Enhancing Self-Supervised Learning with Semantic Pairs: A New Dataset and Empirical Study

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2510.08722
• Title: Enhancing Self-Supervised Learning with Semantic Pairs: A New Dataset and Empirical Study
• Authors: Mohammad Alkhalefi, Georgios Leontidis, Mingjun Zhong (University of Aberdeen)
• Classification: cs.LG cs.AI
• Publication Date: October 13, 2025 (arXiv v2)
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.08722v2

Abstract

This paper addresses the limitations of instance discrimination self-supervised learning methods by proposing an approach to enhance model generalization using semantic pairs. Traditional instance discrimination methods generate different views of the same instance through random transformations, but this approach is constrained by a limited set of transformations that may fail to cover the full variability of real-world data. The authors construct a carefully curated semantic pair dataset and validate through extensive experiments that semantic pairs enable models to learn more universal representations, achieving superior performance across multiple downstream tasks.

Research Background and Motivation

Core Problems

Traditional instance discrimination self-supervised learning methods have the following key limitations:

1. Insufficient Transformation Coverage: Reliance on limited hand-designed transformations (e.g., random cropping, color jittering) fails to encompass the full variability of real-world data
2. Limited Generalization Capacity: Restricted generalization ability on unseen datasets and diverse downstream tasks
3. Inappropriate Association Learning: May learn spurious associations between background and foreground objects

Research Motivation

The authors observe that traditional methods capture shared information between two augmented views during representation learning, but this may include irrelevant background information and fine-grained details. Semantic pairs guide models to focus on task-relevant information while ignoring irrelevant information by placing different instances of the same class in different contexts.

Theoretical Foundation

The paper proposes that semantic pairs enhance four key invariances:

• Occlusion Invariance: Recognition of partially occluded objects
• Background Invariance: Object recognition across different backgrounds
• Pattern Invariance: Robustness to surface pattern variations
• Illumination Invariance: Adaptation to different lighting conditions

Core Contributions

1. Theoretical Clarification: In-depth explanation of how semantic pairs promote generalization in instance discrimination methods
2. Dataset Construction: Creation of a carefully curated semantic pair dataset containing 187 classes, 157 pairs per class, totaling 29,359 semantic pairs
3. Systematic Comparison: Comparison of multiple state-of-the-art self-supervised learning methods to identify which methods best learn useful representations from semantic pairs
4. Empirical Validation: Verification of semantic pair effectiveness through transfer learning and object detection tasks

Methodology Details

Task Definition

This research focuses on self-supervised representation learning, particularly the instance discrimination paradigm. The objective is to learn universal visual representations that perform well across multiple downstream tasks without manual annotation.

Dataset Construction Method

Semantic Pair Dataset

• Scale: 187 classes, 157 pairs per class, totaling 29,359 semantic pairs
• Construction Strategy: Manual annotation ensures precise semantic alignment, avoiding errors from automatic matching methods
• Class Selection: Classes selected from ImageNet-1K with semantic overlap to standard benchmark datasets (e.g., STL-10, CIFAR)
• Quality Assurance: Six months of full-time manual curation (8 hours per day)

Augmentation Pair Dataset (Baseline)

• Scale: 187 classes, 157 images per class, totaling 29,359 images
• Generation Method: Synthetic pairs generated through random transformations (cropping, rotation, flipping, color jittering)

Experimental Framework

A four-stage comparison framework is employed:

1. Dataset Construction: Creation of semantic pair and augmentation pair datasets
2. Image Transformation: Application of standard random transformation pipeline
3. Model Training: Training multiple state-of-the-art methods on both datasets
4. Performance Evaluation: Assessment of representation quality through downstream tasks

Technical Innovations

1. Precise Semantic Alignment: Manual curation ensures accuracy of semantic pairs, avoiding noise from automatic methods
2. Isolated Effect Analysis: Training with semantic pairs alone, avoiding confounding effects from mixing with augmentation data
3. Systematic Evaluation: Verification of semantic pair universal effectiveness across multiple SSL methods

Experimental Setup

Datasets

• Pretraining Data: Semantic pair dataset vs. augmentation pair dataset (29,359 pairs/images each)
• Evaluation Datasets:
  • Transfer Learning: STL-10, CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100
  • Object Detection: PASCAL VOC
  • Comparative Experiments: Tiny-ImageNet

Evaluation Metrics

• Transfer Learning: Linear evaluation accuracy
• Object Detection: AP50, AP, AP75
• Computational Efficiency: Training time comparison

Baseline Methods

• Contrastive Learning: SimCLR
• Non-Contrastive Learning:
  • Information Maximization: VicReg
  • Knowledge Distillation: BYOL, DINO

Implementation Details

• Backbone Networks: ResNet-50, ViT-S/8
• Batch Size: 256
• Input Resolution: 64×64 pixels
• Training Epochs: 200-800
• Hardware: A100 80G GPU

Experimental Results

Main Results

Transfer Learning Performance

Models pretrained with semantic pairs outperform augmentation pair baselines across all evaluated datasets:

Extended Training Effects

Performance gaps persist when training is extended to 800 epochs:

• SimCLR (SP): 86.56% (STL-10)
• SimCLR (AP): 82.41% (STL-10)
• Improvement: +3.75%

Computational Efficiency Comparison

Compared to Tiny-ImageNet, the semantic pair dataset demonstrates significant advantages:

