Astrophysical Consequences of an Electroweak $η_w$ Pseudo-Scalar

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2510.02310
• Title: Astrophysical Consequences of an Electroweak $η_w$ Pseudo-Scalar
• Author: Hooman Davoudiasl (Brookhaven National Laboratory)
• Classification: hep-ph (High Energy Physics - Phenomenology), astro-ph.GA (Astrophysics - Galactic)
• Publication Date: October 12, 2025 (arXiv v2)
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.02310

Abstract

Recent research has proposed that the physical state spectrum of the Standard Model may contain an ultralight pseudo-scalar particle $η_w$, analogous to the $η'$ state in strong interactions. This paper finds that typical expectations regarding the properties of $η_w$ face challenges from astrophysical constraints on ultralight boson couplings. The strongest constraints impose a lower bound of $\mathcal{O}(100 \text{ TeV})$ on the assumed pseudo-scalar's decay constant. The article also briefly discusses whether $η_w$ could potentially be a dark matter candidate or the origin of dark energy, concluding that such identifications appear unlikely.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Definition

This study investigates astrophysical constraints on a theoretically predicted new particle—the electroweak $η_w$ pseudo-scalar. The existence of this particle is motivated by the following theoretical considerations:

1. Electroweak Vacuum Angle Problem: The vacuum angle $θ_w$ associated with SU(2) gauge interactions in the Standard Model is not physical, suggesting that a pseudo-scalar particle must exist to eliminate it
2. QCD Analogy: Similar to how the $η'$ meson in QCD acquires mass through the anomaly of the axial U(1)A symmetry, $η_w$ acquires mass through the anomaly of the global U(1){B+L} symmetry carrying baryon plus lepton number

Research Significance

• Fundamental Physics Implications: If $η_w$ indeed exists, it would have profound implications for our understanding of electroweak interactions and the fundamental description of nature
• Standard Model Completeness: May reveal previously overlooked physical states in the Standard Model
• Astrophysical Constraints: Provides important observational limits on theoretical predictions

Existing Theoretical Limitations

• The status of $η_w$ as a definite Standard Model prediction remains unestablished
• Its fundamental properties (such as mass and couplings) cannot yet be reliably predicted
• Astrophysical observations are needed to test the reasonableness of theoretical expectations

Core Contributions

1. Establishing Astrophysical Constraints: First systematic application of astrophysical constraints to the hypothesized $η_w$ particle
2. Deriving Decay Constant Lower Bounds: Obtaining a strong constraint of $f_{η_w} \gtrsim 100$ TeV through red giant cooling constraints
3. Evaluating Cosmological Roles: Analyzing the possibility of $η_w$ as a dark matter or dark energy candidate
4. Testing Theoretical Consistency: Examining the compatibility of the electroweak origin hypothesis with observational constraints

Methodology Details

Theoretical Framework

Mass Estimation

The mass of $η_w$ is generated by electroweak instanton effects through the B+L anomaly: $m_{η_w}^2 \lesssim e^{-2π/α_2(M)} M^2$

where $α_2 = g_2^2/(4π)$ and $g_2 \approx 0.65$ is the SU(2) coupling constant at the weak scale.

For $M \sim v = 246$ GeV (the Higgs vacuum expectation value), we obtain: $m_{η_w} \lesssim 10^{-29} \text{ eV}$

Decay Constant Estimation

Based on electroweak non-perturbative dynamics, $η_w$ is related to the condensate of quark and lepton doublets: $⟨(QQQℓ)^{N_f}⟩ \propto e^{-2π/α_2(v)} v^{6N_f}$

where $N_f = 3$ is the number of families in the Standard Model. Theory expects $f_{η_w} \lesssim v$.

Interaction Mechanisms

Gauge Field Coupling

$η_w$ couples to SU(2) gauge fields through the anomaly: $\frac{α_2}{8π} \frac{η_w}{f_{η_w}} W^a_{μν}\tilde{W}^{aμν}$

Fermion Coupling

Through loop processes, $η_w$ develops effective couplings to fermions. For charged leptons $l$: $c_{ll} \frac{m_l}{f_{η_w}} η_w \bar{l}γ_5 l$

where the coupling coefficient is: $c_{ll} = \left(\frac{3α_2}{8π}\right)^2 \ln\left(\frac{Λ^2}{m_W^2}\right)$

Astrophysical Constraint Analysis

Electron Coupling Constraints

Using the cutoff scale $Λ = 4πf_{η_w}$, the electron coupling strength is: $y_e \sim (2×10^{-5}) \frac{m_e}{f_{η_w}}$

Red Giant Constraint: Energy loss in red giants in globular clusters requires $y_e \lesssim 10^{-13}$, yielding: $f_{η_w} \gtrsim 100 \text{ TeV}$

This is the most stringent constraint, exceeding the electroweak scale expectation by three orders of magnitude.

Muon Coupling Constraints

The supernova 1987A constraint on muon coupling $y_μ \lesssim \text{few}×10^{-9}$ gives $f_{η_w} \gtrsim 1$ TeV, which is less restrictive than the red giant constraint.

Nucleon Coupling Constraints

For first-generation quarks, the nucleon coupling is estimated as: $y_N \sim \left(\frac{3α_2}{8π}\right)^2 \frac{m_q}{f_{η_w}}$

The constraint $y_N \lesssim 10^{-9}$ gives $f_{η_w} \gtrsim 100$ GeV, which is relatively weak.

