This paper proposes a method for simulating the many-body localization (MBL) crossover phenomenon on near-term quantum devices. The researchers utilized 60 qubits on the IBM Heron r2 superconducting quantum processor ibm_fez to simulate the MBL crossover in a disordered kicked Ising model on a heavy hexagonal lattice. By computing out-of-time-ordered correlators (OTOCs) as indicators of the MBL crossover, quantum chaotic and many-body localized regions are identified from their late-time behavior. The results are verified through two independent error mitigation methods: operator renormalization and zero-noise extrapolation.
Study the many-body localization crossover in a disordered kicked Ising model on a heavy hexagonal lattice. By tuning the disorder strength W, identify the boundary between the quantum chaotic region (W < W_c) and the many-body localized region (W > W_c).
The time-dependent Hamiltonian is defined as:
H_X = \sum_{i=1}^N B_X(i)X_i, & t \in [0,T/2) \\ H_Z = J\sum_{(i,j)} Z_iZ_j + B_Z\sum_{i=1}^N Z_i, & t \in [T/2,T) \end{cases}$$ Where: - $X_i$, $Z_i$ are Pauli operators at the i-th lattice site - $B_X(i)$ is a random field uniformly distributed in $[B_{X0}-W, B_{X0}+W]$ - $J$, $B_Z$, $B_{X0}$ are fixed parameters - $W$ is the disorder strength parameter #### Floquet Evolution Operator The evolution operator for a single driving period: $$U_F = e^{-iH_ZT/2}e^{-iH_XT/2}$$ Parameter settings: $JT = π/2$, $B_ZT = 1.3$, $B_{X0}T = π/2$, such that the system is in maximum chaos state when $W=0$. #### Out-of-Time-Ordered Correlators (OTOCs) Defined as: $$\text{OTOC} = \langle 0^N|(U_F)^{\dagger n}X_1(U_F)^nZ_m(U_F)^{\dagger n}X_1(U_F)^n|0^N\rangle$$ Normalized form: $$\text{OTOC} = \frac{\langle 0^N|(U_F)^{\dagger n}X_1(U_F)^nZ_m(U_F)^{\dagger n}X_1(U_F)^n|0^N\rangle}{\langle 0^N|(U_F)^{\dagger n}I_1(U_F)^nZ_m(U_F)^{\dagger n}I_1(U_F)^n|0^N\rangle}$$ ### Technical Innovations 1. **Circuit optimization**: Manual removal of redundant gates outside the causal cone, significantly improving error mitigation quality 2. **Effective quantum volume**: Utilizing denominator terms to estimate causal cone growth as a complementary MBL indicator 3. **Dual error mitigation**: Combining operator renormalization and ZNE methods for mutual verification 4. **Distance-dependent analysis**: Identifying wavefront propagation characteristics through OTOC behavior at different distances x ## Experimental Setup ### Quantum Device - **Device**: IBM Heron r2 superconducting quantum processor ibm_fez (156 qubits) - **Usage scale**: 60 qubits forming a 2×3 heavy hexagonal lattice - **Gate error rates**: CZ gate ~3.7×10⁻³, SX gate ~2.93×10⁻⁴, readout error ~1.76×10⁻² ### Experimental Parameters - **Number of disorder realizations**: 25 - **Trotter steps**: 10 - **Total circuits**: 250 (25×10) - **Measurements per circuit**: 16,000 - **Pauli string circuits**: 32 ### Evaluation Metrics 1. **Normalized OTOC**: Primary metric reflecting information perturbation propagation 2. **Effective quantum volume**: $V_{eff} = \log F / \log(1-p)$, characterizing causal cone size 3. **Crossover point localization**: $W_c = \arg\max_W \partial\langle\langle\text{OTOC}\rangle\rangle/\partial W$ ### Error Mitigation Methods 1. **Operator renormalization**: Using denominator terms to correct noise effects 2. **Zero-noise extrapolation (ZNE)**: Extrapolation through noise amplification factors f=1.0, 1.5 ## Experimental Results ### Main Results #### OTOC Behavior Characteristics - **Weak disorder region (W≤0.18)**: OTOC drops sharply at distance x=n, exhibits strong late-time decay, showing quantum chaotic behavior - **Strong disorder region (W≥0.18)**: OTOC remains close to 1 or decays slowly, displaying many-body localization characteristics - **Crossover point**: $W_c \sim 0.18$, consistent between two error mitigation methods #### Wavefront Propagation Analysis - **W=0.05**: Clear wavefront propagating near x=n - **W=0.5**: Wavefront disappears, information propagation is suppressed #### Effective Quantum Volume - **Weak disorder**: Superlinear growth at late times, reflecting rapid causal cone expansion - **Strong disorder**: Linear growth, indicating causal cone no longer expands ### Error Mitigation Verification Both error mitigation methods show consistent results in chaotic and MBL regions, with careful analysis needed in the crossover region (0.14≤W≤0.2). The ZNE method makes the phase transition behavior clearer but with relatively larger error bars. ### Experimental Findings 1. **Distance dependence**: OTOC at x=n/2=5 is most suitable as a crossover indicator 2. **System size effects**: The 60-qubit system demonstrates scales inaccessible to