We consider integral functionals with fast growth and the lagrangian explicitly depending on $u$. We prove that the local minimizers are locally Lipschitz continuous.
Local Lipschitz continuity for energy integrals with fast growth and lower order terms Paper ID : 2510.09142Title : Local Lipschitz continuity for energy integrals with fast growth and lower order termsAuthor : Andrea Torricelli (Dipartimento di Scienze Matematiche G.L. Lagrange, Politecnico di Torino)Classification : math.AP (Analysis of PDEs)Publication Date : October 10, 2025Paper Link : https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.09142 This paper investigates integral functionals with fast growth and Lagrangian functions that explicitly depend on u u u . It is proved that local minimizers of such functionals possess local Lipschitz continuity. This research fills a gap in the existing regularity theory concerning functionals with lower order terms under fast growth conditions.
The core problem addressed in this paper concerns the Lipschitz regularity of local minimizers of the integral functional
F ( u ) = ∫ Ω f ( D u ) + g ( x , u ) d x F(u) = \int_\Omega f(Du) + g(x,u) dx F ( u ) = ∫ Ω f ( D u ) + g ( x , u ) d x
where:
f : R n → R f: \mathbb{R}^n \to \mathbb{R} f : R n → R is a convex function with fast growthg : Ω × R → R g: \Omega \times \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R} g : Ω × R → R is a lower order term explicitly depending on u u u Theoretical Completeness : Existing literature primarily focuses on slow growth conditions or cases without lower order terms. This paper aims to establish a complete theoretical framework for fast growth conditions with lower order terms.Practical Applications : Such functionals have important applications in elastoplastic torsion problems and image restoration problems.Technical Challenges : The combination of fast growth conditions and lower order terms introduces new technical difficulties requiring the development of novel analytical techniques.References 8,17 addressed fast/slow growth functionals depending only on D u Du D u Reference 10 handled slow growth functionals simultaneously depending on u u u and D u Du D u A unified theory for fast growth with lower order terms was lacking Established Lipschitz regularity theory for functionals with lower order terms under fast growth conditions Proved the main Theorem 1.1 : Under appropriate assumptions, local minimizers are locally Lipschitz continuous in Ω \Omega Ω Developed new a priori estimate techniques (Lemma 1.2)Extended the application scope of the bounded slope condition (BSC) to the fast growth settingStudy the regularity of local minimizers u ∈ W l o c 1 , 1 ( Ω ) ∩ L l o c ∞ ( Ω ) u \in W^{1,1}_{loc}(\Omega) \cap L^\infty_{loc}(\Omega) u ∈ W l oc 1 , 1 ( Ω ) ∩ L l oc ∞ ( Ω ) of the functional F ( u ) = ∫ Ω f ( D u ) + g ( x , u ) d x F(u) = \int_\Omega f(Du) + g(x,u) dx F ( u ) = ∫ Ω f ( D u ) + g ( x , u ) d x , where Ω ⊂ R n \Omega \subset \mathbb{R}^n Ω ⊂ R n is an open bounded set.
Assumptions on function f f f :
