2025-11-17T01:46:13.090817

Over-The-Air Phase Calibration of Spaceborne Phased Array for LEO Satellite Communications

Zhang, Chen, Zhou
To avoid the unpredictable phase deviations of the spaceborne phased array (SPA), this paper considers the over-the-air (OTA) phase calibration of the SPA for the low earth orbit (LEO) satellite communications, where the phase deviations of the SPA and the unknown channel are jointly estimated with multiple transmissions of the pilots. Moreover, the Cramer Rao Bound (CRB) is derived, and the optimization of beam patterns is also presented to lower the root mean squared error (RMSE) of the OTA calibration. The simulation results verify the effectiveness of the proposed OTA phase calibration algorithm as the RMSEs of the phase estimates closely approach the corresponding CRB, and the beam pattern optimization scheme is also validated for more than 4dB gain of SNR over the randomly generated beam patterns.
academic

Over-The-Air Phase Calibration of Spaceborne Phased Array for LEO Satellite Communications

Basic Information

  • Paper ID: 2510.08011
  • Title: Over-The-Air Phase Calibration of Spaceborne Phased Array for LEO Satellite Communications
  • Authors: Wei Zhang, Ding Chen, Bin Zhou (Shanghai Institute of Microsystem and Information Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences)
  • Classification: eess.SP (Signal Processing)
  • Publication Date: October 10, 2025 (arXiv v2)
  • Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.08011

Abstract

To mitigate unpredictable phase deviations in spaceborne phased arrays (SPA), this paper investigates the over-the-air (OTA) phase calibration problem for SPA in low earth orbit (LEO) satellite communications. Through multiple pilot transmissions, the phase deviations of the SPA and unknown channel are jointly estimated. The paper derives the Cramér-Rao bound (CRB) and proposes a beam pattern optimization scheme to reduce the root mean square error (RMSE) of OTA calibration. Simulation results validate the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm, with phase estimation RMSE approaching the corresponding CRB, and beam pattern optimization achieving over 4 dB SNR gain compared to randomly generated beam patterns.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Definition

  1. Core Problem: Unpredictable phase deviations in spaceborne phased arrays for LEO satellite communication systems caused by device aging and cumulative radiation damage in space
  2. Significance: Phase deviations significantly reduce data transmission rates and degrade satellite communication system performance
  3. Limitations of Existing Methods:
    • Traditional calibration methods rely on anechoic chamber environments and cannot be directly applied to complex space electromagnetic environments
    • Existing on-orbit calibration depends solely on temperature lookup tables, applicable only to phase deviations caused by temperature drift
    • Lack of OTA calibration schemes and beam pattern design for large-scale phased arrays
  4. Research Motivation: To provide effective on-orbit phase calibration solutions for LEO satellite communication systems

Core Contributions

  1. Proposed an on-orbit OTA phase calibration algorithm for hybrid analog-digital SPA, jointly estimating phase deviations and channel state information through block coordinate descent
  2. Derived the Cramér-Rao bound (CRB) for the phase calibration problem, providing a theoretical benchmark for algorithm performance
  3. Designed a beam pattern optimization scheme that significantly improves calibration accuracy, achieving over 4 dB SNR gain compared to random beam patterns
  4. Provided comprehensive complexity analysis, with algorithm complexity approximately O(M³ₜ)

Methodology Details

Task Definition

Input: Received signals from multiple pilot transmissions, known nominal beamforming matrix Output: Phase deviation matrix Ω and channel matrix H Constraints: Phase deviation elements are unit-modulus complex numbers

Signal Model

Considering a LEO satellite communication system with Mₜ-antenna spaceborne transmitter and Mᵣ-antenna ground terminal:

Received signal model:

y = √β w^H H(F ⊙ Ω)S + z

where:

  • F ∈ C^(Mₜ×NRF): Nominal beamforming matrix
  • Ω ∈ C^(Mₜ×NRF): Phase deviation matrix
  • H ∈ C^(Mᵣ×Mₜ): Channel matrix
  • ⊙: Hadamard product

Core Algorithm Architecture

1. Block Coordinate Descent Algorithm

Optimization objective:

min_{Ω,H} ∑ᵏₖ₌₁ ||ỹₖ - √β w^H_k H(Fₖ ⊙ Ω)||²₂

Algorithm Flow:

  1. Initialize Ω as all-ones matrix
  2. Fix Ω and estimate channel H
  3. Fix H and update phase deviation Ω
  4. Iterate until convergence

2. Channel Estimation

Obtain coarse estimates using 4D-FFT:

  • Construct four-dimensional tensor for angle search
  • Refine results using backtracking line search

Objective function:

max_{θᵣ,φᵣ,θₜ,φₜ} f(θᵣ,φᵣ,θₜ,φₜ) = ||ỹ^H_{vec}Ba_{vec}||²₂ / ||Ba_{vec}||²₂

3. Phase Estimation

Solve independently for each RF chain:

max_{ωₙ} g(ωₙ) = ||ȳₙ - Cₙωₙ||²₂

Use Riemannian conjugate gradient (RCG) algorithm to handle unit-modulus constraints.

