Bogoliubov quasi-particles in superconductors are integer-charged particles inapplicable for braiding quantum information

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2509.09663
• Title: Bogoliubov quasi-particles in superconductors are integer-charged particles inapplicable for braiding quantum information
• Authors: Zhiyu Fan (樊知宇), Wei Ku (顧威)
• Classification: cond-mat.str-el, cond-mat.supr-con, quant-ph
• Publication Date: October 14, 2025 (arXiv preprint)
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.09663

Abstract

This paper presents a rigorous mathematical proof that under particle number-conserving Hamiltonians, single-particle quasi-particles generally possess the same quantized charge and inertial mass as bare particles. Consequently, Bogoliubov zero modes in superconductor vortex cores or topological boundaries cannot be their own antiparticles and cannot be used for braiding quantum information. This implies that quantum computing pathways based on Majorana zero modes require reconsideration. The research also reveals conceptual challenges in preparing and manipulating braiding quantum states through physical thermalization or slow external field protocols. These profound results should reignite long-standing investigations into particle number-conserving superconducting theory.

Research Background and Motivation

1. Problem to be Addressed: This research targets theoretical foundation issues in current quantum computing schemes based on Majorana zero modes for braiding quantum information. Specifically, it questions whether Bogoliubov quasi-particles are truly coherent superpositions of electrons and holes, and whether their zero modes possess Majorana properties.
2. Problem Significance: As classical computers approach quantum physical limits, quantum computing becomes a crucial direction for next-generation computing technology. Quantum computing based on Bogoliubov zero modes in topological superconductors is considered one of the most promising routes due to their non-Abelian statistics resistant to decoherence.
3. Limitations of Existing Approaches:
   • Standard superconducting theory relies on effective field descriptions based on spontaneous U(1) symmetry breaking, violating particle number conservation
   • Existing theories have problems handling properties sensitive to particle number conservation, such as optical conductivity failing to automatically satisfy sum rules
   • Reassembling single-particle zero modes into many-body systems and exploiting non-Abelian statistics presents conceptual difficulties
4. Research Motivation: Re-examine quasi-particle properties under strict particle number conservation conditions, providing more rigorous mathematical proofs for the theoretical foundations of quantum computing.

Core Contributions

1. Rigorous Mathematical Proof: Demonstrates that under particle number-conserving Hamiltonians, single-particle quasi-particles possess the same quantized charge and inertial mass as bare particles
2. Theoretical Correction: Corrects long-standing misconceptions about Bogoliubov quasi-particles being electron-hole mixed states
3. Quantum Computing Implications: Proves that Bogoliubov zero modes are not Majorana particles and cannot be used for braiding quantum information
4. Conceptual Challenges Revealed: Exposes fundamental difficulties in preparing braiding quantum states through physical processes
5. Call for Theoretical Reconstruction: Provides compelling arguments for establishing particle number-conserving superconducting theory

Detailed Methodology

Theoretical Framework

This paper is based on a rigorous many-body quantum mechanics framework, with the core concept being "eigen-particles."

Necessity of Particle Number Conservation

For electrons in condensed matter systems, since the energy is too low to produce particle number fluctuations, all reasonable descriptions must include strict particle number conservation:

$[N_c, H] = 0$

where $N_c \equiv \sum_l c_l^\dagger c_l$ is the total particle number operator.

Eigen-particle Representation

Through unitary transformation $\tilde{c}_l^\dagger \equiv U^\dagger c_l^\dagger U$, the Hamiltonian can be diagonalized:

$\tilde{H} = \sum_{l_1} \varepsilon_{l_1} \tilde{c}_{l_1}^\dagger \tilde{c}_{l_1} + \frac{1}{2!}\sum_{l_1 l_2} \varepsilon_{l_1 l_2} \tilde{c}_{l_1}^\dagger \tilde{c}_{l_2}^\dagger \tilde{c}_{l_2} \tilde{c}_{l_1} + \cdots$

Core Theorems

Theorem 1: Under particle number-conserving Hamiltonians, eigen-particles carry exactly one bare particle number.

