2025-11-17T17:46:13.479757

Zeros and Orthogonality of generalized Fibonacci polynomials

Coletti, Flórez, Higuita et al.
This paper analyzes the concept of orthogonality in second-order polynomial sequences that have Binet formula similar to that of the Fibonacci and Lucas numbers, referred to as Generalized Fibonacci Polynomials (GFP). We give a technique to find roots of the GFP. As a corollary of this result, we give an alternative proof of a special case of Favard's Theorem. The general case of Favard's Theorem guarantees that there is a measure to determine whether a sequence of second-order polynomials is orthogonal or not. However, the theorem does not provide an explicit such measure. Our special case gives both the explicit measure and the relationship between the second-order recurrence and orthogonality, demonstrating whether the GFP polynomials are orthogonal or not. This allows us to classify which of familiar GFPs are orthogonal and which are not. Some familiar orthogonal polynomials include the Fermat, Fermat-Lucas, both types of Chebyshev polynomials, both types of Morgan-Voyce polynomials, and Vieta and Vieta-Lucas polynomials. However, we prove that the Fibonacci, Lucas, Pell, and Pell-Lucas sequences are not orthogonal. In Section \ref{sectionrw}, we give a brief description of discrete--time and continuous--time Morkov chains with special emphasis on birth-and-death stochastic processes. We find sufficient conditions on the polynomial's coefficients under which a given family of orthogonal polynomial induces a Markov chain. These families of orthogonal polynomials include Chebyshev polynomials of first kind and Fermat-Lucas. In the final section, we highlight some connections between orthogonal polynomials and Markov processes. These relations are not new but seem to have been somewhat forgotten. We do so to draw the attention of researchers in the orthogonal polynomial and probability communities for further collaboration.
academic

Zeros and Orthogonality of Generalized Fibonacci Polynomials

Basic Information

  • Paper ID: 2510.00074
  • Title: Zeros and Orthogonality of Generalized Fibonacci Polynomials
  • Authors: Cristian F. Coletti, Rigoberto Flórez, Robinson A. Higuita, Sandra Z. Yepes
  • Classification: math.CO (Combinatorics)
  • Publication Date: October 11, 2025 (arXiv v2)
  • Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.00074

Abstract

This paper analyzes the concept of orthogonality for second-order polynomial sequences with Binet formulas similar to Fibonacci and Lucas numbers, referred to as generalized Fibonacci polynomials (GFP). The paper provides techniques for finding GFP roots and, as a corollary, offers an alternative proof of a special case of Favard's theorem. While the general Favard theorem guarantees the existence of a measure determining whether a second-order polynomial sequence is orthogonal, it does not provide an explicit measure. The special case presented here provides both an explicit measure and establishes the relationship between second-order recurrence relations and orthogonality, enabling determination of whether GFP polynomials are orthogonal. This allows classification of which familiar GFPs are orthogonal and which are not. Some familiar orthogonal polynomials include Fermat, Fermat-Lucas, both classes of Chebyshev polynomials, both classes of Morgan-Voyce polynomials, and Vieta and Vieta-Lucas polynomials. However, the paper proves that Fibonacci, Lucas, Pell, and Pell-Lucas sequences are not orthogonal.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Background

  1. Core Problem: Determining which generalized Fibonacci polynomials (GFP) possess orthogonality properties and under what conditions they are orthogonal or non-orthogonal.
  2. Significance:
    • Orthogonal polynomials have important applications in mathematical analysis, numerical computation, probability theory, and stochastic processes
    • Fibonacci-type polynomials appear widely in combinatorics and number theory
    • Research connecting orthogonal polynomial theory with classical recurrence sequences
  3. Limitations of Existing Methods:
    • While the general case of Favard's theorem guarantees the existence of an orthogonal measure, it does not provide an explicit form
    • Lack of systematic methods to determine orthogonality for specific GFP families
    • Insufficient research on the roots of GFPs
  4. Research Motivation:
    • Provide explicit orthogonal measures
    • Establish clear connections between second-order recurrence relations and orthogonality
    • Classify orthogonality properties of common GFPs
    • Explore connections between orthogonal polynomials and Markov processes

Core Contributions

  1. Developed systematic techniques for finding GFP roots: Determining roots of general GFPs through roots of classical Fibonacci and Lucas polynomials
  2. Provided alternative proof of special case of Favard's theorem: Offering explicit orthogonal measures and discriminant conditions
  3. Completed orthogonality classification of common GFPs: Clearly distinguishing which 8 of 13 common polynomials are orthogonal and which 5 are not
  4. Established connections between orthogonal GFPs and Markov chains: Determining sufficient conditions for orthogonal polynomials to induce random walks
  5. Provided explicit weight function constructions: Giving explicit weight functions for orthogonal GFPs

Methodology Details

Task Definition

Input: Generalized Fibonacci polynomial sequences defined by recurrence relations

