Beyond scalar QED radiative corrections: the $\rho^{\pm}-\rho^0$ width difference, FSR corrections and their impact on $\Delta a_\mu^{\rm HVP, LO}[\tau]$

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2510.02723
• Title: Beyond scalar QED radiative corrections: the $\rho^{\pm}-\rho^0$ width difference, FSR corrections and their impact on $\Delta a_\mu^{\rm HVP, LO}[\tau]$
• Authors: F.V. Flores-Baez (Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León), G. López Castro (CINVESTAV), Genaro Toledo (UNAM)
• Classification: hep-ph (High Energy Physics - Phenomenology)
• Publication Date: October 14, 2025 (v2)
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.02723

Abstract

Building upon previous work, this paper recalculates the radiative corrections to the $\rho \to \pi\pi$ decay to estimate the width difference between charged and neutral $\rho$ mesons. Unlike previous approaches using scalar QED approximation and convection terms, this work incorporates the electromagnetic structure of charged mesons and includes the complete Lorentz structure of the electromagnetic vertex. The width difference of $\rho^{\pm}-\rho^0$ vector mesons is reassessed, and the structure-dependent contributions of final-state radiation (FSR) in the $e^+e^-\to \pi^+\pi^-$ cross section are calculated. Both effects are important inputs for isospin-breaking corrections in evaluating the leading-order hadronic vacuum polarization (HVP) contribution to the muon $g-2$ using $\tau$ lepton data.

Research Background and Motivation

Core Issues

1. Muon $g-2$ anomaly: Significant discrepancy between experimental measurements and theoretical predictions necessitates more precise calculations of the hadronic vacuum polarization (HVP) contribution
2. Uncertainty in $\rho$ meson width difference: Current theoretical predictions for $\Delta\Gamma_\rho \equiv \Gamma_{\rho^0} - \Gamma_{\rho^\pm}$ limit the precision of HVP contribution assessments based on $\tau$ data
3. Isospin-breaking corrections: Precise calculation of electromagnetic corrections and isospin-breaking effects arising from the $u-d$ quark mass difference is required

Research Significance

• The muon $g-2$ represents an important precision test of the Standard Model
• Hadronic vacuum polarization is the primary source of theoretical uncertainty in muon $g-2$
• Using $\tau$ decay data provides independent verification of $e^+e^-$ annihilation data, but requires precise isospin-breaking corrections

Limitations of Existing Methods

• Previous scalar QED (sQED) approximations neglected the electromagnetic structure of hadrons
• The convection term approximation only partially accounts for electromagnetic vertex contributions
• Missing structure-dependent virtual corrections lead to ~10% theoretical uncertainty

Core Contributions

1. Beyond scalar QED approximation: First complete calculation incorporating the electromagnetic structure of hadrons using the generalized vector meson dominance (GVMD) model
2. Complete electromagnetic vertex: Considers the full Lorentz structure of charged $\rho$ mesons rather than only convection terms
3. Structure-dependent FSR corrections: Calculates structure-dependent final-state radiation corrections in $e^+e^-\to\pi^+\pi^-$
4. Precise width difference prediction: Obtains $\Delta\Gamma_\rho = (-0.621\pm 0.220)$ MeV, consistent with latest data analysis
5. Improved HVP contribution: Provides more precise inputs for isospin-breaking corrections to HVP contributions from $\tau$ data

Methodology Details

Theoretical Framework

Width Difference Calculation

The total width of the $\rho$ meson can be decomposed as: $\Gamma_\rho = \sum_f \Gamma(\rho \to f) \approx \Gamma[\rho \to \pi\pi(\gamma)]$

The photon-inclusive double pion decay width is: $\Gamma[\rho^\pm \to \pi^\pm\pi^0(\gamma)] = \frac{g_\pm^2 m_{\rho^\pm}}{48\pi}\beta_\pm^3(1+\delta_\pm)$$\Gamma[\rho^0 \to \pi^+\pi^-(\gamma)] = \frac{g_0^2 m_{\rho^0}}{48\pi}\beta_0^3(1+\delta_0)$

where $\delta_{0,\pm}$ contains $O(\alpha)$ radiative corrections.

