Geodesics in Quantum Gravity

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2510.00117
• Title: Geodesics in Quantum Gravity
• Authors: Benjamin Koch, Ali Riahinia, Angel Rincon
• Categories: gr-qc (General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology), hep-ph (High Energy Physics - Phenomenology), hep-th (High Energy Physics - Theory)
• Publication Date: October 16, 2025 (arXiv v2)
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.00117

Abstract

This paper investigates the motion of test particles in quantum gravity backgrounds by introducing the concept of q-geodesics—quantum-corrected analogues of classical geodesics. Unlike standard approaches that depend solely on the expectation value of the spacetime metric, this formulation is based on expectation values of quantum operators, such as the affine connection operator. This enables the capture of richer geometric information. The authors derive the q-geodesic equations using Lagrangian and Hamiltonian methods and apply them to spherically symmetric static backgrounds obtained from canonical quantum gravity. Example results include null radial motion and quantum gravity-corrected circular orbits above the Planck scale. This framework provides a refined description of motion in quantum spacetime, opening new directions for exploring the interface between quantum gravity and classical general relativity.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Definition

The geodesic equation in classical general relativity is a fundamental tool for describing free-fall particles and light ray paths, underlying phenomena from Mercury's perihelion precession to gravitational lensing. However, when approaching quantum regimes, general relativity as a classical theory is expected to fail and must be reconciled with quantum mechanical principles.

Research Significance

1. Observational Foundation: Nearly all modern astrophysical observations rely on classical geodesic equations
2. Theoretical Requirement: Understanding how particle trajectories should be described in quantum gravity theories
3. Observable Effects: Quantum gravity effects may produce observable deviations at both large and small scales

Limitations of Existing Approaches

Traditional semiclassical approximations typically consider particle motion in an effective background metric, where quantum corrections are absorbed into a modified classical geometry. This approach may fail to fully capture the complexity of motion in quantum spacetime, as it neglects quantum fluctuations, non-local effects, or interactions involving higher-order combinations of metric operators.

Research Motivation

The authors argue for the need to move beyond simple background corrections and develop concepts of particle paths that can encapsulate more fundamental quantum gravity effects, thereby motivating the development and analysis of "q-geodesics."

Core Contributions

1. Introduction of q-geodesic Concept: Proposing quantum-corrected geodesic analogues based on expectation values of quantum operators rather than merely the metric expectation value
2. Dual Derivation Method: Deriving q-geodesic equations using both Lagrangian and Hamiltonian formalism
3. Concrete Application Examples: Applying the theory to spherically symmetric static backgrounds, analyzing radial null geodesics and circular orbits
4. Observable Effect Predictions: Predicting quantum gravity correction effects above the Planck scale
5. Theoretical Framework Establishment: Providing new tools for exploring the interface between quantum gravity and classical general relativity

Methodology Details

Task Definition

Investigating the motion of test particles in quantum gravity backgrounds, with inputs being quantized spacetime metric operators and outputs being modified equations of motion (q-geodesic equations), subject to constraints including operator ordering prescriptions and the existence of inverse metric operators.

Core Methodological Architecture

1. Operator-Valued Action

Starting from the operator-valued action for a relativistic point particle:

Ŝ(x^μ, ĝ_μν) = ∫ dλ √(ĝ_μν dx^μ/dλ dx^ν/dλ)

2. Key Operational Sequence

The distinction between the traditional method and the q-geodesic method lies in the operational sequence:

• Classical Path: Expectation value → Variation → Extremization
• Q-geodesic Path: Variation → Extremization → Expectation value

3. Q-geodesic Equation

The resulting q-geodesic equation is:

d²x^μ/dλ² + ⟨Γ̂^μ_νρ⟩ dx^ν/dλ dx^ρ/dλ = 0

where ⟨Γ̂^μ_νρ⟩ is the expectation value of the quantum Christoffel symbol.

4. Operator Ordering Treatment

For non-commuting metric operators, Weyl ordering is employed:

T̂_α...Ŵ^...β ≡ 1/2(T̂_α...Ŵ^...β + Ŵ^...β T̂_α...)

Technical Innovations

1. Operator Expectation Value Priority: Directly using expectation values of connection operators rather than connections constructed from metric expectation values
2. Information Preservation: Retaining more quantum information by delaying expectation value calculations
3. Covariance Analysis: Introducing covariance concepts to quantify differences between q-geodesics and classical geodesics
4. Inverse Metric Operator: Assuming the existence of an inverse metric operator, which is non-trivial in certain quantum gravity approaches

Experimental Setup

Theoretical Framework

Employing spherically symmetric static quantum gravity backgrounds with the static equiradial (SER) condition:

ds² = n²(r)g(r)dt² - dr²/g(r) - r²dθ² - r²sin²(θ)dϕ²

Quantization Scheme

• Metric function g(r) → ĝ operator
• Canonical momentum p̂ satisfying canonical commutation relations
• Constraint relation: n̂ = p̂/(rΓ)