Cosmological Role Assessment

Dark Matter Candidate Analysis

The de Broglie wavelength of $η_w$ is: $λ_w \sim (m_{η_w}v_g)^{-1}$

For $m_{η_w} \sim 10^{-29}$ eV and typical galactic velocity $v_g \lesssim 10^{-3}$: $λ_w \gtrsim 10^{32} \text{ eV}^{-1} \gtrsim \text{Gpc}$

This exceeds galactic scales by several orders of magnitude, so $η_w$ cannot be confined to galactic structures and cannot serve as dark matter.

Dark Energy Candidate Analysis

To serve as dark energy, one would need $m_{η_w} \lesssim H_0 \sim 10^{-33}$ eV. The potential energy density of $η_w$ is estimated as: $ρ_w \sim m_{η_w}^2 f_{η_w}^2$

Even taking $f_{η_w} \sim 100$ TeV, we get $ρ_w \lesssim 10^{-34}$ eV$^4$, far below the observed value of $\sim 10^{-11}$ eV$^4$.

Experimental Results and Findings

Main Constraint Results

1. Strongest Constraint: Red giant cooling → $f_{η_w} \gtrsim 100$ TeV
2. Secondary Constraint: Supernova muon coupling → $f_{η_w} \gtrsim 1$ TeV
3. Weaker Constraint: Nucleon coupling → $f_{η_w} \gtrsim 100$ GeV

Comparison with Theoretical Expectations

• Theoretical Expectation: $f_{η_w} \lesssim v \sim 100$ GeV (electroweak origin)
• Observational Constraint: $f_{η_w} \gtrsim 100$ TeV (red giants)
• Degree of Tension: Constraints exceed expectations by three orders of magnitude

Cosmological Exclusions

• Dark Matter: de Broglie wavelength too large to form galactic structures
• Dark Energy: Energy density exponentially smaller than observed values

Related Work

Theoretical Foundations

• Dvali et al. (2025): First proposal of the electroweak $η_w$ pseudo-scalar
• Anselm & Johansen (1993-1994): Non-physical nature of the electroweak vacuum angle
• Witten (1979): Theoretical framework for the $η'$ meson in QCD

Astrophysical Constraints

• Raffelt's Series of Works: Standard references for axion astrophysics constraints
• Caputo & Raffelt (2024): Recent comprehensive review of axion constraints
• Supernova Constraints: Studies of muon coupling by Bollig et al. and Croon et al.

Methodology

• Bauer et al. (2017): Effective field theory approach for axion-like particles
• Heeck & Patel (2019): Loop correction calculations for Majorons

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Strong Constraints Exist: Astrophysics imposes strong constraints of $f_{η_w} \gtrsim 100$ TeV on the decay constant
2. Theoretical Tension: Significant tension exists between constraints and typical expectations from electroweak origin
3. Cosmological Exclusion: $η_w$ can neither explain dark matter nor dark energy
4. Further Research Necessary: More in-depth theoretical and phenomenological studies are required

Theoretical Significance

• Challenges simple expectations about the fundamental properties of $η_w$
• Suggests that if $η_w$ exists, its underlying dynamics may be more complex than naive arguments suggest
• Non-perturbative effects may violate naive expectations about the magnitude of $f_{η_w}$

Observational Prospects

If the theoretical evidence for $η_w$ becomes more robust, astrophysical observations may provide promising avenues for its discovery.

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Rigorous Methodology: Systematically applies mature axion astrophysics constraint methods to a new theoretical object
2. Accurate Calculations: Correctly employs loop diagram calculations and effective field theory methods
3. Comprehensive Analysis: Considers not only particle physics constraints but also evaluates cosmological roles
4. Clear Conclusions: Clearly quantifies the tension between theoretical expectations and observational constraints

Limitations

1. Theoretical Uncertainty: The existence of $η_w$ itself remains controversial with insufficient foundational support
2. Rough Estimates: Some coupling constant estimates are only accurate to order of magnitude
3. Model Dependence: Results depend on specific choices of cutoff scale and effective field theory assumptions
4. Lack of Experimental Verification: Pure theoretical analysis without direct experimental support

Impact

1. Theoretical Physics: Provides important reality checks for the electroweak $η_w$ hypothesis
2. Astrophysics: Demonstrates the power of astrophysical constraints in testing particle physics theories
3. Phenomenology: Provides guidance for future theoretical development and experimental searches
4. Interdisciplinary: Connects particle physics, astrophysics, and cosmology

Applicable Scenarios

• Astrophysical constraint studies on axion-like particles
• Phenomenological analysis of Standard Model extensions
• Cosmological effects of ultralight particles
• Indirect search strategies for new physics

Future Directions

1. Theoretical Refinement: More precise theoretical calculations of $η_w$ properties are needed
2. Experimental Searches: Design experimental schemes for direct detection of $η_w$
3. Astrophysical Applications: Utilize additional astrophysical phenomena to constrain $η_w$
4. Cosmological Effects: Study possible roles of $η_w$ in the early universe

References

This paper cites 22 important references covering classical and recent research in electroweak theory, axion physics, astrophysical constraints, and related fields.

Assessment Summary: This is a high-quality theoretical physics phenomenology study that applies mature astrophysical constraint methods to the newly proposed $η_w$ particle, revealing important tensions between theoretical expectations and observational reality. Although the foundational theory remains controversial, the analysis is rigorous and the conclusions provide important guidance for the field's development.