  • Fibonacci-type: F0(x)=0,F1(x)=1,Fn(x)=d(x)Fn1(x)+g(x)Fn2(x)F_0(x) = 0, F_1(x) = 1, F_n(x) = d(x)F_{n-1}(x) + g(x)F_{n-2}(x)
  • Lucas-type: L0(x)=p0,L1(x)=p1(x),Ln(x)=d(x)Ln1(x)+g(x)Ln2(x)L_0(x) = p_0, L_1(x) = p_1(x), L_n(x) = d(x)L_{n-1}(x) + g(x)L_{n-2}(x)

Output: Determining whether the sequence is orthogonal; if orthogonal, providing the weight function

Constraints: d(x),g(x)Q[x]d(x), g(x) \in \mathbb{Q}[x], with deg(d(x))>deg(g(x))\deg(d(x)) > \deg(g(x)), and d2(x)+4g(x)0d^2(x) + 4g(x) \neq 0

Core Theoretical Framework

1. Binet Formula Representation

For n0n \geq 0 with d2(x)+4g(x)0d^2(x) + 4g(x) \neq 0, the Binet formula is: Fn(x)=an(x)bn(x)a(x)b(x),Ln(x)=an(x)+bn(x)αF_n(x) = \frac{a^n(x) - b^n(x)}{a(x) - b(x)}, \quad L_n(x) = \frac{a^n(x) + b^n(x)}{\alpha}

where: a(x)=d(x)+d2(x)+4g(x)2,b(x)=d(x)d2(x)+4g(x)2a(x) = \frac{d(x) + \sqrt{d^2(x) + 4g(x)}}{2}, \quad b(x) = \frac{d(x) - \sqrt{d^2(x) + 4g(x)}}{2}

2. Root Determination Method

Theorem 4.3: Let Fn(x)F_n(x) be a GFP as defined in (2.1). If rCr \in \mathbb{C} satisfies d(r)g(r)=γj\frac{d(r)}{\sqrt{g(r)}} = \gamma_j, where γj=2icosjπn\gamma_j = 2i\cos\frac{j\pi}{n} (j=1,2,,n1j = 1,2,\ldots,n-1) and g(r)0g(r) \neq 0, then rr is a root of Fn(x)F_n(x).

Theorem 4.4: Similarly, for Lucas-type GFP, if d(t)g(t)=τj\frac{d(t)}{\sqrt{g(t)}} = \tau_j, where τj=2icos(2j+1)π2n\tau_j = 2i\cos\frac{(2j+1)\pi}{2n}, then tt is a root of Ln(x)L_n(x).

3. Orthogonality Discriminant Conditions

Proposition 3.6: Let g(x)=4kg(x) = -4k (kR<0k \in \mathbb{R}_{<0}), and d(x)d(x) as defined in (2.1) and (2.2). If there exist constants s1,s2s_1, s_2 such that d(s1)=4kd(s_1) = -\sqrt{-4k}, d(s2)=4kd(s_2) = \sqrt{-4k}, and for every xx in the interval [s1,s2][s_1, s_2] we have 4k+d2(x)04k + d^2(x) \leq 0, then for nmn \neq m:

s1s2Fn(x)Fm(x)4kd2(x)d(x)dx=0\int_{s_1}^{s_2} F_n(x)F_m(x)\sqrt{-4k - d^2(x)}d'(x)dx = 0

Technical Innovations

  1. Unified root-solving method: Reducing the root problem for general GFPs to that of classical Fibonacci/Lucas polynomials
  2. Explicit weight function construction: Providing concrete orthogonal weight functions for specific forms of d(x)d(x) and g(x)g(x)
  3. Systematic classification framework: Determining orthogonality based on properties of d(x)d(x) and g(x)g(x)

Experimental Setup

Research Objects

The paper studied 13 common GFPs, including:

  • Non-orthogonal: Fibonacci, Lucas, Pell, Pell-Lucas, Jacobsthal
  • Orthogonal: Fermat, Fermat-Lucas, Chebyshev (both classes), Morgan-Voyce (both classes), Vieta, Vieta-Lucas

Analysis Methods

  1. Theoretical analysis: Using Favard's theorem and orthogonal polynomial theory
  2. Root computation: Based on known results for classical polynomial roots
  3. Weight function verification: Verifying orthogonal relationships through integral calculations

Verification Standards

Using the standard definition of orthogonality: fi(x),fj(x)=Rfi(x)fj(x)dμ(x)=δ(i,j)\langle f_i(x), f_j(x) \rangle = \int_{\mathbb{R}} f_i(x)f_j(x)d\mu(x) = \delta(i,j)

Experimental Results

Main Results

1. Orthogonality Classification

Orthogonal GFPs (8 types):

  • Fermat: Φn(x)=3xΦn1(x)2Φn2(x)\Phi_n(x) = 3x\Phi_{n-1}(x) - 2\Phi_{n-2}(x)
  • Fermat-Lucas: ϑn(x)=3xϑn1(x)2ϑn2(x)\vartheta_n(x) = 3x\vartheta_{n-1}(x) - 2\vartheta_{n-2}(x)
  • Chebyshev polynomials of the second kind: Un(x)=2xUn1(x)Un2(x)U_n(x) = 2xU_{n-1}(x) - U_{n-2}(x)
  • Chebyshev polynomials of the first kind: Tn(x)=2xTn1(x)Tn2(x)T_n(x) = 2xT_{n-1}(x) - T_{n-2}(x)
  • Morgan-Voyce polynomials (both classes)
  • Vieta and Vieta-Lucas polynomials

