Stability and Structure of Binary Metal Hydrides under Pressure, Electrochemical Potential and Combined Pressure-Electrochemistry

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2509.22722
• Title: Stability and Structure of Binary Metal Hydrides under Pressure, Electrochemical Potential and Combined Pressure-Electrochemistry
• Authors: Mgcini Keith Phuthi (University of Michigan), Pin-Wen Guan (Carnegie Mellon University), Russell J. Hemley (University of Illinois Chicago), Venkatasubramanian Viswanathan (University of Michigan)
• Classification: cond-mat.mtrl-sci (Condensed Matter Physics - Materials Science)
• Publication Date: November 20, 2025 (arXiv v2)
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.22722v2

Abstract

Metal hydrides possess tunable and diverse properties with important applications in hydrogen storage and superconductivity. This study introduces electrochemistry as an additional control parameter and employs density functional theory (DFT) calculations to investigate the synthesis of binary metal hydrides under high pressure, electrochemical conditions, and combined pressure-electrochemistry (P²) conditions. The research predicts phase diagrams for selected transition metal hydrides under combined conditions and validates them against experimental observations. Through phase diagram analysis, we examine stability trends in scandium, yttrium, and lanthanum hydrides, as well as hydrogen-metal charge transfer characteristics at different pressures. We further predict various vanadium and chromium hydrides that can be synthesized via the pressure-electrochemistry method, opening new pathways for novel hydride synthesis.

Research Background and Motivation

1. Core Problems to Address

Metal hydride synthesis faces two major challenges:

• Extreme synthesis conditions for superhydrides: Requires ~100 GPa ultra-high pressure to stabilize high hydrogen content compounds with H/M ≥ 6. Experiments can only be performed in diamond anvil cells (DAC), with sample sizes of only 20-100 μm.
• Competition from hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) in electrochemical hydrogen loading: At negative potentials, the hydrogen evolution reaction (H⁺ + e⁻ → ½H₂) competes with hydride formation, limiting effective hydrogen incorporation.

2. Importance of the Problem

• Superconducting applications: LaH₁₀ exhibits Tc = 260 K at 180-200 GPa; H₃S shows Tc = 203 K at 141 GPa, approaching room-temperature superconductivity.
• Hydrogen storage: Clean energy carrier with energy density exceeding lithium batteries and environmental friendliness.
• Technical bottleneck: Existing synthesis methods either require extreme pressures or are limited by HER, hindering practical implementation.

3. Limitations of Existing Methods

• Pure pressure approach: Requires extremely high pressures (>100 GPa) with complex equipment and microscopic samples.
• Pure electrochemical approach: Limited by HER, difficult to form high hydrogen content compounds.
• Existing combined methods: Only studied at megapascal (MPa) pressure ranges, without exploring synergistic effects between gigapascal (GPa)-level pressure and electrochemistry.

4. Research Motivation

Propose the pressure-electrochemical potential combined (P²) method:

• Utilize negative electrochemical potential to provide large driving force for hydrogen incorporation
• Utilize pressure to suppress HER and stabilize hydrides
• Synthesize target hydrides under milder conditions (reducing pressure by an order of magnitude)

Core Contributions

1. Established P² phase diagram prediction framework: Combining DFT calculations and convex hull analysis, systematically predicting stable phases and crystal structures of metal hydrides under combined pressure (10⁻⁵-200 GPa) and electrochemical potential (0 to -1.0 V vs RHE) conditions.
2. Predicted and validated rare-earth metal hydride phase diagrams:
   • First comprehensive P² phase diagram prediction for scandium hydrides
   • Improved yttrium and lanthanum hydride phase diagrams, including structural phase transition information
   • High agreement with experimental data (YH₂, YH₃, LaH₁₀, etc.)
3. Revealed periodic table trends: Systematically analyzed how hydride stability varies with ionic radius and ionization energy in the Sc-Y-La sequence.
4. Predicted novel hydride synthesis pathways:
   • Vanadium hydrides: V₂H, VH₂, VH₃, VH₅
   • Chromium hydrides: Cr₂H₃, CrH₂, CrH₃, Cr₂H₇ (stable only under P² conditions)
5. Charge transfer analysis: Through Bader charge analysis, revealed the charge state of hydrogen atoms at different pressures and the evolution of H-H distances, explaining the transition mechanism from molecular to atomic hydrogen.

