Planar Length-Constrained Minimum Spanning Trees

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2510.09002
• Title: Planar Length-Constrained Minimum Spanning Trees
• Authors: D Ellis Hershkowitz, Richard Z Huang (Brown University)
• Classification: cs.DS (Data Structures and Algorithms)
• Publication Date: October 10, 2025 (arXiv preprint)
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.09002

Abstract

This paper investigates the length-constrained minimum spanning tree (Length-Constrained MST) problem: given an n-node graph G=(V,E) with edge weights w: E → Z≥0 and edge lengths l: E → Z≥0, along with a root node r∈V and length constraint h∈Z≥0. The objective is to output a minimum-weight spanning tree according to w such that the distance (according to l) from each node to the root node r is at most h.

The authors propose a polynomial-time algorithm for planar graphs that outputs an O(log^(1+ε) n)-approximation solution for any constant ε>0, where each node's distance to r is at most (1+ε)h. The algorithm is based on a novel version of length-constrained planar separators, which have independent research value. Additionally, the algorithm applies to the length-constrained Steiner tree problem. As a complement, the authors prove that on general graphs, any length-constrained MST algorithm that keeps node distances to the root at most 2h cannot achieve O(log^(2-ε) n)-approximation under standard complexity assumptions, thereby separating the approximation complexity of length-constrained MST on planar graphs from that on general graphs.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Importance

1. Practical Application Needs: Traditional minimum spanning trees (MST) only guarantee connectivity, but in practical communication network design, connectivity alone is insufficient. If message transmission requires traversing very long paths, it may result in:
   • Excessive communication latency (each edge has a latency cost)
   • Reduced reliability (longer paths have more failure opportunities)
2. Theoretical Challenges: Length constraints significantly complicate the problem:
   • Destroy structural properties of classical problems
   • Lead to strong algorithmic impossibility results
   • Current best algorithm for general graphs is an O(n^ε)-approximation from decades ago
3. Equivalence to Directed Steiner Tree: Length-constrained MST is essentially equivalent to the directed Steiner tree (DST) problem, a major open problem.

Limitations of Existing Approaches

• Best known result on general graphs is O(n^ε)-approximation (Charikar et al., 1999)
• While O(log n)-approximation exists, it requires O(log n) length relaxation
• No known poly-log approximation algorithm with constant length relaxation for non-trivial graph classes

Research Motivation

The authors pose two core questions:

1. Question 1: Is length-constrained MST easier on planar graphs?
2. Question 2: Can planar length-constrained MST achieve poly-log approximation with O(1) length relaxation?

Core Contributions

1. Main Algorithmic Result: First poly-log approximation algorithm for planar graphs with constant length relaxation:
   • O(log^(1+ε) n) approximation ratio
   • (1+ε) length relaxation
   • Polynomial time complexity: poly(n)·n^(O(1/ε²))
2. Technical Innovation - Length-Constrained Planar Separators:
   • Develops new length-constrained version of classical planar separators
   • Separators can be covered by paths of length O(h) and weight O(D^(h)(G))
   • These separators have independent research value
3. Hardness Results: Proves separation between planar and general graphs:
   • Cannot achieve O(log^(2-ε) n)-approximation on general graphs with length relaxation <2
   • Holds under standard complexity assumptions
4. LP-Competitive Algorithm: Provides O(log² n/ε)-approximation relative to flow-based LP relaxation
5. Extensibility: Algorithm applies equally to length-constrained Steiner tree problem

Methodology Details

Problem Definition

Input:

• Planar graph G=(V,E), n=|V|
• Edge weight function w: E → Z≥0
• Edge length function l: E → Z≥0
• Root node r∈V
• Length constraint h∈Z≥0

Output: Spanning tree T satisfying:

• Minimize w(T) = Σ_{e∈T} w(e)
• For all v∈V, d_T(r,v) ≤ h (according to length function l)

Approximation Goal: Find solution with weight O(log^(1+ε) n)·OPT and length constraint (1+ε)h