(H1) Ellipticity condition: h 1 ( ∣ ξ ∣ ) ∣ λ ∣ 2 ≤ ∑ i , j = 1 n f ξ i , ξ j ( ξ ) λ i λ j ≤ h 2 ( ∣ ξ ∣ ) ∣ λ ∣ 2 h_1(|\xi|)|\lambda|^2 \leq \sum_{i,j=1}^n f_{\xi_i,\xi_j}(\xi)\lambda_i\lambda_j \leq h_2(|\xi|)|\lambda|^2 h 1 ( ∣ ξ ∣ ) ∣ λ ∣ 2 ≤ ∑ i , j = 1 n f ξ i , ξ j ( ξ ) λ i λ j ≤ h 2 ( ∣ ξ ∣ ) ∣ λ ∣ 2 (H2) Growth condition: h 2 ( t ) t 2 ≤ c 1 [ 1 + ∫ 0 t h 1 ( s + t 0 ) d s ] α h_2(t)t^2 \leq c_1[1 + \int_0^t \sqrt{h_1(s+t_0)}ds]^\alpha h 2 ( t ) t 2 ≤ c 1 [ 1 + ∫ 0 t h 1 ( s + t 0 ) d s ] α , where 2 ≤ α < 2 ∗ 2 \leq \alpha < 2^* 2 ≤ α < 2 ∗ (H3) Control condition: h 2 ( ∣ ξ ∣ ) ∣ ξ ∣ 2 ≤ c 2 ( 1 + f ( ξ ) ) β h_2(|\xi|)|\xi|^2 \leq c_2(1 + f(\xi))^\beta h 2 ( ∣ ξ ∣ ) ∣ ξ ∣ 2 ≤ c 2 ( 1 + f ( ξ ) ) β , where 1 ≤ β < 2 n α α − 2 1 \leq \beta < \frac{2}{n}\frac{\alpha}{\alpha-2} 1 ≤ β < n 2 α − 2 α Assumptions on function g g g :
(G1) Lipschitz condition: ∣ g ( x , s 1 ) − g ( x , s 2 ) ∣ ≤ L ∣ s 1 − s 2 ∣ |g(x,s_1) - g(x,s_2)| \leq L|s_1 - s_2| ∣ g ( x , s 1 ) − g ( x , s 2 ) ∣ ≤ L ∣ s 1 − s 2 ∣ (G2) Integrability: g ( ⋅ , 0 ) ∈ L l o c 1 ( Ω ) g(\cdot,0) \in L^1_{loc}(\Omega) g ( ⋅ , 0 ) ∈ L l oc 1 ( Ω ) (G3) Convexity: s ↦ g ( x , s ) s \mapsto g(x,s) s ↦ g ( x , s ) is convex (G4) Monotonicity condition: v ≥ u + K ∣ y − x ∣ ⇒ g v + ( y , v ) ≥ g v + ( x , u ) v \geq u + K|y-x| \Rightarrow g_v^+(y,v) \geq g_v^+(x,u) v ≥ u + K ∣ y − x ∣ ⇒ g v + ( y , v ) ≥ g v + ( x , u ) Establish key estimates through second variation techniques:
∥ D u ∥ L ∞ ( B ρ ) ≤ C [ ∫ B R 1 + f ( D u ) d x ] θ \|Du\|_{L^\infty(B_\rho)} \leq C\left[\int_{B_R} 1 + f(Du)dx\right]^\theta ∥ D u ∥ L ∞ ( B ρ ) ≤ C [ ∫ B R 1 + f ( D u ) d x ] θ
Technical highlights :
Use difference quotient techniques to prove u ∈ W l o c 2 , 2 ( Ω ) u \in W^{2,2}_{loc}(\Omega) u ∈ W l oc 2 , 2 ( Ω ) Construct test function ϕ = η 2 u x k Φ ( ∣ D u ∣ − 1 ) + \phi = \eta^2 u_{x_k}\Phi(|Du|-1)_+ ϕ = η 2 u x k Φ ( ∣ D u ∣ − 1 ) + Apply Young's inequality and ellipticity estimates to control various terms Construct approximating functional sequences f ~ k \tilde{f}_k f ~ k :
f ~ k ( ξ ) = f k ( ξ ) + 1 k h ( ∣ ξ ∣ t 0 + 2 ) \tilde{f}_k(\xi) = f_k(\xi) + \frac{1}{k}h\left(\frac{|\xi|}{t_0+2}\right) f ~ k ( ξ ) = f k ( ξ ) + k 1 h ( t 0 + 2 ∣ ξ ∣ )
where f k f_k f k is a smooth approximation of f f f , and h h h is a specially constructed convex function, ensuring:
f ~ k \tilde{f}_k f ~ k satisfies the assumptions and is uniformly convexf ~ k \tilde{f}_k f ~ k converges uniformly to f f f Utilize boundary data u ε u_\varepsilon u ε (smoothing of u u u ) satisfying BSC Construct upper and lower Lipschitz barrier functions ℓ ± \ell^{\pm} ℓ ± Apply comparison principle to prove approximate solutions v k , ε ∈ W 1 , ∞ ( B R ) v_{k,\varepsilon} \in W^{1,\infty}(B_R) v k , ε ∈ W 1 , ∞ ( B R ) Apply Lemma 2.4 to control ∥ v k , ε ∥ L ∞ \|v_{k,\varepsilon}\|_{L^\infty} ∥ v k , ε ∥ L ∞ Use a priori estimates to control the L ∞ L^\infty L ∞ norm of gradients Pass to the limit through weak convergence and lower semicontinuity This is a purely theoretical paper with no numerical experiments. The theoretical results are verified through rigorous mathematical proofs.
