Polarization Dependence of Excess Loss of Amorphous Coating Supermirror in Optical Region for Cavity Ringdown Spectroscopy

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2510.09053
• Title: Polarization Dependence of Excess Loss of Amorphous Coating Supermirror in Optical Region for Cavity Ringdown Spectroscopy
• Authors: Mitsunori Araki (Max-Planck-Institut für extraterrestrische Physik), Kohsuke Suma (Kagoshima University)
• Classification: physics.optics
• Journal: Optical Materials
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.09053

Abstract

This study investigates the polarization dependence of excess loss in amorphous-coated supermirrors at 681.2 nm optical wavelength for cavity ringdown spectroscopy (CRD). By rotating the rear cavity mirror and measuring ringdown times at 10-degree intervals, the authors discovered that even amorphous-coated supermirrors exhibit sinusoidal variation in excess loss, with a maximum difference of 5.8 ± 1.2 ppm. This finding demonstrates the importance of optimizing supermirror rotation angle in cavity ringdown spectroscopy to achieve high sensitivity.

Research Background and Motivation

Research Problem

The core question addressed by this study is: whether amorphous-coated supermirrors exhibit polarization-dependent excess loss in the optical region, and the extent to which this dependence affects cavity ringdown spectroscopy performance.

Significance

1. Spectroscopic Sensitivity: In cavity ringdown spectroscopy, long optical path length is crucial for achieving high-sensitivity detection
2. Gravitational Wave Detection: Supermirror performance directly impacts the precision of gravitational wave detectors such as LIGO and Virgo
3. Practical Guidance: Provides practical guidance for mirror alignment in cavity ringdown spectroscopy instruments

Limitations in Existing Knowledge

• Crystalline-coated supermirrors have been confirmed to exhibit polarization-dependent excess loss
• Amorphous-coated supermirrors, due to their random structure, were believed to have negligible polarization dependence
• Lack of systematic experimental verification of polarization dependence in amorphous-coated mirrors in the optical region

Research Motivation

To verify the actual magnitude of polarization dependence in amorphous-coated supermirrors and provide experimental evidence for optimizing cavity ringdown spectroscopy instruments.

Core Contributions

1. First Systematic Measurement: First systematic measurement of polarization-dependent excess loss in amorphous-coated supermirrors at optical wavelength (681.2 nm)
2. Paradigm-Shifting Discovery: Demonstrates that amorphous-coated supermirrors still exhibit significant polarization dependence (maximum 5.8 ± 1.2 ppm)
3. Practical Guidance: Provides quantitative guidance for optimizing mirror angle in cavity ringdown spectroscopy instruments
4. Theoretical Contribution: Provides important reference data for designing high-precision optical systems such as gravitational wave detectors

Methodology Details

Experimental Setup

The study employs a standard cavity ringdown spectroscopy setup, including:

• Laser System: Nd:YAG-pumped dye laser (wavelength 681.2 nm, linewidth 0.03 cm⁻¹)
• Optical Cavity: 83 cm length, composed of two supermirrors
• Detection System: Photomultiplier tube (HAMAMATSU H10721-20) and oscilloscope

Mirror Specifications

Three amorphous-coated supermirrors from the same manufacturing batch were used:

• Manufacturer: LAYERTEC GmbH
• Coating Material: Ta₂O₅/SiO₂ amorphous material
• Coating Method: Magnetron sputtering
• Center Wavelength: 685 nm
• Substrate: Fused silica, 1-inch diameter

Measurement Method

1. Rotational Measurement: Rotate rear mirror in 10-degree increments, covering 240-degree range
2. Data Acquisition: Measure 40 ringdown time values at each angular position and calculate average
3. Trend Removal: Apply first-order linear fitting to eliminate time-dependent declining trends
4. Sinusoidal Fitting: Perform sinusoidal function fitting on detrended data

Key Technical Details

• Polarization Control: Use polarizer to verify cavity polarization angle rotation less than ±5 degrees
• Environmental Control: Temperature 21-22°C, humidity 21-22%
• Contamination Prevention: Clean mirror surfaces with methanol and acetone before measurement, use dust covers for protection

Experimental Setup

Data Acquisition Parameters

• Sampling Time: 30 μs per ringdown event, 300 data points
• Averaging Strategy: Average 8 ringdown events to obtain one ringdown time, then average 40 values again
• Laser Power: Approximately 0.1 mJ/pulse (attenuated by neutral density filter)
• Repetition Rate: 10 Hz

Evaluation Metrics

• Ringdown Time τ: Characterizes photon lifetime in the cavity
• Excess Loss (1-R): Calculated using relationship τ = L/{c(1-R)}, where L is mirror separation and c is speed of light
• Relative Excess Loss Δ(1-R): Excess loss variation after trend removal

