A one-world interpretation of quantum mechanics

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2510.09149
• Title: A one-world interpretation of quantum mechanics
• Authors: Isaac Layton (University of Tokyo), Jonathan Oppenheim (University College London), Zachary Weller-Davies (University College London)
• Classification: quant-ph (Quantum Physics)
• Publication Date: October 9, 2025
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.09149

Abstract

The measurement problem concerns the difficulty of explaining how an objective classical world emerges from the quantum world. This paper adopts a different approach: by assuming the existence of an objective classical system and requiring that standard probability theory rules apply when it interacts with quantum systems. Under mild assumptions, the authors recover unitary dynamics, collapse, and the Born rule postulate from quantum theory. Nevertheless, there is no decoherence, as the quantum state remains pure conditioned on the given classical trajectory. This leads to one world rather than many worlds. The primary technical tool is the use of measure transformations on classical path space, whose functional form is shown to characterize the quantum dynamics and Born rule of a class of quasi-quantum theories.

Research Background and Motivation

Core Problems

1. The Measurement Problem: The fundamental difficulty of quantum mechanics lies in adequately explaining classical measurement outcomes within the unitary quantum mechanical framework. This is not merely an abstract issue; naive adherence to unitary quantum rules leads to paradoxes within the theory.
2. Diversity of Interpretational Approaches: Existing interpretations of quantum theory, including QBism, decoherent histories, many-worlds, and quantum Darwinism, all attempt to explain when and how classically definite measurement outcomes arise.

Research Motivation

The authors circumvent the measurement problem by a priori assuming the existence of a classically treated system, arguing that this provides a coherent interpretation of quantum theory in which neither measurement nor sudden wavefunction collapse is required. Instead, quantum theory is reduced to a description of two interacting systems: one described by Hilbert space and another by classical configuration space.

Innovation

The core insight of this paper is demonstrating that the existence of classical degrees of freedom, together with classical probability theory, suffices to derive most of the structure of quantum theory. In other words, once the existence of classical and quantum systems and a shared noise process are assumed, the collapse postulate and Born rule are essentially obtained for free.

Core Contributions

1. Proposes a "one-world" interpretation of quantum mechanics: Avoids the ontological complexity of many-worlds interpretation by assuming the existence of a classical system
2. Establishes an axiomatic framework for classical-quantum dynamics: Derives standard quantum mechanics using only four simple axioms
3. Demonstrates the central role of measure transformations: Shows that the Born rule and quantum evolution laws are entirely determined by measure transformations
4. Unifies multiple quantum theory interpretations: Provides a unified framework for understanding continuous measurement theory, spontaneous collapse models, and others
5. Explores possibilities beyond standard quantum theory: Constructs new quasi-quantum theories through different functional choices g(x)

Methodology in Detail

Axiomatic Framework

The authors propose four natural axioms describing the interaction between classical and quantum systems:

Axiom 1: The classical system occupies a definite point Z_t ∈ ℝ in configuration space at all times t; the quantum system is described by a vector |ψ⟩_t ∈ ℂⁿ in Hilbert space.

Axiom 2: The classical system experiences a force from the quantum system, depending on the ray ψ_t ∈ ℙℂⁿ and noise process ξ_t:

dZ_t/dt = f(ψ_t, Z_t) + ξ_t

Axiom 3: For fixed Z_t, the quantum system evolves linearly under the same noise process ξ_t:

d|ψ⟩/dt = A(Z_t)|ψ⟩_t + B(Z_t)|ψ⟩_t ξ_t

Axiom 4: The classical probability distribution at time t depends only on |ψ⟩_t and not on past values.

Measure Transformation Technique

The core technical tool employs measure transformations from stochastic process theory. If Axioms 2 and 3 hold, the true evolution of the classical system can be obtained through a measure transformation from the classical evolution under noise alone.

For the classical probability distribution, there exists a function g : ℂⁿ → ℝ such that:

P(z,t) = 𝔼[g(|ψ⟩_t)δ(z - Z̃_t)]

where Z̃_t is the hypothetical classical evolution affected only by noise.

Derivation of Constraints

By requiring g(|ψ⟩_t) to be a martingale (constant expectation value), using Itô's formula yields the key constraint:

∇g^T A x + x† A†(∇g)* + (1/2)x^T B^T S B x + (1/2)x† B† S* B* x* + x† B† H B x = 0

This equation holds for all x ∈ ℂⁿ, where S and H are second-order derivative matrices of g.

Recovery of Standard Quantum Mechanics

Choosing g(x) = x†x recovers standard quantum mechanics:

1. Normalization condition: x†x = 1 gives the usual quantum state normalization
2. Quantum dynamics:

d|ψ⟩/dt = -iG|ψ⟩ - (1/2)B†B|ψ⟩ + B|ψ⟩ξ_t

where G is a Hermitian operator

3. Classical dynamics:

dZ/dt = ⟨ψ|(B + B†)|ψ⟩/⟨ψ|ψ⟩ + ξ_t

Theoretical Analysis

Proof of Theorem 1

Theorem 1: The only theories satisfying Axioms 1-4 with g invariant under unitary transformations are either trivial or recover the predictions of standard quantum mechanics.

The proof's key insight is considering g as an arbitrary positive function h of the norm squared x†x. By analyzing the constraint:

h'[x†(A + A† + B†B)x] + (h''/2)[x†(B + B†)x]² = 0

Using a lemma, if h'' ≠ 0, then B + B† must be proportional to the identity matrix, leading to trivial theory. The non-trivial case requires h'' = 0, i.e., h(x†x) = cx†x, recovering standard quantum mechanics.

