Could the 650 GeV Excess be a Pseudoscalar of a 3-Higgs Doublet Model?

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2509.06232
• Title: Could the 650 GeV Excess be a Pseudoscalar of a 3-Higgs Doublet Model?
• Authors: Ayoub Hmissou, Stefano Moretti, Larbi Rahili
• Classification: hep-ph (High Energy Physics - Phenomenology)
• Publication Date: Version 5.0 – October 17, 2025
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.06232

Abstract

This study proposes to explain the 650 GeV excess signal observed by the CMS collaboration at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) using a CP-odd pseudoscalar Higgs boson A from a 3-Higgs Doublet Model (3HDM). The model contains two active doublets and one inert doublet, referred to as the I(1+2)HDM. The theoretical framework not only includes the Standard Model's 125 GeV Higgs boson but also a light CP-even Higgs state h₉₅ with mass approximately 95 GeV, which simultaneously explains anomalous signals observed by LEP and LHC in bb̄, γγ, and τ⁺τ⁻ final states.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Background

1. Experimental Anomalies: Multiple anomalous signals have been observed in recent particle physics experiments:
   • LEP collider anomaly near 95 GeV in the bb̄ channel (all collaborations: ALEPH, DELPHI, L3, OPAL)
   • LHC anomalies at 95 GeV in γγ and τ⁺τ⁻ decay channels (CMS and ATLAS)
   • Recently reported CMS 650 GeV anomaly manifesting in γγbb̄ final state with local significance of 3.8σ
2. Theoretical Challenges: The Standard Model cannot explain these anomalous signals, requiring beyond Standard Model (BSM) theoretical frameworks
3. Limitations of Existing Approaches:
   • 2HDM Type-I exhibits tension when simultaneously maximizing bb̄, γγ, and τ⁺τ⁻ decay rates
   • Lack of theoretical framework capable of unified explanation of 95 GeV and 650 GeV anomalies

Research Motivation

This work aims to construct a unified theoretical framework capable of simultaneously explaining the 95 GeV and 650 GeV anomalies and predicting new signals verifiable in future LHC experiments.

Core Contributions

1. Unified Explanation Scheme: First simultaneous explanation of 95 GeV and 650 GeV anomalies within the I(1+2)HDM framework
2. Novel Decay Mechanism: Proposes that the 650 GeV anomaly originates from A → h₁₂₅Z decay, where the Z boson decays to bb̄
3. Loop-Enhanced Mechanism: Utilizes charged scalar states in the inert sector to enhance h₉₅ → γγ decay width
4. Predicted New Signals: Predicts A → h₉₅Z and A → tt̄ processes as model verification signals
5. Dark Matter Candidate: Model naturally includes a scalar dark matter candidate satisfying relevant constraints

Detailed Methodology

Theoretical Framework: I(1+2)HDM Model

Model Construction

The I(1+2)HDM contains two active Higgs doublets Φ₁, Φ₂ and one inert doublet η, with discrete symmetry Z₂ × Z'₂:

Scalar Potential:

V = -½{m²₁₁Φ†₁Φ₁ + m²₂₂Φ†₂Φ₂ + [m²₁₂Φ†₁Φ₂ + h.c.]}
  + λ₁/2(Φ†₁Φ₁)² + λ₂/2(Φ†₂Φ₂)² + λ₃(Φ†₁Φ₁)(Φ†₂Φ₂)
  + λ₄(Φ†₁Φ₂)(Φ†₂Φ₁) + ½[λ₅(Φ†₁Φ₂)² + h.c.]
  + inert sector terms

Particle Spectrum

Active Sector (similar to 2HDM):

• h (CP-even, light, ~95 GeV) → h₉₅
• H (CP-even, heavy, 125 GeV) → h₁₂₅ (SM-like)
• A (CP-odd, ~650 GeV) → explains 650 GeV anomaly
• H± (charged Higgs)

Inert Sector (dark matter candidates):

• χ, χₐ (neutral scalars)
• χ± (charged scalars)

Key Mechanisms

1. 650 GeV Anomaly Explanation

• Process: pp → A → h₁₂₅Z → γγbb̄
• Equivalence Principle: At √s ≃ 650 GeV, the pseudoscalar polarization of the Z boson behaves similarly to a neutral Goldstone mode
• Deviation Suppression: Corrections of O(m²Z/s) ≲ 2% are negligible

2. 95 GeV Anomaly Enhancement

• Loop Contribution: χ± from the inert sector enhances h₉₅ → γγ decay through one-loop diagrams
• Advantage: Resolves the difficulty in simultaneously enhancing multiple decay channels in 2HDM Type-I

3. Yukawa Couplings (Type-I Structure)

Experimental Setup

Parameter Scan Ranges

Constraints

Theoretical Constraints

• Perturbativity: Ensures coupling constants remain within perturbative regime
• Unitarity: Scattering amplitudes satisfy unitarity requirements
• Vacuum Stability: Scalar potential is bounded in all directions

Experimental Constraints

• Higgs Signal Strengths: Implemented via HiggsSignals-3
• Direct Search Limits: Implemented via HiggsBounds-6
• Electroweak Precision Tests: S, T, U parameter constraints
• Dark Matter Constraints: Relic abundance and direct detection via micrOMEGAs
• Flavor Physics Constraints: Verified using SuperIso program

Target Observables

Primary Signal:

