Demystifying and Navigating AI Ethics in Power Electronics

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2510.09439
• Title: Demystifying and Navigating AI Ethics in Power Electronics
• Authors: Fanfan Lin (Zhejiang University-University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign Institute), Peter Wilson (University of Bath), Xinze Li (University of Arkansas), Alan Mantooth (University of Arkansas)
• Classification: cs.CY cs.SY eess.SY
• Publication Date: 2025 (Data retrieval date: September 23, 2025)
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.09439

Abstract

Artificial intelligence is rapidly transforming the power electronics field, with AI-related papers in IEEE Power Electronics Society journals increasing more than fourfold from 2020 to 2025. However, the ethical dimensions of this transformation have received scant attention. This paper emphasizes the urgent need to establish ethical frameworks to guide the responsible integration of AI in power electronics, not only to prevent AI-related accidents but also to meet legal and regulatory requirements. Against this backdrop, the paper identifies four core pillars of AI ethics in power electronics: safety and security, interpretability and transparency, energy sustainability, and the evolving roles of engineers. Each pillar provides practical, actionable insights to ensure that ethical principles are embedded in algorithm design, system deployment, and talent development.

Research Background and Motivation

1. Problem Statement

This paper addresses the absence of ethical considerations in AI applications within the power electronics field. Despite rapid growth in AI technology applications in power electronics, corresponding ethical frameworks and guiding principles are severely lagging.

2. Problem Significance

• Rapid Technological Development: AI-related papers in IEEE PELS journals increased from 21 in 2020 to 97 in 2025, representing a 362% growth rate
• Safety-Critical Nature: Power electronics systems are core to critical infrastructure including electric transportation and microgrids, where failures could result in catastrophic consequences
• Regulatory Requirements: Regulations such as the EU AI Act have transformed AI ethics from an optional consideration to a mandatory legal responsibility

3. Limitations of Existing Approaches

• AI incident reports have increased by approximately 50%, primarily including adversarial attacks, privacy violations, model bias, and performance failures
• The power electronics field lacks specialized AI ethics frameworks and practical guidance
• The engineering community has insufficient awareness of AI ethics and lacks systematic guiding principles

4. Research Motivation

To establish an AI ethics framework specifically tailored to the power electronics field, providing practical guidance for researchers and engineers to ensure responsible application of AI technology.

Core Contributions

1. Proposed a four-pillar framework for AI ethics in power electronics: Safety and security, interpretability and transparency, energy sustainability, and evolving roles of engineers
2. Established mapping relationships between technical metrics and ethical considerations: Translating abstract ethical principles into concrete engineering design specifications
3. Provided practical implementation guidance: Offering specific technical implementation methods and evaluation standards for each ethical pillar
4. Called for establishment of industry standards: Advocating for the IEEE Power Electronics Society to develop relevant ethical standards and best practices

Methodology Details

Task Definition

The paper's task is to establish a comprehensive ethical framework for AI applications in power electronics, including:

• Input: AI application scenarios and requirements in power electronics systems
• Output: Structured ethical guiding principles and implementation methods
• Constraints: Must satisfy technical feasibility, regulatory compliance, and practical applicability requirements

Framework Architecture

Pillar 1: Safety and Security

Energy System Stability and Safety

• Technical Metric Mapping:
  • Accuracy: Degree of match between AI predictions and actual values
  • Robustness: Ability to maintain performance under disturbances, noise, and fault conditions
  • Generalization capability: Reliable performance on unseen or rare edge cases
  • Safety constraints: Predefined operational limits (frequency/current/thermal limits, etc.)
  • Latency: Meeting strict timing requirements for real-time control
• Practical Application Case: IEC 61850-5 standard requires P1-level trip signal end-to-end latency <10ms, P2/P3-level <3ms

AI System Cybersecurity

• Multi-layer Protection Approach:
  • Model layer: Constructing algorithms resistant to adversarial attacks, implementing model integrity assessment
  • Data layer: Ensuring information accuracy and tamper-proofing, implementing data provenance tracking
  • Infrastructure layer: Strict access control, protecting IT and OT assets

Pillar 2: Interpretability and Transparency

Two Complementary Pathways:

Application Scenario Differentiation:

• Mission-critical applications: Require high interpretability, recommending physics-informed AI methods
• Seasonal prediction applications: Lower safety criticality, can use black-box models + post-hoc explanation tools

Pillar 3: Energy Sustainability

AI Development Lifecycle Energy Consumption Analysis:

• Data preprocessing: Cleaning, augmentation, and transformation of raw data
• Model training: Typically the most energy-intensive stage, potentially requiring thousands of GPU hours
• Model inference: Cumulative energy consumption becomes significant in large-scale deployment

Quantitative Assessment Methods:

• Using multiply-accumulate operations (MAC) as a hardware-independent proxy for computational complexity
• PE-GPT customization case: RAG configuration consumes approximately 0.005 kWh, single inference approximately 0.001 kWh

Pillar 4: Evolving Roles of Engineers

Employment Impact Predictions:

• World Economic Forum 2025 report: AI will create 169 million new jobs by 2030, net growth of 78 million
• Focus on role transformation rather than mass unemployment

Emerging Professional Roles:

• Documentation and Compliance Engineer: Preparing legal compliance documentation, audit trails, and user guides
• AI Supervision Engineer: Designing human-machine collaboration systems, ensuring grid stability and equipment protection

