, McLaughlin, and Wong on single-excitation Heisenberg (XYZ) spin models, the author demonstrates that by tuning the parameter kk, one can significantly enhance state transfer fidelity between endpoints on specific graphs.

Research Background and Motivation

  1. Core Problem: Traditional quantum state transfer methods (based on adjacency or Laplacian matrices) suffer from low transmission fidelity on general graph structures, particularly between endpoints of path graphs.
  2. Problem Significance: Quantum state transfer is an important model in quantum communication, and high-fidelity state transfer is crucial for quantum information processing and quantum communication networks.
  3. Limitations of Existing Methods:
    • Standard adjacency and Laplacian matrix Hamiltonians result in poor endpoint transfer fidelity on long paths
    • Perfect state transfer (PST) requires stringent conditions that are difficult to achieve in practical applications
  4. Research Motivation: Inspired by research on vertex-weighted graphs, the study explores whether the family of generalized Laplacian operators can improve state transfer performance through parameter tuning.

Core Contributions

  1. Theoretical Framework Extension: Introduces the generalized Laplacian operator Lk=A+kDL_k = A + kD to quantum state transfer research and establishes explicit relationships between parameter kk and transmission probabilities.
  2. High-Fidelity Transfer Conditions: Proves that by appropriately tuning parameter kk, one can achieve arbitrarily close-to-unity transfer fidelity on certain graph classes.
  3. Enhanced Practicality: Extends previous results on vertex-weighted graphs to all real-valued kk, providing more flexible parameter choices.
  4. Concrete Application Examples: Validates the method's effectiveness on complete bipartite graphs K2,n2K_{2,n-2} and path graphs PnP_n.

Methodology Details

Task Definition

Studies continuous-time quantum walks on graph G=(V,E)G = (V,E), where the system's Hilbert space is Cn\mathbb{C}^n and evolution follows the Schrödinger equation: iddtψ(t)=Hψ(t)i\frac{d}{dt}\psi(t) = H\psi(t)

where the Hamiltonian H=(A+kD)H = -(A + kD), and the goal is to find parameter kk that maximizes the transmission probability from vertex uu to vertex vv.

Model Architecture

1. Generalized Laplacian OperatorLk=A+kDL_k = A + kD where:

  • AA: adjacency matrix of the graph
  • DD: degree matrix with Dii=deg(vi)D_{ii} = \deg(v_i)
  • kk: real-valued parameter

2. Time Evolution OperatorU(t)=eiLktU(t) = e^{-iL_k t}

3. Transmission Probability The transmission probability from vertex uu to vertex vv at time tt is: Puv(t)=U(t)u,v2=j=1neiλjtψj(u)ψj(v)2P_{u \to v}(t) = |U(t)_{u,v}|^2 = \left|\sum_{j=1}^n e^{i\lambda_j t}\psi_j(u)\psi_j(v)\right|^2

Technical Innovations

1. Equivalence Transformation (Lemma 3.3) For graphs with special degree structures, the generalized Laplacian LkL_k is equivalent to: A+Q(Eu+Ev)A + Q(E_u + E_v) where Q=k(d1d2)Q = k(d_1 - d_2), and ExE_x is a projection matrix.

2. High-Fidelity Conditions Based on cospectrality theory, when two vertices satisfy co(u,v)=\text{co}(u,v) = \infty, there exist eigenvector pairs approximately of the form (eu±ev)/2(e_u \pm e_v)/\sqrt{2}.

3. Parameter Bounds For a given error tolerance ε\varepsilon, the requirement is: k>161ε1/min(2,cd+1)m1+max(1/2,d/(cd+1))|k| > 16 \frac{1}{\varepsilon^{1/\min(2,c-d+1)}} m^{1+\max(1/2, d/(c-d+1))}

Experimental Setup

Test Graph Classes

  1. Complete Bipartite Graphs K2,n2K_{2,n-2} (n5n \geq 5)
  2. Path Graphs PnP_n
  3. General Graphs with Involutions

Evaluation Metrics

  • Peak Fidelity: F(Q):=supt>0U(t)u,vF(Q) := \sup_{t>0} |U(t)_{u,v}|
  • Transmission Probability: Puv(t)=U(t)u,v2P_{u \to v}(t) = |U(t)_{u,v}|^2

