Think Just Enough: Sequence-Level Entropy as a Confidence Signal for LLM Reasoning

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2510.08146
• Title: Think Just Enough: Sequence-Level Entropy as a Confidence Signal for LLM Reasoning
• Authors: Aman Sharma, Paras Chopra (Lossfunk)
• Classification: cs.LG cs.AI
• Publication Date: October 16, 2025 (arXiv v2)
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.08146v2

Abstract

This study proposes a novel entropy-based framework that enables early stopping in large language model reasoning tasks through Shannon entropy as a confidence signal, achieving 25-50% computational savings while maintaining task accuracy. The key finding is that entropy-based confidence calibration is an emergent property of advanced post-training optimization in modern reasoning models, but is significantly absent in standard instruction-tuned and pretrained models (such as Llama 3.3 70B). The research demonstrates that advanced reasoning models often know early whether they have arrived at the correct answer, and this emergent confidence awareness can be leveraged to save tokens and reduce latency.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Definition

As large language models approach saturation in reasoning benchmark performance, the computational cost of reasoning inference continues to escalate, with reasoning costs for individual difficult problems potentially reaching thousands of dollars. This high cost and associated latency have motivated researchers to seek methods for reducing token usage without compromising accuracy.

Limitations of Existing Approaches

Current computational optimization methods in reasoning tasks lack theoretical foundations and universal applicability across model architectures:

1. Existing confidence metrics rely on ad-hoc thresholds or simple heuristics
2. Cannot generalize across different model scales or reasoning domains
3. Critical gap exists between theoretical foundations and practical deployment requirements

Research Motivation

This paper addresses this gap by introducing a universal framework based on Shannon entropy, providing principled algorithmic interventions for confidence estimation in LLM mathematical reasoning. The approach is grounded in information theory and statistical decision theory, offering both theoretical rigor and practical applicability.

Core Contributions

1. Accuracy Preservation: Maintains task accuracy while achieving 25-50% computational savings with no statistically significant performance degradation
2. Practical Deployment: Achieves threshold equivalence with minimal samples (5-10), supporting rapid deployment across diverse reasoning benchmarks
3. Enhanced Token Budget Framework: A computational allocation scheme that redirects savings from simple, low-uncertainty problems to difficult, high-uncertainty problems
4. Theoretical Foundation: Four mathematically principled threshold methods based on information theory and Bayesian decision theory

Methodology Details

Task Definition

Given a reasoning problem q, model M, and threshold τ, the system must decide whether to stop after the first reasoning step (when confidence is sufficiently high) or continue expanding reasoning. The input is a reasoning problem, the output is an answer, and the constraint is minimizing computational cost while maintaining accuracy.

Core Technical Framework

Shannon Entropy as Confidence Signal

Using Shannon entropy of top-k token logprobs as a confidence measure (k=20):

1. Logprobs Normalization: $p_i = \frac{e^{\ell_i}}{\sum_{j=1}^{20} e^{\ell_j}}$
2. Shannon Entropy Calculation: $H = -\sum_{i=1}^{20} p_i \log_2 p_i$
3. Sequence-Level Confidence Signal: $H_{mean} = \frac{1}{T} \sum_{t=1}^T H_t$

Four Threshold Methods

1. Entropy Mean Method: Uses the mean of the entropy distribution of correct answers as threshold $\tau_{mean} = \mu_c$
2. Information-Theoretic Optimal Method: Uses logarithmic scaling and effect size to maximize information gain $\tau_{info} = \mu_c + \sigma_c \times \ln(1 + |d|)$
3. Bayesian Optimal Method: Mathematically optimal decision boundary minimizing classification error under Gaussian assumptions $\tau_{bayes} = \frac{-b \pm \sqrt{b^2 - 4ac}}{2a}$
4. Scale-Invariant Universal Method: Adapts to different model characteristics through effect size normalization $\tau_{universal} = \mu_c + \frac{\sqrt{|d|}}{1+\sqrt{|d|}} \times (\mu_i - \mu_c) \times \max(0, 1-\frac{\sigma_c}{\mu_c})$

Token Budget Framework

Introduces an intelligent token allocation mechanism based on entropy gating:

• Total Budget Constraint: Budget = α × β = constant
• Problem Classification: High-confidence problems (H ≤ τ) and low-confidence problems (H > τ)
• Resource Allocation: High-confidence problems receive single API calls, low-confidence problems receive enhanced allocation

Experimental Setup

Datasets

• AIME'24/25: 30 mathematical competition problems each
• GPQA Diamond: 198 graduate-level science reasoning benchmark

Models

• GPT OSS 120B/20B: Large/medium-scale transformers with "high reasoning effort"
• Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507: Alibaba's instruction-tuned variant

Experimental Configuration

• Temperature = 0.7, 4-step sequential scaling process
• Maximum 8,192 tokens per step (32,768 tokens maximum total)
• Extract top-20 logprobs for entropy calculation

Evaluation Metrics

• Step-1 Accuracy: Baseline accuracy using only the first reasoning step
• 4-Step Sequential Accuracy: Final accuracy of 4-step sequential reasoning process
• Thresh Acc.: Accuracy for problems below entropy threshold
• Token Savings: Computational savings achieved through selective early stopping

