Defending Diffusion Models Against Membership Inference Attacks via Higher-Order Langevin Dynamics

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2509.14225
• Title: Defending Diffusion Models Against Membership Inference Attacks via Higher-Order Langevin Dynamics
• Authors: Benjamin Sterling (Stony Brook University), Yousef El-Laham (Stony Brook University), Mónica F. Bugallo (Stony Brook University)
• Classification: cs.LG, stat.ML
• Publication Date: October 16, 2025 (arXiv v2)
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.14225

Abstract

This paper addresses emerging data security challenges in generative artificial intelligence applications by focusing on defending diffusion models against membership inference attacks. Membership inference attacks enable attackers to determine whether a specific data point was used in model training. Although diffusion models exhibit inherent resistance to membership inference attacks compared to other generative models, vulnerabilities remain. The proposed defense method leverages critically-damped higher-order Langevin dynamics, introducing multiple auxiliary variables and joint diffusion processes along these variables. The core idea is that auxiliary variables introduce mixed external stochasticity, which helps disrupt sensitive input data in the early stages of the diffusion process. The concept is validated theoretically and empirically on toy and speech datasets using AUROC curves and FID metrics.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Definition

The core problem addressed in this research is the threat of Membership Inference Attacks (MIA) against diffusion models. Membership inference attacks are privacy attacks where attackers attempt to determine whether specific data samples were used to train a target model.

Importance Analysis

1. Data Privacy Protection Requirements: With the rapid development of generative AI applications, particularly in medical data and sensitive intellectual property domains, protecting training data privacy has become critical
2. Vulnerability of Diffusion Models: While diffusion models demonstrate better inherent attack resistance compared to other generative models like GANs, they remain susceptible to backdoor attacks, membership inference attacks, and adversarial attacks
3. Limitations of Existing Defense Methods: Current primary defense mechanisms such as Differentially Private Diffusion Models (DPDM) suffer from privacy-utility tradeoffs, where privacy protection levels directly correlate with generated sample quality

Research Motivation

Existing membership inference attack defenses primarily include differential privacy, L2 regularization, and knowledge distillation. This paper's motivation is to explore a novel defense strategy that enhances privacy protection through structural improvements in the diffusion process itself, without requiring direct data augmentation or strict differential privacy constraints.

Core Contributions

1. Proposes a novel defense framework based on critically-damped higher-order Langevin dynamics (HOLD++), which enhances resistance to membership inference attacks through auxiliary variable introduction
2. Establishes Rényi differential privacy theoretical guarantees for HOLD++, proving that privacy loss reaches its maximum at the beginning of the diffusion process and monotonically decreases over time
3. Reveals the relationship between auxiliary variables and privacy protection, demonstrating that mean squared error can be "tuned" by adjusting parameters β, L^(-1), and n
4. Validates method effectiveness on Swiss Roll toy dataset and LJ Speech speech dataset, evaluating defense efficacy and generation quality using AUROC and FID metrics

Methodology Details

Task Definition

Input: Training dataset D, diffusion model parameters Output: Diffusion model capable of resisting membership inference attacks Constraints: Maximize privacy protection while maintaining generation quality

Model Architecture

HOLD++ Forward Process

The forward stochastic differential equation for HOLD++ is defined as:

dx_t = Fx_t dt + G dw

Where:

• F = Σ(i=1 to n-1) γ_i(E_{i,i+1} - E_{i+1,i}) - ξE_{n,n}
• G = √(2ξL^(-1))E_{n,n}
• x_0 = (q_0^T, p_0^T, s_0^T, ...)^T

Key Mathematical Expressions

The mean and covariance of the forward process are:

μ_t = exp(Ft)x_0
Σ_t = L^(-1)I + exp(Ft)(Σ_0 - L^(-1)I)exp(Ft)^T

Sampling is implemented via Cholesky decomposition:

x_t = μ_t + L_t ε

PIA Attack Adaptation

The PIA attack metric adapted for HOLD++ becomes:

R_{t,p} = ||Fx_t - (1/2)GG^T S_θ(x_t,t)||_p

Technical Innovations

1. Stochasticity Mixing through Auxiliary Variable Introduction: By introducing velocity, acceleration, and other auxiliary variables, additional randomness is introduced in the early stages of diffusion, making it difficult for attackers to accurately estimate original data
2. Non-deterministic Score Function: HOLD++'s score network only models the score of the final auxiliary variable, making completely deterministic attacks impossible
3. Theoretical Privacy Guarantees: Provides rigorous Rényi differential privacy analysis with privacy loss upper bounds

Experimental Setup

Datasets

1. Swiss Roll Dataset: Two-dimensional toy dataset for validating theoretical predictions
2. LJ Speech Dataset: Real-world speech dataset using Grad-TTS for text-to-speech conversion

Evaluation Metrics

1. AUROC (Area Under ROC Curve): Evaluates membership inference attack effectiveness
   • Close to 1.0 indicates perfect attack discrimination between training/non-training data
   • Close to 0.5 indicates attack performance equivalent to random guessing
2. FID (Fréchet Inception Distance): Evaluates generated data quality