Core Technical Framework

1. Length-Constrained Planar Separators

Definition: An h-length separator is a path P satisfying:

• Balance Property: Partitions the graph into two parts, each containing at most 2/3 of the nodes
• Length Constraint: P has length ≤O(h) and weight ≤O(D^(h)(G))
• Interior-Exterior Separation: Adding edges connecting P's endpoints forms cycle C, with all A(B) nodes inside (outside) C

Key Innovation - Mixed Metric:

w_mix(e) = D^(h)(G)·l(e)/h + w(e)

Existence Lemma: Any planar graph admits an h-length separator, computable in polynomial time.

2. Length-Constrained Decomposition Hierarchy

Length-Constrained α-Decomposition: Partitions graph into α regions, each containing 1/α of the nodes, with total boundary weight ≤O(α·D^(h)(G)).

Decomposition Hierarchy: Recursively applies α-decomposition with depth O(log_α n), total boundary weight ≤O(α log_α n)·OPT.

Boundary Flattening: Sets length and weight of boundary edges to 0 before recursion, ensuring h-length constraint diameter does not increase.

3. Boundary Fragmentation and Connection

Fragmentation Strategy: Decomposes each region boundary into β segments, each with diameter ≤h/β.

Parameter Settings:

• α = log^(ε/2) n
• β = log n/(ε² log log n)

Connection Method: Connects segments by solving multiple length-constrained Steiner tree instances:

• Each instance has at most O(β) terminals
• Uses Charikar et al.'s O(t^δ/δ³)-approximation algorithm
• Achieves overall O(log^(1+ε) n)-approximation

Algorithm Flow

Algorithm 1: Main Algorithm

1. Set parameters: ξ=ε/2, α=log^ξ n, β=log n/(ξ² log log n)
2. Compute 2h-length constrained α-decomposition hierarchy T
3. For each region, compute β-fragmentation
4. Solve dynamic programming table, apply length-constrained Steiner tree algorithm
5. Construct solution graph and return shortest path tree

Dynamic Programming:

• State: DPH,g represents optimal weight for region H under guess g
• Transition: Enumerate guesses for all subregions, solve Steiner tree instance
• Guess Space: Each segment's distance chosen from {h/β, 2h/β, ..., h}

Experimental Setup

Theoretical Analysis Framework

This is primarily a theoretical work, verifying algorithm correctness through rigorous mathematical proofs rather than experimental validation.

Complexity Analysis

• Time Complexity: poly(n)·n^(O(1/ε²))
• Approximation Ratio: O(log^(1+ε) n)
• Length Relaxation: 1+ε
• Space Complexity: Dynamic programming table size poly(n)·n^(O(1/ε²))

Comparison Baselines

• Best General Graph Result: O(n^ε)-approximation with length relaxation 1
• General Graph Poly-log Result: O(log n)-approximation but requires O(log n) length relaxation
• Theoretical Lower Bound: Ω(log^(2-ε) n) inapproximability (length relaxation <2)

Experimental Results

Main Theoretical Results

Theorem 1.1: For any constant ε>0, there exists an O(log^(1+ε) n)-approximation algorithm with length relaxation 1+ε and running time poly(n)·n^(O(1/ε²)).

Theorem 1.2: For any constant ε>0, on general graphs with length relaxation s<2, one cannot achieve O(log^(2-ε) n)-approximation.

Technical Verification

Lemma 3.6: Existence and algorithmic correctness of length-constrained separators

• Separator length ≤4h, weight ≤4D^(h)(G)
• Computable in polynomial time

Lemma 4.12: Decomposition hierarchy weight bounds

• Total boundary weight ≤O(α log_α n)·OPT
• Depth O(log_α n)

Lemma 5.11: Main algorithm correctness

• Weight ≤O(log^(1+ε) n)·OPT
• Length constraint ≤(1+ε)h

Extended Results

Theorem 6.1: LP-competitive algorithm achieves O(log² n/ε)-approximation with length relaxation 1+ε