Isospin-Breaking Corrections

First-order isospin-breaking expression for the width difference: $\Delta\Gamma_\rho[\pi\pi(\gamma)] = \Gamma(\rho^0 \to \pi^+\pi^-)\left[\delta_0 - \delta_+ - \frac{2\delta g}{g_0} - \frac{\Delta m_\rho}{m_{\rho^0}}\left(\frac{3-2\beta_0^2}{\beta_0^2}\right) - \frac{3}{2}\left(\frac{1-\beta_0^2}{\beta_0^2}\right)\frac{\Delta}{m_+}\right]$

Radiative Corrections Calculation

Virtual Corrections

Structure-dependent effects are introduced by modifying the photon propagator: $\frac{1}{k^2} \to \frac{1}{k^2}[F(k^2)]^2$

where the form factor is: $F(k^2) = \sum_V \frac{a_V m_V^2}{m_V^2 - k^2}$

with $V = \rho, \rho', \rho''$ representing vector-isovector resonance states.

The modified propagator can be decomposed as: $\frac{1}{k^2}[F(k^2)]^2 = \frac{1}{k^2} + \frac{F^2(k^2)-1}{k^2}$

The first term yields the sQED contribution, while the second term provides structure-dependent corrections.

Real Photon Corrections

Low's theorem is employed to handle soft photon radiation: $\mathcal{M}_r(\rho \to \pi\pi\gamma) = \mathcal{M}_{Low} + \mathcal{M}_{m.d.}$

where $\mathcal{M}_{Low} = A/k + Bk^0$, with $A,B$ determined by the non-radiative process.

Technical Innovations

1. Finiteness handling: The GVMD model naturally yields finite amplitudes for $\rho^+ \to \pi^+\pi^0$, eliminating the need for convection term approximations
2. Structure-dependent terms: Systematically calculates structure-dependent contributions in virtual corrections, filling theoretical gaps
3. Energy dependence: Provides FSR corrections over the range $2m_\pi \leq \sqrt{s} \leq 1.8$ GeV

Experimental Setup

Input Parameters

• $\rho$ meson mass: 772-778 MeV range
• Pion mass difference: $\Delta = 4.5936(5)$ MeV
• $\rho$ meson mass difference: $\Delta m_\rho = (+0.7 \pm 0.8)$ MeV
• Soft-hard photon separation scale: $\omega_0 = 0.5$ MeV

GVMD Model Parameters

Uses fitted parameters for three $\rho$-class resonance states from reference 23:

• Masses and widths obtained from forward-backward asymmetry fits in $e^+e^- \to \pi^+\pi^-$
• Coupling constants satisfy the normalization condition $\sum_V a_V = 1$

Numerical Calculations

• Passarino-Veltman functions computed using LoopTools package
• Analytical expressions employed for special cases ($C_0$ functions)
• Verified that structure corrections vanish in the $m_V \to \infty$ limit

Experimental Results

Main Results

Radiative Corrections

For $m_\rho = 775$ MeV:

• $\delta_0 = 6.04(2) \times 10^{-3}$ (approximately 25% reduction compared to sQED)
• $\delta_+ = 2.10(5) \times 10^{-3}$ (opposite sign and smaller than convection approximation)
• $\delta_0 - \delta_+ = 3.941(54) \times 10^{-3}$

Width Difference

$\Delta\Gamma_\rho[\pi\pi(\gamma)] = (-0.709 \pm 0.220) \text{ MeV}$

Contributions from various sources:

• Radiative corrections: $+0.591(8)$ MeV
• $\rho$ mass difference: $-0.196(220)$ MeV
• Pion mass difference: $-1.104$ MeV

Including contributions from other decay channels: $\Delta\Gamma_\rho = (-0.621 \pm 0.220) \text{ MeV}$