classical computation 3. **Noise robustness**: Normalized OTOC shows certain resistance to noise ## Related Work ### MBL Theoretical Research - Theoretical framework based on breakdown of eigenstate thermalization hypothesis - Logarithmic light-cone behavior in one-dimensional systems - Controversies regarding MBL stability in higher dimensions ### Quantum Simulation Experiments - Time crystal implementation on superconducting qubits - Identification of local integral-of-motion operators - Application of excited-state variational quantum eigensolver ### Floquet Systems - Exotic phases in periodically driven systems - Equivalence between Trotter dynamics and Floquet systems - Quantum simulation of prethermalization phenomena ## Conclusions and Discussion ### Main Conclusions 1. **Successfully implemented 60-qubit MBL crossover simulation**, locating the crossover point $W_c \sim 0.18$ 2. **Verified OTOC as an effective MBL indicator**, distinguishing chaotic and localized regions 3. **Demonstrated practical capability of near-term quantum devices**, providing new directions for pre-fault-tolerant applications ### Limitations 1. **Trotter step constraints**: Noise limitations prevent observation of long-time asymptotic behavior 2. **Single system size**: Lack of finite-size scaling analysis prevents determination of true phase transitions 3. **Two-dimensional MBL stability**: Theoretical controversy regarding MBL phase stability in higher dimensions 4. **Causal cone limitations**: Circuit extension becomes impossible when causal cone covers all qubits ### Future Directions 1. **Lower-noise devices**: Exploring longer-time logarithmic light-cone behavior 2. **Finite-size scaling**: Multi-system-size studies to determine phase transition properties 3. **Other nonequilibrium phases**: Extension to exotic phases such as time quasicrystals 4. **Classically intractable problems**: Seeking more quantum advantage applications ## In-Depth Evaluation ### Strengths 1. **Technical innovation**: First MBL simulation on large-scale quantum devices with universally applicable circuit optimization and error mitigation methods 2. **Experimental rigor**: 25 disorder realizations, dual error mitigation, multi-distance analysis ensure result reliability 3. **Physical significance**: Successful identification of MBL crossover provides new experimental platform for quantum many-body physics 4. **Methodological contribution**: Establishes paradigm for studying nonequilibrium dynamics on noisy quantum devices ### Weaknesses 1. **Theoretical depth**: Lacks theoretical predictions and comparisons for crossover point values 2. **Scaling analysis**: Single system size limits understanding of phase transition properties 3. **Noise model**: Depolarizing channel assumption may be oversimplified 4. **Generalizability**: Applicability of methods to other quantum devices and models remains to be verified ### Impact 1. **Academic value**: Provides important experimental benchmark for quantum many-body physics and quantum computing intersection 2. **Technical advancement**: Error mitigation and circuit optimization methods generalizable to other quantum simulation problems 3. **Application prospects**: Demonstrates scientific computing potential of near-term quantum devices 4. **Reproducibility**: Detailed experimental parameters and open data support result reproduction ### Applicable Scenarios 1. **Quantum many-body physics research**: Nonequilibrium dynamics, phase transitions, critical phenomena 2. **Quantum algorithm development**: Error mitigation and circuit optimization techniques 3. **Quantum device evaluation**: Benchmarking and performance characterization 4. **Education and training**: Teaching cases for quantum simulation and many-body physics ## References This paper cites 48 important references covering: - MBL theoretical foundations [10-17, 25, 29-33] - Quantum simulation experiments [19, 26-28, 35] - Floquet systems [1-6, 15-17] - Error mitigation methods [22, 34, 35, 44] - Quantum chaos theory [36-39] Key references include Nandkishore & Huse's MBL review, IBM team's quantum advantage demonstration, and OTOC theoretical foundations. --- **Overall Assessment**: This is an important experimental paper at the intersection of quantum many-body physics and quantum computing. The authors successfully implemented digital simulation of MBL crossover on a large-scale quantum device with innovative technical methods and reliable results. Despite certain limitations in theoretical depth and system size, it opens new directions for scientific applications of near-term quantum devices, possessing significant academic value and technical advancement potential.