σγγbb̄ = σ(pp → A → h₁₂₅Z → γγbb̄) = 0.333+0.17₋0.13 fb

Experimental Results

Main Findings

1. Parameter Space Analysis

• tanβ Dependence: tanβ ≤ 5 required to explain σγγbb̄ excess
• Mixing Angle Range: sin(β-α) ∈ 0.27, 0.47 can explain anomaly at -2.5σ level
• Mass Dependence: Entire mₐ ∈ 600, 700 GeV range is viable

2. Dark Matter Sector

• Relic Abundance: All scan points satisfy Planck limit Ωₕ² < 0.1200
• Direct Detection: Most parameter space satisfies XENONnT and LUX-ZEPLIN constraints
• Mass Range: mχ ∈ 100, 350 GeV region most promising

3. Branching Ratio Analysis

At the best-fit point:

• BR(A → h₉₅Z) ≈ 79.16%
• BR(A → h₁₂₅Z) ≈ 10.57%
• BR(A → tt̄) ≈ 9.86%
• σγγbb̄ᵐᵃˣ ≈ 0.096 fb

Signal Strength Correlations

The model can simultaneously explain at the 2σ level:

• μγγ(h₉₅) ≲ 0.2 (di-photon signal strength)
• bb̄ signal strength within constrained ranges

Predicted Signals

1. A → h₉₅Z Process

• Produces identical γγbb̄ final state
• Primary probe of the model
• Dominates viable parameter space

2. A → tt̄ Process

• Provides additional verification channel
• Non-negligible branching ratio (~10%)
• Verifiable in Run 3 and HL-LHC

3. γγτ⁺τ⁻ Final State Constraints

• CMS search for pp → A → h₁₂₅Z → γγτ⁺τ⁻ shows no significant excess
• Model predictions below but not far from current sensitivity
• Promising probe for future searches

Related Work

Theoretical Explanations of 95 GeV Anomaly

Multiple BSM models have attempted to explain the 95 GeV anomaly:

• Non-Supersymmetric Models: 2HDM, Next-to-2HDM (N2HDM), Georgi-Machacek model
• Supersymmetric Models: NMSSM, μνSSM
• This Work's Advantage: I(1+2)HDM provides additional charged scalar states enabling better enhancement of h₉₅ → γγ decay

650 GeV Anomaly Studies

Previous studies focused mainly on:

• Explanations within NMSSM framework
• Possibilities in 2HDM
• This Work's Contribution: First unified explanation of both anomalies within 3HDM framework

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Successful Unified Explanation: I(1+2)HDM can simultaneously explain 95 GeV and 650 GeV anomalies at approximately 2σ confidence level
2. Key Mechanism: Charged scalar states in the inert sector are crucial for enhancing h₉₅ → γγ
3. Dark Matter Compatibility: Model naturally includes viable dark matter candidates
4. Verifiable Predictions: Proposes A → h₉₅Z and A → tt̄ as model verification signals

Limitations

1. τ⁺τ⁻ Anomaly: Explanation of τ⁺τ⁻ channel anomaly is marginal
2. Parameter Tuning: Requires specific parameter ranges (e.g., tanβ ≤ 5)
3. Statistical Significance: Current anomaly statistical significance remains limited
4. Model Complexity: Introduces more parameters compared to 2HDM

Future Directions

1. Experimental Verification: Search for A → h₉₅Z and A → tt̄ signals in LHC Run 3 and HL-LHC
2. Precision Enhancement: Improve statistical significance of anomaly signals with accumulated data
3. Theoretical Refinement: Further investigate model's theoretical consistency and stability
4. Phenomenological Extensions: Explore model predictions in other physical processes

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. High Originality: First unified explanation of multiple anomalies within I(1+2)HDM framework
2. Clear Mechanism: Enhancement of γγ decay through inert sector possesses clear physical picture
3. Comprehensive Constraints: Considers theoretical, experimental, and dark matter constraints
4. Predictive Power: Proposes specific signals verifiable in future experiments
5. Numerical Rigor: Employs professional software packages for comprehensive parameter scanning and constraint verification

Weaknesses

1. Marginal Anomaly Significance: Current experimental anomalies have limited statistical significance
2. Parameter Tuning: Model requires specific parameter ranges to function
3. τ⁺τ⁻ Explanation: Explanation of τ⁺τ⁻ channel anomaly lacks conviction
4. Alternative Explanations: Insufficient discussion of other possible theoretical interpretations

Impact

1. Academic Value: Provides new perspectives for multi-Higgs model phenomenology research
2. Experimental Guidance: Provides clear experimental targets for future LHC searches
3. Theoretical Development: Promotes development and application of 3HDM theoretical framework
4. Interdisciplinary: Connects particle physics and dark matter research

Applicable Scenarios

1. LHC Phenomenology: Applicable to new physics searches in LHC Run 3 and HL-LHC
2. Dark Matter Research: Provides concrete implementation for scalar dark matter models
3. Higgs Physics: Extends phenomenological studies of Higgs sector
4. BSM Theory: Provides exemplar for beyond Standard Model theoretical construction

References

The paper cites 70 relevant references, covering:

• Milestone papers on Higgs discovery 1,2
• Experimental reports on LEP and LHC anomalies 3-10
• Theoretical studies of multi-Higgs models 11-37
• Numerical calculation tools and constraints 54-70

Overall Assessment: This is a high-quality theoretical physics paper providing a unified and self-consistent explanation for current experimental anomalies within the I(1+2)HDM framework. Although the statistical significance of anomaly signals remains limited, the paper's theoretical analysis is rigorous and predictions are concrete, providing clear direction for future experimental verification.