Methodology Details

Task Definition

Predict stable phases and crystal structures of binary metal hydrides MHₓ at given pressure P and electrochemical potential URHE.

Inputs:

• Metal element M
• Pressure range P (10⁻⁵ - 200 GPa)
• Electrochemical potential URHE (relative to reversible hydrogen electrode)

Outputs:

• P² phase diagram: showing stable phases at different (P, URHE) conditions
• Crystal structure information: space group, symmetry
• Phase boundaries and phase transition conditions

Theoretical Framework

1. Thermodynamic Stability Criterion

At constant T and P, using Gibbs free energy to determine stability:

ΔG = GMHₓ(P,T) - GM(P,T) - xGH(P,T) + xeURHE

Key approximations:

• T = 0 K, neglecting entropy contributions: G ≈ H_DFT(P,T=0) = E_DFT + PV
• E_DFT: DFT-optimized crystal structure energy
• PV: pressure-volume work

2. Hydrogen Chemical Potential Treatment

Employing piecewise function approximation for GH(P, T=300K):

         ⎧ E^H₂_DFT + f_trans + f_rot + δ_expt-gas     (P < 0.004 GPa, gas phase)
GH(P) ≈ ⎨ g_expt(P,300K) + δ_expt-solid              (0.004 ≤ P ≤ 10 GPa)
         ⎩ H_DFT(P,T=0)                                (P > 10 GPa, solid phase)

• Low pressure: ideal gas approximation + translational/rotational free energy
• Medium pressure: NIST experimental data
• High pressure: DFT-calculated solid hydrogen

3. Convex Hull Analysis

For given (P, URHE):

1. Calculate formation energies of all candidate structures
2. Construct energy-composition convex hull
3. Phases on the convex hull are stable phases
4. Phase boundaries on the convex hull determine phase transition conditions

Physical significance: As shown in Figure 1, convex hull shape changes under different conditions, leading to different stable phases:

• 1 GPa: YH₂ and YH₃(α) are stable
• 100 GPa: YH₃(β) replaces YH₃(α)

DFT Calculation Details

Parameter Settings

• Software: Quantum Espresso
• Functional: GGA-PBE (Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof)
• Pseudopotentials: SSSP standard solid-state pseudopotential library
• Convergence criteria:
  • Energy convergence: <1 meV/atom
  • Force convergence: <0.01 eV/Å
  • Pressure convergence: 0.5 GPa
  • Brillouin zone sampling: 0.02 Å⁻¹ uniform density
  • Methfessel-Paxton smearing: 0.27 eV (metals)

Structure Candidate Sources

1. Crystal structure search results from literature
2. Materials Project database
3. Metal ion substitution of known structures

High-throughput Workflow

Automated DFT calculations and analysis implemented using ASIMTools framework

Charge Analysis Methods

• Bader charge analysis: Using Critic2 software
• Yu-Trinkle method: Integrating charge density around attractors
• Valence electrons only: Balancing computational cost with physical significance

Experimental Setup

Research Systems

Two classes of metal hydride systems selected:

1. Rare-Earth Metal Hydrides (Group 3)

• Sc-H system: First systematic study
• Y-H system: High-temperature superconductor (YH₉: Tc = 243 K @ >200 GPa)
• La-H system: Near room-temperature superconductor (LaH₁₀: Tc = 260 K @ 180-200 GPa)

Selection rationale:

• Abundant experimental data available for validation
• High superconducting application value
• Demonstrates periodic table trends

2. Early Transition Metal Hydrides (Period 4)

• V-H system: Hydrogen storage, ammonia synthesis catalyst
• Cr-H system: Electroplating intermediate, rich phase diagram

Selection rationale:

• Extensive crystal structure search data available
• Practical application value
• Tests P² method's predictive capability

Computational Range

• Pressure: 10⁻⁵ - 200 GPa (spanning 12 orders of magnitude)
• Electrochemical potential: 0 to -1.0 V vs RHE
• Temperature: T = 0 K (DFT) / 300 K (hydrogen chemical potential)

Validation Strategy

1. Pure pressure axis validation (URHE = 0): Comparison with DAC experiments
2. Pure electrochemistry axis validation (P ≈ 0): Comparison with electrochemical hydrogen loading experiments
3. HER limitation line: Marking region dominated by hydrogen evolution reaction

