A Framework for Distributed Resource Allocation in Quantum Networks

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2510.09371
• Title: A Framework for Distributed Resource Allocation in Quantum Networks
• Authors: Nitish K. Panigrahy, Leonardo Bacciottini, C. V. Hollot, Emily A. Van Milligen, Matheus Guedes de Andrade, Nageswara S. V. Rao, Gayane Vardoyan, Don Towsley
• Categories: quant-ph (Quantum Physics), cs.PF (Computer Performance)
• Publication Date: October 2025
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.09371

Abstract

This paper proposes a distributed resource allocation framework for the quantum internet that relies on feedback-based fully decentralized coordination to serve multiple coexisting applications. The research develops quantum network control algorithms under the Quantum Network Utility Maximization (QNUM) mathematical framework, where utility functions quantify network performance by mapping entanglement rate and fidelity to a jointly optimized objective. The paper introduces QPrimal-Dual, a decentralized and scalable algorithm that solves QNUM by strategically placing network controllers that utilize local state information and limited classical message exchange. Global asymptotic stability is proven for concave, separable utility functions, and sufficient conditions for local stability are provided for broader non-concave cases.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Definition

The quantum internet requires sophisticated hardware component orchestration to seamlessly serve numerous endpoint nodes deploying diverse applications. Traditional centralized resource allocation methods face the following challenges in large-scale or dynamic networks:

1. Single Point of Failure: Centralized controllers become system bottlenecks
2. Complete Network Knowledge Requirement: Requires global topology and session information
3. Latency Sensitivity: Solution deployment delays may result in stale network state

Quantum Network-Specific Challenges

1. Hardware Limitations: Severe constraints of near-term quantum devices, such as imperfect quantum storage
2. Quality Sensitivity: Quantum applications are highly sensitive to the quality of provided states
3. Classical Message Requirements: Quantum communication subroutines require additional coordination

Research Motivation

Drawing from distributed design principles of the classical internet, develop a fully distributed resource allocation framework applicable to quantum networks, implementing feedback mechanisms similar to TCP protocols.

Core Contributions

1. Distributed QNUM Algorithm: Proposes the QPrimal-Dual algorithm that solves the QNUM optimization problem by placing two classes of interactive controllers
2. Theoretical Stability Guarantees: Provides global asymptotic stability proofs for concave utility functions and local stability conditions for non-concave functions
3. Practical Implementation Scheme: Outlines practical implementation protocols for the algorithm in sequential quantum networks
4. Extension Schemes: Proposes solutions to reduce control overhead and address quantum storage decoherence

Methodology Details

Task Definition

In a quantum network graph G = (V, L), allocate resources for multiple entanglement sessions, where each session r ∈ R corresponds to a node pair (Ar, Br). The objective is to maximize aggregate utility ∑r∈R Ur(Rr, Fr), where:

• Rr: End-to-end entanglement rate for session r
• Fr: End-to-end fidelity for session r

QNUM Optimization Problem

QNUM: max ∑r∈R Ur(Rr, w⃗r)
subject to:
∑r:l∈r Rr ≤ dl(1-wl), ∀l ∈ L     (Capacity constraint)
∑l:l∈r log wl ≥ Kr, ∀r ∈ R        (Minimum fidelity constraint)
0 ≤ wl ≤ 1, ∀l ∈ L                (Werner parameter range)
Rr ≥ 0, ∀r ∈ R                    (Non-negative rate constraint)

QPrimal-Dual Algorithm Architecture

Lagrangian Function

A(R⃗, w⃗, λ⃗, μ⃗) = ∑r∈R Ur(Rr, w⃗r) 
                   - ∑l λl[∑r:l∈r Rr - dl(1-wl)]
                   - ∑r μr[Kr - ∑l:l∈r log wl]

Update Rules

1. Link Price Update:

   λ̇l(t) = [∑r:l∈r Rr(t) - dl(1-wl(t))]
   λl(t+1) ← max{λl(t) + kλl(t)λ̇l(t), 0}
   

2. Session Rate Update:

   Rr(t+1) ← fr^(-1)(∑l:l∈r λl(t), w⃗r(t))
   

3. End-to-End Fidelity Price Update:

   μ̇r(t) = [Kr - ∑l:l∈r log wl(t)]
   μr(t+1) ← max{μr(t) + kμr(t)μ̇r(t), 0}
   

4. Link-Level Werner Parameter Update:

   ẇl(t) = -dlλl(t) + ∑r:l∈r fl(Rr(t), w⃗r(t)) + ∑r:l∈r μr(t)/wl(t)
   wl(t+1) ← min{max{wl(t) + kwl(t)ẇl(t), 0}, 1}
   

Two-Layer Update Scheme

• Inner Layer: Rapid updates of link prices and session rates
• Outer Layer: Updates fidelity prices and Werner parameters every Touter iterations, reducing inter-controller communication

Sequential Quantum Network Implementation

q-datagram Header Fields

• ΔRr: Session rate change
• Λsum_r: Cumulative link price sum
• Wprod_r: Cumulative Werner parameter product
• WrU'r: Storage of Wr∂Ur(Rr, w⃗r)/∂Wr
• Δμr: Fidelity price change

Controller Design

1. Session Controller: Located at source node, maintains Rr, μr, Wr
2. Link Controller: Located at link, maintains λl, wl and session-specific fl(Rr, w⃗r)

Experimental Setup

Network Topologies

1. Dumbbell Topology: 8 nodes, 7 links, tests bottleneck and congestion performance
2. NSFNet Topology: 14 nodes, 21 links, tests scalability

