Parametrized Topological Complexity for a Multi-Robot System with Variable Tasks

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2510.09323
• Title: Parametrized Topological Complexity for a Multi-Robot System with Variable Tasks
• Authors: Gopal Chandra Dutta, Amit Kumar Paul, Subhankar Sau
• Classification: math.AT (Algebraic Topology), cs.RO (Robotics)
• Publication Date: October 13, 2025
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.09323v1

Abstract

This paper investigates a generalized motion planning problem involving multiple autonomous robots navigating in d-dimensional Euclidean space amid obstacles with unknown locations. Each robot must sequentially visit a prescribed set of target states, with the number of targets potentially differing across robots. This heterogeneous setting generalizes the previous framework of Farber and the second author regarding sequentially parametrized topological complexity. To determine the topological complexity of the problem, the authors formulate it mathematically through the construction of appropriate fibrations. The main contribution is determining this invariant in the generalized setting, which captures the minimum algorithmic discontinuity required for designing collision-free motion planning algorithms under parameter-dependent constraints.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Definition

The core problem addressed is: In d-dimensional Euclidean space, n autonomous robots z₁, z₂, ..., zₙ must perform collision-free motion planning amid m obstacles with unknown locations. The key feature is that each robot zᵢ must sequentially visit rᵢ predetermined target states, where the number of targets rᵢ can differ across robots.

Research Significance

1. Practical Application Demands: Real-world multi-robot systems often exhibit heterogeneous task requirements, where different robots may need to visit different numbers of target points
2. Theoretical Importance: Extends existing sequentially parametrized topological complexity theory from homogeneous settings to heterogeneous settings
3. Algorithm Design Guidance: Topological complexity provides a measure of minimum discontinuity required when designing motion planning algorithms

Limitations of Existing Approaches

Existing sequentially parametrized topological complexity theory (work by Farber and Paul) assumes all robots follow the same number of sequential targets, which is overly restrictive in practical applications. The heterogeneous setting in this paper better reflects real-world requirements.

Core Contributions

1. Theoretical Framework Extension: Generalizes sequentially parametrized topological complexity theory from homogeneous to heterogeneous settings, allowing different robots to have different numbers of target states
2. Precise Complexity Calculations:
   • For odd-dimensional Euclidean space: $TC_{\bar{r}}[p] = \sum_{i=1}^n r_i + m - 1$
   • For even-dimensional Euclidean space: $TC_{\bar{r}}[p] = \sum_{i=1}^n r_i + m - 2$
3. Complete Upper and Lower Bound Analysis: Establishes lower bounds through cup-length calculations in homological algebra and upper bounds through dimensional arguments and algorithmic construction
4. Explicit Algorithm Construction: Constructs concrete motion planning algorithms for the even-dimensional case, proving the tightness of upper bounds

Methodology Details

Task Definition

Given:

• n robots in d-dimensional Euclidean space ℝᵈ
• m obstacles with unknown locations
• Robot zᵢ must sequentially visit rᵢ target states
• Target vector $\bar{r} = (r_1, r_2, ..., r_n)$, where $r_1 ≤ r_2 ≤ ... ≤ r_n$

Objective: Calculate $\bar{r}$-sequentially parametrized topological complexity $TC_{\bar{r}}[p : E → B]$

Mathematical Framework

Fadell-Neuwirth Fibration

Consider the fibration: $p : E = F(R^d, m+n) → B = F(R^d, m)$ defined by $(o_1, ..., o_m, z_1, ..., z_n) ↦ (o_1, ..., o_m)$

Configuration Space Construction

Define the subspace $E^{\bar{r}}_B ⊂ E^{r_n}_B$: $E^{\bar{r}}_B = \{(e_1, ..., e_{r_n}) ∈ E^{r_n}_B : p_u(e_{r_{n_u}}) = p_u(e_{r_{n_u}+1}) = ... = p_u(e_{r_n}), 1 ≤ u ≤ ℓ-1\}$

Fibration Construction

Construct fibration through pullback diagram: $Π_{\bar{r}} : E^{I\bar{r}}_B → E^{\bar{r}}_B$

Technical Innovations

1. Mathematical Formulation of Heterogeneous Settings: Addresses different numbers of target states for different robots through introduction of distinct fibrations $p_u$
2. Homological Algebra Analysis:
   • Constructs homological classes $w^s_{ij}$ satisfying specific relations
   • Analyzes kernel spaces using diagonal mapping $Δ: E → E^{\bar{r}}_B$
   • Establishes lower bounds through cup product calculations
3. Dimension-Dependent Analysis:
   • Odd dimensions: Homological class degrees are even, cup products commute
   • Even dimensions: Homological class degrees are odd, cup products anticommute, resulting in reduced complexity by 1