Proof: Since $[N_c, U^\dagger] = 0$, we have: $N_c \tilde{c}_l^\dagger - \tilde{c}_l^\dagger N_c = [\tilde{c}_l^\dagger, N_c] = U^\dagger [c_l^\dagger, N_c] U = U^\dagger c_l^\dagger U = \tilde{c}_l^\dagger$

This means $N_c \tilde{c}_l^\dagger = \tilde{c}_l^\dagger (N_c + 1)$, demonstrating that the operator $\tilde{c}_l^\dagger$ increases the bare particle number by 1.

Theorem 2: Under particle number-conserving Hamiltonians, eigen-particles cannot be Majorana particles.

Proof: Assume an eigen-particle can be its own antiparticle, $\tilde{c}_l^\dagger = \tilde{c}_l$, then: $\tilde{c}_l^\dagger = [N_c, \tilde{c}_l^\dagger] = -[\tilde{c}_l^\dagger, N_c] = -[\tilde{c}_l, N_c] = -\tilde{c}_l = -\tilde{c}_l^\dagger$

This holds only when $\tilde{c}_l^\dagger = 0$, proving the theorem.

Correct Bogoliubov Quasi-particles

For BCS-type interactions: $H_{BCS} = -\frac{V}{\Omega} \sum_{kk'} c_{k\uparrow}^\dagger c_{-k\downarrow}^\dagger c_{-k'\downarrow} c_{k'\uparrow}$

The correct Bogoliubov quasi-particles should be:

$\tilde{c}_{k\sigma}^\dagger \approx c_{k\sigma}^\dagger + \sum_{k_1} \tilde{A}_{k\sigma}^{k_1} c_{k_1\uparrow}^\dagger c_{-k_1\downarrow}^\dagger c_{-k\bar{\sigma}} + \cdots$

This maintains strict particle number conservation, differing from the standard incorrect form: $\gamma_{k\uparrow}^\dagger = u_k c_{k\uparrow}^\dagger - v_k c_{-k\downarrow}$

Experimental Setup

Theoretical Analysis Methods

This paper employs pure theoretical analysis methods based on:

1. Rigorous many-body quantum mechanics
2. Unitary transformation theory
3. Eigen-particle representation method
4. Mathematical proof techniques

Verification Pathways

The paper proposes several possible experimental verification methods:

1. Degenerate Subspace Counting: L correct Bogoliubov zero modes form $2^L$-fold degeneracy, rather than the $2^{L/2}$-fold degeneracy predicted by Majorana theory
2. Heat Capacity Experiments: Large entropy should be quantifiable through heat capacity measurements
3. Finite-size Calculations: Appropriately scaled finite-size calculations should reveal these differences

Experimental Results

Theoretical Predictions Comparison

Single-particle Green's Function

The single-particle Green's function in the eigen-particle representation:

$G_l(\omega) = c_l^\dagger \left[(ω-E_l-i0^+)^{-1}\tilde{c}_l\right] + \left[(ω-E_l+i0^+)^{-1}\tilde{c}_l\right] c_l^\dagger + \cdots$

The first term yields the quasi-particle peak energy $E_l$, while remaining terms produce continuous spectrum and peak broadening.

Optical Conductivity Problem

In standard theory, due to violation of particle number conservation, the theoretical optical conductivity typically fails to satisfy sum rules, requiring specially designed corrections. In particle number-conserving theory, this problem is automatically resolved.

