BlockSDN: Towards a High-Performance Blockchain via Software-Defined Cross Networking optimization

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2510.08139
• Title: BlockSDN: Towards a High-Performance Blockchain via Software-Defined Cross Networking optimization
• Authors: Wenyang Jia, Jingjing Wang, Ziwei Yan, Xiangli Peng, Guohui Yuan
• Classification: cs.NI (Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.DC (Distributed Computing)
• Publication Date: October 9, 2024
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.08139

Abstract

The scalability of blockchain systems is constrained by inefficient P2P broadcasting, with most existing optimizations focusing on the logical layer while neglecting physical network conditions. To address this issue, this paper proposes BlockSDN, the first SDN-based blockchain integration architecture. BlockSDN employs a distributed control plane to achieve a global network view, utilizes a graph engine for hierarchical clustering, and combines hybrid macro-micro neighbor selection with hierarchical broadcasting mechanisms. Dedicated simulation results demonstrate that BlockSDN reduces global block synchronization time by 65% and 55% compared to Gossip and Mercury protocols, respectively. These findings highlight the potential of SDN-enabled cross-layer coordination in significantly enhancing blockchain scalability and performance.

Research Background and Motivation

1. Core Problems to Address

Blockchain systems face severe performance bottlenecks, primarily manifested in:

• Excessive propagation delays: Bitcoin 1MB blocks require approximately 80 seconds to reach 90% of nodes, while Ethereum requires approximately 10 seconds
• Limited transaction throughput: Delays directly constrain block production rates and transaction processing capacity
• Consistency and security risks: Delayed block propagation increases fork probability and wastes computational resources

2. Problem Significance

As a revolutionary distributed ledger technology, blockchain is transforming finance, supply chain, healthcare, and other industries. However, performance bottlenecks severely impede its large-scale deployment. In competitive mining systems, delayed block propagation not only wastes computational resources but also compromises system integrity.

3. Limitations of Existing Approaches

Existing research primarily focuses on two directions:

• Network topology optimization: Geographic clustering, reputation-based hierarchical structures, adaptive node selection
• Broadcasting protocol improvements: Tree-based propagation strategies, overlay network broadcast optimization

However, these approaches have fundamental limitations:

• Neglect of resource heterogeneity: Node selection relies on structural metrics while ignoring computational and bandwidth heterogeneity
• Lack of global coordination: Neighbor selection is typically decentralized and heuristic, resulting in fragmented overlay networks
• High dynamic broadcast tree construction costs: While reducing redundancy, construction and maintenance overhead limits practical applicability

4. Research Motivation

The layered decoupling and decentralized control of traditional TCP/IP architecture impedes global visibility and dynamic optimization. This paper introduces the Software-Defined Networking (SDN) paradigm, which separates control and data planes, enabling logically centralized controllers to obtain global network views and apply programmable logic.

Core Contributions

1. Proposed the first blockchain-network integration architecture: BlockSDN is an SDN-based three-tier framework that integrates a graph engine into the control plane, unified modeling of blockchain overlay networks and physical network states, achieving full-stack cross-layer perception and coordination.
2. Designed a micro-macro collaborative data synchronization mechanism comprising three key components:
   • Resource-aware hierarchical partitioning algorithm for clustering and hierarchizing network nodes
   • Hybrid neighbor selection mechanism coordinating macro controller-driven global recommendations with micro node-level adaptive decisions
   • Hierarchical topology-based broadcasting algorithm significantly reducing propagation delays and redundant transmission overhead
3. Conducted comprehensive performance evaluation and validation: Extensive experiments across different network scales, communication loads, and physical topologies demonstrate that BlockSDN significantly outperforms state-of-the-art methods such as Gossip and Mercury in block propagation time, throughput, scalability, and topology adaptability.

