Adhesive forces in droplet kinetic friction

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2510.09642
• Title: Adhesive forces in droplet kinetic friction
• Authors: Glen McHale, Sara Janahi, Hernán Barrio-Zhang, Yaofeng Wang, Jinju Chen, Gary G. Wells, Rodrigo Ledesma-Aguilar
• Classification: physics.flu-dyn cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.soft
• Institutions: Institute of Multiscale Thermal Fluid Science, School of Engineering, University of Edinburgh; Department of Materials, Loughborough University
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.09642

Abstract

This study reveals the fundamental relationship between droplet kinetic friction and surface wettability and adhesive forces. The authors demonstrate that kinetic friction originates from a simple combination of contact angle hysteresis and adhesive forces. Through theoretical analysis and tilted plane experiments on liquid-like surfaces, the dependence of the droplet-solid kinetic friction coefficient on system parameters is verified. The research further demonstrates that the molecular kinetic theory (MKT) model can describe the observed nonlinear velocity-force relationship, providing a fundamental theoretical framework for understanding the relationship between droplet-solid friction, wettability, and liquid adhesion.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Definition

The motion of droplets on solid surfaces involves complex three-phase contact line dynamics. Traditionally, kinetic friction appears to be decoupled from surface wettability and adhesive forces. Existing research lacks a deep understanding of the fundamental relationship between droplet-solid kinetic friction and surface properties.

Research Significance

1. Fundamental Scientific Value: Droplet-solid surface interactions are ubiquitous, from raindrops moving on windows to coffee drops on tabletops
2. Engineering Application Value: Provides important guidance for surface design, particularly in developing low-friction or high-adhesion surfaces
3. Theoretical Refinement: Bridges the gap between the ideal case of Young's law and actual surface behavior

Limitations of Existing Approaches

• Empirical friction laws lack theoretical foundation
• Static contact angle theory cannot explain dynamic behavior on real surfaces
• Absence of a unified theoretical framework describing wettability, adhesion, and friction

Core Contributions

1. Theoretical Framework Establishment: Proposes a definition of droplet friction coefficient based on Amontons' law analogy, directly correlating friction force with adhesive force
2. Mathematical Model Derivation: Establishes quantitative relationship between friction coefficient and contact angle hysteresis: μ = kΔθ/π
3. Experimental Verification: Validates theoretical predictions through experiments on ultra-low contact angle hysteresis liquid-like surfaces
4. MKT Model Extension: Develops a modified molecular kinetic theory model describing nonlinear velocity-force relationships
5. Surface Design Guidance: Provides theoretical design principles for low-friction surfaces

Methodology Details

Theoretical Model Construction

Friction Coefficient Definition

Based on Amontons' law analogy, the droplet friction coefficient is defined as:

μ ≡ Ff/Fn

where Ff is the friction force and Fn is the normal component of capillary force.

Force Calculation

Through parametrized contact angle distribution:

cos θ(φ) = cos θf + (1-cos φ)/2 (cos θb - cos θf)

The Furmidge-type equation for friction force is derived:

Ff = 2krcγLV(cos θb - cos θf)

The normal adhesive force is:

Fn = 2πrcγLV sin θave

where k = π/4 ≈ 0.785 is the shape factor.

Friction Coefficient Expression

The final relationship between friction coefficient and contact angle difference is obtained:

μ = kΔθ/π

Molecular Kinetic Theory (MKT) Model

Activation Energy Definition

Position-dependent activation energy is defined as:

W(φ) = λ²γLV(cos θd - cos θ(φ))

Velocity-Force Relationship

The relationship between droplet motion velocity and driving force is derived:

vT = vs sinh[λ²Fg/(4πrckBT)]

where vs = λK0 is the characteristic velocity, λ is the molecular displacement distance, and K0 is the hopping frequency.

