2025-11-10T03:11:12.535774

Taming forward scattering singularities in partial waves

Zamoro, Grinstein, Quílez
Perturbative partial-wave amplitudes diverge in cases with a massless exchanged particle in the $t$-channel. We argue that the divergence is an artifact of perturbation theory and give a prescription for the all-orders correction factor that renders the partial waves finite. As an example, we apply this to longitudinal $W^+W^-$ elastic scattering, for which there is a photon exchange $t$-channel contribution, and derive improved quasi-perturbative unitarity bounds on the mass of the Higgs. The method is also useful for $t$-channel exchange of very light particles.
academic

Taming forward scattering singularities in partial waves

Basic Information

  • Paper ID: 2510.08784
  • Title: Taming forward scattering singularities in partial waves
  • Authors: Marta Fuentes Zamoro (UAM/CSIC), Benjamín Grinstein (UCSD), Pablo Quílez (UCSD)
  • Classification: hep-ph (High Energy Physics - Phenomenology), hep-th (High Energy Physics - Theory)
  • Submission Date: October 9, 2025
  • Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.08784v1

Abstract

Perturbative partial wave amplitudes diverge when the t-channel exchanged particle is massless. This paper argues that such divergences are artifacts of perturbation theory and provides a prescription for all-order correction factors that render partial waves finite. As an example, this method is applied to longitudinal W+WW^+W^- elastic scattering (where photon t-channel exchange contributions exist), deriving improved semi-perturbative unitarity bounds on the Higgs mass. The method is also useful for t-channel exchange of extremely light particles.

Research Background and Motivation

Importance of the Problem

Partial wave decomposition plays a crucial role in many important developments in particle physics:

  1. Experimental data analysis: Used to reveal quantum numbers of resonant states observed in scattering
  2. Theoretical analysis: Widely employed to exploit unitarity consequences of scattering amplitudes
  3. Bound setting: Partial wave unitarity conditions are essential for establishing upper bounds on scattering amplitudes at asymptotically large center-of-mass energies

Core Problem

When massless particles are exchanged in the t-channel, the resulting scattering amplitude exhibits singularities in the forward direction—a non-integrable divergence that renders partial wave amplitudes ill-defined. This is precisely the same divergence displayed by the Rutherford scattering amplitude.

Limitations of Existing Approaches

Traditional methods regulate this divergence by introducing a small mass m in the propagator of the t-channel exchanged particle. However, the resulting unitarity bounds are sensitive to the value of mass m and become meaningless in the m→0 limit.

Research Motivation

This paper proposes a prescription that renders partial waves finite by incorporating non-perturbative effects, thereby resolving this long-standing technical difficulty.

Core Contributions

  1. Proposes a new correction prescription: Provides a systematic method for handling partial wave divergences arising from massless particle exchange in the t-channel
  2. Establishes theoretical foundation: Connects the correction factor to the exact solution of Coulomb scattering, providing physical intuition
  3. Improves Higgs mass bounds: Applied to WL+WLW^+_LW^-_L scattering, yields improved semi-perturbative unitarity bounds
  4. Extends application scope: The method applies to t-channel exchange of extremely light particles, with important implications for dark matter physics

Methodology Details

Core Prescription

For photon exchange between particles with charges z1z_1 and z2z_2, the tree-level amplitude is corrected as:

T(0)T(0)eiWT^{(0)} \rightarrow T^{(0)}e^{iW}

where the phase factor is: iW=(ϵiz1z2αemβ)ln[(1cosθ)2]iW = \left(\epsilon - i\frac{z_1z_2\alpha_{em}}{\beta}\right)\ln\left[\frac{(1-\cos\theta)}{2}\right]

Here β=(p1p2)2m12m22/(p1p2)\beta = \sqrt{(p_1 \cdot p_2)^2 - m_1^2m_2^2}/(p_1 \cdot p_2) is the relative velocity, and ϵ0+\epsilon \to 0^+.

Physical Principles

The correction factor can be understood as:

  1. Soft photon resummation: Resummation of long-range (soft) photon exchange contributions, corresponding to ladder diagram contributions
  2. Non-relativistic limit: In the non-relativistic case, this exactly corresponds to the exact solution of Coulomb scattering
  3. Relativistic generalization: Work by Dalitz and Weinberg provides supporting evidence for the relativistic case

Technical Implementation

The corrected partial wave amplitude integral: a=132π11dcosθP(cosθ)T(0)(s,cosθ)eiWa_\ell = \frac{1}{32\pi}\int_{-1}^{1} d\cos\theta \, P_\ell(\cos\theta) \, T^{(0)}(\sqrt{s}, \cos\theta) \, e^{iW}

The oscillating phase factor eiWe^{iW} renders the originally divergent integral integrable.

