2025-11-10T02:44:50.265935

Characterizing Maximal Monotone Operators with Unique Representation

Armeniakos, Daniilidis
We study maximal monotone operators $A : X \rightrightarrows X^*$ whose Fitzpatrick family reduces to a singleton; such operators will be called uniquely representable. We show that every such operator is cyclically monotone (hence, $A=\partial f$ for some convex function $f$) if and only if it is 3-monotone. In Radon-Nikodým spaces, under mild conditions (which become superfluous in finite dimensions), we prove that a subdifferential operator $A=\partial f$ is uniquely representable if and only if $f$ is the sum of a support and an indicator function of suitable convex sets.
academic

Characterizing Maximal Monotone Operators with Unique Representation

Basic Information

  • Paper ID: 2510.09368
  • Title: Characterizing Maximal Monotone Operators with Unique Representation
  • Authors: Sotiris Armeniakos & Aris Daniilidis
  • Classification: math.FA (Functional Analysis), math.OC (Optimization and Control)
  • Publication Date: October 10, 2025 (arXiv preprint)
  • Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.09368

Abstract

This paper investigates maximal monotone operators A:XXA : X \rightrightarrows X^* for which the Fitzpatrick family reduces to a singleton, termed uniquely representable operators. The study demonstrates that an operator is cyclically monotone (and hence A=fA = \partial f for some convex function ff) if and only if it is 3-monotone. In Radon-Nikodým spaces, under mild conditions (which become redundant in finite dimensions), it is proven that a subdifferential operator A=fA = \partial f is uniquely representable if and only if ff is the sum of a support function and an indicator function of appropriate convex sets.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Context

Monotone operator theory constitutes a core component of modern convex analysis with extensive applications in optimization, partial differential equations, and machine learning. For a monotone operator A:XXA : X \rightrightarrows X^*, its Fitzpatrick family FA\mathcal{F}_A comprises all representative functions satisfying specific conditions.

Core Problem

The central question addressed in this paper is: Which maximal monotone operators possess a unique representative function? That is, a complete characterization of operators for which the Fitzpatrick family FA\mathcal{F}_A degenerates to a singleton {FA}\{F_A\}.

Research Significance

  1. Theoretical Significance: Deepens understanding of the structure of monotone operators, particularly regarding the uniqueness of representative functions
  2. Applied Value: Provides theoretical foundations for optimization algorithms, machine learning, optimal transport, and related fields
  3. Methodological Innovation: Offers a novel approach for computing Fitzpatrick functions of subdifferential operators

Limitations of Existing Research

  • Known results cover only special cases (e.g., subdifferentials of sublinear functions, indicator functions of closed convex sets)
  • Lacks complete characterization for general cases
  • Linear monotone operators have been resolved, but nonlinear cases remain open

Core Contributions

  1. Establishes equivalence between 3-monotonicity and cyclic monotonicity: Proves that for uniquely representable maximal monotone operators, 3-monotonicity is equivalent to cyclic monotonicity
  2. Provides complete characterization of uniquely representable subdifferential operators: In Radon-Nikodým spaces, completely characterizes subdifferential operators with unique representative functions
  3. Furnishes new computational methods: Provides novel approaches for computing Fitzpatrick functions of subdifferential operators
  4. Extends known results: Generalizes existing special cases to broader function classes

Methodology in Detail

Core Concept Definitions

Representative Function: A function h:X×XR{+}h : X \times X^* \to \mathbb{R} \cup \{+\infty\} is a representative function of operator AA if it satisfies:

  • (R1) hh is proper, convex, and lower semicontinuous
  • (R2) h(x,x)x,xh(x,x^*) \geq \langle x,x^* \rangle for all (x,x)X×X(x,x^*) \in X \times X^*
  • (R3) h(x,x)=x,xh(x,x^*) = \langle x,x^* \rangle for all (x,x)Gr(A)(x,x^*) \in \text{Gr}(A)

Fitzpatrick Function: FA(x,x)=x,xinf(y,y)Gr(A)xy,xyF_A(x,x^*) = \langle x,x^* \rangle - \inf_{(y,y^*) \in \text{Gr}(A)} \langle x-y, x^*-y^* \rangle

Unique Representability: An operator AA is called uniquely representable if FA={FA}\mathcal{F}_A = \{F_A\}.

Principal Technical Tools

Marginal Function Construction

For a monotone operator AA, define marginal functions: fA,w(x):=infaX{PA(x,a)w,a}f_{A,w}(x) := \inf_{a^* \in X^*} \{P_A(x,a^*) - \langle w,a^* \rangle\}gA,v(x):=infaX{PA(a,x)a,v}g_{A,v^*}(x^*) := \inf_{a \in X} \{P_A(a,x^*) - \langle a,v^* \rangle\}

These functions establish important connections between the Fitzpatrick function and the PAP_A function through duality.

Invariance Properties

Unique representability is preserved under graph translations and scaling transformations, providing flexibility for the investigation.

Key Technical Lemmas

Lemma 3.1: For a maximal monotone operator AA, the following are equivalent:

  1. FA\mathcal{F}_A is a singleton
  2. FAPAF_A \equiv P_A
  3. For all (x,x),(y,y)X×X(x,x^*), (y,y^*) \in X \times X^*: FA(x,x)+FA(y,y)x,y+y,xF_A(x,x^*) + F_A(y,y^*) \geq \langle x,y^* \rangle + \langle y,x^* \rangle

Main Theorems

Theorem A (3-Monotonicity Characterization)

Let A:XXA : X \rightrightarrows X^* be a maximal monotone operator with FA={FA}\mathcal{F}_A = \{F_A\}. Then the following are equivalent:

  1. AA is 3-monotone
  2. AA is cyclically monotone

Furthermore, for each vIm(A)v^* \in \text{Im}(A), the function xFA(x,v)x \mapsto F_A(x,v^*) is proper, convex, and lower semicontinuous, and A=FA(,v)A = \partial F_A(\cdot, v^*).