Technical Innovations

  1. Joint Estimation Strategy: Simultaneously estimate phase deviations and channel, avoiding unrealistic assumptions of known channel
  2. Phase Ambiguity Resolution: Eliminate estimation non-uniqueness by presetting specific elements
  3. Beam Pattern Optimization: Optimize beam patterns based on Fisher information matrix to improve estimation accuracy

Experimental Setup

Simulation Parameters

  • Array Configuration: Mₜ = 512, 1024; Mᵣ = 1024; NRF = 4
  • Pilot Length: L = 4
  • Number of Transmissions: K = 1024
  • Phase Deviation Range: -ε, ε, ε = 20°, 40°
  • Channel Model: Single-path Rayleigh fading, γ ~ CN(0,1)

Evaluation Metrics

Root mean square error (RMSE):

RMSE = √(1/(MₜNRF-1) E{||p̂ - p||²₂}) × 180°/π

Comparison Methods

  • Random Beam Pattern (RD): Randomly generated beamforming matrix
  • Optimized Beam Pattern (OPT): Beam pattern optimized based on Fisher information matrix

Experimental Results

Main Results

  1. Convergence Performance: Algorithm converges within 10 iterations, validating the effectiveness of block coordinate descent
  2. RMSE Performance: Estimation error approaches theoretical CRB lower bound, demonstrating algorithm optimality
  3. Beam Optimization Gain: Optimized beam patterns achieve over 4 dB SNR gain compared to random patterns

Detailed Analysis

Figure 2 Results:

  • Left plot: Algorithm converges rapidly under different SNR conditions (-10 dB, 0 dB, 10 dB)
  • Right plot: RMSE variation with SNR, optimized beam significantly outperforms random beam

Figure 3 Results:

  • Impact of imperfect CSI and phase deviations on performance
  • Comparison of angle deviation ν = 0°, 20° and phase deviation ε = 20°, 40°
  • Optimized beam outperforms random beam by at least 1 dB under all conditions

Key Findings

  1. Theoretical Optimality: RMSE approaches CRB, verifying theoretical optimality of the algorithm
  2. Robustness: Maintains good performance under imperfect CSI and large phase deviations
  3. Practicality: Beam optimization provides significant gains even under non-ideal practical conditions
  1. Traditional Calibration Methods: Single-element and array measurement methods based on anechoic chambers
  2. OTA Calibration Research:
    • OTA calibration for mmWave hybrid MIMO systems 14
    • Phase shifter network calibration for multi-user systems 15
    • First consideration of beam optimization design for large-scale SPA in this work
  3. LEO Satellite Communications: Technology innovation driven by Starlink and similar constellation systems

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

  1. The proposed OTA calibration algorithm effectively addresses phase deviation problems in LEO satellite SPA
  2. Beam pattern optimization significantly improves calibration accuracy
  3. The algorithm demonstrates excellent performance in both theoretical and practical aspects

Limitations

  1. Simplified Channel Model: Adopts single-path channel model; actual environments may be more complex
  2. Phase Deviation Assumption: Assumes deviations remain constant within coherence time
  3. Computational Complexity: O(M³ₜ) complexity may become a bottleneck for ultra-large-scale arrays

Future Directions

  1. Extension to multipath channel environments
  2. Joint calibration considering amplitude deviations
  3. Fast algorithms to reduce computational complexity

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

  1. Theoretical Completeness: Provides comprehensive theoretical analysis including CRB derivation and complexity analysis
  2. High Practical Value: Directly addresses practical requirements of LEO satellite communications
  3. Methodological Innovation: First to introduce beam optimization into large-scale SPA calibration
  4. Sufficient Experiments: Multi-faceted validation of algorithm performance including convergence, optimality, and robustness

Weaknesses

  1. Channel Model Limitations: Single-path model may not fully reflect actual complex environments
  2. Experimental Environment: Lacks validation in real satellite environments
  3. Algorithm Complexity: May face computational challenges for future larger-scale arrays

Impact

  1. Academic Contribution: Provides new theoretical framework for satellite communication phased array calibration
  2. Practical Value: Can be directly applied to LEO satellite communication systems
  3. Technology Promotion: Methods are extensible to other wireless communication systems

Applicable Scenarios

  1. On-orbit maintenance of LEO satellite communication systems
  2. Remote calibration of large-scale phased arrays
  3. Phase calibration for millimeter-wave communication systems

References

The paper cites 16 relevant references covering multiple domains including LEO satellite communications, phased array calibration, and optimization theory, providing a solid theoretical foundation for the research.


Overall Assessment: This is a high-quality technical paper that provides a complete theoretical solution to practical engineering problems in LEO satellite communications. The method demonstrates strong innovation, comprehensive theoretical analysis, and thorough experimental validation, possessing significant academic value and practical significance.