Experimental Results

Main Results

1. Scandium Hydrides (Sc-H) - First Prediction

Phase diagram characteristics (Figure 2a):

• ScH₂ (Fm3m): Stable at ambient conditions, consistent with experiments
• ScH₃ (P63/mmc): Stable >20 GPa or URHE < -0.33 V
• ScH₃ (Fm3m): Stable >130 GPa, verified by Shao et al. experiments (Tc = 18.5 K @ 131 GPa)
• ScH₉ (P63/mmc): Appears at ultra-high pressure

P² synergistic effect:

• At URHE = -0.5 V, only ~5 GPa needed to stabilize ScH₃
• Reduces pressure requirement by approximately 4-fold compared to pure pressure method

Experimental gap: Electrochemical hydrogen loading of scandium is rarely studied; P² method provides new synthesis pathway

2. Yttrium Hydrides (Y-H) - Improved Prediction

Improvements over Guan et al. (2021):

1. Excluded unstable structures: Removed low-pressure YH₉ phases with fractured metal lattices
2. Added structural information: Annotated pressure-driven phase transitions
3. Corrected phase boundaries: YH₃ phase transition from P63/mc to Fm3m @ ~10 GPa

Phase diagram validation (Figure 2b):

• YH₂ (Fm3m): Stable at ambient pressure ✓
• YH₃ (P63/mmc) → YH₃ (Fm3m): ~10 GPa phase transition ✓ (consistent with experiments)
• YH₉ (P63/mmc): Synthesized at ~100 GPa, P² method predicts reduction to ~10 GPa
• YH₁₀ (Fm3m): Ultra-high pressure phase

Electrochemical verification:

• YH₂ and YH₃ thin film electrochemical synthesis (Molten et al., 1996; Kooij et al., 1999) ✓
• Observed structural transitions and optical transparency changes ✓

Key finding: YH₉ synthesis pressure may be reduced by an order of magnitude (100→10 GPa)

3. Lanthanum Hydrides (La-H) - Superconductor System

Phase diagram complexity (Figure 2c):

• LaH₃ (Fm3m): Stable at ambient conditions, insulating
• Intermediate phases: La₂H₅ (I41/amd), La₄H₉ (I4/mmm)
• LaH₁₀ (Fm3m): >100 GPa, Tc = 260 K

Differences from prior work:

• This study predicts LaH₁₀ stability (consistent with experiments)
• Guan et al. predicted LaH₁₁ and LaH₁₆ (not observed)
• Differences stem from neglecting entropy effects and nuclear quantum effects

Experimental comparison:

• Laniel et al. (2022) observed seven lanthanum hydrides, mostly >100 GPa
• Predicted LaH₃ (I4/mmm), LaH₄ (I4/mmm) consistent with experiments
• La₂H₅ structure predicted as I41/amd (vs experimental candidate I41md)

Ablation Study - Charge Transfer Analysis

Hydrogen Atom Charge State (ΔQH)

Universal pattern (Figure 3):

1. Charge acquisition: Hydrogen atoms always acquire electrons, but <1 e⁻/atom
2. Pressure effect: ΔQH decreases with increasing pressure (Figure S3)
3. Composition effect: Increasing H/M ratio → decreasing ΔQH (electron competition)

Specific values (@ 1 GPa):

• MH₂ (Fm3m): ΔQH ≈ 0.75 e⁻ (single octahedral site environment)
• YH₉: ΔQH = 0.15-0.70 e⁻ (diverse environments)
• LaH₁₀: ΔQH ≈ 0.18 e⁻ (approaching molecular hydrogen)

H-H Nearest Neighbor Distance (d^NN_H-H)

Key trends:

1. Metal size effect: La > Y > Sc (same compound)
2. Pressure paradox: d^NN_H-H increases at high pressure (despite volume reduction)
3. Molecular hydrogen characteristics:
   • LaH₄ @ 1 GPa: partial H₂ pairs, d ≈ 0.74 Å
   • LaH₄ @ 96 GPa: H₂ pairs disappear, d > 1.5 Å

Physical explanation:

• Low-pressure superhydrides contain "suspended" H₂ molecules
• At high pressure, hydrogen atoms acquire more charge, electrostatic repulsion increases
• Transition toward metallic hydrogen characteristics → favorable for superconductivity