Experimental Method Design

Surface Preparation

1. SOCAL Surface: Prepared through acid-catalyzed condensation polymerization of OH-terminated PDMS chains
2. Molecular Capping: Methylation treatment using chlorotrimethylsilane with controlled relative humidity (30%, 40%, 50%)

Tilted Plane Experiments

• Droplet volume: 20 μL ultrapure water
• Tilt angle range: 5°-40°
• Measured parameters: advancing/receding contact angles, steady-state velocity, contact radius

Experimental Setup

Surface Characteristics

• SOCAL Surface: Static contact angle 103°, contact angle hysteresis ~2°
• c50-SOCAL Surface: Static contact angle 106°, contact angle hysteresis ~5°, significantly reduced kinetic friction

Measurement System

• High-speed videography (169 fps) recording droplet motion
• pyDSA software for droplet shape analysis
• Motorized tilting stage for precise tilt angle control

Experimental Conditions

• Temperature: 20-25°C
• Relative humidity: controlled to ±5% of set value
• Three repeated measurements for each condition

Experimental Results

Main Findings

Friction Coefficient Verification

The experimentally measured shape factor k = 0.79 ± 0.04 is in excellent agreement with the theoretical prediction π/4 = 0.785, validating the accuracy of the theoretical model.

Surface Performance Comparison

At 40° tilt angle, significant velocity differences are observed for droplets on different surfaces:

• SOCAL surface: vT = 0.58 mm/s (high friction)
• c50-SOCAL surface: vT = 35 mm/s (low friction)

Molecular capping treatment achieves a 60-fold velocity increase, despite the static contact angle hysteresis actually increasing slightly.

Nonlinear Velocity-Force Relationship

Experiments reveal a nonlinear relationship between friction force and velocity, which the MKT model fits well:

• Molecular displacement distance λ = 1.33 nm (uniform across all surfaces)
• Hopping frequency K0 varies significantly between surfaces (282-15442 Hz)

Contact Angle Dynamics

The receding contact angle shows much higher sensitivity to velocity than the advancing contact angle, which is the primary cause of friction force variation. When data are expressed as friction coefficient with logarithmic velocity axis, all surfaces show similar behavior patterns.

MKT Model Parameters

Characteristic velocities vs vary dramatically across surfaces:

• SOCAL: 0.37 μm/s
• c50-SOCAL: 20.5 μm/s

This variation primarily originates from changes in molecular hopping frequency, possibly related to the role of OH groups as trapping sites.

Related Work

Classical Theoretical Foundation

• Young's Law (1805): Establishes relationship between three-phase contact angle and interfacial tension
• Furmidge Equation: Describes force balance for droplets on inclined surfaces
• Molecular Kinetic Theory: Contact line motion theory proposed by Blake and Haynes

Recent Developments

• Ultra-low Hysteresis Surfaces: Development of liquid-like surfaces such as SOCAL
• Friction Force Measurement Techniques: Cantilever beam force measurement and tilted plane experimental methods
• Empirical Friction Laws: Linear friction-velocity relationship proposed by Li et al.

Uniqueness of This Study

Compared to existing work, this study is the first to establish a direct quantitative relationship between friction force and adhesive force, and explains nonlinear kinetic behavior through the MKT model.

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Theoretical Unification: Successfully establishes the fundamental relationship between droplet kinetic friction and surface wettability and adhesive forces
2. Quantitative Prediction: Friction coefficient can be calculated quantitatively from contact angle hysteresis: μ = kΔθ/π
3. Nonlinear Kinetics: MKT model can describe the observed nonlinear velocity-force relationship
4. Surface Design: Provides theoretical guidance for developing low-friction surfaces

Physical Insights

Maximum Adhesive Force

For fixed-volume spherical droplets, the normal adhesive force reaches maximum at contact angle θe ≈ 65.5°, corresponding to adhesion work Wadh = 2^(1/2)γLV.