Hamiltonian

Hamiltonian under Einstein-Hilbert truncation:

Ĥ = (1-r²Λ)/r p̂ - (ĝp̂)/r

Expectation Value Calculations

Computing various operator expectation values through Heisenberg relations:

iℏ d⟨Â⟩/dr = ⟨[Â,Ĥ]⟩ + iℏ∂_r⟨Â⟩

Experimental Results

Main Theoretical Results

1. Q-geodesic Equations in Spherically Symmetric Backgrounds

In the equatorial plane (θ = π/2):

[u̇^t, u̇^r, u̇^θ, u̇^ϕ]^T = [-⟨n̂²ĝ'/n̂²ĝ⟩u^ru^t, ⟨ĝ'/2ĝ⟩(u^r)² + r⟨ĝ⟩(u^ϕ)² - ⟨n̂²ĝĝ'⟩(u^t)²/2, 0, -2u^ru^ϕ/r]^T

2. Horizon Corrections

Quantum Schwarzschild horizon:

r_QS = 2GM (1+ε₁,₂)/(1+ε₀,₂)

where ε parameters encode quantum corrections.

3. Circular Orbit Velocity Corrections

Q-geodesic circular orbit velocity:

v² = [-18G²M²(1+ε₂,₂) - r⁴(1+ε₀,₂)Λ(3-r²Λ) + 3GMr(1+ε₁,₂)(3+r²Λ)] / [denominator terms]

Key Findings

1. Short-Range Corrections: Corrections appear at 1/r² order, more significant than typical quantum gravity 1/r³ corrections
2. Long-Range Effects: May potentially explain large-scale phenomena such as galactic rotation curves
3. Parameter Dependence: Effect strength depends on integration constants ε_{i,j} of the spacetime wavefunction

Related Work

Major Research Directions

1. Spinning Particle Theory: Mathisson-Papapetrou-Dixon equations describing spin-curvature coupling
2. Modified Newtonian Dynamics (MOND): Correcting gravitational law at low accelerations
3. Fifth Force Theories: Extra interactions in scalar-tensor theories
4. Stochastic Gravity: Path integral approaches considering metric fluctuations

Uniqueness of This Work

• Arising from quantum spacetime structure rather than classical spin or phenomenological corrections
• Manifesting in single trajectories without requiring statistical averaging
• Allowing both short-range and long-range corrections

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Q-geodesics provide more accurate descriptions of particle motion in quantum spacetime
2. Quantum effects can produce observable deviations above the Planck scale
3. This framework provides new tools for exploring observable effects of quantum gravity

Limitations

1. Inverse Metric Operator Assumption: Not all quantum gravity methods support this assumption
2. Operator Ordering: Weyl ordering is a specific choice that may affect results
3. Spherical Symmetry Restriction: Current analysis is limited to spherically symmetric cases
4. Higher-Order Uncertainties: Certain expectation value calculations contain systematic uncertainties

Future Research Directions

1. Extension to more general quantum states and alternative quantum gravity models
2. Computing orbits beyond circular motion
3. Relaxing spherical symmetry assumptions
4. Comparison with astrophysical observational data

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Conceptual Innovation: Q-geodesics provide a new perspective for quantum gravity phenomenology
2. Mathematical Rigor: Providing both Lagrangian and Hamiltonian derivation methods
3. Practical Application: Providing concrete computable correction formulas
4. Broad Applicability: Framework applicable to different quantum gravity approaches
5. Observability: Predicting observable effects at large scales

Weaknesses

1. Foundational Assumptions: The existence of inverse metric operators is questionable in certain quantum gravity theories
2. Parameter Freedom: Integration constants ε_{i,j} provide numerous free parameters
3. Experimental Verification: Lacking direct comparison with actual observational data
4. Theoretical Completeness: The approximation level as a complete quantum gravity theory remains unclear

Impact

1. Theoretical Contribution: Opening new research directions in quantum gravity phenomenology
2. Practical Value: May provide alternative explanations for problems such as dark matter
3. Reproducibility: Providing clear computational frameworks and formulas

Applicable Scenarios

1. Phenomenological studies of quantum gravity effects
2. Theoretical modeling of large-scale structure formation
3. Theoretical predictions for precision gravitational experiments
4. Quantum corrections in black hole physics

References

The paper cites 103 relevant references, covering important works in quantum gravity, general relativity, astrophysics and other fields, with particular focus on canonical quantum gravity, asymptotic safety, string theory and other major quantum gravity research directions.

Overall Assessment: This is an innovative work at the intersection of quantum gravity theory and phenomenology. The q-geodesic concept provides a new theoretical framework for understanding particle motion in quantum spacetime, possessing significant theoretical value and potential observational significance. Despite certain foundational assumptions and technical limitations, this work opens new directions for studying quantum gravity effects.