Periodic Table Trends

Ionization energy correlation:

• Sc (6.561 eV) → Y (6.217 eV) → La (5.577 eV)
• Y's ΔQH slightly higher than Sc (~0.05 e⁻)
• La's ΔQH unexpectedly lower than Y (complex interplay of f-electrons and ionic radius)

Period 4 Transition Metal Results

Vanadium Hydrides (V-H)

Predicted phase sequence (Figure 4a):

V → V₂H (C12/m1) → VH₂ (Fm3m) → VH₂ (Pnma) → VH₃ (Fm3m) → VH₅ (Cmcm)

Experimental verification:

• V₂H and VH₂ @ <10 GPa: known phases ✓
• VH₃, VH₅: not observed (predicted >10 GPa)

Application limitation: V₂H's extreme thermal stability limits hydrogen storage applications

P² potential: May enable synthesis of VH₃ under mild conditions

Chromium Hydrides (Cr-H)

Phase diagram richness (Figure 4b):

Cr → CrH (P63/mmc) → Cr₂H₃ → CrH₂ (Fm3m) → CrH₂ (Pnma) → CrH₃ (P63/mmc)
                                    ↓ (P² only)
                                 Cr₂H₇ (C1m1)

Verification status:

• CrH (P63/mmc): Electroplating intermediate ✓, synthesized at 3 GPa ✓ (predicted ~1 GPa)
• Cr₂H₃:
  • Prediction: P3m1 (<11 GPa) / P21/m (>15 GPa)
  • Experiment: C2/m @ 19 GPa (Marizy et al., 2018)
  • History: Snavely (1947) claimed CrH₁.₇ (FCC), not reproduced
• CrH₂ (Pnma): Predicted ~11 GPa, experimental 31 GPa (pressure overestimated)
• Cr₂H₅ (Ibam): Predicted >80 GPa, unverified
• Cr₂H₇ (P21/m): Stable only under P² conditions (key prediction!)

P² uniqueness: Cr₂H₇ requires P > 1 GPa and URHE < -0.25 V; cannot be synthesized by pure pressure or electrochemistry alone

Related Work

High-Pressure Hydride Research

1. Superconducting hydride discoveries:
   • H₃S (Drozdov, 2015): Tc = 203 K @ 141 GPa
   • LaH₁₀ (Somayazulu, 2019; Drozdov, 2019): Tc = 260 K
   • YH₉ (Kong, 2021): Tc = 243 K
2. Crystal structure prediction:
   • Liu et al. (2017): Y/La hydride structure search
   • Ye et al. (2018): Sc hydrides, predicted ScH₄, ScH₆
   • Yu et al. (2015): Cr hydrides
   • Li et al. (2017): V hydrides

Electrochemical Hydrogen Loading

1. Hydrogen storage applications:
   • Reversible storage, high safety
   • Monitoring techniques: voltammetry, EIS
   • Challenges: loading rate, capacity
2. Metal hydride electrodes:
   • YH₃ thin film switchable mirrors (Nagengast, 1999)
   • Pd-assisted hydrogen absorption (Benck, 2019)

Combined Methods

1. Low-pressure combined approach: Giovanelli et al. (2004) review, only MPa-level
2. P² method pioneering: Guan et al. (2021, 2022) first proposed GPa-level pressure-electrochemistry

Progress compared to Guan et al.:

• Extended to more metal systems (Sc, V, Cr)
• Included structural phase transition information
• Improved hydrogen chemical potential treatment
• Systematic charge analysis

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. P² method effectiveness:
   • Predicted phase diagrams highly consistent with experiments (Y-H, La-H)
   • Can reduce synthesis pressure by one order of magnitude (YH₉: 100→10 GPa)
   • Discovered phases synthesizable only under P² conditions (Cr₂H₇)
2. Periodic table regularities:
   • Hydrogen loading capability: La > Y > Sc
   • Related factors: ionic radius↑, ionization energy↓ → stability↑
   • Phase diagram complexity: La > Y > Sc
3. Charge transfer mechanism:
   • High pressure promotes H₂→H⁻ transition
   • Favorable for metallic hydrogen characteristics and superconductivity
   • ΔQH inversely correlated with d^NN_H-H
4. New synthesis pathways:
   • Sc: ScH₃ @ 5 GPa + URHE = -0.5 V
   • Y: YH₉ @ 10 GPa + negative potential
   • Cr: Cr₂H₇ achievable only via P²