Methodology Details

Task Definition

Input: Set of nodes in a distributed blockchain network, physical network topology, real-time network state information Output: Optimized logical overlay network topology, efficient block broadcasting paths Constraints: Ensure network connectivity, minimize propagation delays, guarantee system robustness

Model Architecture

1. Three-Tier Architecture Design

Application Layer: Composed of blockchain networks, handling transaction processing and block generation, specifying synchronization requirements and service specifications

Control Layer: Integrates SDN controller and embedded graph engine, providing global visibility, unified scheduling, and dynamic optimization. Coordinates multiple controllers forming a logically centralized but physically distributed architecture

Data Layer: Contains physical networks (blockchain nodes and forwarding devices), responsible for packet forwarding and local state monitoring

2. Graph Engine Integration

The graph engine provides unified modeling of node geographic locations, link states, and logical connections, supporting:

• Unified abstraction of node attributes and network states
• Clustering-based network partitioning
• Dynamic topology reconstruction

3. Distributed Control Plane

Adopts multi-controller collaborative architecture:

• Achieves state synchronization through control domain partitioning
• Seamless takeover of scheduling during failures
• Ensures continuous control and fault tolerance

Technical Innovations

1. Macro-Micro Coordinated Neighbor Selection Algorithm

Macro Level: Controller computes optimal neighbor sets based on global network state

• Considers node geographic location, bandwidth, latency, and other factors
• Uses graph algorithms to optimize global connectivity
• Periodically updates recommended neighbor lists

Micro Level: Nodes perform real-time adaptive adjustments based on local state

• Monitors local network performance metrics
• Adjusts strategies based on fork rate feedback
• Maintains connection quality with recommended neighbors

2. Hierarchical Broadcasting Mechanism

Intra-layer broadcasting: Parallel propagation within the same cluster Inter-layer broadcasting: Cross-cluster propagation through designated representative nodes Redundancy suppression: Avoids duplicate transmission, reducing network congestion

3. Adaptive Mechanism

Monitors fork rate as a proxy for synchronization health through northbound APIs:

• Re-collects network metrics upon detecting increased fork rates
• Dynamically adjusts neighbor selection strategies
• Triggers topology reconstruction

Experimental Setup

Dataset

Experiments utilize a self-constructed SDN-blockchain network simulation platform:

• Network Scale: 5,000-8,000 nodes
• Block Size: 0.5MB-3MB
• Network Topology: Ring, star, and tree topologies
• Synchronization Ratio: 5%-95% node reception rates

Evaluation Metrics

1. Block propagation time: Time required for blocks to reach specified proportion of nodes
2. Network throughput: Transactions per second (TPS) processed by the system per unit time
3. Network scalability: Performance across different network scales
4. Topology adaptability: Performance under different network topologies

Comparison Methods

• Gossip Protocol: Traditional random broadcasting protocol
• Mercury Protocol: Fast transaction broadcasting protocol in high-performance blockchain systems

Implementation Details

• Employs discrete event-driven simulation mechanism
• Constructs multi-layer architecture supporting modular integration
• Simultaneously models blockchain layer propagation processes and underlying physical network state evolution

Experimental Results

Main Results

1. Block Propagation Time

• 50% synchronization ratio: Gossip requires 1647ms, Mercury requires 1202ms, BlockSDN requires only 500ms
• 95% synchronization ratio: BlockSDN reduces propagation delays by 58% and 69% compared to Mercury and Gossip, respectively
• Full network propagation time: BlockSDN achieves 764ms, compared to Mercury (1700ms) and Gossip (2146ms), reducing delays by 55% and 65%, respectively

2. Performance with Different Block Sizes

• 0.5MB blocks: BlockSDN (548ms) vs Mercury (1188ms) vs Gossip (1864ms)
• 3MB blocks: BlockSDN (1545ms) vs Mercury (2864ms) vs Gossip (3870ms)
• BlockSDN maintains significant advantages with large data volumes

3. Network Throughput

• As network scale increases from 5,000 to 8,000 nodes:
  • BlockSDN improves by 2283 TPS
  • Mercury improves by 1365 TPS
  • Gossip improves by only 910 TPS

4. Network Scalability

• At 95% reception rate with increasing network scale:
  • Mercury delay increases by 506ms
  • BlockSDN increases by only 259ms (49% reduction)

Topology Adaptability Analysis

Ring Topology (1,000 nodes)

• BlockSDN: 560ms
• Mercury: 949ms
• Gossip: 9405ms

Star Topology (1,000 nodes)