Comparison Methods

• Traditional diffusion model (n=1)
• HOLD++ with different orders (n=2,3,...)
• Configurations with different variance factors β

Implementation Details

• Swiss Roll experiments: 40,000 training epochs, 15-layer fully connected network, ReLU activation, layer normalization
• LJ Speech experiments: Grad-TTS architecture, tested up to n=2 (higher orders difficult to train)
• 25 repeated experiments for 95% confidence intervals

Experimental Results

Main Results

Swiss Roll Dataset

• AUROC significantly decreases with increasing model order n and variance factor β
• 95% confidence intervals for β=2 and β=10 do not overlap, indicating statistical significance
• Higher-order models (n>1) demonstrate substantially superior privacy protection compared to traditional diffusion models

LJ Speech Dataset

Experimental results demonstrate that n=2 achieves better privacy protection and generation quality compared to n=1:

Ablation Studies

• Impact of Model Order n: AUROC significantly decreases with increasing n, enhancing privacy protection
• Impact of Variance Factor β: Larger β values provide superior privacy protection
• Temporal Distribution Analysis: Privacy vulnerability is primarily concentrated in the early stages of the diffusion process

Experimental Findings

1. Unexpected Results on CIFAR-10: AUROC approaches 0.5 on image datasets, indicating that continuous-time diffusion models themselves exhibit strong resistance to MIA
2. Specificity of Speech Data: Mel-spectrograms are more difficult to augment than images, making speech data more susceptible to MIA attacks
3. Quality-Privacy Tradeoff: Higher-order models provide superior privacy protection while simultaneously producing higher-quality generated samples

Related Work

Diffusion Model Security

• SecMI: First MIA attack against discrete diffusion models
• PIA (Proximal Initialization Attack): Continuous-time version of MIA attacks
• DPDM: Differential privacy approach combining DP-SGD with continuous-time diffusion models

Higher-Order Langevin Dynamics

• CLD (Critically-damped Langevin Dynamics): Introduces velocity auxiliary variables
• TOLD (Third-Order Langevin Dynamics): Adds acceleration variables
• HOLD++: Critically-damped higher-order Langevin dynamics

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. HOLD++ Provides Effective MIA Defense: Stochasticity introduced through auxiliary variables significantly reduces membership inference attack success rates
2. Theoretical Guarantees Align with Practical Validation: Rényi differential privacy analysis corresponds with experimental results
3. Dual Improvement in Quality and Privacy: In certain scenarios, higher-order models simultaneously improve generation quality and privacy protection

Limitations

1. Increased Training Complexity: Higher-order models are more difficult to train, particularly on complex datasets
2. Parameter Tuning Complexity: Requires balancing between model order n, variance factor β, and privacy parameter ε_num
3. Limited Higher-Order Validation: Real dataset validation only extends to n=2, with insufficient verification of higher-order effectiveness

Future Directions

1. Explore more efficient higher-order model training methods
2. Investigate higher-order dynamics applications to other generative model types
3. Develop adaptive parameter selection strategies

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Strong Theoretical Innovation: Cleverly combines higher-order Langevin dynamics with privacy protection, providing novel theoretical perspectives
2. Rigorous Mathematical Analysis: Provides complete Rényi differential privacy proofs and privacy loss upper bound analysis
3. Well-Designed Experiments: Progressive validation strategy from toy to real datasets is scientifically effective
4. High Practical Value: Offers novel defense approaches beyond traditional differential privacy

Weaknesses

1. Limited Experimental Scale: Validation on only two datasets, lacking large-scale dataset experiments
2. Missing Computational Overhead Analysis: Lacks detailed analysis of additional computational costs from higher-order models
3. Insufficient Comparison with Other Defense Methods: Primarily compares with traditional diffusion models, lacking direct comparison with methods like DPDM
4. Insufficient Parameter Sensitivity Analysis: Provides insufficient guidance for selecting critical hyperparameters

Impact

1. Academic Contribution: Provides novel theoretical framework and practical methods for diffusion model privacy protection
2. Practical Value: Demonstrates important application potential in sensitive data domains such as healthcare and finance
3. Reproducibility: Authors provide open-source code, facilitating research reproduction and extension

Applicable Scenarios

1. Sensitive Data Generation: Medical imaging, speech synthesis, and other privacy-sensitive generation tasks
2. Federated Learning Environments: Collaborative training requiring simultaneous data privacy protection
3. Industrial Applications: Generative model deployment with strict intellectual property protection requirements

References

This paper cites 17 important references covering foundational diffusion model theory, membership inference attack methods, differential privacy techniques, and higher-order Langevin dynamics, providing solid theoretical foundations for the research.

Overall Assessment: This is an important paper with significant innovation in the field of diffusion model privacy protection. By combining higher-order Langevin dynamics with membership inference attack defense, it provides novel and effective solutions. Despite room for improvement in experimental scale and certain technical details, its theoretical contributions and practical value make it an important advance in the field.