Comparison Methods

  1. Adjacency matrix model: H=AH = -A
  2. Laplacian model: H=(AD)H = -(A - D)
  3. Unsigned Laplacian model
  4. Generalized Laplacian model: H=LkH = -L_k

Experimental Results

Main Results

Application of Theorem 3.1:

  • For K2,n2K_{2,n-2} (n5n \geq 5): When k>16(n2)3/2ε(n4)|k| > 16\frac{(n-2)^{3/2}}{\sqrt{\varepsilon}(n-4)}, endpoint transfer fidelity is at least 1ε1-\varepsilon
  • For path PnP_n: When k>322ε|k| > \frac{32\sqrt{2}}{\sqrt{\varepsilon}}, endpoint transfer fidelity is at least 1ε1-\varepsilon

Specific Case Analysis

Experiment on Path Graph P6P_6:

  • Selected k=143k = 143 (based on lower bound for ε=0.1\varepsilon = 0.1)
  • Generalized Laplacian method significantly outperforms the three standard methods
  • Achieves near-unity transfer fidelity

Experimental Findings

  1. Effectiveness of Parameter Tuning: Appropriate kk values can elevate transfer fidelity from near-zero to near-unity
  2. Equivalence of Negative Parameters: Negative kk values are equally effective, expanding the parameter selection range
  3. Readout Time Trade-off: High fidelity requires larger kk values, but corresponding readout times also increase
  1. Quantum State Transfer Foundations: Godsil's algebraic methods provide theoretical basis for perfect state transfer
  2. Vertex-Weighted Approaches: Research by Kirkland and von Bommel on paths, and work by Lippner et al. on graphs with involutions
  3. Heisenberg Spin Models: Duda et al. demonstrated that single-excitation Heisenberg models can realize generalized Laplacian operators
  4. Cospectrality Theory: Definitions and related lemmas by Lin, Yau, and Lippner

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

  1. The generalized Laplacian operator Lk=A+kDL_k = A + kD provides an effective parameterized framework for improving quantum state transfer
  2. By tuning parameter kk, one can achieve arbitrarily high transfer fidelity between vertex pairs with high cospectrality
  3. The method demonstrates significant advantages on graph classes where traditional methods fail

Limitations

  1. Parameter Selection: Requires large k|k| values to achieve high fidelity, potentially affecting practical implementation
  2. Readout Time: High fidelity is accompanied by longer readout times, presenting an efficiency trade-off
  3. Graph Structure Dependence: Method effectiveness depends on specific graph structural properties (e.g., involutions, cospectrality)

Future Directions

  1. Explore applications on broader graph classes
  2. Investigate parameter optimization strategies to balance fidelity and efficiency
  3. Experimentally verify the feasibility of physical implementation

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

  1. Theoretical Rigor: Provides a complete mathematical framework with rigorous proofs
  2. Practical Value: Addresses practical problems in quantum state transfer
  3. Methodological Innovation: Successfully applies generalized Laplacian operators to quantum walks
  4. Significant Results: Demonstrates substantial performance improvements in concrete examples

Weaknesses

  1. Limited Experimental Verification: Primarily theoretical analysis with insufficient large-scale numerical experiments
  2. Physical Implementation: While citing potential implementation via Heisenberg models, lacks specific implementation details
  3. Parameter Selection Guidance: Lacks systematic guidance for choosing optimal kk values for general graphs

Impact

  1. Academic Contribution: Provides new theoretical tools for quantum state transfer research
  2. Application Prospects: Holds potential applications in quantum communication and quantum computing
  3. Method Generality: Framework can be extended to broader graph classes and problems

Applicable Scenarios

  1. Graph networks with involution structures
  2. Systems requiring high-fidelity quantum state transfer
  3. Physical implementation systems where coupling parameters can be tuned

References

The paper cites important literature in quantum state transfer, including:

  • Foundational algebraic methods by Godsil
  • Quantum communication models by Bose et al.
  • Recent research on vertex-weighted graphs and Heisenberg spin models
  • Author's previous work on graphs with involutions and cycle-edge graphs

Overall Assessment: This is a high-quality paper with rigorous theory and innovative methodology, providing an effective solution to quantum state transfer problems. While there is room for improvement in experimental verification and practical applications, its theoretical contributions and methodological innovations make it of significant value in the field.