On Stable Cutsets in General and Minimum Degree Constrained Graphs

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2510.09432
• Title: On Stable Cutsets in General and Minimum Degree Constrained Graphs
• Authors: Mats Vroon (Utrecht University), Hans L. Bodlaender (Utrecht University)
• Classification: cs.DS (Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.CC (Computational Complexity), cs.DM (Discrete Mathematics)
• Publication Date: October 10, 2025 (arXiv preprint)
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.09432

Abstract

A stable cutset is a vertex set S in a connected graph where no two vertices are adjacent, and removing S disconnects the graph. Determining whether a graph contains a stable cutset is an NP-complete problem. This paper presents a novel exact algorithm for stable cutsets by branching on graph configurations and utilizing the O*(1.3645) time complexity algorithm for (3,2)-constraint satisfaction problems proposed by Beigel and Eppstein, achieving an improved runtime of O*(1.2972^n).

Furthermore, the paper investigates the stable cutset problem on graphs with bounded minimum degree δ. It first proves that if graph G has minimum degree at least 2/3(n-1), then G contains no stable cutset. It further provides polynomial-time algorithms for δ≥n/2 and analogous kernelization algorithms for δ=n/2-k. Finally, it proves that the stable cutset problem remains NP-complete when minimum degree c>1, and designs an O*(λ^n) time exact algorithm, where λ is the positive root of x^(δ+2)-x^(δ+1)-6. This algorithm also applies to 3-coloring problems with identical minimum degree constraints.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Definition and Significance

The stable cutset problem is a fundamental problem in graph theory. Given a connected graph G=(V,E), a stable cutset is a vertex subset S⊆V satisfying:

1. No two vertices in S are adjacent (stability)
2. Removing S disconnects the graph (cutset property)

This problem has important applications in perfect graph theory. Tucker proved that a graph G is k-colorable if and only if all Gi∪S are k-colorable, where Gi are connected components of G\S and S is a stable cutset containing no vertices on any hole.

Limitations of Existing Methods

1. Complexity: Chvátal first proved the stable cutset problem is NP-complete
2. Algorithm Efficiency: The best existing exact algorithm by Rauch et al. has time complexity O*(3^(n/3))
3. Insufficient Study of Special Graph Classes: Research on minimum degree constrained graphs is relatively limited

Research Motivation

1. Improve exact algorithms for stable cutsets on general graphs
2. Investigate the impact of minimum degree constraints on problem complexity
3. Establish connections between stable cutsets and other problems (e.g., 3-coloring)

Core Contributions

1. Improved Exact Algorithm: Proposes a new algorithm with time complexity O*(1.2972^n), significantly improving the previous O*(3^(n/3)) result
2. Minimum Degree Theoretical Bounds: Proves that graphs with minimum degree exceeding 2/3(n-1) contain no stable cutset
3. Polynomial-Time Algorithm: Provides polynomial-time algorithm for graphs with δ≥n/2
4. Kernelization Algorithm: Provides kernelization algorithm with kernel size O(k) for graphs with δ=n/2-k
5. NP-Completeness Results: Proves the problem remains NP-complete when minimum degree c>1
6. Exact Algorithm for Minimum Degree Constraints: Proposes O*(λ^n) time algorithm where λ is the positive root of a specific polynomial
7. Application to 3-Coloring: Extends the algorithm to 3-coloring problems with improved results

Methodology Details

Task Definition

Input: Connected graph G=(V,E) Output: Determine whether G contains a stable cutset Constraints: Stable cutset S must satisfy both stability and cutset properties

Annotated Graph Model

The paper models the stable cutset problem as an annotated graph problem where each vertex is assigned one of three possible labels:

• A: First connected component
• B: Second connected component
• S: Stable cutset

An annotation function p: V → P(L) records the possible label set for each vertex.

Core Algorithm Architecture

1. Transformation to (3,2)-CSP

The paper demonstrates how to transform stable cutset instances into (3,2)-constraint satisfaction problems:

• Each vertex corresponds to a variable
• Variable domain is the set of possible labels for the vertex
• Edge constraints prohibit certain label combinations for adjacent vertices

2. Branching Strategy

The algorithm employs two main branching strategies:

Branching Rule 1: When vertex v is in triangle T and |N(v)∩(W\T)|≥2

• Branch 1: p(v)={A}, apply Lemma 1 to N(v)∩W
• Branch 2: p(v)={B}, apply Lemma 1 to N(v)∩W
• Branch 3: p(v)={S}, apply Lemma 1 to N(v)∩W

Branching Rule 2: When Branching Rule 1 does not apply

• Branch 1: Set p(v)={A,S} for all vertices in T
• Branch 2: Set p(v)={B,S} for all vertices in T

3. Intelligent Vertex Set Construction

To avoid the slowest vertex set configurations, the paper proposes a polynomial-time algorithm for constructing "fast" vertex sets:

• Greedy construction of maximal triangle families
• Complex case analysis to ensure avoidance of slow configurations
• Maintenance of invariant: each vertex belongs to some triangle

Technical Innovations

1. Annotated Graph Modeling: Elegantly models the stable cutset problem as a three-label annotation problem
2. Connection to (3,2)-CSP: Establishes effective reduction to constraint satisfaction problems
3. Intelligent Branching Strategy: Significantly improves time complexity by avoiding worst-case configurations
4. In-Depth Minimum Degree Analysis: Systematically investigates the impact of minimum degree on problem complexity

