New HDE models with higher derivatives of the Hubble parameter $H$

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2509.12284
• Title: New HDE models with higher derivatives of the Hubble parameter $H$
• Author: Antonio Pasqua
• Classification: gr-qc (General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology)
• Publication Date: October 14, 2025
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.12284v6

Abstract

This paper investigates two dark energy (DE) models characterized by higher-order derivatives of the Hubble parameter $H$, which generalize previously proposed DE scenarios. Assuming a power-law form for the scale factor $a(t)=b_0t^n$, the authors derive analytical expressions for the DE energy density, pressure, equation of state (EoS) parameter, deceleration parameter, and the evolution of the DE fractional density. Both non-interacting and interacting dark sector frameworks are studied, where interactions are modeled through coupling terms proportional to the dark matter (DM) energy density. For specific parameter sets with power-law indices $n=2$, $n=3$, and $n=4$, the current age of the universe is calculated. The obtained values show slight deviations from the observationally inferred age of $\approx 13.8$ Gyr; furthermore, a systematic trend is identified wherein larger values of $n$ lead to higher ages. The interacting scenario consistently predicts larger ages compared to the non-interacting counterpart.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Background

1. Cosmic Accelerated Expansion Phenomenon: WMAP, the Supernova Cosmology Project, SDSS, the Planck mission, and X-ray studies consistently indicate that the universe is currently undergoing accelerated expansion
2. Dark Energy Theory Challenges: The cosmological constant $\Lambda_{CC}$ as the simplest candidate faces conceptual challenges, such as the cosmological constant problem and the coincidence problem
3. Quantum Field Theory Prediction Issues: Quantum field theory calculations using Planck-scale or electroweak-scale cutoffs predict vacuum energy densities that exceed observed values by factors of $10^{123}$ and $10^{55}$, respectively

Research Motivation

1. Dynamical Dark Energy Models: Develop dynamical DE models where the EoS parameter $\omega_D$ evolves with time, providing a flexible framework consistent with observational data
2. Holographic Approach: Based on the principle that system entropy is proportional to boundary area rather than volume, offering a complementary perspective
3. Higher-Order Derivative Models: Explore DE density models dependent on the Hubble rate $H$ and its time derivatives, which encode the dynamics of cosmic expansion

Core Contributions

1. Proposal of Two New Higher-Derivative DE Models: Generalized dark energy models incorporating the third-order derivative $\dddot{H}$ of the Hubble parameter
2. Complete Analytical Analysis: Under the power-law scale factor assumption, analytical expressions for DE energy density, pressure, EoS parameter, and deceleration parameter are derived
3. Interacting Dark Sector Study: Systematic investigation of the effects of DM-DE interactions on cosmological parameters
4. Cosmic Age Calculation: Computation of the current universe age for different parameter sets, revealing systematic trends
5. Parameter Constraints: Provision of model parameter combinations consistent with observational constraints

Methodology Details

Model Definition

First Model

The dark energy density expression is: $\rho_D = 3\left[\alpha\left(\frac{\dddot{H}}{H^2}\right) + \beta\left(\frac{\ddot{H}}{H}\right) + \gamma\dot{H} + \delta H^2\right]$

where $\alpha$, $\beta$, $\gamma$, and $\delta$ are dimensionless parameters.

Second Model

The dark energy density expression is: $\rho_D = 3\left[\alpha\left(\frac{\dddot{H}}{H^2}\right) - \zeta\left(\frac{\ddot{H}\dot{H}}{H^3}\right) + \beta\left(\frac{\ddot{H}}{H}\right) + \gamma\dot{H} + \delta H^2\right]$

where an additional parameter $\zeta$ is introduced.

Cosmological Framework

FLRW Metric

The homogeneous and isotropic FLRW metric is adopted: $ds^2 = -dt^2 + a^2(t)\left[\frac{dr^2}{1-kr^2} + r^2d\Omega^2\right]$

Friedmann Equations

$H^2 = \frac{1}{3M_p^2}(\rho_D + \rho_m) - \frac{k}{a^2}$$\dot{H} + 2H^2 = \frac{8\pi G}{6}p_D - \frac{k}{a^2}$

Power-Law Scale Factor

The scale factor is assumed to take a power-law form: $a(t) = b_0t^n$

where $b_0$ and $n$ are positive constants, and the Hubble parameter is $H(t) = n/t$.

