Hard X-ray view of two γ-ray detected low-luminosity active galactic nuclei: NGC 315 and NGC 4261

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2510.06810
• Title: Hard X-ray view of two γ-ray detected low-luminosity active galactic nuclei: NGC 315 and NGC 4261
• Authors: Yuwei Yu, Jin Zhang (Beijing Institute of Technology)
• Classification: astro-ph.HE (High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena)
• Publication Date: October 13, 2025 (Astronomy & Astrophysics)
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.06810

Abstract

This study aims to search for evidence of radiatively inefficient accretion flow (RIAF) radiation in low-luminosity active galactic nuclei (LLAGNs) and analyze their radiation characteristics. The research team conducted X-ray observations and analysis of NGC 315 and NGC 4261 using NuSTAR and XMM-Newton, including temporal variability and spectral studies. Results show that both sources exhibit no significant variability on timescales of days. The X-ray continuum spectrum of NGC 315 is well-fitted by a cutoff power-law model with a cutoff energy of Ecut = 18.45 keV, the lowest value found in LLAGNs to date. NGC 4261 requires a two power-law component fit. NGC 315 displays a neutral Fe Kα line, while NGC 4261 shows an ionized Fe XXV line. The reflection fractions are R = 0.61 and R = 0.18, respectively. The study supports RIAF radiation as the primary origin of X-rays in both sources.

Research Background and Motivation

Scientific Questions

1. Nature of the central engine in LLAGNs: Low-luminosity AGN differ fundamentally from luminous AGN in their physical mechanisms, requiring understanding of their accretion disk structure
2. Evidence for RIAF radiation: Seeking observational evidence for radiatively inefficient accretion flows in LLAGNs to validate theoretical models
3. Origin of X-ray radiation: Distinguishing whether X-ray radiation originates from the accretion disk-corona system or from jets

Research Significance

• LLAGNs constitute the majority of all AGN; understanding their physical mechanisms is crucial for AGN unified models
• Hard X-ray observations can reveal the transition between synchrotron and inverse Compton processes, providing high-energy cutoff information
• Provides important samples and observational constraints for future LLAGN research

Limitations of Existing Research

• Most studies focus on soft X-ray bands, lacking hard X-ray constraints
• Insufficient understanding of the origin of reflection components and iron emission lines in LLAGNs
• The X-ray radiation mechanism (jets vs. accretion flow) remains controversial

Core Contributions

1. Discovery of the lowest cutoff energy: NGC 315's cutoff energy of 18.45 keV is the lowest observed in LLAGNs
2. Confirmation of RIAF-dominated radiation: Multi-band spectral analysis confirms RIAF as the primary source of X-ray radiation
3. Revelation of different cooling mechanisms: NGC 315 is dominated by bremsstrahlung, while NGC 4261 is dominated by Comptonization
4. Provision of reflection fraction constraints: NGC 315's high reflection fraction (0.61) suggests a small truncated accretion disk radius

Methodology Details

Observational Data

• NuSTAR observations: NGC 315 (July 27, 2021, 45 ks), NGC 4261 (June 2, 2021, 45 ks)
• XMM-Newton observations: NGC 315 (January 27, 2019, 51 ks), NGC 4261 (December 16, 2007, 127 ks)
• Energy ranges: NuSTAR 3-30 keV, XMM-Newton 0.5-10 keV

Data Processing

1. NuSTAR data: Processed using HEASoft v6.31.1 and CALDB 20231205
2. XMM-Newton data: Processed using SAS v21.0.0
3. Source region selection: 30″ circular region for source extraction, 60″ background region
4. Spectral binning: Minimum 25 counts/bin to ensure valid χ² statistics

Joint Spectral Fitting Feasibility Analysis

Three scenarios (SMF0-SMF2) were evaluated to assess consistency of different satellite data:

• SMF0: All parameters linked
• SMF1: One parameter allowed to vary independently
• SMF2: Two parameters allowed to vary independently

F-tests were used to determine the optimal fitting strategy, with results supporting the SMF0 scenario.

Spectral Modeling Methods

1. Basic model: const × tbabs × (mekal + ztbabs × powerlaw)
2. Cutoff power-law: cutoffpl model to test high-energy cutoff
3. Reflection models: pexmon and MYTorus models
4. Radiation models: zbremss (bremsstrahlung) and compTT (Comptonization)

Experimental Setup

Spectral Fitting Tools

• XSPEC 12.13.0c: Primary spectral analysis software
• Fitting range: 0.5-30 keV joint spectrum
• Statistical method: χ² minimization, 1σ confidence intervals

Model Comparison Methods

1. F-test: Evaluates statistical significance of model complexity
2. AIC criterion: Addresses boundary issues in cutoff energy testing
3. Parameter constraints: Uses steppar command to determine 3σ confidence intervals

Physical Parameter Calculations

• Normalized excess variance: Assesses temporal variability
• Compactness parameter ℓ and dimensionless electron temperature Θ: Determines cooling mechanism
• Reflection fraction R: Quantifies reflection component contribution

Experimental Results

Temporal Variability Analysis

• NGC 315 and NGC 4261: No significant variability on day timescales
• 3σ upper limits: σ²ₙₓₛ < 0.0083 (NGC 315), < 0.076 (NGC 4261)
• Consistent with theoretical expectations: LLAGNs typically lack short-timescale variability

NGC 315 Spectral Characteristics

NGC 4261 Spectral Characteristics

• Dual power-law structure: Hard component (Γ₁2.10) and soft component (Γ₂2.89)
• Different absorption: NH18.84×10²² cm⁻², NH20.14×10²² cm⁻²
• Reflection fraction: R = 0.18⁺⁰·¹⁵₋₀.₁₄
• No cutoff energy constraint: Upper limit 500 keV