Linear Picture

The measure transformation allows studying quantum mechanics in a completely linear non-interacting picture:

• Real picture: dZ_t = ⟨ψ|B + B†|ψ⟩dt + dW_t, d|ψ⟩_t = A|ψ⟩dt + B|ψ⟩dW_t
• Linear picture: dZ̃_t = dW_t, d|ψ̃⟩_t = A|ψ̃⟩dt + B|ψ̃⟩dW_t

The two pictures are related by: 𝔼|ψ⟩_t⟨ψ|_t δ(z - Z_t) = 𝔼|ψ̃⟩_t⟨ψ̃|_t δ(z - Z̃_t)

Beyond Standard Quantum Theory

By choosing different g functions, new quasi-quantum theories can be constructed:

1. g(x) = (x†x)²: Leads to purely classical evolution
2. g(x) = (x + x)†(x + x)**: Recovers real amplitude quantum mechanics
3. g(x) = x†Tx: Produces "Bloch ellipsoid" rather than Bloch sphere

Comparison with Other Interpretations

Stochastic Collapse Models

Traditional stochastic collapse models directly impose nonlinear stochastic modifications on the quantum state, but typically lack dynamical models for the degrees of freedom responsible for collapse. In this framework, the pre-existing classical field necessarily induces collapse through self-consistent coupling.

Weak Measurement and Feedback

This approach relates to continuous measurement and feedback formulations, but begins with dynamical classical degrees of freedom; weak measurement equations emerge dynamically from the coupling without requiring the Born rule as an axiom.

Many-Worlds/Quantum Darwinism

While structurally similar (pure quantum state conditioned on classical record), this theory involves only a single definite trajectory, with probability distribution arising solely from subjective ignorance about the true state of the classical system.

de Broglie-Bohm Theory

Conceptually similar, but in this framework the classical system is not a hidden variable of the quantum state but rather a fundamental degree of freedom allowing mutual interaction.

Experimental Significance and Applications

Gravitational Decoherence

A well-motivated choice is to treat the gravitational field as a classical degree of freedom. This is motivated both by the difficulty of constructing quantum gravity theories and because spacetime is central to gravity; treating spacetime as a classical structure may be necessary for well-defined quantum field theory.

Effective Classicality

Alternatively, one may adopt a more pragmatic stance, identifying effective classicality in measurement apparatus, experimenters' notebooks, or systems like Wigner's friend.

Heating Constraints

The theory may inherit anomalous heating problems from stochastic models, but at short distances, interactions between quantum and classical fields are expected to be highly non-Markovian, requiring renormalization treatment.

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Conceptual Simplification: Provides a concise interpretation of quantum mechanics by assuming the existence of a classical system
2. Mathematical Unification: Measure transformation technique unifies multiple quantum theory formulations
3. Predictive Consistency: Fully recovers standard quantum mechanics under appropriate assumptions
4. Theoretical Extension: Provides a framework for exploring new quasi-quantum theories

Limitations

1. Classicality Criterion: Lacks universal criteria for determining which systems should be treated classically
2. Composite Postulate: Does not attempt to derive the tensor product composition postulate of quantum theory
3. Nonlocality: Insufficiently discusses how nonlocality interacts with the linear non-interacting picture

Future Directions

1. Understanding whether the composition postulate can be derived within the framework
2. Investigating the interaction between nonlocality and the linear picture
3. Exploring renormalization procedures to handle short-distance effects
4. Developing concrete physical realizations, particularly in gravitational theory

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Theoretical Innovation: Provides a novel axiomatic foundation for quantum mechanics, avoiding ontological issues of traditional interpretations
2. Mathematical Rigor: Employs mature tools from stochastic process theory with rigorous proofs
3. Unified Framework: Incorporates seemingly disparate quantum theory interpretations into a single framework
4. Practical Value: The linear picture provides practical methods for studying measurement and feedback

Weaknesses

1. Fundamental Assumption: The assumption of classical system existence may be viewed as artificial
2. Scope of Application: Lacks clear guidance on which systems should be treated classically
3. Experimental Verification: Theory makes identical predictions to standard quantum mechanics, making experimental differentiation difficult
4. Technical Challenges: Technical issues like heating constraints require further investigation

Impact

This work has significant implications for quantum foundations research, particularly:

1. Provides new perspectives on quantum measurement theory
2. Establishes foundations for classical-quantum hybrid theories
3. Offers new insights for quantum gravity research
4. Promotes reconsideration of fundamental postulates of quantum theory

Applicable Scenarios

This approach is particularly suitable for:

1. Quantum measurement and feedback control systems
2. Classical-quantum hybrid dynamics research
3. Semiclassical approximations in quantum gravity
4. Teaching and understanding quantum foundations

References

The paper cites 60 important references spanning multiple fields including quantum foundations, stochastic processes, and measurement theory, providing solid academic foundations for theoretical development.

Overall Assessment: This is an important paper with significant innovative contributions to quantum foundations theory. Through clever axiomatic methods and measure transformation techniques, the authors provide a novel interpretational framework for quantum mechanics that maintains theoretical predictive power while avoiding philosophical difficulties of traditional interpretations. Despite certain limitations, its theoretical contributions and potential applications make it an important advance in quantum foundations research.