• BlockSDN: 117ms
• Gossip: 604ms
• Mercury: 1339ms

Tree Topology (1,000 nodes, depth 5)

• BlockSDN: 260ms
• Mercury: 1356ms
• Gossip: 2090ms

Experimental Findings

1. Consistency advantages: BlockSDN demonstrates superior performance across all test scenarios
2. Strong scalability: Minimal performance degradation with increasing network scale
3. Topology independence: Maintains efficient performance across different topologies
4. Good stability: Smooth propagation time curve growth, indicating stronger stability

Related Work

Primary Research Directions

1. Blockchain network topology optimization:
   • Geographic clustering methods
   • Reputation-based hierarchical structures
   • Adaptive node selection
2. Broadcasting protocol improvements:
   • Tree-based propagation strategies
   • Overlay network broadcast optimization
   • Redundant message suppression
3. SDN applications in blockchain:
   • P4 programmable data plane acceleration for consensus
   • SDN network architecture optimization
   • Software-defined network performance optimization

Advantages of This Work

Compared to existing work, BlockSDN achieves for the first time:

• Deep integration of blockchain logical layer with physical network layer
• Global network view-guided neighbor selection
• Macro-micro coordinated dynamic optimization mechanism

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Effectiveness of cross-layer coordination: SDN-enabled cross-layer coordination significantly enhances blockchain performance
2. Value of architectural innovation: The three-tier integration architecture addresses fundamental limitations of traditional methods
3. Practical validation: Achieves significant performance improvements across multiple scenarios

Limitations

1. Control overhead: Computational and communication overhead of SDN controllers not analyzed in detail
2. Practical deployment complexity: Potential differences between simulation and real network environments
3. Security considerations: Centralized control may introduce new security risks
4. Standardization level: Requires network infrastructure support for SDN

Future Directions

1. Security enhancement: Research security mechanisms for distributed control planes
2. Practical deployment: Validate performance in real network environments
3. Standardization advancement: Promote standardization of SDN-blockchain integration
4. Cross-chain extension: Extend to cross-chain network optimization

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Strong innovation: First to propose deep SDN-blockchain integration architecture with pioneering significance
2. Complete methodology: Detailed exposition from architecture design to algorithm implementation
3. Sufficient experiments: Multi-dimensional, multi-scenario performance evaluation with convincing results
4. Significant performance improvements: Substantial performance gains compared to existing methods
5. Solid theoretical foundation: Well combines SDN and blockchain technical characteristics

Weaknesses

1. Simulation limitations: Validation only in simulation environments, lacking real network deployment
2. Insufficient cost analysis: Lacks in-depth analysis of SDN controller computational and storage overhead
3. Missing security analysis: Insufficient discussion of security risks from centralized control
4. High deployment threshold: Requires network infrastructure support, relatively high actual deployment costs
5. Limited comparison methods: Primarily compares with Gossip and Mercury; could consider more recent methods

Impact

1. Academic value: Provides new research direction for blockchain network optimization
2. Practical value: Offers important guidance for enhancing blockchain system performance
3. Technology advancement: May promote SDN application development in blockchain field
4. Standardization potential: May become reference standard for future blockchain network architecture

Applicable Scenarios

1. Enterprise-grade blockchain: Enterprise applications with high performance requirements
2. Consortium blockchain networks: Consortium deployments with relatively controllable network environments
3. High-frequency trading scenarios: Financial trading applications requiring rapid confirmation
4. Large-scale IoT networks: Blockchain applications in device-dense Internet of Things environments

References

The paper cites 17 relevant references, primarily including:

• Foundational research on blockchain network propagation mechanisms
• SDN architecture and programmable network technology
• Related work on blockchain performance optimization
• Network topology and broadcasting protocol optimization methods

Overall Assessment: This is a high-quality research paper proposing an innovative SDN-blockchain integration architecture with relatively complete theoretical design and experimental validation. While possessing certain limitations, its innovation and significant performance improvements confer important academic and practical value. This work opens new research directions for blockchain network optimization and merits further in-depth investigation and practical deployment validation.