Theorem A.1: Quasi-polynomial time algorithm achieves O(log n)-approximation with length relaxation 1+o(1)

Related Work

Length-Constrained MST Research

• Kortsarz-Peleg (1999): O(n^ε·exp(1/ε))-approximation, contains errors
• Charikar et al. (1999): O(n^ε/ε³)-approximation, corrected previous errors
• Marathe et al. (1998): O(log n)-approximation but O(log n) length relaxation
• Hershkowitz-Huang (2025): O(n^ε/ε)-approximation with O(1/ε) length relaxation

Planar Graph Algorithms

• Friggstad-Mousavi (2023): O(log n)-approximation for planar directed Steiner tree
• Klein-Mozes-Sommer (2013): Planar separator techniques
• Chekuri et al. (2024): LP-competitive algorithm for planar DST

Hardness Results

• Naor-Schieber (1997): o(log n) inapproximability
• Halperin-Krauthgamer (2003): Ω(log² n) lower bound for group Steiner tree

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Theoretical Breakthrough: First proof that planar length-constrained MST is significantly easier than the general graph case
2. Technical Contribution: Length-constrained separators provide new tools for planar graph algorithms
3. Optimality: Nearly optimal in terms of length relaxation (constant vs. logarithmic)

Limitations

1. Running Time: While polynomial, has strong dependence on ε (n^(O(1/ε²)))
2. Constant Factors: Implicit constants may be large, requiring optimization for practical applications
3. Planar Graph Restriction: Methods highly dependent on planar graph structure, difficult to generalize

Future Directions

1. Improved Running Time: Reduce exponential dependence on ε
2. Broader Graph Classes: Extend to more general sparse graphs
3. Practical Algorithms: Develop practical versions and conduct experimental validation
4. Related Network Design Problems: Apply techniques to related problems

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Theoretical Importance: Resolves a long-standing open problem, first separation of complexity between planar and general graphs
2. Technical Innovation: Length-constrained separators represent important extension of classical techniques
3. Result Strength: Achieves good balance between approximation ratio and length relaxation
4. Completeness: Provides complete theoretical framework including algorithms, lower bounds, and LP analysis
5. Writing Quality: Clear paper structure with detailed technical exposition

Weaknesses

1. Limited Practical Applicability: Highly theoretical, lacks experimental validation and practical considerations
2. Complexity: Algorithm is quite complex, involving multiple levels of recursion and numerous parameter adjustments
3. Constant Optimization: Does not focus on optimizing implicit constants, potentially affecting practical performance
4. Generalizability: Techniques are highly specialized to planar graphs, difficult to extend to other graph classes

Impact

1. Academic Contribution: Makes important contribution to planar graph algorithms and network design theory
2. Technical Impact: Length-constrained separators may inspire other algorithm designs
3. Open Problems: Provides new insights and tools for research on related problems
4. Theoretical Value: Advances understanding of complexity of length-constrained optimization problems

Applicable Scenarios

1. Theoretical Research: Provides important tools for algorithm theory and complexity research
2. Network Design: Potential applications in planar network design requiring simultaneous cost and latency considerations
3. Algorithm Education: Excellent case study for planar graph algorithms and approximation algorithms
4. Follow-up Research: Provides foundation for improved algorithms and extensions to other problems

References

The paper includes 43 related references covering multiple fields including length-constrained network design, planar graph algorithms, approximation algorithms, and complexity theory. Key references include:

• Charikar et al. (1999): Classical results on length-constrained MST
• Friggstad-Mousavi (2023): Planar directed Steiner tree algorithm
• Klein-Mozes-Sommer (2013): Planar separator techniques
• Halperin-Krauthgamer (2003): Lower bounds for group Steiner tree

This paper holds significant importance in theoretical computer science, not only resolving a long-standing open problem but also providing new technical tools for planar graph algorithm design. While there remains room for improvement in practical applicability, its theoretical contributions and technical innovations make it an important work in the field.