Iron Emission Line Characteristics

• NGC 315: Neutral Fe Kα line (6.35 keV), equivalent width 0.38 keV
• NGC 4261: Ionized Fe XXV line (6.71 keV), equivalent width 0.14 keV
• Spatial distribution: NGC 4261's iron line primarily originates from the nuclear region

Cooling Mechanism Analysis

Analysis via ℓ-Θ diagram:

• NGC 315: Located below the bremsstrahlung cooling line, ℓ0.05, Θ0.02
• NGC 4261: Possibly near the electron-electron coupling line, supporting Comptonization cooling

Related Work

Current State of LLAGN Research

1. RIAF theoretical models: Advection-dominated accretion flow proposed by Narayan & Yi (1994)
2. Observational characteristics: Absence of "big blue bump," weak reflection component, anti-correlation between Γ and λEdd
3. FRI radio galaxies: Typical LLAGN subclass, commonly displaying dual jet structures

X-ray Research Progress

• Gliozzi et al. (2003): 0.3-100 keV spectral analysis of NGC 4261
• González-Martín et al. (2009): Discovery of iron emission lines in NGC 315
• Younes et al. (2019): Reflection properties of LLAGN samples

Theoretical Expectations vs. Observational Comparison

• Cutoff energy anti-correlation: Ricci et al. (2018) found Ecut anti-correlated with λEdd
• Present study findings: Extremely low λEdd LLAGNs may not follow this trend

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Scientific Conclusions

1. RIAF-dominated radiation:
   • Negative correlation between photon index and Eddington ratio
   • Absence of Compton reflection hump features
   • Presence of iron emission lines supports accretion disk-corona origin
2. Different physical mechanisms:
   • NGC 315: Truncated accretion disk + bremsstrahlung cooling
   • NGC 4261: RIAF + jet dual component + Comptonization cooling
3. Extreme physical conditions:
   • Lowest cutoff energy (18.45 keV) reflects special plasma state
   • High reflection fraction indicates small truncation radius

Physical Interpretation

NGC 315's low cutoff energy:

• Possibly originates from effective Compton cooling near the truncated disk
• Bremsstrahlung process dominates in the transition region near the Bondi radius
• Similar radiation mechanism to Sgr A*

NGC 4261's dual-component structure:

• Hard component originates from RIAF Comptonization
• Soft component attributed to inner jet synchrotron radiation
• Ionized iron line possibly originates from hot accretion flow

Limitations

1. Observational constraints:
   • Insufficient signal-to-noise ratio above 30 keV
   • Cannot fully resolve degeneracies in Comptonization parameters
   • Lack of simultaneous multi-wavelength observations
2. Model uncertainties:
   • Impact of reflection geometry assumptions
   • Insufficient constraints on iron abundance and ionization parameters
   • Difficulty in precisely separating jet contributions
3. Sample limitations:
   • Only two sources with limited statistical significance
   • Larger sample needed to verify generality of findings

Future Research Directions

1. Higher energy observations:
   • Soft MeV band observations to constrain high-energy cutoff
   • Improved understanding of cooling mechanisms
2. Large-scale sample studies:
   • Expansion of hard X-ray LLAGN samples
   • Establishment of more reliable statistical relationships
3. Multi-wavelength coordination:
   • Simultaneous radio-X-ray observations
   • Better separation of jet and accretion flow contributions

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. High-quality observations:
   • Utilizes state-of-the-art hard X-ray telescope NuSTAR
   • Multi-satellite data combination improves statistical precision
   • Rigorous data processing and quality control
2. Rigorous analysis methods:
   • Detailed feasibility analysis ensures joint fitting validity
   • Multiple model comparisons verify result reliability
   • Appropriate use of F-tests and AIC criterion
3. In-depth physical interpretation:
   • ℓ-Θ diagram analysis provides cooling mechanism insights
   • Combines theoretical models to explain observational phenomena
   • Provides reasonable explanations for source differences
4. Important scientific discoveries:
   • Discovery of lowest cutoff energy has significant implications
   • Provides critical observational constraints for RIAF theory
   • Reveals diversity of LLAGNs

Shortcomings

1. Sample size limitations:
   • Only two sources make establishing universal laws difficult
   • Limited statistical significance
2. Model simplifications:
   • Simplified reflection geometry assumptions
   • Does not consider possible temporal variability effects
3. Parameter degeneracies:
   • Strong degeneracies in Comptonization parameters
   • Insufficient constraints on certain physical quantities

Impact Assessment

1. Academic contributions:
   • Provides important benchmarks for LLAGN research
   • Advances hard X-ray astrophysics development
   • Provides observational tests for theoretical models
2. Practical value:
   • Data analysis methods applicable to other studies
   • Provides guidance for future observation plans
   • Establishes important observational database
3. Reproducibility:
   • Detailed data processing procedures
   • Clear model parameters and fitting methods
   • Publicly available observational data

Applicable Scenarios

1. LLAGN research: Directly applicable to analysis of similar sources
2. AGN physics: Provides constraints for AGN unified models
3. Accretion theory: Validates theoretical models such as RIAF
4. X-ray astrophysics: Hard X-ray spectral analysis methodology

References

Key references include:

• Narayan & Yi (1994): Theoretical foundation of ADAF
• Gliozzi et al. (2003): Early X-ray studies of NGC 4261
• Younes et al. (2019): Reflection properties of LLAGN samples
• Jana et al. (2023): Statistical studies of LLAGN samples
• Ricci et al. (2018): Systematic study of AGN cutoff energies

Through high-quality hard X-ray observations, this study provides important progress in understanding the physical mechanisms of low-luminosity active galactic nuclei, particularly achieving new insights into RIAF radiation and cooling mechanisms. Although the sample size is limited, the scientific significance and methodological value of its findings are both prominent.