Real-Time Instantons in Complex-Driven Qubits

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2510.08820
• Title: Real-Time Instantons in Complex-Driven Qubits
• Author: Samuel Alperin (Los Alamos National Laboratory)
• Classification: quant-ph math-ph math.MP
• Publication Date: October 9, 2025 (arXiv preprint)
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.08820

Abstract

This paper investigates the dynamics of the quantum Rabi model driven by complex-coupled periodic modulation of parameters. The study demonstrates that, unlike conventional Rabi oscillations, this non-unitary coherent driving leads to unidirectional instanton solutions, enabling rapid deterministic one-way tunneling from arbitrary initial coherent states to the ground state, establishing the ground state as a strong attractor in qubit dynamics. The tunneling timescale is inversely proportional to the effective resonant coupling, achieving ultrafast, deterministic, and high-fidelity qubit reset through purely coherent PT-symmetric driving without requiring external dissipative baths, lossy resonators, or measurement-based feedback.

Research Background and Motivation

Core Problem

Qubit initialization (reset) is a fundamental element of universal quantum computing systems. This operation requires accepting arbitrary states as input and outputting predefined states. This is necessary not only at the beginning of quantum algorithms but also repeatedly in error correction schemes for readout and reset operations of auxiliary/syndrome qubits.

Problem Significance

1. Quantum Computing Bottleneck: With increasing qubit coherence times in current technology and the demand for sufficiently fast and reliable reset operations, qubit reset now represents a primary limitation on quantum computing clock speed in many physical platforms.
2. Error Correction Requirements: Error correction schemes necessary for large-scale useful computation employ numerous reset operations with extreme demands on speed and reliability.

Limitations of Existing Approaches

1. Passive Methods: Rely on natural qubit relaxation to the ground state, which is too slow.
2. Feedback Methods: Apply customized gate operations after reading out the qubit state, limited by the speed and fidelity of readout and gate operations.
3. Dissipative Methods: Modulate qubit coupling with lossy resonators, requiring auxiliary states, trading off between speed and fidelity, and introducing decoherence.

Research Motivation

Exploit the unidirectional transport properties of non-Hermitian quantum systems to explore a novel qubit reset mechanism that:

• Does not depend on feedback, auxiliary states, or structures beyond abstract two-level systems
• Achieves deterministic one-way tunneling
• Maintains coherence and avoids decoherence

Core Contributions

1. Theoretical Discovery: Proves that the quantum Rabi model under PT-symmetric parameter driving produces unidirectional instanton solutions, enabling deterministic tunneling from arbitrary initial states to the ground state.
2. Mathematical Framework: Establishes the correspondence between SU(1,1) algebraic structure and φ⁴ field theory instanton equations.
3. Universal Reset Protocol: Proposes a robust non-Hermitian single-step qubit reset protocol.
4. Arbitrary Attractor Engineering: Demonstrates how to place strong attractors at arbitrary points on the Bloch sphere through modulated driving parameters.
5. Experimental Feasibility: Demonstrates experimental feasibility of the scheme in current superconducting circuit technology.

Detailed Methodology

Task Definition

Input: Qubit in an arbitrary unknown quantum state Output: Qubit in the ground state (or specified target state) Constraint: Purely coherent process without measurement or feedback

Model Architecture

1. Quantum Rabi Model Foundation

Standard quantum Rabi model:

H_R = ω₀â†â + ωₐσ̂z + g(↠+ â)(σ̂₋ + σ̂₊)

2. Complex Parameter Driving

Introduce time-dependent complex coupling:

g(t) = g₀e^(-iωₓt)

This corresponds to PT-symmetric parameter driving: g(t) = g₀cos(ωₓt) + i sin(ωₓt)

3. Rotating Wave Approximation

Under sum-frequency parametric resonance condition ωₓ ≈ ω₀ + ωᵨ, counter-rotating terms dominate slow timescale dynamics:

H = ω₀â†â + ωₐσ̂z + g₀(âσ̂₋ + â†σ̂₊)

4. SU(1,1) Algebraic Structure

Through transformation of the Casimir operator Ĉ = â†â + ½(1 - σ̂z), obtain closed SU(1,1) algebra:

[σ̂z, b̂] = -2b̂
[σ̂z, b̂†] = 2b̂†  
[b̂, b̂†] = (1/Ĉ - 1)σ̂z

Technical Innovations

1. Wei-Norman Theorem Solution

Utilize the Wei-Norman theorem for finite-dimensional closed algebras to construct the time evolution operator:

Û(t) = e^(-if₀(t)M̂)e^(-if₁(t)σ̂z)e^(-if₂(t)b̂)e^(-if₃(t)b̂†)

2. Emergence of Instanton Solutions

The spin expectation value obtained from solving:

⟨σ̂z⟩(t) = σ̂z(t₀)(1 - 2tanh(αt))

precisely corresponds to the classical trajectory of a φ⁴ kink instanton.

3. Bloch Sphere Instanton Geometry

In the Bloch sphere representation, the qubit tunnels along an interior gradient flow path from the north pole (z = +1) directly through the Bloch sphere to the south pole (z = -1), rather than rotating on the surface.