Limitations

1. Theoretical approximations:
   • Zero-temperature approximation: Neglects entropy effects (LaH₁₀ vs LaH₁₁ uncertainty)
   • No nuclear quantum effects: Hydrogen quantum fluctuations not considered
   • Simplified hydrogen chemical potential: Piecewise function may introduce errors
2. Structure screening:
   • "Metal lattice fracture" exclusion based on empirical criteria
   • May miss metastable but synthesizable phases
   • Requires more rigorous dynamic stability criteria
3. Non-stoichiometry:
   • Assumes strict stoichiometric ratios
   • Actual materials often have defects and non-stoichiometry (especially at low-medium pressure)
4. Experimental challenges:
   • P² experimental techniques at >1 GPa not yet mature
   • HER line only indicative; actual behavior may be more complex
   • Stability after pressure release not predicted (requires kinetic studies)

Future Directions

1. Theoretical improvements:
   • Include finite temperature and entropy effects
   • Consider nuclear quantum effects (especially for hydrogen)
   • Non-stoichiometry modeling (Monte Carlo + GNN acceleration)
2. Experimental development:
   • GPa-level pressure-electrochemistry combined apparatus
   • In-situ characterization techniques
   • Pressure release stability testing
3. System expansion:
   • Other transition metals (Ti, Mn, Fe, etc.)
   • Ternary/multi-element hydrides
   • Non-metal doping effects
4. Property prediction:
   • Superconducting Tc calculations
   • Hydrogen diffusion kinetics
   • Mechanical stability
5. Alternative synthesis:
   • Ball milling (Kataoka, 2021 successfully synthesized YH₃)
   • Chemical vapor deposition
   • Plasma-assisted methods

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Methodological Innovation ★★★★★

• Pioneering framework: First systematic establishment of GPa-level P² phase diagram prediction method
• Theoretical completeness: Clear thermodynamic framework, rigorous convex hull analysis
• Practical value: Provides experimentally actionable synthesis condition predictions

2. Computational Rigor ★★★★☆

• Parameter convergence: Energy convergence <1 meV/atom, exceeding standard requirements
• High-throughput workflow: ASIMTools ensures reproducibility
• Multi-source structure validation: Combines literature, databases, and substitution strategies

3. Experimental Verification Sufficiency ★★★★★

• Multi-dimensional verification:
  • Pure pressure axis: Comparison with DAC experiments (Sc, Y, La, Cr)
  • Pure electrochemistry axis: Comparison with electroplating/thin film experiments (Y, Cr)
  • Quantitative agreement: Phase transition pressures, stable phase composition
• Prediction success rate: Y-H system nearly perfect, Cr-H system slight pressure deviation but correct trends

4. Physical Insight Depth ★★★★★

• Charge analysis: Reveals microscopic mechanism of H₂→H⁻ transition
• Periodic table regularities: Systematically elucidates roles of ionization energy and ionic radius
• Pressure paradox: Explains counterintuitive increase in H-H distance at high pressure

5. Writing Clarity ★★★★★

• Logical flow: Clear progression from background → methods → results → discussion
• Excellent visualization: Phase diagrams, charge analysis figures, structure diagrams information-rich
• Complete details: Comprehensive method parameters, abundant Supporting Information

Weaknesses

1. Theoretical Limitations ★★★☆☆

• Missing temperature effects: T = 0 K approximation creates ambiguity in LaH₁₀ vs LaH₁₁ prediction
• Hydrogen chemical potential treatment: Piecewise function may have discontinuities at connection points
• Kinetics neglected: Cannot predict post-pressure-release stability and decomposition rates

2. Incomplete Structure Search ★★★☆☆

• Dependent on existing data: No independent crystal structure search performed
• Possible phase omission: Especially P²-specific metastable phases
• Subjective screening criteria: "Metal lattice fracture" criterion lacks quantitative basis

3. Limited Experimental Guidance ★★★☆☆

• Ambiguous HER line: Only "indicative," actual experiments may deviate
• Kinetics absent: Synthesis rates, diffusion coefficients not addressed
• Engineering challenges: Synthesis route for >1 GPa P² experiments not discussed