Experimental Setup

Data Collection Methods

• Literature Statistics: Using IEEE Xplore to retrieve AI-related papers from PELS journals (2020-2025)
• Retrieval Strategy: ("All Metadata": AI) OR ("All Metadata": "artificial intelligence") OR ("All Metadata": "deep learning") OR ("All Metadata": "machine learning")
• Covered Journals: JESTPE, TPEL, IEEE Power Electronics Magazine

Case Analysis Methods

• Safety cases: Photovoltaic MPPT systems, energy storage system control
• Cybersecurity cases: Solar power plant AI control system attack scenarios
• Energy consumption cases: PE-GPT LLM platform energy consumption quantification

Experimental Results

Primary Statistical Results

Key Findings

1. Rapid Growth Trend: Total AI-related papers increased 362% over five years, with TPEL showing the most significant growth (446%)
2. Increased Industry Attention: Major conferences such as APEC 2025 and ECCE 2025 have added AI-focused sessions
3. Escalating Cybersecurity Threats: Energy sector organizations face over 1,500 cyberattacks per week on average

Case Analysis Results

PE-GPT Energy Consumption Quantification:

• RAG knowledge base construction: Processing 5,500 tokens, consuming approximately 0.005 kWh
• Single dialogue inference: 8-round dialogue with 1,100 tokens, consuming approximately 0.001 kWh
• Total: Approximately 0.006 kWh, equivalent to a 60W light bulb operating for 6 minutes

Related Work

Primary Research Directions

1. AI Safety and Reliability: Stanford University's 2025 AI Index Report shows 50% growth in AI incident reports
2. AI Regulation and Compliance: EU AI Act effective August 2024, with phased implementation obligations
3. Explainable AI: Application of LIME, SHAP tools in high-risk AI systems
4. Green AI: Focus on environmental impact of AI development and deployment

Advantages of This Paper

• Domain Expertise: Specialized AI ethics framework for the power electronics field
• Practicality: Provides concrete technical metrics and implementation methods
• Comprehensiveness: Covers technical, regulatory, environmental, and social dimensions
• Forward-Looking: Considers long-term impacts such as evolving engineer roles

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Necessity of Ethical Framework: Rapid AI application in power electronics urgently requires ethical guidance
2. Completeness of Four Pillars: Safety assurance, transparency, sustainability, and role evolution constitute a comprehensive ethical system
3. Leading Role of Engineers: Power electronics engineers should play a leadership role in AI ethics discussions
4. Standardization Requirements: IEEE PELS should develop relevant ethical standards and best practices

Limitations

1. Insufficient Framework Validation: Lacks large-scale practical application verification
2. Limited Quantitative Metrics: Some ethical principles are difficult to fully quantify for assessment
3. Dynamic Adaptability: Framework requires continuous updates with technological development
4. Implementation Costs: Ethical requirements may increase system complexity and costs

Future Directions

1. Standard Development: Collaborate with IEEE PELS to develop specific technical standards
2. Tool Development: Develop software tools and platforms supporting ethical assessment
3. Educational Integration: Incorporate AI ethics into power electronics engineering curricula
4. International Collaboration: Promote coordination of ethical standards globally

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Pioneering Contribution: First systematic proposal of an AI ethics framework for the power electronics field
2. High Practical Value: Provides complete guidance from abstract principles to concrete implementation
3. Interdisciplinary Integration: Successfully integrates AI technology, power electronics expertise, and ethical principles
4. Forward-Looking Perspective: Considers long-term trends in regulatory development, technological evolution, and social impact
5. Adequate Data Support: Substantiated viewpoints through detailed literature statistics and concrete case analyses

Weaknesses

1. Lack of Empirical Validation: Primarily based on theoretical analysis, lacking verification data from large-scale practical applications
2. Insufficient Cost-Benefit Analysis: Inadequate discussion of economic costs and technical complexity of implementing ethical requirements
3. Limited Consideration of Cultural Differences: Primarily based on Western regulatory frameworks, with limited discussion of applicability to other regions
4. Limited Technical Depth: Some technical implementation details require further elaboration

Impact

1. Academic Impact: Opens new research directions at the intersection of power electronics and AI ethics
2. Industrial Value: Provides practical ethical compliance guidance for engineers and enterprises
3. Policy Reference: Can provide technical support for relevant standard development and policy formulation
4. Educational Significance: Promotes emphasis on and development of ethics education in engineering curricula

Applicable Scenarios

1. Research and Development Phase: Ethical guidance for AI algorithm design and system development
2. Deployment and Implementation: Risk assessment and control for AI applications in power electronics systems
3. Compliance Review: Technical preparation for meeting AI Act and other regulatory requirements
4. Education and Training: Reference material for improving engineer AI ethics literacy
5. Standard Development: Theoretical foundation for industry standard and best practice formulation

References

1 N. Maslej et al., "Artificial Intelligence Index Report 2025," 2025, arXiv. 2 European Parliament & Council, "Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act)." Jun. 13, 2024. 3 International Energy Agency, "Energy and AI." IEA, Paris, 2025. 4 World Economic Forum, "The Future of Jobs Report 2025," World Economic Forum, Geneva, Switzerland, Jan. 2025.

Overall Assessment: This is a groundbreaking paper that systematically establishes an ethical framework for AI applications in the power electronics field for the first time. The paper features clear structure, comprehensive content, and strong practical value with forward-looking perspective. Although there are certain limitations in empirical validation, it provides important theoretical foundation and implementation guidance for related research and practice.