Experimental Setup

Numerical Verification Methods

• Direct numerical integration of the complete quantum Rabi Hamiltonian using QuTiP Python library
• One million randomly distributed initial qubit states on the Bloch sphere
• Random initial cavity photon occupations (between 0-5)
• Evolution of the Rabi model for each initial value problem

Parameter Settings

• Coupling strength: Tens of MHz (within the range of state-of-the-art superconducting devices)
• Modulation frequency: Several GHz
• System parameters within experimentally accessible ranges of current technology

Physical Implementation Platforms

1. Superconducting Circuits: Transmon qubits + linear resonators, with complex time-dependent coupling implemented via flux-tunable couplers or Josephson mixers
2. Neutral Atom Systems: Can implement corresponding parameter modulation
3. Photonic Qubit Systems: Complex coupling modulation achievable through optical methods

Experimental Results

Main Results

1. Convergence Verification: All initial states rapidly converge to the ground state expectation value, with analytical solutions providing outer bounds for initially excited states.
2. Fidelity: Fidelity increases significantly with time.
3. Timescale: Tunneling time is inversely proportional to effective resonant coupling, achieving ultrafast reset.
4. Robustness: Insensitive to initial conditions, achieving true "blind" reset.

Theory-Numerics Consistency

• Black line: Analytical instanton solution (Equation 12)
• Dark blue line: Numerical simulation results of the complete quantum Rabi model
• Light blue shading: Quantum uncertainty boundaries
• Numerical results show high consistency with theoretical predictions

Universality Verification

By adjusting the elliptically polarized non-Hermitian driving parameters (η,Φ), attractors can be placed at arbitrary points on the Bloch sphere:

⟨σ⟩∞ = -α/|α|

Related Work

Non-Hermitian Quantum Systems

• Real spectrum theory of PT-symmetric Hamiltonians
• Unidirectional invisibility, topological lasers, and related phenomena
• Non-Hermitian skin effects in Su-Schrieffer-Heeger models

Qubit Reset Methods

1. Measurement-Feedback Methods: Work by Johnson et al., Ristè et al.
2. Dissipative Engineering Methods: Magnard et al., Murch et al. on lossy resonator coupling
3. Optimal Control Methods: Quantum optimal control by Basilewitsch et al.

Quantum Rabi Model

• Historical development of Jaynes-Cummings approximation
• Counter-rotating term effects in deep strong coupling regime
• Exact solutions by Braak

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Novel Mechanism Discovery: PT-symmetric parameter driving produces unidirectional instantons, enabling deterministic quantum state engineering.
2. Mathematical Correspondence: Establishes precise correspondence between SU(1,1) quantum dynamics and φ⁴ field theory instantons.
3. Practical Protocol: Provides high-fidelity qubit reset method independent of dissipative processes.
4. Universal Framework: Extensible to arbitrary target states on the Bloch sphere.

Limitations

1. Approximation Conditions: Depends on rotating wave approximation, potentially failing in deep strong coupling regime.
2. Experimental Challenges: Requires precise complex parameter modulation with high experimental control precision.
3. Environmental Effects: Decoherence and noise effects in actual systems not fully addressed.

Future Directions

1. Experimental Verification: Experimental implementation on superconducting circuits and other platforms.
2. Multi-Qubit Extension: Investigation of analogous phenomena in many-body systems.
3. Fault-Tolerance Analysis: Assessment of robustness in noisy environments.
4. Application Extensions: Exploration of applications in quantum error correction and quantum algorithms.

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Theoretical Innovation: First introduction of field theory instanton concepts into qubit dynamics, establishing profound mathematical-physical correspondences.
2. Practical Value: Provides a novel pathway for addressing critical bottlenecks in quantum computing.
3. Mathematical Rigor: Provides exact analytical solutions using the Wei-Norman theorem.
4. Experimental Feasibility: Detailed analysis of implementation schemes with current technology.

Weaknesses

1. Approximation Limitations: Rotating wave approximation may restrict the method's applicability range.
2. Environmental Robustness: Insufficient analysis of actual noisy environments.
3. Scaling Behavior: Insufficient discussion of how system parameter scaling affects performance.
4. Comparative Analysis: Quantitative comparison with existing methods is insufficient.

Impact

1. Theoretical Contribution: Provides new theoretical framework for non-Hermitian quantum system research.
2. Technology Advancement: May catalyze development of new qubit control technologies.
3. Interdisciplinary Value: Connects quantum optics, field theory, and quantum information domains.

Applicable Scenarios

1. Quantum Computing: Fast qubit reset in high-frequency quantum error correction protocols.
2. Quantum Simulation: Quantum simulation experiments requiring precise state preparation.
3. Quantum Sensing: Precision quantum sensing protocols requiring repeated initialization.
4. Fundamental Research: Experimental verification platform for non-Hermitian quantum dynamics.

References

This paper cites 26 important references spanning quantum computing foundations, non-Hermitian physics, quantum optics, and mathematical physics, providing solid theoretical grounding for the research.

Overall Assessment: This is a high-quality paper with significant theoretical and practical value, successfully applying abstract mathematical-physical concepts to solve practical quantum technology problems, demonstrating profound physical insight and rigorous mathematical analysis.