Quantum Strategies to Overcome Classical Multiplexing Limits

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2510.06099
• Title: Quantum Strategies to Overcome Classical Multiplexing Limits
• Authors: Tzula B. Propp, Jeroen Grimbergen, Emil R. Hellebek, Junior R. Gonzales-Ureta, Janice van Dam, Joshua A. Slater, Anders S. Sørensen, Stephanie D. C. Wehner
• Classification: quant-ph (Quantum Physics)
• Publication Date: October 10, 2025 (arXiv v2)
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.06099

Abstract

Recent quantum networks face a bottleneck of low quantum communication rates, which not only reduces operational speed but also increases the storage time of qubits in noisy memory, rendering some quantum internet applications infeasible. Multiplexing techniques represent one approach to circumvent this bottleneck by combining multiple signals into a single signal to enhance overall throughput. Classical multiplexing techniques fail to exploit coherence between quantum channels and do not account for time-varying decoherence rates during protocol execution. This paper first derives the semi-classical limit for multiplexing multi-qubit protocols, then introduces novel techniques—quantum multiplexing and multi-server multiplexing—that achieve multiplexing advantages beyond the classical limit.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Definition

1. Core Issue: Recent quantum networks are constrained by low quantum communication rates, severely limiting the feasibility of quantum internet applications
2. Specific Manifestations:
   • Reduced operational speed
   • Increased storage time of qubits in noisy memory
   • Rendering certain quantum applications (e.g., blind quantum computing, BQC) infeasible

Importance Analysis

Quantum internet will enable quantum-secure applications transcending the capabilities of individual quantum computers, including:

• Blind Quantum Computing (BQC)
• Private Distributed Quantum Sensing
• Secure Position Verification
• Quantum Key Distribution

High qubit transmission rates are critical for multi-qubit quantum internet experiments, as quantum information is inherently fragile and degrades over time due to decoherence.

Limitations of Existing Approaches

Constraints of traditional classical multiplexing techniques:

• Do not exploit coherence between quantum channels
• Fail to account for time-varying decoherence rates during protocol execution
• Cannot fully utilize resources in asymmetric quantum network nodes

Research Motivation

By developing novel quantum multiplexing strategies that leverage multiple noisy interconnected quantum devices rather than a few low-noise devices, this work opens new pathways for achieving high-speed multi-qubit quantum network applications.

Core Contributions

1. Theoretical Contribution: Derives the semi-classical limit for multiplexing multi-qubit protocols, providing theoretical bounds on multiplexing advantages
2. Methodological Innovation: Proposes two novel techniques that surpass classical multiplexing:
   • Quantum Multiplexing
   • Multi-server Multiplexing
3. Application Validation: Verifies the effectiveness of new methods through three concrete application scenarios
4. Performance Enhancement: Achieves super-linear performance improvements under specific conditions, breaking through classical multiplexing limitations

Methodology Details

Task Definition

The core task studied in this paper is improving multiplexing strategies in quantum networks to enhance the execution rate of s-qubit protocols. The multiplexing improvement factor is defined as:

$m_s = \frac{R_{s|F}(M)}{R_{s|F}(1)}$

where $R_{s|F}(M)$ is the maximum achievable rate using M multiplexed resources at desired minimum fidelity F.

Semi-Classical Limit Derivation

Single-Qubit Protocol Limit

For single-qubit protocols, the upper bound of semi-classical multiplexing advantage is: $m \leq M \leq M_c$ where $M_c$ is the number of end-to-end channels that can be simultaneously utilized.

Multi-Qubit Protocol Limit

For s-qubit protocols, under the condition of window size $w \gg s$: $m_s \leq M^s \leq M_c^s$

This upper bound can only be achieved when the success probability is asymptotically small ($p \to 0$).

