On the Irreducibility of the Cuboid Polynomial $P_{a,u}(t)$

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2510.07643
• Title: On the Irreducibility of the Cuboid Polynomial $P_{a,u}(t)$
• Author: Valery Asiryan
• Classification: math.GM (General Mathematics)
• Publication Date: October 9, 2025 (arXiv preprint)
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.07643

Abstract

This paper considers the even monic degree-8 cuboid polynomial $P_{a,u}(t)$ with coprime integers $a \neq u > 0$. The irreducibility of this polynomial over $\mathbb{Z}$ is established by excluding all degree-8 factorizations. First, through brief 2-adic and 3-adic analysis, it is shown that any assumed $4+4$ factorization leads to a specific Diophantine constraint with no integer solutions. Second, all $2+6$ factorizations are excluded using precise divisibility criteria and discriminant obstructions. Finally, after excluding $2+6$ factorizations, the patterns $2+2+4$, $2+2+2+2$, and $3+3+2$ can be trivially regrouped into $2+6$, making them impossible. Therefore, $P_{a,u}(t)$ admits no nontrivial factorization in $\mathbb{Z}[t]$.

Research Background and Motivation

This research addresses the irreducibility problem of cuboid polynomials, a fundamental question in number theory and algebraic geometry. Specifically:

1. Core Problem: Prove the irreducibility of the degree-8 polynomial $P_{a,u}(t)$ of a specific form over the ring of integers
2. Significance:
   • Cuboid polynomials are related to the perfect cuboid problem, a classical unsolved problem in number theory
   • Polynomial irreducibility is a foundational problem in algebraic number theory
   • This research provides new techniques and methods for understanding factorization of higher-degree polynomials
3. Limitations of Existing Methods:
   • Standard irreducibility criteria (such as Eisenstein's criterion) typically cannot be uniformly applied to $P_{a,u}$
   • Specialized analytical techniques tailored to this class of polynomials with special structure are needed
4. Research Motivation: Establish a complete irreducibility proof by systematically excluding all possible factorization patterns

Core Contributions

1. Established necessary conditions for $4+4$ factorization: Reduced any $4+4$ factorization to the Diophantine equation $(X^2-8\Delta^2)(X^2-9\Delta^2) = 4a^2u^2X^2$
2. Proved key lemma: $\gcd(X,\Delta) = 1$, which forms the foundation for subsequent analysis
3. Completed 2-adic and 3-adic analysis: Proved through detailed $p$-adic analysis that the Diophantine equation has no integer solutions
4. Developed exclusion method for $2+6$ factorizations: Combined divisibility criteria and discriminant obstruction techniques
5. Provided complete irreducibility proof: Systematically excluded all possible degree-8 factorization patterns

Detailed Methodology

Task Definition

Input: Coprime integers $a \neq u > 0$Output: Prove that the polynomial $P_{a,u}(t) = t^8 + At^6 + Bt^4 + Ct^2 + D$ is irreducible over $\mathbb{Z}[t]$

where the coefficients are:

• $A = 6\Delta$, $\Delta := u^2 - a^2 \neq 0$
• $B = \Delta^2 - 2a^2u^2$
• $C = -a^2u^2A$
• $D = a^4u^4$

Core Methodological Framework

1. Structural Analysis Phase

Utilizing the evenness of the polynomial and Gauss's lemma, possible $4+4$ factorizations are classified into:

• (E) Even-Even Case: Both factors are even functions
• (C) Conjugate Pair Case: $G(t) = F(-t)$

2. Diophantine Reduction

For case (E), through coefficient comparison, a system of equations is obtained that ultimately reduces to the key Diophantine equation: $(X^2 - 8\Delta^2)(X^2 - 9\Delta^2) = 4a^2u^2X^2 \quad (\star)$

For case (C), the absence of solutions is directly proved through algebraic manipulation.

3. $p$-adic Analysis

Key Lemma: Prove that $\gcd(X,\Delta) = 1$

Through case-by-case analysis:

• Odd primes $p \geq 3$: Utilize properties of $p$-adic valuations to derive contradictions
• Prime $p = 2$: Detailed analysis of different 2-adic valuation cases
• Special treatment for $p = 3$: Employ elliptic curve theory to complete the analysis of remaining cases

4. Complete Case Analysis

Branch according to whether $3 \mid au$:

• Branch I ($3 \mid au$): Prove impossibility through 3-adic analysis
• Branch II ($3 \nmid au$): Prove impossibility through 2-adic analysis and modular arithmetic

Technical Innovations

1. Introduction of Elliptic Curve Methods: When handling residual cases with odd primes, cleverly transform the problem into the question of existence of rational points on the elliptic curve $E_0: y^2 = x(x+1)(x+9)$
2. Systematic Application of $p$-adic Techniques: Beyond standard $p$-adic valuation comparisons, combine modular arithmetic to obtain stronger constraints
3. Discriminant Obstruction Method: For $2+6$ factorizations, exclude possibilities by computing the non-square nature of the discriminant $32\Delta^2q^2$ of related quadratic equations

Experimental Setup

This is a pure theoretical mathematics paper with no numerical experiments. All results are obtained through rigorous mathematical proofs.