Ablation Studies

Transformation Removal Experiment

Semantic pair models demonstrate greater robustness when specific transformations are removed:

• Removing grayscale transformation: SimCLR (AP) drops 9.69%, SimCLR (SP) nearly unaffected
• Retaining only random cropping: SimCLR (AP) performance plummets to 24.25%, SimCLR (SP) maintains 64.23%

Architecture Generalization

Results on ViT architecture confirm universal effectiveness of semantic pairs:

Data Scale Impact

Semantic pair advantages become more pronounced as training samples decrease:

• 50 samples/class: Semantic pair advantage +4.20%
• 157 samples/class: Semantic pair advantage +3.83%

Object Detection Results

On PASCAL VOC object detection task:

Experimental Findings

1. Contrastive Learning Advantage: SimCLR demonstrates superior performance in leveraging semantic pairs, achieving maximum improvements across all datasets
2. Reduced Transformation Dependency: Models trained with semantic pairs show significantly reduced dependence on data transformations
3. Small-Sample Advantage: Semantic pair benefits are more pronounced with limited training data
4. Universal Applicability: Semantic pair benefits are verified across different architectures and tasks

Related Work

Classification of Self-Supervised Learning Methods

The paper categorizes related work into three major categories:

Contrastive Learning

• SimCLR: End-to-end method using large batch negative samples
• MoCo: Momentum contrast method using dictionary-stored negative samples
• PIRL: Uses memory bank to store negative samples

Non-Contrastive Learning

• Clustering Methods: DeepCluster, SWAV
• Knowledge Distillation: BYOL, SimSiam, DINO
• Information Maximization: Barlow Twins, VICReg

Enhanced Contrastive Learning

• Hard Negative Mining: Mining difficult negative samples
• Positive Sample Construction: Leveraging semantic similarity to construct positive pairs

Distinction from Related Work

1. Isolated Effect Study: Avoids confounding effects from mixing semantic pairs with augmentation data
2. Precise Semantic Alignment: Manual curation ensures quality
3. Systematic Comparison: Verification of effectiveness across multiple methods

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Semantic Pair Effectiveness: Semantic pairs significantly enhance generalization capacity of self-supervised models
2. Contrastive Learning Advantage: Contrastive learning methods (particularly SimCLR) benefit most from semantic pairs
3. Reduced Transformation Dependency: Semantic pair training reduces reliance on manual data transformations
4. Improved Computational Efficiency: Carefully curated semantic pair datasets achieve better results with fewer computational resources compared to large-scale datasets

Limitations

1. Dataset Scale: Current dataset is relatively small (187 classes), scalability remains to be verified
2. Manual Cost: Manual curation process is time-consuming with limited automation
3. Domain Specificity: Primarily validated on visual tasks; applicability to other modalities unknown
4. Theoretical Explanation: Theoretical explanation for why contrastive learning is more suitable for semantic pairs remains insufficient

Future Directions

1. Large-Scale Expansion: Explore scalability of semantic pair methods in larger semantic spaces
2. Automated Curation: Develop more accurate automatic semantic pair matching methods
3. Cross-Modal Applications: Extend semantic pair concepts to other modalities
4. Theoretical Analysis: Investigate intrinsic mechanisms of how contrastive learning leverages semantic relationships

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Clear Problem Definition: Accurately identifies core limitations of traditional instance discrimination methods
2. Reasonable Method Design: Manual curation ensures semantic pair quality, avoiding noise interference
3. Rigorous Experimental Design: Employs controlled variables to isolate independent effects of semantic pairs
4. Convincing Results: Consistent improvements verified across multiple datasets and methods
5. High Practical Value: Provided dataset and code facilitate field advancement

Weaknesses

1. Limited Theoretical Depth: Insufficient theoretical explanation for why semantic pairs are effective
2. Scale Limitations: Experiments primarily conducted on relatively small datasets
3. Insufficient Cost Considerations: High cost of manual curation may limit practical application
4. Incomplete Comparisons: Lacks direct comparison with other semantic enhancement methods

Impact

1. Academic Contribution: Provides new research direction and benchmark dataset for self-supervised learning
2. Practical Value: Simple and effective method, easily implementable within existing frameworks
3. Reproducibility: Authors commit to releasing dataset and code, facilitating result reproduction
4. Inspirational Significance: Provides insights into constructing better self-supervised learning data

Applicable Scenarios

1. Resource-Constrained Environments: When computational resources are limited but high-quality representations are needed
2. Domain-Specific Applications: When achieving good performance on specific downstream tasks is required
3. Research Prototypes: As foundation for investigating semantic relationships in representation learning
4. Educational Purposes: Helps understand trade-offs between data quality and quantity in self-supervised learning

References

The paper cites important works in self-supervised learning, including:

• Classical contrastive learning methods: SimCLR, MoCo, PIRL
• Non-contrastive learning methods: BYOL, DINO, VicReg
• Related datasets: ImageNet, CIFAR, STL-10
• Semantic pair related research: Recent work on positive sample construction

Overall Assessment: This is a high-quality empirical research paper that validates the importance of semantic pairs in self-supervised learning through carefully designed experiments. Despite limited theoretical depth, its practical value and contribution to the field merit recognition. The dataset and findings provided will serve as important foundations for future research.