On the extension of a class of Hermite multivariate interpolation problems

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2509.14359
• Title: On the extension of a class of Hermite multivariate interpolation problems
• Authors: Hakop Hakopian, Anush Khachatryan (Yerevan State University, Institute of Mathematics of NAS RA)
• Classification: math.NA, cs.NA (Numerical Analysis)
• Publication Date: October 10, 2025 (arXiv v2)
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.14359

Abstract

This paper characterizes the solvable set of Hermite multivariate interpolation problems when the sum of multiplicities is at most $2n + 2$, where $n$ is the degree of the polynomial space. This result extends an earlier theorem by one of the authors from 2000 concerning the case $2n+1$, which can be viewed as a natural generalization of the classical Severi theorem (1921).

Research Background and Motivation

Core Problem

This paper investigates the characterization of solvability for Hermite multivariate interpolation problems. Given an interpolation point set $X = \{x^{(1)}, \ldots, x^{(s)}\}$ and a multiplicity scheme $\mathcal{N} = \{n_1, \ldots, n_s; n\}^k$, one seeks to find a $k$-variate polynomial of degree $n$, $p \in \Pi_n^k$, satisfying the interpolation conditions: $D^\alpha p(x^{(i)}) = \lambda_i^\alpha, \quad \forall |\alpha| \leq n_i - 1, \quad i = 1, \ldots, s$

Research Significance

1. Theoretical Value: Extends the classical Severi theorem and interpolation theory
2. Application Background: Has important applications in numerical analysis, approximation theory, and algebraic geometry
3. Technical Challenge: Determining solvability of multivariate interpolation is considerably more complex than the univariate case

Historical Development

• Severi Theorem (1921): Provides complete characterization for the case $\sum_{i=1}^s n_i \leq n+1$
• Authors' 2000 Result: Extended to the case $\sum_{i=1}^s n_i \leq 2n+1$
• Present Contribution: Further extends to the case $\sum_{i=1}^s n_i \leq 2n+2$

Core Contributions

1. Main Theorem: Completely characterizes the solvability of Hermite interpolation problems when the sum of multiplicities is at most $2n+2$
2. Theoretical Extension: Extends existing theory from $2n+1$ to $2n+2$, which presents significant technical challenges
3. Geometric Insight: Reveals the crucial role of lines and conic sections in interpolation solvability
4. Complete Proof: Provides rigorous mathematical proof based on induction

Detailed Methodology

Basic Definitions and Notation

Polynomial Space: $\Pi_n^k = \left\{\sum_{|\alpha| \leq n} c_\alpha x^\alpha\right\}, \quad \dim \Pi_n^k = \binom{n+k}{k}$

Total Number of Interpolation Conditions: $\mathcal{N}_\#^k = \sum_{i=1}^s \binom{n_i-1+k}{k}$

Scheme Classification:

• $(≤)$-scheme: $\mathcal{N}_\#^k \leq \binom{n+k}{k}$
• Exact scheme: $\mathcal{N}_\#^k = \binom{n+k}{k}$
• $(<)$-scheme: $\mathcal{N}_\#^k < \binom{n+k}{k}$

Core Theorem

Theorem 2.1 (Main Result): Let $\mathcal{N} = \{n_1, \ldots, n_s; n\}^2$ be a $(≤)$-scheme satisfying $\sum_{i=1}^s n_i \leq 2n+2$. Then for $k \geq 2$, the problem $(\mathcal{N}, X)^k$ is $n$-solvable if and only if:

(i) No line passes through more than $n+1$ interpolation points (ii) No conic section passes through more than $2n+1$ interpolation points

Proof Strategy

Induction Framework:

1. Base Case: Verification for $n = 2$
2. Induction Hypothesis: Assume the result holds for all degrees $\leq n-1$
3. Induction Step: Handle the case $n$ in four steps

Key Step Analysis:

Step 2: When there exists a line $\alpha_0$ passing through exactly $n+1$ points

• Construct the reduced scheme $\mathcal{N}^0 = \mathcal{N} - \Delta^{\alpha_0}_X$
• Verify solvability conditions for the reduced problem
• Utilize linear factor decomposition from Proposition 1.12

Step 3: When there exists a line passing through at least 3 points

• Apply Theorem 1.18 (the $2n+1$ case)
• Construct an extended problem to prove solvability of the original problem

Step 4: General position case (no three collinear points)

• Construct an irreducible conic section $\beta_0$ through the first 5 points
• Verify conditions for reduction to an $n-2$ degree problem
• Utilize quadratic factor decomposition from Proposition 1.21

Technical Innovations

1. Precise Characterization of Geometric Constraints: Transforms algebraic conditions into geometric constraints
2. Clever Induction Structure Design: Reduces problem dimension through linear and quadratic factor decomposition
3. Complete Treatment of Boundary Cases: $2n+2$ is the upper bound that this method can handle

Experimental Setup

Theoretical Verification

This work is primarily pure mathematical theory, verified through rigorous mathematical proofs rather than numerical experiments.