Verification Methods

• Verify the torsion group structure of elliptic curves through constructive proofs
• Verify the rank of elliptic curves using Cremona tables and LMFDB database
• Verify key algebraic identities through direct computation

Main Results

Proof Chain of Theorems 1-8

1. Theorem 1: Establish the target for $4+4$ factorization
2. Theorem 2: Exclude the conjugate pair case (C)
3. Theorem 3: Establish equation $(\star)$ as a necessary condition
4. Lemma 2: Prove $\gcd(X,\Delta) = 1$
5. Theorems 4-5: Complete remaining cases through elliptic curve theory
6. Theorem 6: Complete exclusion of $4+4$ case
7. Theorem 7: Exclude $2+6$ factorizations
8. Theorem 8: Establish complete irreducibility

Key Technical Results

• Elliptic Curve Computation: $E_0(Q) \cong \mathbb{Z}/2\mathbb{Z} \oplus \mathbb{Z}/4\mathbb{Z}$, rank equals 0
• Discriminant Analysis: The 2-adic valuation of $\text{Disc}_{A_0} = 32\Delta^2q^2$ is odd, hence not a perfect square
• $p$-adic Estimates: Establish precise $p$-adic valuation equalities and inequalities in various cases

Related Work

The paper cites works from the following main research directions:

1. Perfect Cuboid Problem: Related work by Sharipov and unsolved problems in Guy's collection
2. Algebraic Number Theory Foundations: Classical textbooks by Dummit-Foote, Lang, etc.
3. Elliptic Curve Theory: Monographs by Silverman, Cassels, etc.
4. Computational Number Theory: Cremona tables and LMFDB database

The innovation of this paper lies in organically combining techniques from these different fields, specifically targeting the irreducibility problem of cuboid polynomials.

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

For any coprime integers $a \neq u > 0$, the cuboid polynomial $P_{a,u}(t)$ is irreducible over $\mathbb{Z}[t]$.

Advantages of the Proof Strategy

1. Completeness: Systematically considers all possible factorization patterns
2. Technical Depth: Combines multiple techniques from algebra, number theory, and elliptic curve theory
3. Constructiveness: Provides concrete computational and verification methods

Limitations

1. Specific Form: Methods are specialized for cuboid polynomials with limited generalizability
2. Technical Complexity: Requires deep knowledge from multiple fields
3. Computational Dependence: Some results depend on computational results from elliptic curve databases

Future Directions

1. Generalize the method to more general polynomial families
2. Explore deeper connections with the perfect cuboid problem
3. Develop more unified irreducibility criteria

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Methodological Innovation:
   • Cleverly transforms polynomial factorization problems into Diophantine equations
   • Innovatively applies elliptic curve theory to resolve remaining cases
   • Systematic $p$-adic analysis methodology
2. Completeness of Proof:
   • Carefully considers all possible factorization patterns
   • Each step has rigorous mathematical justification
   • Technical details are handled appropriately
3. Writing Quality:
   • Clear logic and reasonable structure
   • Sufficient but not redundant technical details
   • Appropriate use of diagrams and formulas

Weaknesses

1. Limited Applicability: The method is highly specialized and difficult to generalize to other types of polynomials
2. High Technical Threshold: Requires readers to have background knowledge in algebraic number theory, elliptic curve theory, and other fields
3. Partial Dependence on External Resources: Elliptic curve computational results depend on existing databases, lacking completely independent proofs

Impact

1. Theoretical Contribution: Provides new technical tools for irreducibility research on special polynomials
2. Methodological Value: Demonstrates how to systematically handle complex factorization problems
3. Application Prospects: May have impact on related research such as the perfect cuboid problem

Applicable Scenarios

This method is particularly suitable for:

• Irreducibility problems of higher-degree polynomials with special algebraic structure
• Complex Diophantine problems requiring combination of multiple number-theoretic techniques
• Applications of elliptic curve methods in polynomial theory

References

The paper cites 23 important references covering:

• Specialized research on the perfect cuboid problem (Sharipov, etc.)
• Classical textbooks in algebraic number theory (Hardy-Wright, Ireland-Rosen, etc.)
• Standard references in elliptic curve theory (Silverman, Cassels, etc.)
• Computational number theory resources (Cremona tables, LMFDB, etc.)

This paper represents in-depth technical research on a specific mathematical problem. While its application range is relatively limited, it has significant methodological value, demonstrating how to synthesize multiple techniques from modern number theory to solve classical algebraic problems.