On the preservation of unification type of Heyting algebras and interior algebras

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2510.09455
• Title: On the preservation of unification type of Heyting algebras and interior algebras
• Authors: Ivo Düntsch (Brock University), Wojciech Dzik (University of Silesia)
• Classification: math.LO (Mathematical Logic)
• Publication Date: October 13, 2025
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.09455

Abstract

This paper investigates the preservation of unification type under the action of the Blok functor between locally finite varieties of interior algebras and Heyting algebras. The article aims to clarify the preservation properties of unification type in these algebraic structures under specific functor mappings.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Background

1. Core Problem: Investigating how functor relationships between Heyting algebras and interior algebras affect the preservation of unification type
2. Historical Context: Based on the pioneering work of McKinsey-Tarski and the two important functors O: IA → HA and B: HA → IA established by Blok in his doctoral thesis
3. Theoretical Significance: Unification theory holds an important position in algebraic logic, particularly in studying the classification and property preservation of algebraic structures
4. Research Motivation: Filling gaps in the theory of unification type preservation in the locally finite case

Limitations of Existing Research

• Previous results on unification type preservation were primarily limited to categorical equivalence cases
• Unification type preservation for algebraic varieties with functor relationships but lacking categorical equivalence has been insufficiently studied
• Lack of specific analysis for locally finite Grzegorczyk algebras

Core Contributions

1. Established sufficient conditions for unification type preservation: Proved that functors ρ* and γ preserve unification type under locally finite conditions
2. Refined the mapping theory from Heyting algebras to interior algebras: Detailed analysis of the role of functor B in unification type preservation
3. Provided conditions for interior algebra to Heyting algebra mappings: Determined precise conditions under which functor O preserves unification type
4. *Established a complete theoretical framework for locally finite -varieties: Provided theoretical foundations for subsequent research

Methodology in Detail

Task Definition

Investigation of two core problems:

1. For a Heyting algebra variety V and L ∈ V, comparing the unification type of L in V with the unification type of B(L) in Eq(BV)
2. For an interior algebra variety V and A ∈ V, comparing the unification type of A in V with the unification type of O(A) in OV

Theoretical Framework

Foundations of Unification Theory

• Unification Definition: For a finitely presented algebra A in variety V, a unification is a pair ⟨u, B⟩, where B ∈ V is finitely presented and projective in V, and u: A → B is a homomorphism
• Unification Type Classification:
  • 1 (unitary): μ-set has cardinality 1
  • ω (finitary): μ-set is finite with cardinality greater than 1
  • ∞ (infinitary): μ-set is infinite
  • 0 (nullary): no μ-set exists

Key Functors

1. Functor O: IA → HA
   • O(A) := A° (Heyting algebra of open elements)
   • Preserves homomorphism relationships
2. Functor B: HA → IA
   • B(L) := ⟨Fr(L), g_L⟩ (free Boolean extension equipped with interior operator)
   • Is a full embedding functor

Technical Innovations

Critical Role of Local Finiteness

• Theorem 5.5: ρ*(V) is locally finite if and only if ρ*(V) = BV
• This result bridges abstract algebraic varieties and concrete constructions

Importance of *-Algebras

• Theorem 4.2: All algebras in V* are -algebras if and only if V is locally finite
• Provides structured conditions for unification type preservation

Main Theoretical Results

From Heyting Algebras to Interior Algebras

Theorem 5.7: If V ≤ HA and Eq(BV) is locally finite, then for all L ∈ V: t^V(L) = t^{ρ*(V)}(B(L))

Theorem 5.8: If V ≤ HA and ρ*(V) is locally finite, then: t(V) = t(ρ*(V))

From Interior Algebras to Heyting Algebras

Theorem 5.13: If V ≤ IA is a locally finite *-variety, then: t(V) = t(γ(V))

Key Lemmas

Lemma 5.3: If L ∈ V is projective in V, then B(L) is projective in ρ(V)

Lemma 5.9: For B ∈ V, O(B) is projective in γ(V) if and only if B* is projective in V*

Proof Techniques

Exploitation of Functor Properties

• Utilization of properties of functors B and O that preserve finite presentability
• Transfer of unification type preservation problems via categorical equivalence

Transitivity of Projectivity

• Establishment of correspondence relationships between projective algebras in different varieties
• Proof of preservation of unifications under functor action

Full Utilization of Local Finiteness

• Simplification of *-algebra structures through locally finite conditions
• Establishment of equivalence between abstract varieties and concrete constructions

Related Work

Historical Development

1. McKinsey-Tarski (1946): Established fundamental connections between Heyting algebras and closure algebras
2. Blok (1976): Systematically studied functor relationships between interior algebras and Heyting algebras in his doctoral thesis
3. Ghilardi (1997): Developed the basic framework of algebraic unification theory
4. Albert (1996): Proved that categorical equivalence preserves unification type

Uniqueness of This Paper's Contribution

• First systematic study of unification type preservation in non-categorical equivalence cases
• In-depth analysis specifically for locally finite Grzegorczyk algebras
• Provision of concrete sufficient conditions rather than merely existence results

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Under locally finite conditions, the functor ρ*: Λ(HA) → Λ(IA) preserves unification type
2. For locally finite *-varieties, the functor γ: Λ(IA) → Λ(HA) preserves unification type
3. Local finiteness is a key condition for unification type preservation

Limitations

1. Sufficiency of Conditions: The conditions established in the paper are sufficient but not necessary
2. Scope Restrictions: Main results are limited to the locally finite case
3. Absence of Non-*-Varieties: Results are incomplete for general interior algebra varieties

Future Directions

The authors explicitly indicate investigation of:

• The non-*-variety case
• Locally finite interior algebra varieties of the form ρ(V)
• Establishment of necessary conditions

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Theoretical Rigor: Complete proofs, clear logic, precise technical treatment
2. Problem Importance: Resolves a fundamental problem in algebraic logic
3. Methodological Innovation: Skillfully combines category theory, algebraic geometry, and unification theory
4. Practical Results: Provides operational criteria for subsequent research

Weaknesses

1. Application Scope: Results are primarily theoretical with unclear practical application scenarios
2. Computational Complexity: No discussion of algorithmic complexity for determining local finiteness
3. Lack of Examples: Insufficient concrete non-trivial examples illustrating result applications

Impact

1. Theoretical Contribution: Provides new theoretical tools for algebraic logic unification theory
2. Methodological Value: Demonstrates how to study property preservation in non-equivalent functor cases
3. Foundation for Further Research: Establishes groundwork for subsequent research in related fields

Applicable Scenarios

• Algebraic semantics research in modal logic
• Algebraic representation of intuitionistic logic
• Development of general algebraic unification theory
• Applications of category theory in logic

Technical Details Supplement

Key Definitions

• μ-set: Dense antichain in a quasi-ordered set, used to define unification type
• *-algebra: Interior algebra generated by its open elements
• Free Boolean extension: Minimal Boolean extension of a distributive lattice

Important Properties

• Grzegorczyk axiom: g(x + g(x · ¬g(x))) ≤ x
• Equivalent characterizations of projectivity
• Preservation of finite presentability

This paper makes important theoretical contributions to the field of algebraic logic. Although technically demanding, it provides new perspectives for understanding the deep connections between Heyting algebras and interior algebras.