Comparison Benchmarks

• Comparison with Huang & Lehmann (2008) results at 1.6 μm (~10⁻² ppm)
• Comparison with Winkler et al. (2021) results on crystalline-coated mirrors at 4.54 μm (8.3 ppm)

Experimental Results

Main Findings

All three amorphous-coated supermirrors exhibited pronounced polarization dependence:

Key Result Analysis

1. Periodicity: Variation periods of all mirrors are consistent with 180 degrees within 1.1σ error
2. Amplitude: Average polarization dependence is 4.5 ppm, with maximum value of 5.8 ± 1.2 ppm
3. Consistency: Three mirrors from the same manufacturing batch exhibit similar behavior patterns
4. Impact: Maximum polarization dependence corresponds to 9.1% ringdown time variation

Reproducibility Verification

Reproducibility of results was verified through repeated measurements on different dates, with similar phenomena observed on Los Gatos Research mirrors (3.9 ± 1.4 ppm).

Comparison with Literature

Related Work

History of Polarization Dependence Research

• Birefringence Effects: Early research primarily focused on polarization angle rotation caused by birefringence
• Excess Loss: Recent studies have begun examining the impact of polarization-dependent excess loss on cavity ringdown spectroscopy
• Wavelength Differences: Infrared region studies are relatively abundant, while optical region studies are less common

Technical Development Timeline

1. Theoretical Expectation: Random structure of amorphous materials should eliminate polarization dependence
2. Experimental Verification: This study first confirms in the optical region that amorphous coatings still exhibit polarization dependence
3. Application Impact: Significant implications for high-precision applications such as gravitational wave detection

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Paradigm-Shifting Discovery: Amorphous-coated supermirrors exhibit significant polarization-dependent excess loss in the optical region
2. Quantitative Results: Maximum polarization dependence reaches 5.8 ± 1.2 ppm, corresponding to approximately 20% path length variation
3. Practical Guidance: Even with amorphous coatings, mirror rotation angle optimization is necessary to achieve optimal performance

Physical Mechanism Discussion

Possible Causes:

1. Partial Crystallization: Local crystallization during coating process or crystallization from aging
2. Thickness Inhomogeneity: Non-uniform coating layer thickness
3. Post-Processing: Possible annealing treatment during manufacturing

Verification Attempts: Polarization microscopy failed to reveal visible crystalline structures, suggesting crystalline regions smaller than 10 μm.

Limitations

1. Mechanism Unclear: Physical mechanism of polarization dependence not fully determined
2. Limited Samples: Only three mirrors from one batch tested
3. Single Wavelength: Measurements conducted only at 681.2 nm

Future Directions

1. Mechanism Research: Investigate crystalline structures using higher-resolution microscopy techniques
2. Wavelength Dependence: Study polarization dependence at different wavelengths
3. Material Optimization: Develop coating materials and processes with lower polarization dependence

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Rigorous Experimental Design: Multiple verification and control experiments employed
2. Significant Results: Challenges conventional understanding of amorphous coating polarization independence
3. High Practical Value: Provides important design reference for high-precision optical systems
4. Reliable Data: Result reliability ensured through repeated measurements and multi-mirror verification

Weaknesses

1. Insufficient Mechanism Explanation: Lacks in-depth analysis of physical mechanisms generating polarization dependence
2. Limited Sample Range: Only products from one manufacturer tested
3. Incomplete Wavelength Coverage: Measurements conducted at only a single wavelength

Impact

1. Academic Impact: Provides important experimental data for optical coating and cavity ringdown spectroscopy fields
2. Engineering Guidance: Offers design reference for gravitational wave detectors, high-precision spectrometers, and other equipment
3. Industrial Impact: May promote improvement and optimization of coating processes

Applicable Scenarios

1. Cavity Ringdown Spectroscopy: Direct application to improving spectrometer sensitivity
2. Gravitational Wave Detection: Provides reference for mirror selection and alignment in LIGO, Virgo, and other detectors
3. High-Precision Interferometry: Applicable to various precision optical systems requiring ultra-high reflectivity mirrors

References

This paper cites 17 important references covering key research achievements in polarized optics, cavity ringdown spectroscopy, gravitational wave detection, and related fields, providing a solid theoretical foundation and comparison benchmarks for the research.

Overall Assessment: This is an experimental research paper with significant academic value and practical importance. Through rigorous experimental design and detailed data analysis, it provides the first confirmation in the optical region of polarization dependence in amorphous-coated supermirrors, making important contributions to theoretical understanding and engineering applications in related fields. Although further investigation into the underlying mechanisms is warranted, the reliability of experimental results and practical value make it an important reference in this field.