Quantum Multiplexing Technique

Core Concept

Quantum multiplexing exploits coherence between spatial modes to utilize unused network resources in asymmetric connections. The key transformation is: $\xi |\emptyset\rangle + \sqrt{1-\xi^2} |1\rangle \to \xi |\emptyset\rangle + \sum_k \sqrt{\frac{1-\xi^2}{M}} |1_k\rangle$

Asymmetric Entanglement Generation

In M-to-1 quantum multiplexed entanglement generation, the success probability is: $P[\text{single click}] = M\eta_A\xi_A^2(1-\eta_A\xi_A^2)^{M-1}(1-\eta_B\xi_B^2) + \eta_B\xi_B^2(1-\eta_A\xi_A^2)^M$

In the high-loss symmetric case, the asymptotic behavior of multiplexing gain is: $m(M) \sim \frac{2M}{M+1}$

Multi-Client Remote State Preparation

For remote state preparation with M client devices and a single server node, under high-fidelity constraints: $m(M) \sim \frac{M(1 + \frac{4}{\eta_s} - 4)}{1 + \frac{4M}{\eta_s} - 4M} \to 1 + \frac{\eta_s}{4(1-\eta_s)}$

Multi-Server Multiplexing Technique

Strategy Definition

• Try-and-Commit Strategy ($\sigma = t$): Client commits to the first successful node
• Multiplexing Strategy ($\sigma = m$): When nodes store qubits, do not attempt remote state preparation on those nodes

Performance Analysis

For s=2 qubit RSP, in the low success probability limit:

• Try-and-Commit strategy: $m_{s=2,\sigma=t} \lesssim M$
• Multiplexing strategy: $m_{s=2,\sigma=m} \lesssim M(M-1)n_o/n'_e$

In the limit $\tau_{co} \gg \tau_{ce}$, the multiplexing strategy can achieve $m_{s=2,\sigma=m} \lesssim M^2n_o$.

Experimental Setup

Parameter Configuration

Key parameters used in experiments:

• Client-server transmission efficiency: $\eta_c = 10^{-3}$ (simulating 150 km distance)
• Server-to-server transmission efficiency: $\eta_s = 10^{-1}$ (simulating 50 km distance)
• Coherence time: $\tau_{co} = 2.8$ s (without EG/RSP), $\tau_{ce} = 20$ ms (with EG/RSP)
• Attempt duration: $\tau_e = 300$ ns
• Maximum number of attempts: $n_e = 10^3$

Evaluation Metrics

• Rate-fidelity trade-off curves
• Comparison of multiplexing improvement factor $m_s$ with classical bound $M^s$
• Performance with varying numbers of qubits (s=2,3,4)

Comparison Methods

• Classical multiplexing methods
• Time-sharing strategies
• Baseline methods without multiplexing

Experimental Results

Main Results

Quantum Multiplexing Performance

1. Asymmetric Entanglement Generation:
   • In high-loss scenarios ($\eta = 0.1$), multiplexing gain approaches theoretical maximum $2M/(M+1)$
   • As $M \to \infty$, $m \to 2$
   • Particularly effective on the multi-memory node side with low-efficiency connections
2. Multi-Client RSP:
   • Achieves improvements under high-fidelity constraints
   • As $\eta_s \to 1$, $m(M) \to M$
   • Cooperative client devices reduce undetected multi-photon emission probability

Multi-Server Multiplexing Performance

1. Rate Improvement:
   • For s=2,3,4 qubits, all exceed classical bound $M^s$
   • Gap from classical bound widens with increasing s
   • Several orders of magnitude performance improvement achievable even at moderate s and M values
2. Strategy Comparison:
   • Multiplexing strategy ($\sigma = m$) significantly outperforms try-and-commit strategy ($\sigma = t$)
   • Multiplexing strategy exceeds classical limit by constant factor $n_o$

Ablation Studies

The paper validates through different parameter configurations:

• Impact of transmission efficiency on multiplexing gain
• Importance of coherence time ratio
• Performance differences between multiplexing strategies

