Experimental overview: quarkonia as probes for deconfinement

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2510.09075
• Title: Experimental overview: quarkonia as probes for deconfinement
• Author: Michael Winn (DPhN/Irfu, CEA, Université Paris-Saclay)
• Classification: nucl-ex hep-ex hep-ph
• Publication Date: October 10, 2025
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.09075

Abstract

This paper presents a comprehensive review of experimental studies on quarkonia (quarkonium) as probes for deconfinement in heavy-ion collisions. The focus is on qualitative understanding of charm quarkonia (cc̄ bound states) and bottom quarkonia (bb̄) based on results from recent years. Particular emphasis is placed on observations of non-prompt J/ψ (cc̄) production as a signal of deconfinement based on different observables, as well as the sequential suppression pattern of Υ (bb̄) states. The paper also provides an outlook extending to the timescale of the next Quark Matter conference.

Research Background and Motivation

Core Research Questions

The fundamental question addressed in this research is how to utilize quarkonia as probes to investigate the deconfinement phenomenon in the quark-gluon plasma (QGP). Quarkonia are regarded as the "hydrogen atoms" of quantum chromodynamics (QCD), with heavy quarks representing the best approximation of static color charges in nature.

Significance

1. Fundamental Physics: Deconfinement is a core feature of the QCD phase transition; understanding this phenomenon is crucial for comprehending the nature of strong interaction matter
2. Cosmological Relevance: Similar phase transitions existed in the early universe
3. Experimental Verification: Provides experimental validation of theoretical predictions, particularly lattice QCD calculations

Limitations of Existing Methods

1. Theoretical Calculation Constraints: Lattice QCD indicates that at zero baryon chemical potential, the transition from hadronic matter to QGP is a rapid crossover rather than a true phase transition
2. Experimental Challenges: Quarkonium production comprises only ~1% of total heavy quark pair production, resulting in weak signals
3. Background Interference: In heavy-ion collisions, measurements are limited to dilepton decay channels, restricting observable states

Core Contributions

1. Systematic Review of Charm Quarkonium Regeneration: Summarizes multiple experimental evidences of non-prompt J/ψ production as a deconfinement signal
2. Clarification of Bottom Quarkonium Sequential Suppression Pattern: Detailed analysis of differential suppression degrees for Υ(1S), Υ(2S), and Υ(3S)
3. Systematic Comparison of Experiments with Theoretical Models: Including comparisons between Statistical Hadronization Model for charm (SHMc) and transport models
4. Outlook on Future Experimental Directions: Provides specific measurement targets for LHC Run 3 and sPHENIX experiments

Methodology Details

Research Framework

This paper employs a comprehensive review methodology, systematically organizing and analyzing experimental data from RHIC and LHC, with focus on two key observables:

1. Nuclear Modification Factor

Defined as the ratio of quarkonium production rates in heavy-ion collisions to proton-proton collisions: $R_{AA} = \frac{1}{N_{coll}} \frac{dN_{AA}/dp_T dy}{d\sigma_{pp}/dp_T dy}$

2. Production Ratio Normalization

Normalizing quarkonium production to total heavy flavor quark production, the most model-independent observable: $\frac{\sigma_{J/\psi}}{\sigma_{D^0}}$

Theoretical Model Comparison

Statistical Hadronization Model for Charm (SHMc)

• Assumes quarkonium is produced entirely at the phase boundary
• Predicts total charm quark cross section at mid-rapidity: dσcc̄ = 0.68 ± 0.10 mb

Transport Models

• Assumes bound states continue to be produced and destroyed in the deconfined phase
• Predicts total charm quark cross section: 0.93 ± 0.12 mb

Technical Innovations

1. Multi-Observable Verification: Combining nuclear modification factors, anisotropic flow, transverse momentum dependence, and other observables
2. Energy and Rapidity Dependence Analysis: Systematic investigation of behavior across different collision energies and rapidity intervals
3. Multiplicity Dependence Studies: Investigating production ratio variations with multiplicity in proton-proton and proton-nucleus collisions

Experimental Setup

Major Experimental Facilities

• LHC: ALICE, CMS, ATLAS, LHCb
• RHIC: PHENIX, STAR
• Future: sPHENIX

Collision Systems

• Heavy-ion collisions: Pb-Pb (√sNN = 5.02 TeV)
• Proton-nucleus collisions: p-Pb, p-Ne, γ-Pb
• Proton-proton collisions: pp (√s = 5.02 TeV, 13 TeV)

Detection Methods

• Heavy-ion collisions: Limited to dilepton decay channels (μ+μ−, e+e−)
• Proton collisions: Including hadronic decays and dilepton plus photon decay channels

Kinematic Range

Focus on transverse momentum integrated and low transverse momentum regions, where:

• Mquarkonium ≫ pT,quarkonium
• Heavy quark systems have only small boosts relative to the local fluid rest frame

Experimental Results

Primary Evidence for Charm Quarkonium Regeneration

1. Rapidity Dependence of Nuclear Modification Factor

• Mid-rapidity: RAA > RAA at forward rapidity
• Physical Interpretation: Larger charm quark density at mid-rapidity leads to stronger regeneration effects

2. Transverse Momentum Dependence

• Low pT Region: Increasing nuclear modification factor
• Physical Significance: Indicates "thermal" origin of quarkonium