Related Work

Historical Background

1. BCS Theory (Bardeen, Cooper, Schrieffer, 1957): Established microscopic theory of superconductivity
2. Bogoliubov Theory (1958): Introduced the quasi-particle concept
3. Topological Superconductivity (Kitaev, 2001; Read-Green, 2000): Proposed the Majorana zero mode concept

Recent Related Research

1. Ortiz et al. (2014): First questioned topological superfluidity under particle number conservation
2. Lapa and Levin (2020): Rigorous results on particle number-conserving topological superconductivity
3. Leggett (Multiple works): Long-standing questioning of U(1) symmetry breaking in superconducting theory

Unique Contributions of This Paper

Compared to previous research, this paper:

1. Provides completely rigorous mathematical proofs
2. Introduces a comprehensive eigen-particle framework
3. Reveals fundamental difficulties in preparing braiding states
4. Provides theoretical foundations for the entire field to reconsider

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Fundamental Result: Under particle number conservation, Bogoliubov quasi-particles possess integer charge and mass, and cannot be Majorana particles
2. Quantum Computing Implications: The topological quantum computing pathway based on Majorana zero modes is theoretically flawed
3. Preparation Difficulties: Preparing braiding quantum states through physical thermalization is conceptually difficult
4. Theoretical Reconstruction: Requires establishing strictly particle number-conserving superconducting theory

Limitations

1. Scope of Applicability: Analysis primarily targets electronic systems; applicability to other particle systems requires further investigation
2. Environmental Effects: While environmental effects are discussed, treatment of strongly coupled environments is insufficient
3. Experimental Verification: Proposed experimental verification schemes for theoretical predictions require more detailed design
4. Alternative Approaches: Discussion of alternative quantum computing pathways is insufficient

Future Directions

1. Particle Number-Conserving Superconducting Theory: Establish a complete U(1) symmetric superconducting theory framework
2. Experimental Verification: Design concrete experiments to verify degeneracy differences
3. Alternative Quantum Computing Schemes: Explore other topological quantum computing pathways
4. Strongly Correlated Systems: Extend analysis to strongly correlated electron systems

In-depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Mathematical Rigor: Provides completely rigorous mathematical proofs with clear logic and no flaws
2. Conceptual Profundity: Touches upon fundamental issues in quantum many-body theory—particle number conservation
3. Far-reaching Impact: Questions the theoretical foundations of the entire topological quantum computing field
4. Complete Framework: Eigen-particle theory provides a comprehensive framework for handling such problems
5. Clear Writing: Complex theoretical concepts are expressed clearly with reasonable logical structure

Weaknesses

1. More Destructive than Constructive: Primarily negates existing theory; discussion of alternative approaches is insufficient
2. Limited Experimental Guidance: While verification methods are proposed, specific experimental designs lack detail
3. Highly Controversial: Conclusions contradict mainstream views, likely facing strong criticism
4. Unclear Application Prospects: If the Majorana pathway is not viable, where are new quantum computing schemes?

Impact

1. Theoretical Impact: Will force the condensed matter physics and quantum computing communities to reconsider fundamental assumptions
2. Practical Value: May salvage substantial resources invested in Majorana quantum computing
3. Reproducibility: Mathematical proofs are completely verifiable; theoretical predictions can be tested experimentally
4. Interdisciplinary: Connects condensed matter physics, quantum information, and mathematical physics

Applicable Scenarios

1. Theoretical Research: Provides new perspectives for superconducting theory and topological matter research
2. Quantum Computing: Provides theoretical guidance for quantum computing pathway selection
3. Experimental Physics: Provides theoretical framework for related experimental design and interpretation
4. Education and Teaching: Provides profound case studies for quantum many-body theory instruction

References

This paper cites 44 important references, covering:

• Classical superconducting theory literature (BCS, Bogoliubov, etc.)
• Topological quantum computing literature (Kitaev, Ivanov, etc.)
• Particle number conservation-related research (Leggett, Ortiz, etc.)
• Quantum many-body theory (Anderson, White, etc.)

Overall Assessment: This is a paper of major theoretical significance. Although its conclusions are controversial, the mathematical proofs are rigorous and the logic is clear. If widely accepted, it will have a revolutionary impact on the topological quantum computing field, promoting the redevelopment of superconducting theory. The paper's profundity lies not only in identifying problems but more importantly in providing a theoretical framework for solving them.