FSR Corrections Comparison

• Under sQED approximation, results perfectly agree with classical calculations by Schwinger et al.
• With structure effects included, FSR corrections decrease by approximately 30% for $\sqrt{s} > 1.2$ GeV

Impact on HVP Contribution

Effect of structure-dependent corrections on $\Delta a_\mu^{HVP,LO}[\tau,2\pi]$:

Total isospin-breaking correction: $\Delta a_\mu^{HVP,LO}[\tau,2\pi] = (-11.9 \pm 1.7) \times 10^{-10}$

Related Work

Theoretical Calculations

• Bijnens & Gosdzinsky (1996): $\Delta m_\rho = (-0.7, +0.4)$ MeV
• Feuillat et al. (2001): $\Delta m_\rho = (0.02 \pm 0.02)$ MeV
• Previous work by authors 1: $\Delta\Gamma_\rho = (+0.76 \pm 0.20)$ MeV under sQED approximation

Experimental Determinations

• PDG average 13: $\Delta\Gamma_\rho = (+0.3 \pm 1.3)$ MeV, $\Delta m_\rho = (+0.7 \pm 0.8)$ MeV
• Latest analysis 14: $\Delta\Gamma_\rho = (-0.58 \pm 1.04)$ MeV, $\Delta m_\rho = (+0.30 \pm 0.53)$ MeV

FSR Corrections

• Schwinger (1963): Classical FSR calculation for $e^+e^- \to \pi^+\pi^-$
• Drees & Hikasa (1990): Modern FSR correction expressions

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Width difference sign: Obtains negative $\Delta\Gamma_\rho$, consistent with latest experimental analysis but contrary to previous theoretical predictions
2. Importance of structure effects: Structure-dependent corrections are significant (~30%) and cannot be neglected
3. Reduced theoretical uncertainty: Decreased from previous ~10% to approximately 1%
4. HVP contribution correction: Isospin-breaking corrections to HVP contributions from $\tau$ data show a $+3.1 \times 10^{-10}$ shift

Limitations

1. Model dependence: GVMD model parameters derived from specific fits, subject to model uncertainty
2. Higher-order corrections: Only $O(\alpha)$ corrections considered; higher-order terms may be important
3. Strong-interaction isospin breaking: Does not account for effects of $u-d$ quark mass difference on $\rho\pi\pi$ coupling

Future Directions

1. Improve hadron structure models to reduce model dependence
2. Calculate higher-order electromagnetic corrections
3. Include strong-interaction isospin-breaking effects
4. Compare with lattice QCD calculations for verification

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Theoretical completeness: First to include complete electromagnetic structure effects, filling important theoretical gaps
2. Computational rigor: Detailed technical appendices and numerical verification ensure reliable results
3. Practical significance: Directly improves theoretical prediction accuracy for muon $g-2$
4. Experimental validation: Results highly consistent with latest experimental analysis

Weaknesses

1. Model selection: Choice of GVMD model lacks sufficient theoretical motivation discussion
2. Uncertainty assessment: Propagation analysis of model parameter uncertainties is insufficient
3. Comparative analysis: Lacks systematic comparison with alternative theoretical approaches (e.g., chiral perturbation theory)

Impact

1. Academic value: Provides important theoretical inputs for precision tests of the Standard Model
2. Practical value: Direct application to global fit analyses of muon $g-2$
3. Methodological significance: Serves as a template for precision calculations of other hadronic processes

Applicable Scenarios

• Theoretical predictions for muon $g-2$
• Isospin-breaking studies in $\tau$ physics
• Electromagnetic correction calculations for hadronic processes
• Precision QCD phenomenology analysis

References

This paper cites 33 references, spanning from classical Schwinger FSR calculations to latest experimental data analyses, reflecting both historical continuity and contemporary urgency of this research. Key references include Schwinger's (1963) pioneering work, PDG data compilations, and recent muon $g-2$ experimental results.