Theorem B (Structural Characterization of Subdifferential Operators)

Let XX be a Radon-Nikodým space and f:XR{+}f : X \to \mathbb{R} \cup \{+\infty\} be a proper, convex, lower semicontinuous function satisfying int(domf)\text{int}(\text{dom}f) \neq \emptyset and int(domf)\text{int}(\text{dom}f^*) \neq \emptyset. Then the Fitzpatrick family Ff\mathcal{F}_{\partial f} is a singleton if and only if there exist a constant cRc \in \mathbb{R}, a functional xXx^* \in X^*, and closed convex sets K,CXK,C \subseteq X, VXV \subseteq X^*, where:

  • CC is a cone and VV is ww^*-closed and convex
  • 0VKK0 \in V^{\perp} K - K

such that for each x^K\hat{x} \in K and xXx \in X: f(x)=σV(xx^)+iK+C(x)+x,x+cf(x) = \sigma_V(x - \hat{x}) + i_{K+C}(x) + \langle x, x^* \rangle + c

Technical Innovations

1. Marginal Function Technique

By constructing special marginal functions, the paper establishes precise relationships between the Fitzpatrick function and its dual, which is the key technical tool for proving the main results.

2. Geometric Structure Analysis

Deep analysis of the geometric structure of uniquely representable functions reveals intrinsic connections between support functions, indicator functions, and orthogonality conditions.

3. Application of Differentiability Theory

Skillful application of differentiability theory in Radon-Nikodým spaces, particularly the ww^*-Asplund property, ensures good differentiability properties of conjugate functions.

Experimental Results and Applications

Simplification in Finite Dimensions

Theorem 4.18: In finite-dimensional Euclidean spaces, the technical assumptions regarding domf\text{dom}f and domf\text{dom}f^* in Theorem B can be completely removed.

Concrete Examples

  1. Sublinear Functions: When K={0}K = \{0\} and C=XC = X, the known results for sublinear functions are recovered
  2. Indicator Functions: When V={0}V = \{0\} and C={0}C = \{0\}, the case of indicator functions of closed convex sets is obtained
  3. Linear Skew-Symmetric Operators: Serves as an example of non-subdifferential operators

Computational Methods

Provides new formulas for computing Fitzpatrick functions: Ff(w,v)=Φf(w,v)Kf(w,v)F_{\partial f}(w,v^*) = \Phi_f(w,v^*) - K_{\partial f}(w,v^*) where KfK_{\partial f} is a computable correction term.

Historical Development

  • Rockafellar (1966): Established equivalence between cyclic monotonicity and subdifferentiability
  • Fitzpatrick (1988): Introduced the concept of representative functions
  • Burachik & Svaiter (2002): Characterized subdifferential operators using separable representative functions

Recent Progress

  • Bartz et al. (2007): Investigated cases of sublinear functions and indicator functions
  • Bauschke et al. (2009): Resolved the case of linear monotone operators
  • Carlier et al. (2023): Applications in optimal transport

Uniqueness of This Paper's Contribution

This paper provides the first complete theoretical characterization of unique representability for general maximal monotone operators, filling a theoretical gap.

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

  1. Uniquely representable maximal monotone operators under 3-monotonicity conditions must be subdifferential operators
  2. Unique representability of subdifferential operators is equivalent to their being special combinations of support functions and indicator functions
  3. In finite dimensions, technical conditions can be substantially simplified

Theoretical Significance

  • Deepens understanding of the geometric structure of monotone operators
  • Establishes precise relationships between different monotonicity concepts
  • Provides new tools and perspectives for convex analysis

Practical Applications

  • Convergence analysis of optimization algorithms
  • Regularization theory in machine learning
  • Solution of optimal transport problems

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

  1. Theoretical Completeness: Provides a complete solution to the unique representability problem
  2. Technical Innovation: The marginal function technique and geometric analysis methods are original
  3. Profound Results: Reveals deep connections between seemingly different concepts
  4. Broad Applicability: Results have application value across multiple mathematical branches

Technical Highlights

  1. Clever Construction: The marginal function construction is both natural and effective
  2. Precise Characterization: Provides necessary and sufficient conditions, not merely sufficient ones
  3. Unified Framework: Incorporates multiple known special cases into a unified theory

Limitations

  1. Technical Conditions: Requires relatively strong technical assumptions in general Banach spaces
  2. Computational Complexity: While theoretical characterization is provided, practical computation may remain complex
  3. Generalization Questions: Whether results can be extended to more general operator classes remains open

Future Directions

  1. Space Generalization: Investigate whether Radon-Nikodým conditions can be relaxed
  2. Algorithmic Applications: Translate theoretical results into practical algorithms
  3. Related Conjectures: Verify conjectures in the paper regarding general maximal monotone operators

Impact Assessment

This is a high-quality theoretical mathematics paper expected to have significant impact in convex analysis, monotone operator theory, and related application fields. Its complete theoretical characterization and innovative technical methods confer important academic value.

References

The paper cites 26 relevant references spanning multiple fields including convex analysis, monotone operator theory, and Banach space theory, demonstrating the authors' deep understanding and comprehensive mastery of related areas.


Overall Assessment: This is an excellent mathematics paper with profound theory and sophisticated techniques that completely resolves an important problem in monotone operator theory, possessing significant theoretical value and application prospects.