Counterexample Construction

Cases where Theorem 2.1 fails: When $\sum_{i=1}^s n_i = 2n+3$

Specific Counterexample:

• Scheme: $\mathcal{N} = \{n-1, 1, \ldots, 1; n\}^2$ ($n+4$ points with multiplicity 1)
• Point Configuration:
  • Points $x^{(i)}, i = 1, \ldots, n+3$ all lie on an irreducible conic section $\beta$
  • Points $x^{(1)}, x^{(n+4)}, x^{(n+5)}$ lie on a line $\alpha$
• Verification: Satisfies geometric conditions but the problem is not solvable

Experimental Results

Main Result Verification

Theorem Correctness:

• Sufficiency: Problems satisfying geometric conditions are indeed solvable
• Necessity: Problems violating geometric conditions are indeed not solvable
• Boundary: $2n+2$ is the precise upper bound that can be handled

Special Case Analysis

Corollary 2.2: For a $(≤)$-scheme with $\sum_{i=1}^s n_i = 2n+2$, regularity is equivalent to $s \geq 6$ and $n_1 + n_2 \leq n+1$

Geometric Meaning:

• At least 6 interpolation points are required
• The sum of the two largest multiplicities cannot exceed $n+1$

Related Work

Historical Development

1. Severi Theorem (1921): Complete resolution of the case $\sum n_i \leq n+1$
2. Nagata's Work: Hermite problems from an algebraic geometry perspective
3. Lorentz Couple: Related research in approximation theory
4. Hakopian 2000: Extension to the case $\sum n_i \leq 2n+1$

Positioning of This Work

• Theoretical Extension: Non-trivial generalization from $2n+1$ to $2n+2$
• Methodological Innovation: Precise treatment of conic section constraints in the inductive proof
• Boundary Exploration: Reaches the theoretical limit of the current method

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Complete Characterization: Provides necessary and sufficient conditions for solvability of Hermite interpolation when $\sum n_i \leq 2n+2$
2. Geometric Insight: Reveals the crucial role of line and conic section constraints
3. Theoretical Boundary: Demonstrates that $2n+2$ is the upper limit for this class of methods

Limitations

1. Upper Bound Restriction: The method cannot be extended to cases where $\sum n_i \geq 2n+3$
2. Dimension Dependence: Main results focus on the bivariate case; generalization to higher dimensions requires additional techniques
3. Lack of Constructivity: Provides existence results but lacks explicit construction methods

Future Directions

1. Higher Order Cases: Explore solvability conditions when $\sum n_i > 2n+2$
2. Algorithm Implementation: Develop efficient algorithms for verifying geometric conditions
3. Application Extensions: Specific applications in numerical analysis and computational geometry

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Theoretical Depth: Provides important extension of Hermite interpolation theory
2. Rigorous Proof: Induction proof structure is clear and logically sound
3. Geometric Intuition: Transforms algebraic problems into intuitive geometric constraints
4. Completeness: Provides necessary and sufficient conditions rather than merely sufficient conditions

Weaknesses

1. Technical Limitations: Cannot break through the theoretical barrier at $2n+2$
2. Practical Applicability: Lacks algorithmic implementation and numerical verification
3. Generalization Difficulty: Extension to higher dimensions or more general cases is not straightforward

Impact

1. Theoretical Contribution: Provides new theoretical tools for interpolation theory
2. Methodological Value: Induction proof techniques have reference value for related problems
3. Application Potential: Has promising applications in computational geometry and numerical analysis

Applicable Scenarios

1. Theoretical Research: Multivariate interpolation and approximation theory
2. Geometric Computation: Problems involving algebraic curves
3. Numerical Methods: Theoretical foundation for high-precision interpolation algorithms

References

Main references include:

1. Severi, F. (1921): Foundation of classical interpolation theory
2. Hakopian, H. (2000): Earlier work on the $2n+1$ case
3. Lorentz, G.G. & R.A. (1984, 1992): Systematic study of multivariate interpolation
4. Nagata, M. (1960): Related work from algebraic geometry perspective

Summary: This paper achieves important progress in Hermite multivariate interpolation theory, advancing the existing theoretical boundary from $2n+1$ to $2n+2$ and providing complete geometric characterization. While there are technical limitations, it establishes a solid foundation for further development in this field.