Technical Innovations

1. Higher-Order Derivative Terms: Systematic inclusion of the third-order derivative of the Hubble parameter for the first time, providing richer cosmological dynamics
2. Dimensional Consistency Treatment: Ensuring physical dimensional consistency of all terms through $H^{-2}$ and $H^{-1}$ factors
3. Parameterized Interaction: Adoption of the phenomenological interaction form $Q = 3d_2H\rho_m$
4. Analytical Solution: Complete analytical solutions obtained under the power-law assumption

Experimental Setup

Parameter Selection

• Power-law indices: $n = 2, 3, 4$
• Cosmological parameters: $\Omega_{m0} = 0.315$, $\Omega_{k0} = 0.01$
• Interaction parameter: $d_2 = 0.02$
• Dark energy fraction: $\Omega_{D0} \approx 0.685$

Parameter Constraint Conditions

Based on the current dark energy fraction requirement: $-\frac{6\alpha}{n^3} + \frac{2\beta}{n^2} - \frac{\gamma}{n} + \delta \approx 0.685$

Specific Parameter Combinations

• $n=2$: $(\alpha,\beta,\gamma,\delta) = (1,2,0.5,0.685)$ or $(0.5,1,0.2,0.66)$
• $n=3$: $(\alpha,\beta,\gamma,\delta) = (1,2,0.5,0.63)$
• $n=4$: $(\alpha,\beta,\gamma,\delta) = (1,1,1,0.90375)$

Experimental Results

Equation of State Parameter

Both models yield the same EoS parameter: $\omega_D = -1 + \frac{2}{3n}$

• At $n=1$: $\omega_D = -1/3$ (critical value between acceleration and deceleration)
• For $n>1$: $\omega_D > -1/3$ (accelerated expansion)
• As $n$ increases, $\omega_D$ approaches $-1$ (cosmological constant-like behavior)

Deceleration Parameter

Current deceleration parameter values:

All cases show $q_0 < 0$, indicating cosmic acceleration.

Cosmic Age Calculation

The cosmic age is calculated through numerical integration:

Key Findings:

1. All calculated values are close to the observed value of 13.8 Gyr
2. The predicted age increases with increasing $n$
3. The interacting scenario consistently yields larger ages

Dark Energy Fraction Evolution

Both models predict: $\Omega_D = \text{constant} = -\frac{6\alpha}{n^3} + \frac{2\beta}{n^2} - \frac{\gamma}{n} + \delta$

That is, the fraction of dark energy in the total critical density remains constant over time.

Related Work

Holographic Dark Energy Development

• Li Model: First proposed HDE with $\rho_D = 3\alpha M_p^2 L^{-2}$
• Ricci Dark Energy: $L \propto R^{-1/2}$
• Granda-Oliveros Model: $\rho_\Lambda$ dependent on $H$ and $\dot{H}$

Higher-Order Derivative Models

• Chen & Jing Model: Models including $\ddot{H}$ terms ($\alpha=0$ case)
• Generalized Framework: The present models can reduce to special cases of several known models

Interacting Dark Sector

• Motivation: Addressing the coincidence problem
• Observational constraints: $0 < d_2 < 0.025$
• Studies of various interaction forms

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Model Viability: Both higher-derivative DE models are phenomenologically viable and can describe cosmic acceleration
2. Parameter Dependence: Cosmological behavior strongly depends on the power-law index $n$ and model parameters
3. Interaction Effects: DM-DE interactions have systematic effects on cosmic age and deceleration parameter
4. Age Prediction: Model predictions for cosmic age are basically consistent with observations, showing systematic trends

Limitations

1. Power-Law Assumption: Restriction to a specific scale factor form
2. Parameter Degeneracy: Additional observational constraints needed to determine optimal parameter values
3. Phenomenological Approach: Lacks explanation of deeper physical mechanisms
4. Analytical Limitations: Some calculations require numerical methods

Future Directions

1. Parameter Fitting: Finding optimal parameter values fitting observational data
2. Alternative Scale Factors: Investigating model behavior under other scale factor forms
3. Observational Tests: Comparison with SNe Ia, CMB, BAO, and other observational data
4. Theoretical Foundation: Exploring the microscopic physical origin of the models

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Mathematical Rigor: Complete analytical derivations with rigorous mathematical treatment
2. Systematic Study: Simultaneous consideration of both interacting and non-interacting scenarios
3. Parametric Analysis: Provision of specific computational results for multiple parameter sets
4. Physical Reasonableness: All results comply with fundamental physical constraints

Weaknesses

1. Model Motivation: Lacks deeper physical motivation for introducing higher-order derivative terms
2. Observational Comparison: Lacks systematic comparison with actual observational data
3. Parameter Space: Relatively limited parameter selection without thorough exploration of parameter space
4. Stability Analysis: Absence of model stability and causality analysis

Impact

1. Theoretical Contribution: Provides a new theoretical framework for dark energy research
2. Methodological Value: Analytical methods applicable to other cosmological models
3. Parameter Constraints: Provides theoretical predictions for future observations
4. Extensibility: Model framework possesses good extensibility

Applicable Scenarios

1. Theoretical Cosmology: Theoretical research on dark energy models
2. Parameter Estimation: Theoretical constraints on cosmological parameters
3. Model Comparison: Comparative studies with other DE models
4. Observational Predictions: Theoretical predictions for future observational missions

References

The paper cites 87 relevant references, covering a broad range of literature from observational missions such as WMAP and Planck to various dark energy theoretical models, providing a solid theoretical foundation for the research.

Overall Assessment: This is a work with certain innovations in dark energy theoretical research. By introducing higher-order derivative terms of the Hubble parameter, it extends the existing holographic dark energy model framework. While there is room for improvement in observational verification and physical motivation, its analytical methods and systematic analysis provide valuable theoretical contributions to the field.