Experimental Setup

Theoretical Analysis Methods

The paper primarily conducts theoretical analysis using the following methods:

1. Branching Factor Analysis: Computes worst-case branching factors for various branching rules
2. Measure and Conquer: Employs intelligent measure analysis for minimum degree constrained algorithms
3. Case Analysis: Exhaustive case analysis for intelligent vertex set construction

Complexity Analysis

• General graph algorithm: Analyzes worst-case vertex cost of 1.2972
• Minimum degree constrained algorithm: Uses measure κ=w₂n₂+w₃n₃ for analysis

Experimental Results

Main Theoretical Results

1. General Graph Algorithm

• Theorem 13: An O*(1.2972^n) time stable cutset algorithm exists
• Significant improvement compared to previous best result O*(3^(n/3))≈O*(1.4422^n)

2. Minimum Degree Bounds

• Theorem 14: Graphs with minimum degree δ>2/3(n-1) contain no stable cutset
• This bound is tight

3. Polynomial-Time Algorithms

• Theorem 20: Polynomial-time algorithm exists for δ≥n/2
• Theorem 23: Kernelization algorithm with kernel size O(k) exists for δ=n/2-k

4. NP-Completeness

• Theorem 24: Problem remains NP-complete when minimum degree c>1

5. Exact Algorithm for Minimum Degree Constraints

• Theorem 26: O*(λ^n) algorithm exists for δ≥3, where λ is the positive root of x^(δ+2)-x^(δ+1)-6
• Outperforms general graph algorithm when δ≥11

6. 3-Coloring Application

• Theorem 27: Same complexity applies to 3-coloring with minimum degree constraints

Specific Numerical Results

Algorithm complexity for different minimum degrees δ:

• δ=3: λ≈1.7069
• δ=15: λ≈1.2271
• δ=25: λ≈1.1519
• δ=50: λ≈1.0866
• δ=100: λ≈1.0488

Related Work

Stable Cutset Research

1. Complexity: Chvátal (1984) first proved NP-completeness
2. Special Graph Classes: Brandstädt et al. studied K₄-free graphs; Le et al. studied claw-free graphs
3. Parameterized Complexity: Marx et al. proved FPT results parameterized by solution size

Related Problems

1. Matching Cutset: Kratsch and Le proposed O*(1.4143^n) algorithm, later improved to O*(1.3280^n)
2. 3-Coloring: Current fastest algorithm is O*(1.3217^n)

Minimum Degree Constrained Research

• Matching cutset problem has been studied with minimum degree constraints
• 3-coloring problem has minimum degree algorithms based on dominating sets
• This paper is the first to systematically study minimum degree constraints for stable cutsets

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Significantly improves exact algorithm complexity for stable cutsets on general graphs
2. Establishes theoretical connections between minimum degree and stable cutset existence
3. Provides a complete spectrum of algorithms from polynomial-time to exponential-time
4. Establishes effective connections with 3-coloring problems

Limitations

1. Missing Experimental Validation: Paper is primarily theoretical analysis without actual runtime experiments
2. Hidden Constants: O* notation hides polynomial factors; actual performance may be affected
3. Special Structures: No specialized optimization for graphs with special structures (e.g., planar graphs, sparse graphs)

Future Directions

1. Experimental Validation: Implement algorithms and conduct actual performance testing
2. Special Graph Classes: Study stable cutsets on more special graph classes
3. Approximation Algorithms: Develop high-quality approximation algorithms
4. Parameterized Algorithms: Explore additional parameterization possibilities

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Significant Theoretical Contributions: Important theoretical breakthroughs in multiple aspects
2. Technical Innovation: Annotated graph model and intelligent branching strategy are innovative
3. Systematic Research: Systematically investigates minimum degree constraint impacts from multiple angles
4. Clear Writing: Paper has clear structure and accurate technical descriptions
5. Broad Applicability: Algorithm techniques applicable to other problems (e.g., 3-coloring)

Weaknesses

1. Lack of Experiments: Pure theoretical analysis without actual performance validation
2. Hidden Constants: Actual algorithms may have large hidden constants
3. Application Scenarios: Insufficient discussion of practical application scenarios
4. Heuristic Methods: No exploration of possible heuristic acceleration techniques

Impact

1. Academic Value: Important theoretical contributions to exact algorithms and graph theory
2. Methodology: Provides new methodology for studying minimum degree constrained problems
3. Reproducibility: Detailed algorithm descriptions and verifiable theoretical results
4. Extensibility: Technical methods generalizable to other graph problems

Applicable Scenarios

1. Theoretical Research: Suitable for exact algorithms and computational complexity research
2. Small-Scale Instances: Potentially practical for graphs with fewer vertices
3. Special Graph Classes: Particular advantages for graphs satisfying minimum degree conditions
4. Algorithm Design: Provides design insights for other NP-hard graph problems

References

The paper cites 24 important references, including:

• Beigel & Eppstein (2005): (3,2)-CSP algorithm
• Chvátal (1984): Stable cutset NP-completeness
• Marx et al. (2013): Parameterized complexity results
• Chen et al. (2021): Minimum degree constrained matching cutset algorithm
• Meijer (2023): Current fastest 3-coloring algorithm

This paper makes important theoretical contributions to exact algorithms and minimum degree constraint analysis for the stable cutset problem, providing new insights and methodologies for related research. Although lacking experimental validation, the significance of its theoretical results and the innovation of its technical methods make it an important work in the field.