Experimental Results

Main Results

Comprehensive performance across 9 model-dataset combinations demonstrates:

• Consistent Computational Savings: All combinations achieve 25-50% token savings
• Accuracy Preservation: No accuracy loss relative to 4-step baseline (∆-Acc = 0%)
• Threshold Accuracy: Most models achieve 88-100%, indicating effective entropy-based discrimination

Key Findings

Emergent Confidence Calibration Analysis

Comparative experiments show standard instruction-tuned models (Llama 3.3 70B) lack entropy-based confidence calibration:

• Correct vs. incorrect answers: Cohen's d = -0.191 (negligible effect)
• Statistically insignificant: p = 0.230
• Demonstrates entropy-based confidence mechanisms are emergent properties of advanced post-training optimization

Threshold Method Comparison

• Scale-Invariant Universal Method: Highest computational savings (75.0% peak, 45.2% average)
• Information-Theoretic Optimal Method: Balanced performance (67.9% average savings)
• Bayesian Optimal Method: Mathematically optimal boundary (65.3% average savings)
• Entropy Mean Method: Conservative baseline ensuring perfect early-stop accuracy (32.1% average)

Ablation Studies

Top-k Logprobs Analysis

Systematic ablation study with k=5,10,15,20:

• Token savings remain stable (37.4-37.9%)
• Cohen's d effect size increases monotonically (0.574→0.600)
• All k values show statistical significance (p<0.001)

Sequential Refinement Persistence

10-step self-refinement analysis demonstrates:

• Persistent decision boundaries across all refinement steps
• Correct problems maintain low entropy (μ=0.799) vs. incorrect (μ=1.069)
• Entropy remains a reliable confidence signal throughout extended reasoning

Related Work

Adaptive Computation and Early Exit

• Methods like DeeBERT, CALM perform dynamic computational adjustment at layer level
• Require architectural modifications or auxiliary classifiers
• This paper's approach is training-free, model-agnostic, and triggers at reasoning step level

Entropy-Based Stopping

• HALT-CoT uses answer distribution entropy but requires per-dataset threshold tuning
• AdaDec applies token-level entropy in code generation
• This paper uses "sequence-level token entropy from first reasoning step," supporting few-shot calibration

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. First comprehensive study of entropy-based confidence mechanisms in reasoning models
2. Validates universality across mathematical and scientific reasoning benchmarks
3. Reveals confidence calibration as an emergent property of advanced post-training optimization
4. Achieves 25-50% computational savings while maintaining accuracy

Limitations

1. Entropy thresholds require calibration on small subsets containing both correct and incorrect answers
2. No universal entropy threshold generalizes across models and benchmarks
3. Current entropy signal only determines stopping timing, does not capture whether uncertain first steps can be refined to correct solutions

Future Directions

1. Extend to more diverse benchmarks (programming, open-domain QA, multilingual reasoning)
2. Novel confidence signals (semantic entropy, hidden state variance)
3. Design refinement-aware strategies
4. Entropy-based multi-agent reasoning systems

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Solid Theoretical Foundation: Rigorous mathematical framework grounded in information theory and statistical decision theory
2. High Practical Value: Significant computational savings (25-50%) with easy deployment
3. Important Scientific Discovery: Reveals confidence calibration as an emergent property of modern reasoning models
4. Comprehensive Experiments: Thorough validation across multiple models and datasets with detailed ablation studies

Weaknesses

1. Limited Generalization: Requires model-dataset specific threshold calibration
2. Model Dependency: Only effective in models with advanced post-training optimization
3. Evaluation Scope: Primarily limited to mathematical and scientific reasoning tasks
4. Shallow Theoretical Analysis: Insufficient explanation of mechanisms behind why certain models exhibit this emergent property

Impact

1. Academic Value: Provides new theoretical perspectives and practical methods for reasoning efficiency optimization
2. Industrial Application: Directly applicable to production environments with significant inference cost reduction
3. Reproducibility: Provides detailed implementation details and mathematical formulas supporting reproduction
4. Inspirational Significance: Offers new insights for understanding emergent capabilities of modern LLMs

Applicable Scenarios

1. High-Cost Reasoning Tasks: Mathematical competitions, scientific problem solving
2. Resource-Constrained Environments: Applications requiring balance between accuracy and computational cost
3. Real-Time Reasoning Systems: Interactive AI assistants requiring latency reduction
4. Research Tools: Analyzing and comparing confidence calibration capabilities across different models

References

The paper cites important works in related fields, including early exit methods (DeeBERT, CALM), entropy-based stopping strategies (HALT-CoT, AdaDec), and confidence estimation research, providing solid theoretical foundations and comparative baselines for this work.

Overall Assessment: This is a high-quality research paper with significant contributions in theoretical innovation, experimental validation, and practical value. Particularly, the discovery of confidence calibration as an emergent property provides new scientific insights for understanding modern LLM capabilities. The method is simple, effective, and has broad application prospects.