4. Quantitative Precision ★★★☆☆

• Pressure deviations: Cr-H system predicted pressure lower than experimental (11 vs 31 GPa)
• Phase boundary uncertainty: ±few GPa errors not quantified
• Potential calibration: RHE reference applicability at high pressure unverified

Impact Assessment

Academic Contribution ★★★★★

1. Paradigm shift: Introduces electrochemistry into high-pressure materials synthesis, opening new field
2. Predictive capability: Provides specific, testable hypotheses for experiments (YH₉ @ 10 GPa)
3. Theoretical tool: P² phase diagram method generalizable to other material systems

Practical Value ★★★★☆

1. Reduced synthesis threshold: Lower pressure requirements → easier implementation
2. New material discovery: P²-unique phases like Cr₂H₇
3. Hydrogen storage optimization: Guides electrochemical hydrogen storage material design

Potential applications:

• Superconductor synthesis (cost reduction)
• Hydrogen energy storage (capacity enhancement)
• Catalyst development (V, Cr hydrides)

Reproducibility ★★★★★

• Open-source code: ASIMTools framework publicly available
• Detailed parameters: Complete DFT settings reproducible
• Data transparency: Supporting Information provides supplementary data

Applicable Scenarios

Ideal Scenarios ✓

1. High-pressure superconducting hydrides: Systems requiring reduced synthesis pressure (e.g., YH₉)
2. Electrochemical hydrogen storage: Metal hydrides needing HER suppression
3. Novel phase exploration: Phases inaccessible to pure pressure or electrochemistry

Limited Scenarios ✗

1. Room-temperature applications: Zero-temperature calculations have large errors for high-temperature systems (>500 K)
2. Complex compounds: Computational cost escalates for ternary and higher systems
3. Fast kinetics: Cannot predict diffusion, nucleation processes

Recommended Strategy

• Step 1: Use P² phase diagram to screen candidate materials
• Step 2: Experimentally verify phases near ambient pressure/potential
• Step 3: Gradually increase P or |URHE|, verify phase boundaries
• Step 4: Characterize post-pressure-release stability

Selected References

Methodological Foundation

1. Guan et al., PNAS 2021: P² method first proposed
2. Bartel, J. Mater. Sci. 2022: Convex hull stability review
3. Giannozzi et al., J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 2009: Quantum Espresso

Experimental Verification

4. Somayazulu et al., PRL 2019: LaH₁₀ superconductor discovery
5. Kong et al., Nat. Commun. 2021: YH₉ Tc = 243 K
6. Marizy et al., PRB 2018: Cr hydride high-pressure synthesis

Theoretical Prediction

7. Liu et al., PNAS 2017: Y/La hydride structure search
8. Ye et al., J. Phys. Chem. C 2018: Sc hydride prediction

Summary Statement

The pressure-electrochemical potential combined (P²) method proposed in this paper represents an important innovation in metal hydride synthesis. Through systematic DFT calculations and phase diagram predictions, the authors convincingly demonstrate the method's feasibility and superiority. Particularly in the yttrium hydride system, the high agreement between predictions and experiments (YH₂, YH₃ phase transitions, electrochemical synthesis) establishes the method's credibility.

Greatest highlights:

1. Predicts YH₉ synthesis pressure reduction to 10 GPa (vs 100 GPa)
2. Discovers Cr₂H₇ stable only under P² conditions
3. Reveals charge transfer mechanism of H₂→H⁻ transition at high pressure

Main limitations:

1. Zero-temperature approximation limits entropy-driven phase transition predictions
2. Dependent on existing structure data, may omit novel phases
3. Lacks kinetics and post-pressure-release stability analysis

Future outlook: This method opens new pathways for practical implementation of superconducting hydrides and hydrogen storage materials. With development of GPa-level pressure-electrochemistry experimental techniques, more predictions are expected to be verified and new hydrides discovered. Combined with machine learning-accelerated structure search and kinetic simulations, the P² method is poised to become a standard tool in materials synthesis.

Recommendation Index: ★★★★★ (Strongly Recommended)

• Condensed matter physics/materials science researchers: Must read
• Superconductivity/hydrogen energy professionals: Highly relevant
• Computational materials science students: Excellent methodology case study