Limiting Case Analysis

• Completely hydrophobic surface (θe → 180°): Both adhesive and friction forces approach zero
• Completely hydrophilic surface (θe → 0°): Both adhesive and friction forces also approach zero
• This explains why moderately wettable surfaces typically exhibit the highest adhesion

Limitations

1. Surface Shape Assumption: Model assumes circular contact region; actual situations may involve elliptical deformation
2. Small Deformation Approximation: Theoretical derivation is based on small perturbation assumption; large deformation cases require numerical methods
3. Surface Uniformity: Experiments use relatively uniform liquid-like surfaces; behavior on actual rough surfaces may be more complex

Future Directions

1. Complex Surface Geometry: Extension to non-circular contact regions and complex surface topologies
2. Multiphase Systems: Application to bubble motion and capillary flow
3. Dynamic Wetting: Integration with evaporation, condensation, and other dynamic processes
4. Surface Design Optimization: Intelligent surface design based on theoretical models

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

Theoretical Innovation

1. Conceptual Breakthrough: First extension of Amontons' friction law to droplet systems, establishing direct connection between friction and adhesion
2. Mathematical Rigor: Quantitative relationships derived from first principles, avoiding purely empirical descriptions
3. Model Unification: MKT model naturally incorporates adhesive force effects, providing a complete theoretical framework

Experimental Design

1. Material Selection: Clever use of chemically identical but kinetically different surfaces for comparison
2. Measurement Precision: High-precision contact angle and velocity measurements with high data quality
3. Systematic Study: Comprehensive coverage from static to dynamic parameter space

Result Credibility

1. Theory-Experiment Agreement: Experimental shape factor values in excellent agreement with theoretical predictions
2. Data Reproducibility: Multiple repeated experiments ensure result reliability
3. Physical Reasonableness: Model parameters have clear physical meaning

Limitations

Theoretical Constraints

1. Geometric Restrictions: Only considers circular contact regions; actual droplets may undergo deformation
2. Approximation Conditions: Small angle approximation may fail at large contact angle differences
3. Surface Idealization: Assumes perfectly uniform surfaces; surface heterogeneity not fully considered

Experimental Scope

1. Material Limitations: Primarily focused on PDMS-type surfaces; universality for other material systems remains to be verified
2. Scale Effects: Only studies droplets of specific sizes; scale effects not thoroughly explored
3. Environmental Conditions: Experiments conducted under relatively ideal conditions; effects of practical application environments require further investigation

Impact Assessment

Academic Value

1. Theoretical Contribution: Provides new theoretical framework for droplet kinetics field
2. Interdisciplinary Impact: Connects surface science, fluid mechanics, and materials science
3. Methodological Significance: Experimental methods can be generalized to other three-phase system research

Application Prospects

1. Surface Engineering: Provides theoretical guidance for designing surfaces with specific friction performance
2. Microfluidic Technology: Potential applications in microscale fluid manipulation
3. Industrial Applications: Practical value in coating, printing, cleaning, and other fields

Reproducibility

The paper provides detailed experimental methods and material preparation procedures with good reproducibility. Theoretical derivations are clear and mathematical expressions explicit, facilitating verification and extension by other researchers.

Applicable Scenarios

1. Surface Design: Applications requiring precise control of droplet friction performance
2. Fundamental Research: Theoretical research on three-phase contact line dynamics
3. Engineering Applications: Microfluidics, self-cleaning surfaces, droplet manipulation technologies
4. Quality Control: Quantitative assessment and prediction of surface wettability performance

References

This paper cites important literature in the field, including:

• Young (1805): Foundational work on contact angle theory
• Blake & Haynes (1969): Original molecular kinetic theory paper
• Furmidge (1962): Droplet sliding theory
• Recent SOCAL surface research: Wang & McCarthy (2016), Khatir et al. (2023)

Overall Assessment: This is a high-quality paper combining theory and experiment, making important contributions to the droplet kinetics field. The theoretical framework is novel, experimental design is ingenious, and results are convincing. Despite some limitations, it provides valuable theoretical tools for understanding and designing surfaces with specific wettability performance.