Let u ∈ W l o c 1 , 1 ( Ω ) ∩ L l o c ∞ ( Ω ) u \in W^{1,1}_{loc}(\Omega) \cap L^\infty_{loc}(\Omega) u ∈ W l oc 1 , 1 ( Ω ) ∩ L l oc ∞ ( Ω ) be a local minimizer of functional (1), with f f f satisfying assumptions (H1)-(H3) and g g g satisfying assumptions (G1)-(G4). Then u u u is locally Lipschitz continuous in Ω \Omega Ω , and there exists R ˉ > 0 \bar{R} > 0 R ˉ > 0 such that for any 0 < ρ < R < R ˉ 0 < \rho < R < \bar{R} 0 < ρ < R < R ˉ ,
∥ D u ∥ L ∞ ( B ρ ) ≤ C [ 1 ( R − ρ ) n ( ∫ B R f ( D u ) + g ( x , u ) d x + κ ) ] θ \|Du\|_{L^\infty(B_\rho)} \leq C\left[\frac{1}{(R-\rho)^n}\left(\int_{B_R} f(Du) + g(x,u)dx + \kappa\right)\right]^\theta ∥ D u ∥ L ∞ ( B ρ ) ≤ C [ ( R − ρ ) n 1 ( ∫ B R f ( D u ) + g ( x , u ) d x + κ ) ] θ
where θ \theta θ depends on α , β , n \alpha, \beta, n α , β , n .
Under appropriate assumptions, for local minimizers u ∈ W l o c 1 , ∞ ( Ω ) u \in W^{1,\infty}_{loc}(\Omega) u ∈ W l oc 1 , ∞ ( Ω ) ,
∥ D u ∥ L ∞ ( B ρ ) ≤ C [ ∫ B R 1 + f ( D u ) d x ] θ \|Du\|_{L^\infty(B_\rho)} \leq C\left[\int_{B_R} 1 + f(Du)dx\right]^\theta ∥ D u ∥ L ∞ ( B ρ ) ≤ C [ ∫ B R 1 + f ( D u ) d x ] θ
Slow growth case : Eleuteri-Perrotta-Treu 10 addressed slow growth functionals with lower order termsFast growth without lower order terms : Eleuteri-Marcellini-Mascolo-Perrotta 8 and Marcellini 17 BSC theory extensions : Fiaschi-Treu 11 and Giannetti-Treu 12 First systematic treatment of fast growth with lower order terms Development of new estimate techniques applicable to fast growth Extension of BSC theory to more general settings This paper successfully establishes Lipschitz regularity theory for local minimizers of integral functionals with lower order terms under fast growth conditions, filling an important theoretical gap in the field.
New a priori estimate techniques : Adapted to the combination of fast growth and lower order termsImproved approximation methods : Construction of approximating sequences preserving growth conditionsBSC theory extension : Generalization of classical results to more general settingsThe relationship between growth exponents α \alpha α and β \beta β is restrictive Verification of assumption (G4) may be difficult in practical applications Results are local; global regularity requires additional conditions Study boundary regularity Extend to vector-valued cases Consider more general growth conditions Investigate convergence of numerical methods Theoretical Completeness : Fills an important theoretical gap and establishes a complete regularity theoryTechnical Innovation : Develops new techniques for handling the combination of fast growth and lower order termsRigorous Proofs : Mathematical arguments are rigorous with clear logical structureApplied Value : Provides theoretical foundation for applications in elastoplasticity and image processingComplex Assumptions : Multiple technical assumptions may be difficult to verify in practiceLocal Limitation : Results are only local; practical applications often require global informationConstant Dependence : The dependence of constants in estimates is complex, making practical computation difficultTheoretical Contribution : Makes important contributions to calculus of variations and PDE regularity theoryMethodological Value : Developed techniques are applicable to related problemsApplication Prospects : Provides theoretical support for mathematical modeling of practical problemsMathematical analysis of elastoplastic torsion problems Variational methods in image restoration Nonlinear elliptic problems with fast growth Regularity theory research in calculus of variations The paper cites 23 important references, primarily including:
8 Work by M. Eleuteri et al. on slow growth10 Work by M. Eleuteri et al. on slow growth with lower order terms11,12 Extensions of BSC conditions17 Classical work by P. Marcellini on fast growth