3. Anisotropic Flow

• Observed Result: J/ψ exhibits significant elliptic flow v2
• Run 3 Preliminary Results: Compatible with Run 2 legacy results

4. J/ψ/D0 Ratio

• ALICE Measurement: Consistent with Statistical Hadronization Model predictions
• LHCb Fixed-Target Results: Measurements in PbNe collisions require further analysis

Bottom Quarkonium Sequential Suppression

CMS Measurement Results

According to CMS data shown in Figure 3:

1. Υ(1S): Minimal suppression, RAA ≈ 0.4-0.6
2. Υ(2S): Intermediate suppression, RAA ≈ 0.1-0.3
3. Υ(3S): Maximum suppression, RAA < 0.1

Physical Mechanism

• Theoretical Picture: QGP acts as a "sieve" through which quarkonium states pass
• Sequential Suppression: Loosely bound states are more easily destroyed than tightly bound states

Elliptic Flow Measurements

• Run 2 Results: v2 compatible with zero at lowest transverse momentum
• Physical Interpretation: Consistent with expectations for fully thermalized bottom quarks

Related Work

Theoretical Developments

1. Polyakov Loop Theory: Connecting heavy quark free energy to deconfinement order parameter
2. Lattice QCD Calculations: Predicting phase transition as rapid crossover
3. Effective Field Theory: Better separation of intrinsic and system scales

Experimental Technical Progress

1. Detector Upgrades: ALICE continuous readout, LHCb SMOG2 system
2. Measurement Precision Enhancement: Statistical precision improved by 1-2 orders of magnitude
3. New Decay Channels: Measurements of χc and ηc states

Phenomenological Models

1. Rescattering Models: Explaining ψ(2S) suppression in proton-nucleus collisions
2. Jet Quenching: Energy loss mechanism in high transverse momentum regions
3. Nuclear Parton Distribution Functions: Theoretical description of initial state effects

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Deconfinement Signal Confirmed:
   • Charm quarkonium regeneration phenomenon verified by multiple observables
   • Bottom quarkonium sequential suppression pattern clearly visible
2. Theoretical Model Validation:
   • Statistical Hadronization Model essentially consistent with experimental data
   • Transport models require higher total charm quark cross sections
3. Experimental Technique Maturity:
   • LHC Run 2 provides high-precision legacy results
   • Run 3 and sPHENIX will bring qualitative advances

Limitations

1. Model Discrimination Difficulty:
   • Differences between Statistical Hadronization Model and transport model predictions require more precise total heavy flavor measurements for discrimination
   • Experimental measurement precision of total charm quark production still needs improvement
2. Systematic Effects:
   • Uncertainties in nuclear parton distribution functions
   • Large uncertainties in factorization scales
3. Statistical Constraints:
   • Limited statistical precision for excited state measurements (ψ(2S), Υ(3S))
   • First measurements of non-vector states (χc) in heavy-ion collisions still ongoing

Future Directions

Wish List for LHC Run 3 and sPHENIX:

1. Transverse Momentum Integrated Heavy Flavor Normalization: For charm and bottom quarks
2. More p/γ-nucleus Constraints: For nuclear parton distribution functions
3. Excited State Vector Meson Measurements: Prompt ψ(2S), Υ(3S)
4. First Measurements of Non-Vector States: Possibly χc states first
5. Forward and Mid-Rapidity Coverage: LHC collider mode
6. Fixed-Target Mode: Low-energy lever arm for LHC and RHIC

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Comprehensiveness: Systematically covers all important experimental results for charm and bottom quarkonia
2. Timeliness: Includes latest LHC Run 3 preliminary results and theoretical developments
3. Critical Thinking: Objectively analyzes strengths and weaknesses of different theoretical models and experimental limitations
4. Forward-Looking Perspective: Provides concrete and feasible measurement targets for future experiments

Limitations

1. Theoretical Depth: As an experimental review, discussion of theoretical mechanisms is relatively shallow
2. Data Presentation: Key numerical results could be presented in greater detail
3. Error Analysis: Discussion of systematic uncertainties could be more thorough

Impact

1. Academic Value: Provides important summary of experimental status for quark matter research
2. Guidance Value: Indicates directions for future experimental design and theoretical development
3. Educational Value: Serves as excellent introductory material for graduate students and postdoctoral researchers

Applicable Scenarios

1. Experimental Physicists: Understanding current experimental status and technical challenges
2. Theoretical Physicists: Obtaining latest experimental constraints to improve models
3. Graduate Education: Reference material for heavy-ion physics courses
4. Policy Making: Supporting scientific justification for large experimental facilities

References

The paper cites 75 important references, covering:

• Lattice QCD theoretical calculations 4,5
• Quarkonium regeneration theory 37,38
• ALICE experimental results 2,3,6,11,26,39,40,43, etc.
• CMS experimental results 13,14,18,27,35,47,52,55,58,67, etc.
• LHCb experimental results 19,20,22-24,29-31,34,44,46,51,56,59,63, etc.
• ATLAS experimental results 12,36,53,65
• PHENIX/STAR results 21,54

Summary: This is a high-quality experimental review paper that systematically summarizes the progress in experimental research on quarkonia as probes for deconfinement, providing important stage-wise summary and future guidance for the development of this field.