Experimental Setup

Concrete Example Analysis

The authors provide detailed analysis of a specific example in Section 3:

• 2 robots moving in ℝ³
• 2 obstacles
• First robot visits 2 target points
• Second robot visits 3 target points
• Calculated result: $TC_{(2,3)}[p] = 6$

Theoretical Verification

Theory is verified through:

1. Upper Bound Calculation: Using homotopy dimension and connectivity
2. Lower Bound Calculation: Constructing specific homological class combinations
3. Algorithm Construction: Explicitly constructing motion planning algorithms

Experimental Results

Main Theoretical Results

Theorem 6.1 (Odd-Dimensional Case): For odd d ≥ 3, m ≥ 2, n ≥ 1: $TC_{\bar{r}}[p : F(R^d, n+m) → F(R^d, m)] = \sum_{i=1}^n r_i + m - 1$

Theorem 8.2 (Even-Dimensional Case): For even d ≥ 2, m ≥ 2, n ≥ 1: $TC_{\bar{r}}[p : F(R^d, n+m) → F(R^d, m)] = \sum_{i=1}^n r_i + m - 2$

Upper and Lower Bound Matching

• Odd dimensions: Lower bounds perfectly match general upper bounds
• Even dimensions: Tight upper bounds proven through explicit algorithm construction

Algorithm Construction Verification

The algorithm constructed in Section 8 verifies that:

• General case requires R + m local algorithms
• Even-dimensional case can be reduced to R + m - 1 local algorithms

Related Work

Topological Complexity Theory

1. Farber's Topological Complexity: Foundational theory quantifying inherent discontinuities in motion planning algorithms
2. Sequential Topological Complexity: Rudyak's generalization to multiple sequential states
3. Parametrized Topological Complexity: Framework introduced by Cohen, Farber, and Weinberger for handling parameter-dependent conditions

Multi-Robot Motion Planning

• Configuration space methods in collision-free multi-robot motion planning
• Application of Fadell-Neuwirth fibrations in the presence of obstacles

Innovation of This Work

Compared to existing work, this paper is the first to address heterogeneous multi-robot systems where different robots have different numbers of target states.

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Successfully generalizes sequentially parametrized topological complexity theory to heterogeneous settings
2. Provides exact formulas for both odd-dimensional and even-dimensional cases
3. Constructs corresponding motion planning algorithms

Limitations

1. Dimensional Restrictions: Requires d ≥ 2, with special treatment needed for d = 2 even case
2. Obstacle Count: Requires m ≥ 2
3. Theoretical Nature: Primarily theoretical results; computational complexity of actual algorithms not discussed in detail

Future Directions

1. Consider more general configuration spaces and constraint conditions
2. Investigate practical computational efficiency of algorithms
3. Extend to dynamic obstacle scenarios

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Theoretical Rigor: Complete mathematical derivations from fibration construction to homological calculations
2. Strong Innovation: First to address parametrized topological complexity for heterogeneous multi-robot systems
3. Completeness: Includes both theoretical analysis and algorithm construction with precisely characterized bounds
4. Novel Methods: Cleverly exploits dimensional parity differences in handling cup product commutativity

Weaknesses

1. Practical Limitations: Theoretical results are quite abstract with significant distance from practical applications
2. Computational Complexity: Does not analyze actual computational complexity of constructed algorithms
3. Special Cases: Incomplete treatment of boundary cases (e.g., d=2, m=1)

Impact

1. Theoretical Contribution: Provides new theoretical tools for topological methods in multi-robot motion planning
2. Methodological Inspiration: Mathematical framework for handling heterogeneous systems may inspire research on related problems
3. Algorithm Guidance: Exact topological complexity values provide theoretical guidance for algorithm design

Applicable Scenarios

1. Theoretical Research: Interdisciplinary research between topological robotics and algebraic topology
2. Algorithm Design: Multi-robot motion planning algorithms requiring theoretical guarantees
3. Complexity Analysis: Evaluating inherent difficulty of different multi-robot system configurations

References

The paper cites 24 important references, primarily including:

• Farber's pioneering work on topological complexity
• Rudyak's generalization to sequential topological complexity
• Research by Cohen, Farber, and Weinberger on parametrized topological complexity
• Classical work by Fadell-Neuwirth on configuration spaces

Overall Assessment: This is a high-quality theoretical paper making significant contributions to topological robotics. While emphasizing theory over practical application verification, its mathematical rigor and innovation make it an important advance in the field.