Experimental Setup

Application Case: WL+WLW^+_LW^-_L Scattering

Studies elastic scattering of longitudinally polarized W bosons, which includes:

  1. t-channel photon exchange: Causes forward divergence
  2. Z boson exchange: Also yields divergent contributions in the large momentum expansion
  3. Higgs exchange: Provides mass-dependent contributions

Scattering Amplitude

In the pp \to \infty, fixed θ0\theta \neq 0 limit: T0=2GF(2mH2(3+cos2θ)(1cosθ)mZ21)T^0 = -\sqrt{2}G_F\left(2m_H^2 - \frac{(3+\cos^2\theta)(1-\cos\theta)m_Z^2}{1}\right)

Calculation Details

Uses the complete scattering amplitude expression, including all t-channel contributions, with phase corrections applied to handle singularities.

Experimental Results

Higgs Mass Bounds

  1. Classical LQT bound: mH1234m_H \leq 1234 GeV (considering only Higgs contribution)
  2. Improved bound in this work: mH1420m_H \lesssim 1420 GeV (including all tree-level contributions)

Although numerically slightly weaker, the new bound:

  • Includes all tree-level contributions (including photon exchange)
  • Does not depend on the problematic large momentum expansion
  • Provides more complete and consistent treatment

Key Findings

The corrected partial wave amplitude contains terms of the form mZ2/α2m_Z^2/\alpha_2, demonstrating the non-perturbative nature of the result, where α2=g22/4π\alpha_2 = g_2^2/4\pi.

Light Particle Applications

For particles with mass mpm \ll p, the method eliminates unphysical sensitivity to mass, allowing calculations in the zero-mass limit.

Historical Background

  1. Classical results: Exact solution of Coulomb scattering (Messiah, Gottfried, et al.)
  2. Relativistic generalization: Dalitz's quantum field theory calculations
  3. Infrared divergences: Weinberg's work on infrared divergences from massless mediators
  4. Unitarity bounds: Pioneering work by Lee, Quigg, and Thacker

Uniqueness of This Work's Contribution

  • Provides a systematic prescription for handling partial wave divergences
  • Establishes connections with known exact results
  • Extends to relativistic cases and arbitrary spin

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

  1. Method validity: The oscillating phase factor successfully tames forward scattering singularities
  2. Physical reasonableness: The correction factor has clear physical interpretation (soft photon resummation)
  3. Practical applications: Important applications in Higgs physics and light particle research

Limitations

  1. Theoretical proof: Lacks rigorous first-principles derivation
  2. Gluon exchange: Strong interaction case is more complex, requiring further study
  3. Higher-order corrections: Systematic extension of the method requires more work

Future Directions

  1. Rigorous proof: Establish first-principles foundation for the method
  2. Strong interactions: Extend to gluon exchange cases
  3. Phenomenological applications: Applications in effective field theory and new physics searches

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

  1. Innovation: Provides a new approach to a long-standing technical problem
  2. Physical intuition: Connection with known exact results enhances credibility
  3. Practical value: Broad application prospects in particle physics phenomenology
  4. Mathematical rigor: Prescription is explicit and calculations are reproducible

Weaknesses

  1. Theoretical foundation: Lacks complete theoretical proof
  2. Scope of applicability: Treatment of strong interaction cases is insufficient
  3. Numerical verification: Requires more independent numerical checks

Impact

This work is expected to have significant impact in:

  1. Standard Model studies: Improved theoretical calculations in electroweak physics
  2. New physics searches: Provides tools for beyond Standard Model research
  3. Effective field theory: Applications in SMEFT and HEFT studies

Applicable Scenarios

  • Scattering processes involving massless or extremely light particle t-channel exchange
  • Theoretical analyses requiring precise unitarity bounds
  • Dark matter and axion physics research
  • Unitarity constraints in effective field theory

References

The paper cites important literature in the field, including:

  • Lee, Quigg, and Thacker's classical unitarity bound work
  • Pioneering research by Dalitz and Weinberg on infrared divergences
  • Exact solutions of Coulomb scattering in quantum mechanics textbooks
  • Recent advances in effective field theory unitarity constraints