System Parameters

• Repetition Rate: χl = 100 kHz
• Storage Qubits: 50 per node per link
• Coherence Time: Tc = 1s (considering decoherence)
• Outer Layer Period: Touter = 10

Utility Functions

1. Secret Key Rate (SKR): Based on BB84 QKD protocol
2. Entanglement Negativity (NEG): Based on entanglement negativity measure

Comparison Methods

QTCP Protocol: Baseline method with fixed Werner parameter wl ≈ 0.967

Experimental Results

Main Results

Stable Convergence Performance

• Outer layer update period Touter ∈ 1, 50 ensures convergence
• Touter ≥ 250 may lead to instability

Steady-State Performance Comparison

1. Without Decoherence:
   • QPrimal-Dual and QPrimal-Dual-approx differ from theoretical bounds by <5%
   • Significantly outperforms QTCP baseline method
2. With Decoherence:
   • QPrimal-Dual-DA and QPrimal-Dual-PI effectively recover performance
   • QPrimal-Dual-DA-approx maintains similar performance while reducing communication overhead

Dynamic Adaptability

1. Fault Recovery: Rapidly adapts to new optimal values after link failures
2. Dynamic Workload: Quickly adjusts Werner parameters when sessions switch utility functions

Scalability

On NSFNet topology, QPrimal-Dual variants consistently outperform QTCP as session count increases

Theoretical Analysis

Stability Theorems

Theorem 3.1 (Concave Utility Functions)

Assuming Ur(Rr, w⃗r) is concave and separable in (Rr, w⃗r), under other stated assumptions, the equilibrium point (R⃗*, w⃗*, λ⃗*, μ⃗*) is globally asymptotically stable.

Theorem 3.2 (Non-Concave Utility Functions)

If Ur(Rr, w⃗r) is separable but not necessarily concave, and satisfies U''wℓ(wℓ) < ∑r:ℓ∈r μr/w*2ℓ, then the equilibrium point is locally asymptotically stable.

Proof Strategy

Stability is proven using Lyapunov functions and LaSalle's invariance principle. The key lies in constructing appropriate Lyapunov candidate functions and proving their derivatives are non-positive.

Extension Schemes

QPrimal-Dual-approx

Eliminates the ΔRr field by estimating link session rate sums through exponential averaging, reducing communication overhead:

Tint ← αTint + (1-α)(t'' - t')
Rsum_l ← 1/Tint

QPrimal-Dual-DA (Decoherence-Aware)

Modifies link capacity constraints to account for queueing delays:

∑r:l∈r Rr ≤ dl(1-wl) - G/Tc

where G > 1 is a tunable parameter ensuring waiting time Tl_W ≤ Tc/G.

QPrimal-Dual-PI

Two-step approach: First uses QPrimal-Dual to converge, then fixes wl and switches to QTCP with PI controller.

Related Work

Quantum Network Resource Allocation

• Most existing strategies adopt centralized models
• Limited distributed approaches, primarily TCP adaptation schemes
• Existing methods neglect fidelity or lack theoretical guarantees

Classical NUM Research

• Extensive distributed NUM solutions exist for classical networks
• Cannot be directly applied to quantum networks due to quantum effects such as fidelity loss and storage decoherence

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Successfully extends classical NUM theory to quantum networks
2. Provides distributed algorithms with theoretical stability guarantees
3. Practical implementation schemes perform well under realistic conditions
4. Extension schemes effectively address quantum-specific challenges

Limitations

1. Stability analysis based on continuous-time dynamics; actual systems are discrete
2. Assumes lossless classical information exchange
3. Primarily targets sequential quantum network architecture
4. Requires separable utility function assumption

Future Directions

1. Stability analysis considering feedback delays
2. Extension to other entanglement swapping architectures
3. Handling classical communication losses
4. Relaxing separability assumptions

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Solid Theoretical Contribution: Provides rigorous stability proofs, filling a theoretical gap in distributed quantum network control
2. Strong Practicality: Offers complete implementation schemes for sequential quantum networks
3. Good Adaptability: Multiple extension schemes address practical challenges such as decoherence and communication overhead
4. Comprehensive Experiments: Validates algorithm performance across diverse scenarios

Weaknesses

1. Assumption Limitations: Separable utility functions and lossless classical communication assumptions may limit applicability
2. Architecture Constraints: Primarily targets sequential quantum networks; applicability to other architectures remains to be verified
3. Parameter Sensitivity: Step size parameter selection significantly affects convergence performance, but lacks systematic guidance
4. Complexity Analysis: Lacks detailed analysis of algorithmic and communication complexity

Impact

1. Theoretical Value: Establishes foundations for quantum network control theory, analogous to TCP's significance for the classical internet
2. Practical Value: Provides feasible distributed control schemes for future quantum internet
3. Inspirational Value: Methodology extensible to other quantum network problems

Applicable Scenarios

1. Distributed resource management in large-scale quantum networks
2. Fairness guarantees in multi-application quantum networks
3. Adaptive control in dynamic quantum network environments
4. Protocol design for quantum internet infrastructure

References

Key references include:

1. Kelly et al.'s classical NUM theory 6,7
2. Vardoyan et al.'s QNUM framework 5
3. Quantum network TCP adaptation work 32,49
4. Research on quantum entanglement distribution and swapping 3,15,16

This work provides important theoretical foundations and practical solutions for distributed control of the quantum internet, and is expected to become a fundamental component of the quantum network protocol stack.