Experimental Findings

1. Optimal Scenarios for Quantum Multiplexing: High efficiency connections to few-memory nodes, low efficiency connections to multi-memory nodes
2. Multi-Server Multiplexing Advantages: Particularly effective with fast server-to-server connections and memories susceptible to EG/RSP attempts (e.g., color centers)
3. Window Effects: Finite window suppression of rate strengthens with increasing required qubit number s

Related Work

Classical Multiplexing Research

• Multiplexing effects in parameter estimation
• Multiplexing applications in Bayesian experimental design
• Various multiplexing strategies in quantum repeater chains

Quantum Network Protocols

• Single-click and double-click remote state preparation protocols
• Entanglement distribution in quantum repeater chains
• Theoretical and experimental exploration of photonic client designs

Scan Statistics

Utilizes window problem theory from scan statistics to analyze success probability distributions in quantum networks.

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Theoretical Contribution: First systematic derivation of semi-classical limits for quantum communication protocol multiplexing
2. Methodological Innovation: Proposed quantum multiplexing and multi-server multiplexing techniques overcome classical multiplexing constraints
3. Practical Value: Provides pathways for near-term quantum networks to achieve high performance using multiple noisy devices

Limitations

1. Symmetry Assumptions: Analysis assumes highly symmetric network protocols and configurations
2. Fixed Parameters: Servers and clients maintain fixed parameters throughout protocol execution
3. Idealized Conditions: Some analyses based on idealized experimental conditions

Future Directions

1. Adaptive Strategies: Develop machine learning methods for real-time parameter adjustment based on network performance
2. Asymmetric Networks: Study multiplexing techniques in realistic networks lacking symmetry
3. Quantum Limits: Seek fundamental Heisenberg limits for multiplexing advantages
4. Advanced Encoding: Explore techniques for encoding qubits in high-dimensional quantum states across multiple pulses

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Theoretical Rigor: Provides strict mathematical bounds on multiplexing advantages, filling theoretical gaps
2. Methodological Innovation: Quantum multiplexing and multi-server multiplexing are novel concepts with high originality
3. Practical Orientation: Addresses actual limitations of near-term quantum networks with concrete solutions
4. Comprehensive Analysis: Complete analytical framework from single-qubit to multi-qubit protocols
5. Experimental Validation: Verifies theoretical predictions through concrete application scenarios

Weaknesses

1. Complexity: Multi-server multiplexing requires substantial network resources with complex implementation
2. Condition Constraints: Quantum multiplexing advantages are significant only under specific conditions (e.g., high loss, asymmetric efficiency)
3. Security Considerations: WCP client security decreases with increasing average photon number, limiting parameter choices
4. Scalability: Numerical simulations become challenging for protocols with higher qubit numbers

Impact

1. Academic Value: Provides new analytical tools and conceptual frameworks for quantum network theory
2. Technical Guidance: Offers concrete technical roadmaps for quantum network experimental design
3. Industrial Significance: Provides pathways for transition from prototype quantum internet to practical quantum internet
4. Cross-Domain Applications: Multiplexing theory may apply to other quantum information processing tasks

Applicable Scenarios

1. Asymmetric Quantum Networks: Networks with nodes possessing unequal memory capacities
2. High-Loss Environments: Long-distance quantum communication scenarios
3. Multi-User Services: Single quantum server serving multiple clients
4. Color Center Systems: Physical systems where entanglement generation degrades stored qubit quality

References

The paper cites 97 relevant references spanning quantum networks, quantum communication, multiplexing techniques, and scan statistics, providing solid theoretical foundation for the research.

Overall Assessment: This is an excellent paper with pioneering contributions to quantum network multiplexing technology. The authors provide rigorous theoretical analysis and propose novel methods with practical application value, opening new pathways for addressing critical bottlenecks in near-term quantum networks. Despite some implementation complexity and condition constraints, its theoretical contributions and practical value make it an important advance in the quantum networking field.