The independence polynomial of a graph $G$ is the generating polynomial corresponding to its independent sets of different sizes. More formally, if $a_k(G)$ denotes the number of independent sets of $G$ of size $k$ then
\[I(G,z) \as \sum_{k}^{} (-1)^k a_k(G) z^k.\] The study of evaluating $I(G,z)$ has several deep connections to problems in combinatorics, complexity theory and statistical physics. Consequently, the roots of the independence polynomial have been studied in detail. In particular, many works have provided regions in the complex plane that are devoid of any roots of the polynomial. One of the first such results showed a lower bound on the absolute value of the smallest root $β(G)$ of the polynomial. Furthermore, when $G$ is connected, Goldwurm and Santini established that $β(G)$ is a simple real root of $I(G,z)$ smaller than one. An alternative proof was given by Csikvári. Both proofs do not provide a gap from $β(G)$ to the smallest absolute value amongst all the other roots of $I(G,z)$. In this paper, we quantify this gap.
- Paper ID: 2510.09197
- Title: On The Roots of Independence Polynomial: Quantifying The Gap
- Authors: Om Prakash (The Institute of Mathematical Sciences, HBNI, Chennai, India), Vikram Sharma (The Institute of Mathematical Sciences, HBNI, Chennai, India)
- Classification: math.CO (Combinatorics), cs.DM (Discrete Mathematics)
- Publication Date: October 13, 2025 (arXiv preprint)
- Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.09197
This paper investigates the distribution of roots of the independence polynomial of graphs. The independence polynomial I(G,z):=∑k(−1)kak(G)zk is the generating polynomial corresponding to independent sets of different sizes in graph G, where ak(G) denotes the number of independent sets of size k in G. This polynomial has important applications in combinatorics, complexity theory, and statistical physics. It is known that when G is connected, β(G) (the minimum real root) is a simple real root less than 1, and all other roots have absolute values strictly greater than β(G). This paper provides the first quantification of the gap between β(G) and other roots.
- Problem Background: The study of independence polynomials is significant in multiple fields:
- Counting problems in combinatorics
- Approximation algorithm design in complexity theory
- Hard-core models in statistical physics
- Limitations of Existing Research:
- Goldwurm and Santini proved that β(G) is the unique minimum real root
- Csikvári provided an alternative proof
- However, these proofs are existential in nature and cannot quantify the specific gap between β(G) and other roots
- Research Motivation:
- Quantifying the gap between roots is significant for algorithm design
- May provide theoretical foundations for designing efficient algorithms for certain graph classes
- Fills theoretical gaps in the field
- Main Theoretical Result: Proves that for a connected graph G with n vertices, the disk centered at the origin with radius β(G)+(β(G)/n)O(n) contains only the minimum root β(G)
- Technical Innovations:
- Application of Smale's γ-function to study local function behavior
- Construction of majorant functions to upper bound the absolute values of complex functions
- Integration of univalence radius theory from complex analysis
- Explicit Lower Bounds for Specific Graph Classes: Provides precise root gap calculations for path graphs, cycle graphs, and complete bipartite graphs
- Methodological Contribution: Provides a systematic approach to quantify the separation between polynomial roots
Given a connected graph G, quantify the minimum gap between the minimum root β(G) of the independence polynomial I(G,z) and other roots.
For any vertex u∈V, define:
fu(z):=I(G∖u,z)zI(G∖N[u],z)
where N[u] is the closed neighborhood of vertex u.
Step One: Local Univalence
- Define rG:=2nβ(G)⋅dia(G)
- Prove that I(G,z) is injective on D(β(G),rG/2)
Step Two: Global Root Separation
- For each point on the circle β(G)eiθ, construct a disk containing no roots
- Use majorant function techniques to handle absolute values of functions
For the base case (1−z)ℓz, its majorant function on reiθ is:
gr(θ):=(1−rcosθ)ℓr
Recursively, for more complex functions:
Fu,r(θ):=(1−rcosθ)ℓ∏j(1−Gj,r(θ))r
- Application of γ-function: First application of Smale's γ-function to root analysis of independence polynomials
- Majorant Function Technique: Innovative use of monotonically decreasing majorant functions to control the behavior of complex functions
- Integration of Geometry and Algebra: Skillful combination of geometric intuition from complex analysis with algebraic structures from graph theory
This paper is primarily theoretical work, with results verified through:
- Specific Graph Class Calculations:
- Path graphs Pn
- Cycle graphs Cn
- Complete bipartite graphs Kn×n
- Numerical Verification:
- Functional behavior analysis of star graph S3
- Plotting absolute value functions to verify theoretical predictions
- Tightness of theoretical bounds
- Consistency with known results
- Computational feasibility
Theorem 1.1: Let G be a connected graph with n vertices. Then the disk centered at the origin
D(0,β(G)+(nβ(G))O(n))
contains only the minimum root β(G) of the independence polynomial.
- Path Graphs Pn:
βα=1+Ω(n21)
- Cycle Graphs Cn:
βα=1+n22π2+O(n−4)
- Complete Bipartite Graphs Kn×n:
β∣α∣≈9.119−O(n21)
Numerical analysis of star graph S3 verifies:
- Majorant functions indeed upper bound the original functions
- Monotonicity properties of functions
- Consistency between theoretical predictions and numerical computations
- Early Work:
- Existential studies of independence polynomial roots
- Characterization of root-free regions
- Key Breakthroughs:
- Goldwurm-Santini: Proved uniqueness and simplicity of β(G)
- Csikvári: Provided alternative proof methods
- Position of This Work:
- First quantification of root gaps
- Important progress from existence to quantitative analysis
- Connections with Trace Monoid theory
- Applications of Pringsheim's theorem
- Use of maximum modulus principle from complex analysis
- Theoretical Contribution: First provision of quantitative bounds on independence polynomial root gaps
- Methodological Value: Establishes a systematic framework for analyzing such problems
- Computational Significance: Provides precise calculation formulas for specific graph classes
- Tightness of Bounds: Current bounds may not be optimal
- Computational Complexity: Computation remains difficult for general graphs
- Scope of Applicability: Primarily limited to connected graphs
- Algorithm Applications: Study efficient algorithms for graph classes with large root gaps
- Bound Improvements: Seek tighter upper and lower bounds
- Generalization: Extend to other graph polynomials
- Theoretical Breakthrough: Resolves a long-standing quantitative problem
- Methodological Innovation: Skillfully combines complex analysis, graph theory, and combinatorics
- Technical Depth: Employs advanced mathematical tools (γ-functions, majorant functions)
- Completeness: Provides detailed analysis from theory to concrete examples
- Practical Utility of Bounds: The O(n) exponent may make bounds too loose for large graphs
- Computational Complexity: Actual computation of root gaps remains difficult
- Generalizability: Unclear whether methods apply to other polynomials
- Theoretical Value: Fills an important theoretical gap
- Methodological Significance: Provides new analytical frameworks
- Application Potential: May inspire new algorithm design approaches
- Theoretical research in graph theory and combinatorial optimization
- Applications requiring precise root analysis
- Algorithm design for specific graph classes
The paper cites 21 important references, including:
- Goldwurm & Santini (2000): Foundational theory of independence polynomial roots
- Csikvári (2012): Alternative proof methods
- Flajolet & Sedgewick (2009): Analytic combinatorics methods
- Blum et al. (1998): Complexity theory of real computation
Overall Assessment: This is a high-quality theoretical paper that resolves an important problem in independence polynomial root analysis. While its practical applicability is limited, its theoretical value is significant and provides a foundation for further development in the field.