Non-orthogonal GFPs (5 types):

  • Fibonacci, Lucas, Pell, Pell-Lucas, Jacobsthal

2. Weight Function Results

Corollary 3.7: For d(x)=cxt+hd(x) = cx^t + h, g(x)=k/4g(x) = -k/4 (where c,h,k,tZc,h,k,t \in \mathbb{Z}, c0c \neq 0, k,t>0k,t > 0, and tt is odd), the weight function is: ω(x)=kd2(x)xt1\omega(x) = \sqrt{k - d^2(x)}x^{t-1}

3. Markov Chain Connection

Proposition 5.2: Under specific conditions, Lucas-type GFPs determine a random walk with transition matrix:

\frac{-h}{c} & \frac{2}{c} & 0 & \cdots \\ \frac{c-1+h}{c} & \frac{-h}{c} & \frac{1}{c} & \cdots \\ 0 & \frac{c-1+h}{c} & \frac{-h}{c} & \cdots \\ \vdots & \vdots & \vdots & \ddots \end{pmatrix}$$ ### Important Findings 1. **Parity properties**: When $d(x)$ is an odd function and $g(x)$ is an even function, polynomials with different parity indices are orthogonal 2. **Root complexity**: For $d(x) = ax + b$ with $g(x)$ a positive constant, all roots are complex, leading to non-orthogonality 3. **Weight function uniqueness**: For the linear case ($t=1$), the weight function is unique ## Related Work ### Main Research Directions 1. **Classical orthogonal polynomial theory**: Research on Chebyshev polynomials, Jacobi polynomials, etc. 2. **Fibonacci polynomials**: Hoggatt and Bicknell's research on roots of classical Fibonacci polynomials 3. **Generalized Fibonacci sequences**: André-Jeannin's two-parameter generalization 4. **Orthogonal polynomials and probability**: Karlin-McGregor representation and random walk theory ### Advantages of This Work 1. **Systematicity**: First systematic study of orthogonality of GFPs 2. **Explicit results**: Providing concrete weight functions rather than existence proofs 3. **Unified framework**: Incorporating multiple classical results into a unified theoretical framework 4. **Cross-disciplinary connections**: Establishing connections with Markov processes ## Conclusions and Discussion ### Main Conclusions 1. **Complete classification**: Successfully classified orthogonality of 13 common GFPs 2. **Discriminant criteria**: Established orthogonality discriminant methods based on recurrence coefficients 3. **Explicit construction**: Provided concrete weight functions for orthogonal GFPs 4. **Probabilistic connections**: Determined conditions for orthogonal polynomials to induce Markov chains ### Limitations 1. **Scope of applicability**: Primarily focuses on specific forms of $d(x)$ and $g(x)$ 2. **Generality**: Conclusions may not apply to more general polynomial coefficients 3. **Computational complexity**: Root computation may be complex for high-degree polynomials ### Future Directions 1. **Extension to more general coefficients**: Studying arbitrary-degree $d(x)$ and $g(x)$ 2. **Multivariate generalization**: Considering multivariate generalized Fibonacci polynomials 3. **Application research**: Exploring specific applications in numerical analysis and probability theory 4. **Computational algorithms**: Developing efficient orthogonality discriminant algorithms ## In-Depth Evaluation ### Strengths 1. **Significant theoretical contributions**: First systematic solution to the GFP orthogonality problem, filling a theoretical gap 2. **Methodological innovation**: The method of solving general GFP roots through classical polynomial roots has universal applicability 3. **Complete results**: Not only providing discriminant conditions but also explicit weight function constructions 4. **Cross-disciplinary value**: Bridging orthogonal polynomials and Markov processes 5. **Clear exposition**: Well-structured paper with rigorous mathematical derivations ### Weaknesses 1. **Technical limitations**: Main results restricted to specific forms of recurrence coefficients 2. **Practical considerations**: Insufficient discussion of computational efficiency for practical applications 3. **Numerical verification**: Lacking large-scale numerical experiments for verification 4. **Comparative analysis**: Insufficient comparison with other orthogonal polynomial families ### Impact 1. **Academic value**: Provides new research directions for orthogonal polynomial theory 2. **Practical value**: Potential applications in numerical analysis, probability theory, and combinatorics 3. **Reproducibility**: Clear theoretical results, easily verifiable and extensible 4. **Inspirational value**: Provides new ideas and methods for related research fields ### Applicable Scenarios 1. **Numerical computation**: Requiring specific orthogonal polynomials for numerical integration and approximation 2. **Probabilistic modeling**: Analysis of Markov chains and random walks 3. **Combinatorics**: Research on recurrence sequences and generating functions 4. **Theoretical research**: Further development of orthogonal polynomial theory ## References The paper cites 26 important references covering orthogonal polynomial theory, Fibonacci polynomials, Markov processes, and other fields, reflecting the interdisciplinary nature of the research and the solid theoretical foundation.